ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07724743MWBOXUpdated Jul 24, 2026

Comparative Evaluation of Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes of Box and Mini-Wing Genioplasty Techniques

An observational study in Class II Malocclusion, Dentofacial Deformities and Retrognathia, sponsored by Istanbul Medipol University Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-24.

Sponsored by Istanbul Medipol University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the effects of Mini Wing and Box genioplasty performed in conjunction with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery on upper airway area and soft tissue profile in adult patients with skeletal Class II dentofacial deformity. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements will be evaluated to determine changes in upper airway area, mentolabial angle, and submental angle. The study also aims to assess whether either genioplasty technique provides superior postoperative functional and esthetic outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Skeletal Class II dentofacial deformity is commonly treated with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery combined with genioplasty to improve facial harmony and functional outcomes. Among the available genioplasty techniques, Mini Wing and Box genioplasty differ in their osteotomy design and the direction of chin advancement, which may influence postoperative soft tissue profile and upper airway morphology.

This retrospective cohort study includes adult patients who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with either Mini Wing or Box genioplasty at Istanbul Medipol University between 2019 and 2025. Patients meeting the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria will be identified through hospital records. Preoperative and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images will be analyzed to evaluate changes in upper airway area, mentolabial angle, and submental angle.

Demographic characteristics and baseline measurements will be compared between groups to ensure similarity before surgery. Postoperative changes within each group and differences between the two surgical techniques will be statistically analyzed. The findings are expected to provide evidence regarding the effects of Mini Wing and Box genioplasty on upper airway dimensions and soft tissue profile, thereby supporting surgical planning and technique selection in patients with skeletal Class II deformity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Class II Malocclusion
  • Dentofacial Deformities
  • Retrognathia

Keywords

  • Mini Wing Genioplasty
  • Box Genioplasty
  • Orthognathic Surgery
  • Bimaxillary Surgery
  • Genioplasty
03

In context

Dentofacial Deformities

40 studies on the registry are indexed under Dentofacial Deformities; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 45 across 15 observational studies indexed under Dentofacial Deformities.

Browse Dentofacial Deformities studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 366 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with skeletal Class II dentofacial deformity who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery combined with Mini Wing or Box genioplasty at Istanbul Medipol University between 2019 and 2025.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of skeletal Class II dentofacial deformity.
  • Underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery combined with either Mini Wing or Box genioplasty.
  • Available preoperative and postoperative CBCT images obtained 6 months after surgery.
  • Complete clinical and radiographic records.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous orthognathic or genioplasty surgery.
  • Craniofacial syndromes or congenital craniofacial anomalies.
  • History of facial trauma affecting craniofacial morphology.
  • Incomplete clinical records or missing CBCT data.
  • Poor-quality CBCT images unsuitable for analysis.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Mini Wing Genioplasty

    Patients with skeletal Class II dentofacial deformity who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery combined with Mini Wing genioplasty.

    Procedure: Mini Wing Genioplasty

  • Box Genioplasty

    Patients with skeletal Class II dentofacial deformity who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery combined with Box genioplasty.

    Procedure: Box Genioplasty

Interventions

  • ProcedureMini Wing Genioplasty

    Mini Wing genioplasty performed in conjunction with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery for correction of skeletal Class II dentofacial deformity.

  • ProcedureBox Genioplasty

    Box genioplasty performed in conjunction with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery for correction of skeletal Class II dentofacial deformity.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Upper Airway Area

    Change in upper airway area measured on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images obtained before surgery and 6 months after surgery.

    Time frame: Preoperative and 6 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Mentolabial Angle

    Change in the mentolabial angle measured on CBCT images before surgery and 6 months after surgery.

    Time frame: Preoperative and 6 months after surgery

  2. Change in Submental Angle

    Change in the submental angle measured on CBCT images before surgery and 6 months after surgery.

    Time frame: Preoperative and 6 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared because the study is retrospective and contains confidential patient information. Data sharing is restricted to protect participant privacy and is subject to institutional and ethical regulations.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2019 to primary completion in Jul 2026, 88 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 21, 2026
First posted
Jul 24, 2026
StartActual
Mar 1, 2019
Primary completionActual
Jul 20, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 20, 2026
Last update
Jul 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07724743
Responsible party
Merve Gaye Akgök (Research Assistant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Istanbul Medipol University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 24, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 20, 2026
Completion
Jul 20, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion