ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07719634muaUpdated Jul 22, 2026

Value of Ultrasound-Guided Microwave Ablation for Breast Fibroadenoma

An interventional study of microwave ablation in Breast Fibroadenoma, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-22.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

assess the efficacy of MWA in reducing fibroadenoma volume and achieving complete lesion regression at 12 months post-treatment

Read the detailed description

Breast fibroadenomas are commonly seen among women worldwide, with the incidence having increased over the past few decades. The breast fibroadenoma arise due to proliferation of ductal or lobular tissue, and their treatment is controversial. Small asymptomatic breast lesions generally do not require treatment, and some surgeons tend to favor conservative management of breast fibroadenoma with regular follow-up, which should be accompanied by auxiliary examination (i.e., ultrasound and/or mammography and pathological assessment) every 3-6 months in order to dynamically monitor the status of breast lesions. However, some patients with large-sized breast fibroadenomas suffering from pain or anxiety are not satisfied with the conservative management approach and seek for treatment. Thus, it is necessary to excise part of the breast fibroadenoma according to therapeutic options that depend on different presenting situations Surgical resection is the most effective treatment option for patients suffering from breast lesions, although it is an invasive procedure. The patients much prefer a better cosmetic outcome and fewer surgically associated complications, which are commonly associated with minimally invasive procedures. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) is a new minimally invasive treatment technology used in breast fibroadenoma and has emerged as a hot topic of clinical exploration in recent years. MWA has already shown promising results in treating liver carcinoma and pulmonary tumors, and in the settings of adrenal and renal malignancies Currently, in relation to benign lesions, MWA is considered a promising treatment option for patients with benign thyroid nodules given its advantage of being minimally invasive, scar-free, and relatively safe, and is associated with fewer post-operative complications.

To the best of our knowledge, MWA, as a thermal ablation technique, is increasingly being accepted by surgeons and clearly needs to be evaluated

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Fibroadenoma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Fibroadenoma

27 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibroadenoma; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is close to the median of 50 across 20 interventional studies indexed under Fibroadenoma.

Browse Fibroadenoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female participants ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosed with fibroadenoma by clinical and ultrasonographic signs, core needle done only if atypical fibroadenoma.
  • Lesion(s) measurable by ultrasound (e.g., diameter 0.7 - 3.0 cm),distance from breast lesion to the skin and pectoralis muscle exceeding 10 mm and the lesion away from nipple areola area .
  • Symptomatic lesion or patient preference for minimally invasive treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • or high suspicion of malignancy, BIRADs 4 or more/if pathological proved.
  • Active infection.
  • Coagulopathy or to ablation.
  • Distance from breast lesion to the skin and pectoralis muscle less than 10 mm and the lesion near nipple areola area .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    breast fibroadenoma

    Fibroadenoma is a common benign breast lesion resulting from the excess proliferation of connective tissue. Fibroadenomas characteristically contain both stromal and epithelial cells. Fibroadenomas typically occur in women between the ages of 10 and 40 years. It is the most common solid breast mass in women of all ages and the most common breast mass in the adolescent and young adult population.. The lesions are well-defined and well-circumscribed clinically, with normal overlying skin. The lesions are not fixed to the surrounding parenchyma and slide around with palpation, hence the colloquial term a breast "mouse".

    Device: microwave ablation

Interventions

  • Devicemicrowave ablation

    Patients will be positioned supine or lateri-cumbent, which fully exposed the breast and permitted surgical disinfection. During the administration of a local anesthetic, the investigators will carefully administer a mixture of 2% lidocaine and 0.9% saline solution into the surrounding breast fibroadenoma to achieve a liquid isolated region to protect the skin, pectoralis, and areola from thermal injury. Under real-time ultrasound guidance, an MWA antenna will be inserted into the breast fibroadenoma, and therapy will be ceased until the hyper echoic area completely cover the entire breast fibroadenoma

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. assess the efficacy of MWA in reducing fibroadenoma volume

    Volume Reduction Ratio (VRR): Calculated to see how much the fibroadenoma has shrunk. Measure 3 orthogonal diameter, calculate volume: L x W x H x0.5 and compare to previous exam.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. To evaluate the safety profile of MWA (adverse events, complications).

    the investigators will follow up the patients for any appearance of unwanted changes or any complications

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cosmetic outcome - breast shape and symmetry

    Assessment of breast shape and symmetry using the Breast Symmetry Scale (1-4), where 1 = excellent symmetry and 4 = marked deformity.

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Cosmetic outcome - scar appearance

    Assessment of skin scar quality using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) or Vancouver Scar Scale.

    Time frame: 18 months

  3. Cosmetic outcome - skin pigmentation changes

    Assessment of hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation at the ablation site compared to the contralateral breast, graded as: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe.

    Time frame: 18 months

  4. Patient satisfaction

    Assessment of patient satisfaction with the overall procedure and cosmetic results using a 5-point Likert scale. * Minimum Value: 1 (Very dissatisfied) * Maximum Value: 5 (Very satisfied) * Higher score indicates: Better outcome

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07719634
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Asmaa Mohammed Abdel Hamed Ali (doctor, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 22, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion