ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07708259Updated Jul 16, 2026

Effects of Cervical and Sacroiliac Mobilization Combined With Pilates on Bruxism

An interventional study of Pilates-Based Exercise Program and Cervical and Sacroiliac Mobilization in Bruxism, sponsored by Elif Tuğçe Çil. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-16.

Sponsored by Elif Tuğçe Çil · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 66 studies in Bruxism with a site in Turkey — 11 open to participants now, 13 under way, none of them phase 3. Bruxism · Turkey.

Enrollment
19th of 41
38 · median 36
Started
2026
with 7 others
No phase
39 of 66
5 open now
Registered
62nd of 66
by date

Among the 66 studies in Bruxism with a site in Turkey, this one is the 19th largest by enrollment of the 41 interventional ones, is one of 8 that started in 2026, is one of 39 with no phase, and was the 62nd registered.

By phase

66 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study39 · 5 open
Observational25 · 4 open
Phase 11 · 1 open
Phase 41 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 2017; this study’s year is marked. 8 started in 2026.

Size and results

Median enrollment 36 across the 41 interventional studies, 76 across the 25 observational. Of the 52 that completed or were terminated, 2 (4%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 66 studies in Bruxism with a site in Turkey, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study investigated the effects of adding cervical and sacroiliac mobilization to a Pilates-based exercise program on pain, perceived stress, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, jaw functional limitation, cervical range of motion, cervical joint position error, and sacroiliac joint screening findings in individuals with bruxism. Thirty-eight participants were randomly allocated to a Pilates-only group (n=19) or a Manual Therapy + Pilates group (n=19). Both groups completed an 8-week, twice-weekly Pilates protocol (16 sessions); the Manual Therapy + Pilates group additionally received cervical and sacroiliac mobilization.

Read the detailed description

Bruxism is a repetitive jaw-muscle activity associated with musculoskeletal and psychosocial dysfunction, including cervical spine impairment and altered proprioception. This randomized study examined whether adding cervical and sacroiliac mobilization to a standardized Pilates-based exercise program produces greater improvements than Pilates alone. Outcomes included pain intensity (VAS), perceived stress (PSS-10), pain catastrophizing (PCS), kinesiophobia (TSK-17), jaw functional limitation (JFLS-8), cervical range of motion (goniometry), cervical joint position error, and sacroiliac joint screening (Standing Forward Flexion Test, Gillet Test), assessed before and after the 8-week intervention.

03

Conditions studied

  • Bruxism

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • manual therapy
  • Bruxism
  • Cervical Mobilization
  • Sacroiliac Joint
  • Pilates
  • Proprioception
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being between 18 and 65 years of age
  • Being diagnosed with bruxism (awake bruxism and/or sleep bruxism) based on clinical presentation and self-reported symptoms
  • Reporting symptoms such as jaw clenching, teeth grinding, masticatory muscle fatigue, or orofacial discomfort
  • Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study and providing written
  • Having sufficient cognitive ability to understand and follow instructions
  • Being physically capable of participating in a structured exercise program
  • Not receiving any ongoing physiotherapy or rehabilitation program targeting the craniofacial, cervical, or lumbopelvic regions during the study period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of surgical intervention involving the temporomandibular joint, cervical spine, or craniofacial region Presence of neurological, rheumatological, or systemic diseases that could affect movement, pain perception, or neuromuscular control Diagnosis of severe temporomandibular joint disorders that significantly limit jaw function or require specialized medical treatment Presence of acute musculoskeletal injury affecting the cervical spine, lumbar region, or lower extremities Current use of medications affecting neuromuscular function, such as muscle relaxants, sedatives, or psychotropic drugs Diagnosed psychiatric conditions that could interfere with participation or compliance with the study protocol Participation in any physiotherapy, rehabilitation, or structured exercise program targeting the craniofacial, cervical, or lumbopelvic regions during the study period Pregnancy, due to potential alterations in musculoskeletal and hormonal status Inability to attend regular sessions or complete the intervention protocol
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Pilates-only

    Participants completed an 8-week, twice-weekly Pilates-based exercise program (16 sessions, 30-40 minutes each).

    Behavioral: Pilates-Based Exercise Program

  • Experimental
    Manual Therapy + Pilates

    Participants received cervical and sacroiliac mobilization in addition to the same 8-week, twice-weekly Pilates-based exercise program (16 sessions, 30-40 minutes each).

    Behavioral: Pilates-Based Exercise Program · Procedure: Cervical and Sacroiliac Mobilization

Interventions

  • BehavioralPilates-Based Exercise Program

    A structured Pilates-based exercise program targeting core stability, posture, and cervical control, performed twice weekly for 8 weeks (16 sessions total, 30-40 minutes per session).

  • ProcedureCervical and Sacroiliac Mobilization

    Manual mobilization techniques applied to the cervical spine and sacroiliac joint, performed in addition to the Pilates-based exercise program.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity (VAS)

    Pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (0-10 cm), with higher scores indicating greater pain.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 8-week intervention

  2. Perceived Stress (PSS-10)

    Perceived stress assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10), with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 8-week intervention

  3. Pain Catastrophizing (PCS)

    Pain catastrophizing assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), with higher scores indicating greater catastrophizing.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 8-week intervention

  4. Cervical Joint Position Error

    Cervical proprioception assessed via joint position error (flexion, extension, right/left rotation), with smaller error indicating better proprioceptive accuracy.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 8-week intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cervical Range of Motion

    Cervical range of motion (flexion, extension, right/left lateral flexion, right/left rotation) assessed with goniometry.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 8-week intervention

  2. Kinesiophobia (TSK-17)

    Fear of movement/kinesiophobia assessed using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-17 (TSK-17), with higher scores indicating greater kinesiophobia.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 8-week intervention

  3. Sacroiliac Joint Screening

    Sacroiliac joint status assessed using the Standing Forward Flexion Test and the Gillet Test, categorized as negative or positive (with side/structure indicated when positive).

    Time frame: Baseline and after 8-week intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Noi Physio Pilates Studio
    Istanbul, Ataşehir 34755, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers, as the informed consent obtained from participants did not include provisions for sharing de-identified data beyond the scope of this study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2026 to primary completion in Jun 2026, 1 month.

Of 59 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Bruxism, half reached primary completion within 8 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 13. This study's 1 month is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 60 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 13.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 12, 2026
First posted
Jul 16, 2026
StartActual
May 4, 2026
Primary completionActual
Jun 29, 2026
CompletionActual
Jun 29, 2026
Last update
Jul 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07708259
Lead sponsor
Elif Tuğçe Çil
Responsible party
Elif Tuğçe Çil (ASSISTANT PROF. DR., Yeditepe University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2026
Start date
May 4, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 29, 2026
Completion
Jun 29, 2026
Last update
Jul 16, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion