ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07706517Updated Jul 16, 2026

Assessing Transition Practices for Children With Disabilities: Pathways to a Successful Adulthood

An observational study in Spina Bifida, Cerebral Palsy and Spinal Cord Injury, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-16.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
128
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Transition to adult care is a purposeful and structured movement of youth with complex disabilities from child centered to adult oriented services.

This complex and potentially challenging period requires careful planning.

The investigators aim to examine the transition practices in the University Hospital of Saint Etienne. The study employs a mixed methods approach, combining:

  • A retrospective evaluation : Analyzing transition data over a 10-year period.
  • A prospective qualitative study : Conducting semi-structured interviews with patients who have already transitioned within our clinic.
Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to assess how transition from pediatric to adult care is currently managed within a university hospital center. By examining existing practices and gathering the perspectives of young people and their families, the investigators sought to identify both the strengths of the current system and the areas where improvements are needed to ensure a smoother, more effective transition process.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spina Bifida
  • Cerebral Palsy
  • Spinal Cord Injury
  • Spastic Paraplegia
  • Stroke

Keywords

  • Transition to adult care
  • Adolescent care
  • disability
  • rehabilitation
03

In context

Spinal Dysraphism

142 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Dysraphism; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 128 is above the median of 105 across 48 observational studies indexed under Spinal Dysraphism.

Browse Spinal Dysraphism studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne is the lead sponsor of 597 studies on the registry; 127 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study will be based on a cohort of patients treated in the pediatric physical medicine and rehabilitation department at Saint-Étienne University Hospital between 2012 and 2022.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients who had been diagnosed with conditions such as cerebral palsy, neonatal stroke, polyhandicap, spinal cord injury, spina bifida, or other genetic syndromes.
  • patients who had visited the pediatric rehabilitation department at least once between 2012 and 2022.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neuromuscular disorders,
  • any cancer diagnoses,
  • autism spectrum disorders,
  • patients still in pediatric care,
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
128 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Transition to adulthood

    All patients from pediatric Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM\&R) department database with at least one hospitalisation (day or week) from 2012 to 2022 over 15 years old

    Other: Chart review · Behavioral: Semi-structured interview

Interventions

  • OtherChart review

    Chart review of adults who had been followed in the pediatric PM\&R department and who should have already completed their transition to adult care.

  • BehavioralSemi-structured interview

    The qualitative approach was designed to explore patient's related experience of the transition process, with a focus on how they perceived, interpreted, and navigated their journey from pediatric to adult care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of follow-up following transfer of care.

    The absence of follow up discontinuity is based on the major indicator retained from the Suris et al Delphi study on key elements of a successful transition, which is "patient not lost to follow up". Thus by calculating the delay between the last pediatric visit and the first adult visit.

    Time frame: One year after the last pediatric visit.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of follow-up following transfer of care.

    The absence of follow up discontinuity is based on the major indicator retained from the Suris et al Delphi study on key elements of a successful transition, which is "patient not lost to follow up". Thus by calculating the delay between the last pediatric visit and the first adult visit.

    Time frame: Two years after the last pediatric visit.

  2. Key Themes and Narratives (semi-structured interviews)

    The identification and detailed description of key themes and patterns emerging from the semi-structured interviews. This will involve a rigorous thematic analysis of young adults' narratives, capturing their lived experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses during the transition from child-centered to adult-oriented healthcare. The analysis will illuminate the core elements of their transition journey, providing a rich understanding of their challenges, successes, and perspectives.

    Time frame: At inclusion

  3. The Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ)

    It is a validated self-report tool designed to assess the preparedness of adolescents and young adults with chronic health conditions for the transition from pediatric to adult health care services . Scores are interpreted on a 5-point Likert scale (from 0 to 5), where higher scores reflect greater autonomy and readiness for transition.

    Time frame: At inclusion

  4. Polyhandicap quality of life questionnaire (PolyQol).

    It is designed to assess the quality of life of individuals with polyhandicap. It covers key domains such as physical well-being, communication, emotional state, autonomy, and participation. Items are scored on a Likert-type scale (total score ranging from 20 to100), with higher scores reflecting better perceived quality of life

    Time frame: At inclusion

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU de Saint-Etienne
    Saint-Etienne, 42055, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07706517
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 15, 2026
Start date
Feb 14, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 10, 2025
Completion
Sep 10, 2025
Last update
Jul 16, 2026

Study contacts

Maria ZAKHEM, MD
principal investigator · CHU de Saint-Etienne

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion