ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07714733Updated Oct 27, 2026

Effect of Different Apical Motion Algorithms on Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment

An interventional study of Root Canal Treatment and Rotary Instrumentation in Apical Periodontitis and Postoperative Pain After Endodontic Treatment, sponsored by Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Updated Oct 27, 2026Now RecruitingFirst site in Turkey (Türkiye)+4 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Brief Summary

This prospective, randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of different endodontic motor settings used during root canal treatment on postoperative pain.

During root canal treatment, the inner part of the tooth is cleaned and shaped using specialized rotating instruments. These instruments can operate with different motion patterns, and the motor may respond differently as the instrument approaches the tip of the root. The influence of these technical variations on postoperative pain has not been clearly established.

Adult participants requiring root canal treatment for mandibular premolar teeth will be enrolled in the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to different groups. In each group, root canal treatment will be performed using different motor motion settings. All procedures applied in this study are routine and safe treatment methods commonly used in clinical endodontic practice.

After treatment, participants' pain levels will be monitored through telephone follow-ups. Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). In addition, analgesic intake will be recorded.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether different endodontic motor settings influence postoperative pain and patient comfort following root canal treatment. The findings are expected to contribute to safer and more comfortable root canal treatment protocols.

Read the detailed description

Detailed Description

Postoperative pain remains one of the most relevant short-term outcomes in endodontic treatment and may be influenced by several mechanical and biological factors during root canal preparation. Among these factors, the kinematics of nickel-titanium instrumentation systems and the apical motion algorithms integrated into endodontic motors may affect debris extrusion, apical stress, and periapical tissue irritation. Although different motor settings are routinely used in clinical practice, the influence of these apical motion modes on postoperative pain has not been sufficiently clarified.

This prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial is designed to investigate the effect of different apical motion algorithms used during root canal treatment on postoperative pain. The study will focus on mandibular premolar teeth diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis and requiring primary root canal treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of six treatment groups according to the kinematic system used during canal preparation (rotary or reciprocating) and the apical motion mode of the endodontic motor (auto apical stop, auto apical reverse, or off mode).

All treatments will be performed by the investigator using a standardized clinical protocol under local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation. Working length determination, irrigation, ultrasonic activation, canal preparation, obturation, and coronal restoration procedures will be standardized in order to minimize operator- and technique-related variability. A single nickel-titanium file system will be used in all groups to reduce the confounding effect of instrument design.

The main purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of different apical motion modes, under rotary and reciprocating kinematics, results in differences in postoperative pain intensity. In addition, the study seeks to provide clinically relevant evidence regarding whether these motor settings influence patient comfort after treatment. The findings are expected to contribute to the optimization of endodontic instrumentation protocols and to support more evidence-based selection of motor settings in daily clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Apical Periodontitis
  • Postoperative Pain After Endodontic Treatment

Keywords

  • Endodontics
  • Root Canal Treatment
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Apical Motion
  • Rotary Nicel Titanium File
  • Reciprocating Nickel-Titanium File
03

In context

Periapical Periodontitis

280 studies on the registry are indexed under Periapical Periodontitis; 79 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 60 across 245 interventional studies indexed under Periapical Periodontitis.

Browse Periapical Periodontitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-70 years
  • Systemically healthy individuals ()
  • Mandibular premolar teeth diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis
  • Periapical Index (PAI) score ≥ 3 confirmed radiographically
  • Teeth indicated for single-visit root canal treatment
  • Patients able to understand and complete the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
  • Written provided

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with systemic diseases or medically compromised conditions
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Use of analgesics or antibiotics within the previous 7 days
  • Teeth with root resorption
  • Teeth with immature apices
  • Previously endodontically treated teeth
  • Patients unable to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rotary + Apical Stop

    Participants receive root canal treatment using continuous rotary instrumentation with the auto apical stop function activated.

    Procedure: Root Canal Treatment · Device: Rotary Instrumentation · Device: Auto Apical Stop Mode

  • Experimental
    Rotary + Apical Reverse

    Participants receive root canal treatment using continuous rotary instrumentation with the auto apical reverse function activated.

    Procedure: Root Canal Treatment · Device: Rotary Instrumentation · Device: Auto Apical Reverse Mode

  • Experimental
    Rotary + Apical Off

    Participants receive root canal treatment using continuous rotary instrumentation with the apical action mode turned off.

    Procedure: Root Canal Treatment · Device: Rotary Instrumentation · Device: Apical Off Mode

  • Experimental
    Reciprocating + Apical Stop

    Participants receive root canal treatment using reciprocating instrumentation with the auto apical stop function activated.

    Procedure: Root Canal Treatment · Device: Reciprocating Instrumentation · Device: Auto Apical Stop Mode

  • Experimental
    Reciprocating + Apical Reverse

    Participants receive root canal treatment using reciprocating instrumentation with the auto apical reverse function activated.

    Procedure: Root Canal Treatment · Device: Reciprocating Instrumentation · Device: Auto Apical Reverse Mode

  • Experimental
    Reciprocating + Apical Off

    Participants receive root canal treatment using reciprocating instrumentation with the apical action mode turned off.

    Procedure: Root Canal Treatment · Device: Reciprocating Instrumentation · Device: Apical Off Mode

Interventions

  • ProcedureRoot Canal Treatment

    Standardized primary root canal treatment performed under local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation.

  • DeviceRotary Instrumentation

    Canal preparation performed using continuous rotary motion.

  • DeviceReciprocating Instrumentation

    Canal preparation performed using reciprocating motion.

  • DeviceAuto Apical Stop Mode

    Endodontic motor operated with the auto apical stop mode activated.

  • DeviceAuto Apical Reverse Mode

    Endodontic motor operated with the auto apical reverse mode activated.

  • DeviceApical Off Mode

    Endodontic motor operated with the apical action mode turned off.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity

    Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Higher scores indicate greater postoperative pain intensity. The same outcome measure will be assessed repeatedly at predefined postoperative time points to evaluate changes in postoperative pain intensity over time.

    Time frame: Repeated measurements at 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days after treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Analgesic Intake

    Analgesic intake will be assessed as the total number of analgesic tablets taken by each participant during the first 7 days after treatment.

    Time frame: Within 7 days after treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • ALKÜ Diş hekimliği Fakültesi
    Antalya, 07490, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tulgar MM, Kilic Y, Karalar O, Yilmaz HE, Karataslioglu E. Inflammatory Mediator Levels and Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Shaping with Different Apical Actions: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Endod. 2026 Apr;52(4):574-581.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2025.12.005. Epub 2025 Dec 23. PubMed 41448536 ↗
  • Mendes WV, Lima SNL, do Nascimento Azevedo JV, Leite HLA, Oliveira PS, Ferreira MC, Carvalho CN. Postoperative pain and quality of life assessment after endodontic preparation with rotary and reciprocating endodontic instruments: randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2025 Feb 26;26(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08766-1. PubMed 40001136 ↗
  • Govindiah Chandra Mohan BG, Shivakumar D, Laxmi Penumaka S, Althaf S, Garg G, Kamatchi Subramani S. To Evaluate Different Endodontic Instrumentation Systems Regarding Post-Operative Pain After Endodontic Therapy: A Clinical Study. Cureus. 2024 Mar 19;16(3):e56466. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56466. eCollection 2024 Mar. PubMed 38638716 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared due to ethical restrictions, institutional policies, and the requirements of the Turkish Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 6698, KVKK). Participant confidentiality will be strictly protected, and the collected data will be used solely for the purposes of the approved study protocol.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2027, 6 months after the start.

Of 171 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Periapical Periodontitis, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 19. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 172 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 19.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 27, 2026: start Jul 2026 → Aug 2026, primary completion Feb 2027 → Mar 2027 and completion Mar 2027 → Apr 2027.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 11, 2026
First posted
Jul 20, 2026
StartActual
Aug 20, 2026was Jul 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 15, 2027was Feb 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 15, 2027was Mar 2027
Last update
Oct 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 27, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in Turkey (Türkiye)
Show site
  • ALKÜ Diş hekimliği Fakültesi · Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Jul 20, 2026→Aug 20, 2026 (actual)
Oct 27, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 15, 2027→Mar 15, 2027
Oct 27, 2026
Study completion
Mar 15, 2027→Apr 15, 2027
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    1 site added — first site in Turkey (Türkiye)
    Show site
    • ALKÜ Diş hekimliği Fakültesi · Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Start date Jul 20, 2026→Aug 20, 2026 (now actual)
    Primary completion Feb 15, 2027→Mar 15, 2027
    Study completion Mar 15, 2027→Apr 15, 2027
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07714733
Lead sponsor
Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University
Responsible party
Hatice BÜYÜKÖZER ÖZKAN (Associate Professor, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 20, 2026
Start date
Aug 20, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Study contacts

Mehmet Sinan SİNECAN, Research Assistant
Contact
sinan.sinecan@alanya.edu.tr
90 507 059 81 62
Hatice BÜYÜKÖZER ÖZKAN, Associate Professor
principal investigator · Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion