CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07700576MFNAPUpdated Jul 14, 2026

Effects of Different Nap Durations on Volleyball Performance and EEG Activity Following Mental Fatigue

An interventional study of Mental Fatigue Induction and Control Condition in Mental Fatigue, Recovery and Volleyball, sponsored by Inonu University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to male participants aged 19 Years to 22 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-14.

Sponsored by Inonu University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2025, registered Jun 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 22 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Mental fatigue is known to impair cognitive and physical performance in athletes, but the effectiveness of different nap durations in counteracting these effects remains unclear. The purpose of this randomized crossover study is to investigate the effects of mental fatigue and different nap durations (20, 40, 60, and 90 minutes) on volleyball-specific performance and electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in trained male volleyball players. Mental fatigue is induced using a 15-minute Stroop task. Performance outcomes include the Volleyball Agility Test (VAT) and Countermovement Jump (CMJ), while cortical activity is assessed using resting-state EEG recordings. The findings are expected to improve understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying mental fatigue and recovery and to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding optimal nap duration for athletes.

Read the detailed description

Mental fatigue has emerged as an important factor influencing athletic performance by impairing attention, executive function, decision-making, and motor performance. Volleyball is a sport requiring rapid cognitive processing, agility, explosive power, and precise motor control, making athletes particularly vulnerable to the detrimental effects of mental fatigue. Although daytime napping has been proposed as an effective recovery strategy, the optimal nap duration for restoring sport performance and brain activity following mental fatigue remains uncertain.

This study employs a randomized crossover repeated-measures design in which each participant completes six experimental conditions: Control, Mental Fatigue, Mental Fatigue followed by a 20-minute nap, Mental Fatigue followed by a 40-minute nap, Mental Fatigue followed by a 60-minute nap, and Mental Fatigue followed by a 90-minute nap. Mental fatigue is induced using a standardized 15-minute computerized Stroop task. A 72-hour washout period is maintained between consecutive experimental sessions.

Primary assessments include volleyball-specific agility performance, countermovement jump performance, and resting-state electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings obtained before and after mental fatigue and following the nap intervention. EEG analyses focus on spectral power in the delta, theta, alpha, and beta frequency bands as well as Theta/Alpha and Theta/Beta ratios.

The study aims to determine whether different nap durations differentially improve volleyball-specific performance and cortical activity following mental fatigue. The results are expected to provide practical recommendations for coaches and athletes regarding evidence-based recovery strategies while contributing to a better understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying mental fatigue and post-nap recovery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mental Fatigue
  • Recovery
  • Volleyball
  • Sport Performance

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Mental Fatigue
  • Nap
  • Volleyball
  • EEG
  • Electroencephalography
  • Recovery
  • Agility
  • Countermovement Jump
  • Cognitive Performance
  • Brain Activity
  • Athletes
03

In context

Mental Fatigue

154 studies on the registry are indexed under Mental Fatigue; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 47 across 124 interventional studies indexed under Mental Fatigue.

Browse Mental Fatigue studies →

Lead sponsor

Inonu University is the lead sponsor of 375 studies on the registry; 86 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 22 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Male volleyball players aged 19 to 22 years.
  • Minimum of 3 years of regular volleyball training and active participation in organized training.
  • Apparently healthy and free from neurological, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, or metabolic disorders.
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision.
  • Willing to provide written informed consent.
  • Agreed to refrain from strenuous exercise, alcohol, and caffeine for at least 24 hours before each experimental session.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of neurological, psychiatric, cardiovascular, or musculoskeletal disorders.
  • Current injury affecting sports performance.
  • Use of medications known to influence cognitive function, sleep, or central nervous system activity.
  • Diagnosed sleep disorders.
  • Failure to comply with study procedures or pre-test instructions.
  • Inability to complete all experimental sessions.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Participants completed the control condition without mental fatigue induction or daytime nap intervention. A neutral documentary was viewed for 15 minutes. Resting-state EEG recordings, volleyball-specific agility performance, and countermovement jump performance were assessed according to the study protocol.

    Other: Control Condition

  • Experimental
    Mental Fatigue

    Participants completed a 15-minute computerized Stroop task to induce mental fatigue. Following the mental fatigue protocol, resting-state EEG recordings, volleyball-specific agility performance, and countermovement jump performance were assessed.

    Behavioral: Mental Fatigue Induction

  • Experimental
    Nap20

    Participants completed a 15-minute computerized Stroop task followed by a supervised 20-minute daytime nap. Resting-state EEG recordings, volleyball-specific agility performance, and countermovement jump performance were assessed after the nap intervention.

    Behavioral: Mental Fatigue Induction · Behavioral: Daytime Nap 20 Minutes

  • Experimental
    Nap40

    Participants completed a 15-minute computerized Stroop task followed by a supervised 40-minute daytime nap. Resting-state EEG recordings, volleyball-specific agility performance, and countermovement jump performance were assessed after the nap intervention.

    Behavioral: Mental Fatigue Induction · Behavioral: Daytime Nap 40 Minutes

  • Experimental
    Nap60

    Participants completed a 15-minute computerized Stroop task followed by a supervised 60-minute daytime nap. Resting-state EEG recordings, volleyball-specific agility performance, and countermovement jump performance were assessed after the nap intervention.

    Behavioral: Mental Fatigue Induction · Behavioral: Daytime Nap 60 Minutes

  • Experimental
    Nap90

    Participants completed a 15-minute computerized Stroop task followed by a supervised 90-minute daytime nap. Resting-state EEG recordings, volleyball-specific agility performance, and countermovement jump performance were assessed after the nap intervention.

    Behavioral: Mental Fatigue Induction · Behavioral: Daytime Nap 90 Minutes

Interventions

  • BehavioralMental Fatigue Induction

    Mental fatigue was induced using a standardized 15-minute computerized Stroop Color-Word Task designed to increase cognitive load and induce mental fatigue before performance and EEG assessments.

  • OtherControl Condition

    Participants watched a neutral documentary for 15 minutes without mental fatigue induction or daytime nap intervention before EEG and performance assessments.

  • BehavioralDaytime Nap 20 Minutes

    Participants underwent a supervised 20-minute daytime nap following mental fatigue induction in a quiet, darkened room before post-intervention EEG and performance assessments.

  • BehavioralDaytime Nap 40 Minutes

    Participants underwent a supervised 40-minute daytime nap following mental fatigue induction in a quiet, darkened room before post-intervention EEG and performance assessments.

  • BehavioralDaytime Nap 60 Minutes

    Participants underwent a supervised 60-minute daytime nap following mental fatigue induction in a quiet, darkened room before post-intervention EEG and performance assessments.

  • BehavioralDaytime Nap 90 Minutes

    Participants underwent a supervised 90-minute daytime nap following mental fatigue induction in a quiet, darkened room before post-intervention EEG and performance assessments.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. EEG Spectral Power

    Resting-state electroencephalographic (EEG) activity was recorded from the Fz, Cz, Pz, O1, and O2 electrode sites. Power spectral density was analyzed for the delta (1-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), and beta (13-30 Hz) frequency bands. All frequency-band power values were expressed in microvolts squared per hertz (µV²/Hz).

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after the mental fatigue task, and immediately after completion of the assigned intervention during each experimental session.

  2. EEG Theta/Alpha Ratio

    The theta-to-alpha power ratio was calculated from resting-state EEG recordings obtained from the Fz, Cz, Pz, O1, and O2 electrode sites by dividing theta-band power by alpha-band power. The outcome was expressed as a unitless ratio.

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after the mental fatigue task, and immediately after completion of the assigned intervention during each experimental session.

  3. EEG Theta/Beta Ratio

    The theta-to-beta power ratio was calculated from resting-state EEG recordings obtained from the Fz, Cz, Pz, O1, and O2 electrode sites by dividing theta-band power by beta-band power. The outcome was expressed as a unitless ratio.

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after the mental fatigue task, and immediately after completion of the assigned intervention during each experimental session.

  4. Volleyball-Specific Agility Performance

    Volleyball-specific agility performance was assessed using the Volleyball Agility Test (VAT). Performance was quantified as test completion time (seconds), with lower values indicating better agility performance.

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of each experimental protocol.

  5. Countermovement Jump Height

    Countermovement jump (CMJ) performance was assessed using the My Jump Lab application by measuring jump height in centimeters (cm), with higher values indicating better jump performance.

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of each experimental protocol.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Countermovement Jump-Derived Mechanical and Kinematic Parameters

    Countermovement jump (CMJ)-derived mechanical and kinematic parameters were obtained using the My Jump Lab application from the CMJ assessment performed at the end of each experimental protocol. Participant jump height and body mass were entered into the application's manual data-entry module, which provided flight time (ms), average velocity (m/s), take-off velocity (m/s), and impulse (kg·m/s). These parameters were analyzed as complementary derived measures of CMJ performance.

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of each experimental protocol.

  2. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score

    Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a validated self-reported questionnaire that evaluates sleep quality over the previous month. The PSQI consists of 19 self-rated items yielding a global score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer subjective sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline (before the first experimental session).

  3. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score for Perceived Nap Quality

    Perceived nap quality was assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants rated the overall quality of their daytime nap on a horizontal line ranging from 0 mm (very poor nap quality) to 100 mm (excellent nap quality). Higher scores indicate better perceived nap quality.

    Time frame: Immediately after each daytime nap intervention (20-, 40-, 60-, and 90-minute nap conditions).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Inonu University, Faculty of Sport Sciences
    Malatya, Malatya 44280, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared because the study includes a small sample size, and no data-sharing plan was included in the approved study protocol or informed consent. Aggregate study results will be reported in scientific publications.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07700576
Lead sponsor
Inonu University
Responsible party
Oğuzhan Bozkurt (Principal Investigator, Inonu University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 14, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2025
Completion
Dec 1, 2025
Last update
Jul 14, 2026

Study contacts

Ozgur EKEN, Associate Professor
study chair · Inonu University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion