CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06452147ANDES platformUpdated Sep 25, 2026

Anesthesia and Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders in the Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery Platform Trial (ANDES Platform Trial)

An interventional study of Nerve block and Standard anesthesia care in Anesthesia, Hip Fractures and Dementia, sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Recruiting at 13 sites in China. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,860
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The ANDES Platform Trial is a pragmatic, multicenter, adaptive randomized controlled platform trial in patients aged 65 years or older undergoing surgery for hip fracture. The trial evaluates whether enhanced anesthesia techniques reduce perioperative neurocognitive disorders compared with standard anesthesia care.

The platform includes two randomization processes. In the first randomization, eligible participants are assigned to an active platform intervention-currently a preoperative regional nerve block or perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion-or to a shared standard-anesthesia control. Participants for whom general anesthesia is planned may also enter a second, nested randomization and are assigned in a fixed 1:1 ratio to total intravenous anesthesia or volatile inhalational anesthesia, regardless of whether they participate in the first randomization.

A non-surgical cognitive control cohort is included to characterize changes in cognitive test performance over time without exposure to surgery or study interventions. The Data Monitoring Committee reviews accumulating trial data and makes recommendations to the Trial Steering Committee, which determines whether platform interventions should continue, be modified, advance, or stop.

Read the detailed description

The ANDES Platform Trial is a pragmatic, multicenter, adaptive platform trial designed to evaluate anesthesia strategies for reducing perioperative neurocognitive disorders in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

The trial includes two related randomization processes.

In the first randomization, participants who meet the eligibility criteria for a specific platform intervention are randomly assigned to that intervention or to shared standard anesthesia care. The current platform interventions include preoperative regional nerve block and perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion. Each intervention is compared with control participants who were eligible for randomization to that intervention.

Participants for whom the responsible anesthesiologist plans to use general anesthesia may enter a second, nested randomization, irrespective of their participation in the first randomization. These participants are assigned in a fixed 1:1 ratio to one of two anesthetic-maintenance strategies: total intravenous anesthesia, for which propofol-based maintenance is recommended, or volatile anesthesia, for which maintenance mainly with sevoflurane or isoflurane is recommended following intravenous induction.

Patients and treating clinicians are not blinded because of the nature of the interventions. Where implemented as specified in the protocol, outcome assessors remain unaware of treatment allocation, and statistical analyses are conducted using blinded treatment codes.

The study also includes a non-surgical cognitive control cohort. Members of this cohort do not undergo study randomization and do not receive any trial intervention. The cohort is used to help characterize changes associated with repeated cognitive testing and changes in cognition over time in the absence of surgery.

The platform allows interventions to be introduced, modified, advanced, or discontinued in accordance with the master protocol and applicable intervention-specific subprotocols. Accumulating safety and effectiveness data are reviewed by the independent Data Monitoring Committee. The committee makes recommendations to the Trial Steering Committee, which is responsible for platform decisions in accordance with the prespecified adaptive decision framework.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia
  • Hip Fractures
  • Dementia
  • Cognitive Impairment
  • Cognitive Decline
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged 65 years and older.
  2. Patients with unilateral hip fracture (including femoral neck, femoral head, intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures) are scheduled for surgical treatment.
  3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status IV or below.
  4. The patients or family members provide written informed consent.
  5. Additional inclusion criteria may pertain to specific interventions and will be described in relevant sub-protocols.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with multiple trauma or fractures (excluding trauma that the researcher judges will not affect the patient's overall recovery, such as simple spinal compression fractures, mild soft tissue contusions, fractures of hands and feet, etc.);
  2. Two or more anesthetic surgeries are required.
  3. Patients with an obvious history of head trauma (such as loss of consciousness for more than 5 minutes, post-traumatic amnesia, etc.);
  4. Patients who the researcher believes are unable to complete the assessment of primary outcome;
  5. Additional exclusion criteria may pertain to specific interventions and will be described in relevant sub-protocols.

Additional exclusion criteria for the nerve block randomization:

  1. Contraindications to nerve block, including allergy to local anesthetics, other contraindications specified in the applicable prescribing information, infection at the puncture site, or refusal to receive nerve block;
  2. The investigator considers the participant unsuitable for nerve block because of conditions such as a history of severe peripheral neuropathy or severe coagulation dysfunction;
  3. Receipt of nerve block before randomization during the current hospitalization.

Additional exclusion criteria for the intravenous lidocaine randomization:

  1. Allergy to lidocaine;
  2. Severe hepatic impairment or renal insufficiency for which the investigator considers the participant unsuitable for enrollment.

Eligibility Criteria for nonsurgical cognitive control participants:

A nonsurgical cognitive control cohort may be recruited from emergency departments, outpatient clinics, inpatient wards, or the community for standardization of neurocognitive assessments. These participants will be matched as far as possible to surgical participants by age and education level. Except for criteria related to hip fracture surgery and trial interventions, the same general inclusion and exclusion criteria will apply. Nonsurgical cognitive control participants must not undergo surgery or anesthesia during the observation period; participants who undergo surgery during follow-up will be excluded from the nonsurgical cognitive control cohort.

04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,860 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nerve block

    Participants receive standard anesthesia care plus preoperative regional nerve block, as described in sub-trial protocol 1. Participants in this arm who are planned to undergo general anesthesia may also enter the second nested randomization and be assigned in a 1:1 ratio to total intravenous anesthesia or volatile anesthesia maintenance.

    Procedure: Nerve block · Procedure: Standard anesthesia care · Drug: Bupivacaine liposome · Drug: Regular local anesthetic · Procedure: Total intravenous anesthesia maintenance · Procedure: Volatile anesthesia maintenance

  • Experimental
    Intravenous infusion of lidocaine

    Participants receive standard anesthesia care plus perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion, as described in sub-trial protocol 2. Participants in this arm who are planned to undergo general anesthesia may also enter the second nested randomization and be assigned in a 1:1 ratio to total intravenous anesthesia or volatile anesthesia maintenance.

    Procedure: Standard anesthesia care · Drug: Intravenous infusion of lidocaine · Procedure: Total intravenous anesthesia maintenance · Procedure: Volatile anesthesia maintenance

  • Active comparator
    Shared standard anesthesia care

    Participants receive standard anesthesia care. Participants for whom general anesthesia is planned may also enter the second nested randomization and be assigned in a fixed 1:1 ratio to total intravenous anesthesia maintenance or volatile anesthesia maintenance.

    Procedure: Standard anesthesia care · Procedure: Total intravenous anesthesia maintenance · Procedure: Volatile anesthesia maintenance

Interventions

  • ProcedureNerve block

    Participants receive a preoperative regional nerve block as soon as possible after randomization. Ultrasound guidance is recommended, and fascia iliaca block is the recommended block technique.

  • ProcedureStandard anesthesia care

    Standard anesthesia care consists of routine general or regional anesthesia according to usual practice at each study center. Participants randomized to the shared control group do not receive protocol-specified trial interventions unless otherwise required by the Trial Steering Committee. Changes to standard anesthesia care are made in accordance with the prespecified adaptive decision framework. The independent Data Monitoring Committee reviews accumulating data and makes recommendations to the Trial Steering Committee, which makes the final platform decisions.

  • DrugBupivacaine liposome

    For participants randomized to the nerve block group, 1.33% bupivacaine liposome is recommended as a long-acting local anesthetic, with a maximum dose not exceeding 133 mg, to maintain the continuity of the nerve block effect.

  • DrugRegular local anesthetic

    For participants randomized to the nerve block group, regular local anesthetic, such as bupivacaine or ropivacaine, may be used with continuous electronic analgesic pump infusion or multiple single injections to maintain the continuity of the nerve block effect.

  • DrugIntravenous infusion of lidocaine

    Participants randomized to the lidocaine group receive ECG monitoring, oxygen saturation monitoring, blood pressure monitoring, and an open intravenous route on the morning of surgery. It is recommended to start the infusion of lidocaine as soon as possible in the ward. A portable electronic infusion pump is recommended for drug delivery. The loading dose is 1 mg/kg, and the maintenance dose range is 1 to 2 mg/kg/h. The specific dose is determined by the anesthesiologist according to the patient's condition. The infusion ends when the patient leaves the post-anesthesia care unit after surgery, and the infusion time and total amount are recorded. Intravenous infusion of lidocaine should be administered under ECG monitoring.

  • ProcedureTotal intravenous anesthesia maintenance

    Among participants who are eligible under the master protocol and for whom general anesthesia is planned, anesthetic maintenance may be assigned by the second nested randomization to total intravenous anesthesia maintenance in a 1:1 ratio. Total intravenous anesthesia maintenance is recommended to be mainly propofol-based, and analgesics such as remifentanil or fentanyl are recommended.

  • ProcedureVolatile anesthesia maintenance

    Among participants who are eligible under the master protocol and for whom general anesthesia is planned, anesthetic maintenance may be assigned by the second nested randomization to volatile anesthesia maintenance in a 1:1 ratio. Following intravenous induction, anesthesia maintenance mainly with sevoflurane or isoflurane is recommended.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Neurocognitive Disorders (NCD) events rate during the first 7 postoperative days

    Neurocognitive Disorders includes: 1. Postoperative delirium (POD) was mesaured by 3D-CAM; 2. Neurocognitive decline was mesaured within 7 postoperative days by: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and neuropsychological tests containing 5 cognitive domains (1. digit span test (DST); 2. trail making test (TMT); 3. Boston naming test (BNT); 4. auditory verbal learning test-Huashan version (AVLT-H);5. clock drawing test (CDT).), and active report of patients or family members). Neurocognitive function is assessed at screening, postoperative day 3, and postoperative day 7. If discharge occurs on postoperative day 5 or 6, the final assessment is performed on the day of discharge; if discharge occurs on postoperative day 4, no repeat cognitive assessment is performed. A participant with postoperative delirium and/or postoperative neurocognitive decline is classified as positive for the primary outcome.

    Time frame: during the first 7 postoperative days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subtypes, severity, and duration of delirium

    Using CAM-S, and in units of days from the onset of delirium symptoms to the disappearance of symptoms or when the patient is discharged.

    Time frame: during the first 7 postoperative days

  2. Neurocognitive decline in postoperative 7 days

    Neurocognitive decline was mesaured by: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), or neuropsychological tests containing 5 cognitive domains (1. digit span test (DST); 2. trail making test (TMT); 3. Boston naming test (BNT); 4. auditory verbal learning test-Huashan version (AVLT-H);5. clock drawing test (CDT).), or active report of patients or family members.

    Time frame: during the first 7 postoperative days

  3. Delayed neurocognitive recovery during 30 postoperative days

    This was mesaured by: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), or neuropsychological tests containing 5 cognitive domains(1. digit span test (DST); 2. trail making test (TMT); 3. Boston naming test (BNT); 4. auditory verbal learning test-Huashan version (AVLT-H);5. clock drawing test (CDT).), or active report of patients or family members.

    Time frame: Postoperative day 11 ± 3 days if the hospital stay exceeds 7 days, and postoperative day 30 ± 7 days.

  4. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADs)

    Time frame: At screening, postoperative day 5 ± 2 days, postoperative day 11 ± 3 days if the hospital stay exceeds 7 days, postoperative day 30 ± 7 days, and postoperative month 12 ± 1 month.

  5. Acute pain before and after surgery

    Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Before surgery and on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3.

  6. Length of hospitalization

    Time frame: days from admission to discharge, an average of 7 days

  7. Incidence of important intraoperative adverse events requiring treatment

    Important intraoperative adverse events are defined as adverse events requiring treatment.

    Time frame: During anesthesia on the day of surgery.

  8. Complications (except cognitive impairment)

    including pulmonary infection, myocardial infarction, renal failure, gastrointestinal obstruction, etc.

    Time frame: during postoperation 30 days

  9. In-hospital and 30-day mortality

    Time frame: During hospitalization and within 30 days after surgery.

  10. Days at home up to 30 days after surgery (DAH30)

    Time frame: up to 30 days after surgery

  11. Score of EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D)

    Quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D). Prefracture quality of life will be assessed retrospectively for the week before fracture.

    Time frame: 1 week before fracture (retrospective assessment), and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery.

  12. Incidence of postoperative Neurocognitive Disorders (NCD)

    Postoperative neurocognitive disorder will be determined as a binary outcome according to the prespecified neurocognitive assessment framework. Cognitive assessments, including the Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, multidomain neuropsychological tests, and patient- or caregiver-reported cognitive change, will be integrated according to the prespecified criteria to determine whether postoperative neurocognitive disorder is present. The reported outcome is the proportion of participants with postoperative neurocognitive disorder.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after surgery.

  13. Severity of postoperative Neurocognitive Disorders (NCD)

    Time frame: At 12 months after surgery

  14. Type of postoperative Neurocognitive Disorders (NCD)

    Using Hachinski Ischemic Scale (HIS) combined with clinical symptoms and auxiliary examination to mesaure the type of postoperative NCD. HIS ≥7 was considered as vascular cognitive impairment.

    Time frame: within 1 year after surgery (long-term)

  15. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)

    Time frame: At screening for the week before fracture, postoperative day 5 ± 2 days, postoperative day 11 ± 3 days if the hospital stay exceeds 7 days, postoperative day 30 ± 7 days, and postoperative months 3, 6, 9, and 12.

  16. 1-year all-cause mortality

    Time frame: 1-year after surgery

  17. Health economic outcomes

    Health economic outcomes include direct medical costs, direct nonmedical costs, and indirect costs. Direct medical costs include anesthesia and related costs, surgical treatment costs, medication and biological product costs, diagnosis-related costs, supportive treatment costs, rehabilitation costs, blood and blood product costs, and consumable material costs. Direct nonmedical costs include paid caregiver costs, transportation costs, and accommodation costs related to medical care. Indirect costs mainly include productivity losses of family members or unpaid caregivers due to accompanying or caring for the participant.

    Time frame: During hospitalization; from hospital discharge to the 1-month follow-up; and for each interval from the previous follow-up visit to the 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up visits.

Other outcomes

  1. Incidence of adverse events

    We will collect the following known potential risks of general and local anesthesia from the start of the intervention to the subject's discharge and assess the overall incidence: 1. cardiopulmonary resuscitation; 2. Malignant hyperthermia or anaphylaxis; 3. Aspiration pneumonia ; 4. Epidural hematoma requiring surgical intervention within 24 hours after regional anesthesia; 5. Lower-limb paralysis lasting more than 24 hours after regional anesthesia or nerve block; 6. Unplanned postoperative mechanical ventilation lasting more than 6 hours in patients who did not require mechanical ventilation before surgery; 7. Other adverse events during postoperative hospitalization.

    Time frame: From enrollment to hospital discharge, an average of 7 days.

06

Study locations

13 of 13 sites recruiting
  • Dongyang People's Hospital
    Dongyang, Zhejiang, China
    Enrolling by invitation
  • Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
    Enrolling by invitation
  • Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital
    Jinhua, Zhejiang, China
    Recruiting
  • Lishui Central Hospital, the Fifth Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University
    Lishui, Zhejiang, China
    Recruiting
  • Lishui People's Hospital
    Lishui, Zhejiang, China
    Recruiting
  • Ningbo No.2 Hospital
    Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
    Recruiting
  • Ningbo No.6 Hospital
    Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
    Recruiting
  • Quzhou People's Hospital
    Quzhou, Zhejiang, China
    Recruiting
  • Taizhou Central Hospital
    Taizhou, Zhejiang, China
    Enrolling by invitation
  • Zhejiang Taizhou Hospital
    Taizhou, Zhejiang, China
    Enrolling by invitation
  • The First People's Hospital of Wenling
    Wenling, Zhejiang, China
    Recruiting
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
    Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China
    Enrolling by invitation
  • The Second Affilliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
    Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China
    • Ting Li, PhD · Contact · liting1021@aliyun.com · 13587876896
    • Ting Li, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Bingwu Huang, PhD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Within 1 year after study completion, study data and related documentation will be made available upon request to the principal investigator or data coordinating center. The documentation will include annotated case report forms, descriptions of the structure, variables, and content of each dataset, the final protocol, study procedures, data collection forms, descriptions of variable recoding, and lists and links to major publications. Key datasets will be archived as appropriate.

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06452147
Lead sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Collaborators
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou Hospital, Affiliated Wenling Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui Country People's Hospital, The Fifth Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University/ Lishui Central Hospital, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Dongyang People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Quzhou
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 11, 2024
Start date
Jun 19, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Ting Li, MD, PhD
Contact
liting1021@aliyun.com
13587876896
Ting Li, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion