ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07787078AI-CURLUpdated Aug 26, 2026

AI-Based Working Length Determination in Curved Root Canals

An observational study in Endodontic Working Length Determination, sponsored by Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-26.

Sponsored by Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study tests whether artificial intelligence (AI) can accurately measure the length of curved root canals from dental x-rays. Curved root canals are hard to measure correctly, and wrong measurements can lower the success of root canal treatment.

Adults over 18 years old who need root canal treatment can take part. Researchers will use x-rays taken during the patient's normal treatment. No extra x-rays, procedures, or visits are needed. An AI program will be trained to measure canal length automatically, and its measurements will be compared to measurements made by a human expert.

The results may show whether AI can measure root canal length faster and more consistently, which could help dentists plan treatment more accurately in the future.

Read the detailed description

Working length determination is a critical step in root canal treatment, and inaccurate measurement can lead to under- or over-instrumentation, post-operative pain, and reduced treatment success. This is particularly challenging in curved root canals, where the apical foramen often deviates from the anatomical or radiographic apex, and where small endodontic files are difficult to visualize on periapical radiographs. Conventional methods for working length determination, including tactile sensation, electronic apex locators, and radiographic interpretation, are subject to observer variability and technical limitations, especially as canal curvature increases.

Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning-based image analysis, have shown promise in improving the objectivity and consistency of measurements derived from dental radiographs. This study aims to develop and evaluate deep learning models (including convolutional neural network architectures such as GoogleNet Inception V3, U-Net, Mask R-CNN, and YOLO-based networks) for the automatic detection and measurement of curved root canal length on periapical radiographs, and to compare the performance of these models with measurements made by a human observer.

Periapical radiographs will be obtained using the paralleling technique during the working length confirmation stage of routine root canal treatment, as part of the patient's standard clinical care. No additional radiographic exposure, procedure, or clinical visit will be performed solely for research purposes. Radiographic images will be anonymized and labeled using canal length segmentation, with pixel-based measurements calibrated to millimeters based on DICOM metadata.

The dataset will be divided into training, validation, and test subsets. Model performance will be evaluated using standard classification and segmentation metrics, including sensitivity, precision, F1 score, Intersection over Union (IoU), and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with area under the curve (AUC).

02

Conditions studied

  • Endodontic Working Length Determination

Keywords

  • Deep learning
  • Working Length Determination
  • Root Canal Curvature
  • Periapical Radiography
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of adult patients (18 years and older) presenting for routine root canal treatment at the Department of Endodontics, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University Faculty of Dentistry, who have radiographically identified curved root canals. No sex-based restriction is applied. Periapical radiographs obtained during the working length confirmation stage of standard clinical care will be used; no additional radiographic exposure or procedure will be performed for research purposes.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Eligibility Criteria
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Presenting for routine root canal treatment at Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University Faculty of Dentistry
  • Radiographically identified curved root canal(s)
  • Periapical radiograph obtained using the paralleling technique during working length confirmation
  • Willing and able to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years
  • Root canals without curvature
  • Periapical radiographs of insufficient diagnostic quality (e.g., distortion, poor image quality preventing accurate canal length assessment)
  • Unwillingness to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of AI Model in Detecting Curved Root Canal Length

    Agreement between the AI-predicted root canal length and the length determined by a human observer on periapical radiographs, assessed by sensitivity, calculated as TP/(TP+FN), where TP (true positive) represents the overlapping region between the ground truth and predicted segmentation, and FN (false negative) represents the region present in the ground truth but not in the prediction.

    Time frame: Measured once, at the time of model testing following completion of radiograph collection (estimated 12 months from study initiation)

  2. Precision of AI Model in Detecting Curved Root Canal Length

    Agreement between the AI-predicted root canal length and the length determined by a human observer on periapical radiographs, assessed by precision, calculated as TP/(TP+FP), where FP (false positive) represents the region present in the prediction but not in the ground truth.

    Time frame: Measured once, at the time of model testing following completion of radiograph collection (estimated 12 months from study initiation)

  3. F1 Score of AI Model in Detecting Curved Root Canal Length

    F1 score of the AI-predicted root canal segmentation compared to ground truth on periapical radiographs, calculated as 2TP/(2TP+FP+FN), representing the harmonic mean of precision and sensitivity and interpreting the overlap between the ground truth and predicted pixels.

    Time frame: Measured once, at the time of model testing following completion of radiograph collection (estimated 12 months from study initiation)

  4. Intersection over Union (IoU) of AI Model in Detecting Curved Root Canal Length

    Intersection over Union between the AI-predicted root canal segmentation and the ground truth segmentation on periapical radiographs, calculated as TP/(TP+FN+FP), representing the overlapping area between the predicted result and the ground truth segmentation area.

    Time frame: Measured once, at the time of model testing following completion of radiograph collection (estimated 12 months from study initiation)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJWL. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(8):500-510. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5. PubMed 29777175 ↗
  • Schwendicke F, Samek W, Krois J. Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: Chances and Challenges. J Dent Res. 2020 Jul;99(7):769-774. doi: 10.1177/0022034520915714. Epub 2020 Apr 21. PubMed 32315260 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (periapical radiographs and associated measurements) contain identifiable patient imaging information. No data-sharing infrastructure or protocol has been established for this study, and sharing was not addressed in the informed consent obtained from participants. Data may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to institutional and ethics committee approval.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Nov 2026, 2 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 18, 2026
First posted
Aug 26, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 22, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 22, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 22, 2026
Last update
Aug 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07787078
Lead sponsor
Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University
Responsible party
Hatice BÜYÜKÖZER ÖZKAN (Associate Professor, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 26, 2026
Start date
Sep 22, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 22, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 22, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 26, 2026

Study contacts

Hatice Büyüközer Özkan, Doç. Dr. (Associate Professor)
Contact
hatice.ozkan@alanya.edu.tr
05309710252
Tuğba Gök
Contact
tugba.gok@alanya.edu.tr
05522521446
Hatice Büyüközer Özkan, Associate Professor (Doç. Dr.)
principal investigator · Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Faculty of Dentistry

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion