ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07695311Updated Sep 17, 2026

EWSR1 Immunotherapy in Ewing Sarcoma and DSRCT

A Phase 1 interventional study of EWSR1 immunotherapy and Pembrolizumab in Ewing Sarcoma and Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor, sponsored by Rabi Hanna. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.

Sponsored by Rabi Hanna · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
2 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is for people who have high-risk Ewing sarcoma (ES), or a related Ewing's family tumor, desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT). The purpose of this study is to see if a new EWSR1 immunotherapy (a lipid nanoparticle coated with EWSR1 mRNA) which is given as a shot is safe and whether it can help the body's immune system better recognize and fight cancer.

This EWSR1 immunotherapy is designed to target a specific genetic change (EWSR1 fusion gene) that is found in cancer cells but not in normal, healthy cells. Because the EWSR1 gene is broken in cancer cells and the small protein it makes are only in the ES or DSRCT cancer cells, the goal of EWSR1 immunotherapy is to help the immune system identify and attack the cancer without harming normal cells. It is not yet approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

EWSR1 immunotherapy will be given as a shot into the muscle of the arm, leg, or buttock. If participants also receive pembrolizumab (an infusion every 2 weeks), it is given intravenously (IV) by a needle in the arm over 30 minutes. Participants in this study will receive treatment for about 6 months or until their cancer gets worse. Participants will remain in the study for follow-up for an additional year, for a total time of about 1.5 years in the study.

Read the detailed description

Ewing sarcoma (ES) is an aggressive type of cancer that has a high risk of spreading to other parts of the body. Even though it often responds well to chemotherapy and radiation at first, it still carries the risk of coming back and/or spreading. Children and young adults whose cancer is limited to one area generally have a better outlook with overall survival at about 75%. However, outcomes are much worse for adults and for people whose cancer has already spread, returned after treatment, or relapsed. In these groups, overall survival is only about 15-25%. People with relapsed or metastatic ES, who make up nearly half of all cases, still need better treatments than the current standard of care. More effective therapies are needed to achieve longer-lasting results.

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a rare cancer that belongs to the Ewing family of tumors. It often spreads widely throughout the abdomen. Like Ewing sarcoma, DSRCT often responds to chemotherapy and radiation at first. However, even with standard of care treatment, long-term outcomes remain poor. Overall survival is only about 10-15%, and the cancer frequently returns in additional, outside areas. Because current treatments have had limited success, there is an urgent need to develop new targeted therapies that can more effectively treat these cancers.

Both ES and DSRCT are driven by recurrent, highly conserved gene fusion events that create neoantigens. Conventional therapies are often unable to target these gene events, and thus are unable to effectively treat the cause of the cancer. However, because these fusion events create proteins that are required for tumor survival and generate unique tumor-specific neoantigens that are absent from normal tissues, they represent highly attractive targets for immunotherapeutic approaches. Recent advances in immuno-oncology have highlighted the promise of tumor-specific neoantigens, particularly those arising from gene fusions, as targets for precision immunotherapy. Our group has been at the forefront of defining the importance of tumor mutations and neoantigens in cancer therapy.

The overall goal of this study in using EWSR1 immunotherapy without or with anti-PD1 is to develop cancer-specific long-lasting immunity against EWSR1 neoantigens. Adding anti-PD1 will be done because of concern that monotherapy may not overcome tumor inhibitory microenvironment (TIME) and T-cell exhaustion. Therefore, it is hypothesized that this combination will be safe because of the known safety profiles of other immunotherapy interventions with anti-PD1.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ewing Sarcoma
  • Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor

Keywords

  • EWSR1 immunotherapy
  • Pembrolizumab
  • EWSR1 Gene Fusion neoantigen with predicted immune responsiveness
03

In context

Sarcoma, Ewing

250 studies on the registry are indexed under Sarcoma, Ewing; 69 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 36 across 204 interventional studies indexed under Sarcoma, Ewing.

Browse Sarcoma, Ewing studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Rabi Hanna as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants must have confirmed Ewing sarcoma (ES) or desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) and confirmation of fusion gene rearrangement and breakpoint EWSR1-FLI1, EWSR1-ERG, EWSR1-WT1, who have completed standard of care vincristine + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide alternating with ifosfamide + etoposide (VDC/IE) and have or had disease or are very high-risk disease (Bosma groups C, D, E, and/or very poor necrosis after VDC/IE) are eligible. All EWSR1 immunotherapy monotherapy participants are expected to have completed standard of care VDC/IE chemotherapy with local control and have had end of therapy follow-up for > 3 months.
  • Participants must have demonstrated HLA (human leukocyte antigens) fit with an EWSR1 gene fusion peptide contained in the EWSR1 immunotherapy, as determined by HLA-binding analysis of peptides that span the EWSR1 fusion gene breakpoint and analysis of HLA fit to one of the constructs included in EWSR1 immunotherapy.
  • Participants may have no evidence of active disease, detectable disease (e.g., lung metastases \< 1 cm or bone metastases), or by (Immune ) criteria. The presence of RECIST measurable disease is not required for study entry.
  • At least 1 (VDC/IE) is needed.
  • Age. The first 3 EWSR1 immunotherapy monotherapy and combination therapy participants will be adults ≥ 18 years old. After safety analysis of EWSR1 immunotherapy monotherapy in adults and Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, adolescents (13-17 years old and 40kg or more are eligible for EWSR1 immunotherapy monotherapy. After safety analysis of EWSR1 immunotherapy monotherapy in adolescents and IRB approval, adolescents will be eligible for combination therapy and children ages 12 years old or younger will be eligible for EWSR1 immunotherapy monotherapy. Only after safety analysis of EWSR1 immunotherapy monotherapy will any group become eligible for combination therapy.
  • Participants must have adequate organ and marrow function as defined below:

    • ≥ 1000/microliter (mcL)
    • ≥ 100,000/mcL
    • ≥ 8 g/dL (transfusion allowed)
    • total ≤ 1.5 x (upper normal limits)
    • (aspartate aminotransferase) / ALT (alanine aminotransferase) ≤ 2.5 x ULN
    • creatinine ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or ≤ 1.5 mg/mcL if \< 18 yrs
  • Participants on inhaled or maintenance doses of hydrocortisone are allowed (e.g., 20 mg in morning, 10 mg in evening in adult participants on chronic corticosteroids or history of adrenal insufficiency).
  • Participants with treated are eligible after central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapy (surgery or radiotherapy). If on corticosteroids these participants should be weaned to hydrocortisone (20 mg am/10 mg pm if ≥ 40 kg or if \< 40 kg (20-39.9 kg) hydrocortisone 10 mg am/5 mg pm).
  • Participants with are eligible. If on corticosteroids these participants should be weaned to hydrocortisone (20 mg am/10mg pm if ≥ 40 kg or if \< 40 kg hydrocortisone 10 mg am/5 mg pm).
  • Performance or Lansky Scale ≥ 60%
  • Participants with ES or DSRCT are eligible for planned radiotherapy before or during protocol therapy (e.g., to treat symptomatic lesions or bone metastases that are not "indicator lesions").
  • A of 2 weeks from chemotherapy and return of any chemotherapy related or radiation adverse events (AEs) to grade 1 or to baseline prior to cancer treatment except lymphopenia is required.
  • The effects of EWSR1 immunotherapy on the developing human fetus are unknown. For this reason, women of and men must agree to use adequate (hormonal or barrier method of birth control and/or abstinence for at least 90 days after last dose of EWSR1 immunotherapy. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she or her partner is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately.
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written document; minors must assent.
  • Women of childbearing potential to have negative pregnancy test within 7 days of EWSR1 immunotherapy dosing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants on concurrent chemotherapy or other immunotherapy.
  • Participants who have not recovered from adverse events due to prior anti-cancer therapy (i.e., have residual toxicities ≥ Grade 2) with the exception of alopecia and lymphopenia, post-nadir neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and decreased function that has achieved a "new and stable baseline" from cancer, surgery, or radiation.
  • Participants who are receiving any other agents.
  • Participants on total parenteral nutrition.
  • History of severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis) attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to EWSR1 immunotherapy.
  • Participants with uncontrolled infection (e.g., on intravenous antibiotics or with symptoms of fever attributable to infection).
  • Pregnant women are excluded from this study because of the unknown effects of EWS immunotherapy or anti-PD1and their potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects.
  • Participants who are unwilling or unable to comply with required study visits are ineligible.
  • Recent (\< 2 weeks) vaccine use, active /Hep B/C, or any current or prior medical condition or therapy that, in the opinion of the treating investigator, could confound the results of the trial or is not in the best interest of the participant to participate.
  • Any participant with congestive heart failure (as defined by Functional Classification III or IV), unstable angina, serious uncontrolled heart arrythmia, a myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to study entry, or a history of myocarditis.
  • Inadequate pulmonary function as defined by baseline pulse oximetry 92% or less on room air.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(24)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

iRECIST and mRECIST

Versions of RECIST adapted to particular cases. iRECIST is for immunotherapy, where a tumour can look bigger for a while before it shrinks, so growth has to be confirmed on a later scan. mRECIST usually means the version for liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma), which measures only the part of a tumour that still has a blood supply.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Leptomeningeal disease

Cancer that has spread to the leptomeninges, the thin layers covering the brain and spinal cord, and the fluid between them. It is not the same as brain metastases.

Criteria often treat it separately, and many studies leave it out even where treated brain metastases are allowed.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Washout period

A planned gap after a treatment, so that its effects can lessen before the study treatment or a study assessment. Ask the study team and the doctor who prescribed it before changing any medicine.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Monotherapy cohort

    First, a safety cohort of participants will be enrolled in the study. Participants will receive EWSR1 immunotherapy on Weeks 0, 4, 12 and 24.

    Drug: EWSR1 immunotherapy

  • Experimental
    Combination cohort

    After safety is established through the monotherapy cohort, participants will be enrolled in the combination cohort. Participants will receive EWSR1 immunotherapy on Weeks 0, 4, 12 and 24. Participants will also receive pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) on Week 0 and then every 2 weeks for 6 months.

    Drug: EWSR1 immunotherapy · Drug: Pembrolizumab

Interventions

  • DrugEWSR1 immunotherapy

    Participants will receive EWSR1 immunotherapy at 50 micrograms (mcg) (or 25 mcg for children 12 years and younger) through an intramuscular injection on Weeks 0, 4, 12 and 24.

  • Participants will receive Pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) at 3 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenously (through an IV) on Week 0 and Week 4.

    Also known as: anti-PD1

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety of EWSR1 immunotherapy, measured by number of participants with grade 4 immunotherapy-related adverse events

    Safety will be achieved in the EWSR1 immunotherapy monotherapy cohort if no participant has grade 4 EWSR1 immunotherapy-related toxicity

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  2. Safety of combination therapy (EWSR1 immunotherapy + pembrolizumab), measured by number of participants with grade 3 drug related adverse events lasting greater than 1 week

    In the combination therapy cohort (EWSR1 immunotherapy + pembrolizumab) cohort, safety will be achieved if participants without progression at 6 months have no grade 3 drug related AE lasting \> 1 week

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  3. Feasibility of EWSR1 immunotherapy monotherapy, measured by proportion of participants who receive doses

    Feasibility will be achieved in the EWSR1 immunotherapy monotherapy cohort if participants receive at least 3 of 4 proposed doses.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  4. Feasibility of combination therapy (EWSR1 immunotherapy + pembrolizumab), measured by number of participants who receive at least 3 months of therapy

    In the combination therapy cohort (EWSR1 immunotherapy + pembrolizumab) cohort, feasibility will be achieved if 12 participants receive at least 3 months of combination therapy.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression free survival (PFS)

    PFS will be assessed using iRECIST (Immunologic Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria and is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: Up to 1.5 years

  2. Overall survival (OS)

    OS is defined as the time from start of treatment until death from any cause.

    Time frame: Up to 1.5 years

  3. Tumor response, as measured by change in tumor volume

    Tumor responses will be determined comparing chest CT (Computed Tomography) and PET-CT (Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography) scans. Trends of lesion size will be depicted using waterfall and "spaghetti" plots showing and tumor volume differences over time.

    Time frame: Baseline, month 6

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation Taussig Cancer Institute
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
    • Peter M Anderson, MD, PhD · ContactANDERSP@ccf.org · 216-308-2706
    • Rabi Hanna, MD · Principal investigator
    • Peter M Anderson, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Matteo Trucco, MD · Sub investigator
    • Timothy A Chan, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Womer RB, West DC, Krailo MD, Dickman PS, Pawel BR, Grier HE, Marcus K, Sailer S, Healey JH, Dormans JP, Weiss AR. Randomized controlled trial of interval-compressed chemotherapy for the treatment of localized Ewing sarcoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 20;30(33):4148-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.5703. Epub 2012 Oct 22. PubMed 23091096 ↗
  • Ahmed SK, Randall RL, DuBois SG, Harmsen WS, Krailo M, Marcus KJ, Janeway KA, Geller DS, Sorger JI, Womer RB, Granowetter L, Grier HE, Gorlick RG, Laack NNI. Identification of Patients With Localized Ewing Sarcoma at Higher Risk for Local Failure: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Dec 1;99(5):1286-1294. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.08.020. Epub 2017 Aug 24. PubMed 28964585 ↗
  • Bosma SE, Lancia C, Rueten-Budde AJ, Ranft A, Gelderblom H, Fiocco M, van de Sande MAJ, Dijkstra PDS, Dirksen U. Easy-to-use clinical tool for survival estimation in Ewing sarcoma at diagnosis and after surgery. Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 29;9(1):11000. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46721-8. PubMed 31358784 ↗
  • Albergo JI, Gaston CL, Laitinen M, Darbyshire A, Jeys LM, Sumathi V, Parry M, Peake D, Carter SR, Tillman R, Abudu AT, Grimer RJ. Ewing's sarcoma: only patients with 100% of necrosis after chemotherapy should be classified as having a good response. Bone Joint J. 2016 Aug;98-B(8):1138-44. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B8.37346. PubMed 27482030 ↗
  • Zollner SK, Amatruda JF, Bauer S, Collaud S, de Alava E, DuBois SG, Hardes J, Hartmann W, Kovar H, Metzler M, Shulman DS, Streitburger A, Timmermann B, Toretsky JA, Uhlenbruch Y, Vieth V, Grunewald TGP, Dirksen U. Ewing Sarcoma-Diagnosis, Treatment, Clinical Challenges and Future Perspectives. J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 14;10(8):1685. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081685. PubMed 33919988 ↗
  • Juan Ribelles A, Felix A, Benavent N, Escriva-Fernandez J, Brahmi M, Gaspar N, Gatz SA, Grunewald TG, Linder-Stragliotto C, Palmerini E, Pantziarka P, Strauss S, Surdez D, Berlanga P, McCabe MG. Recurrent and Refractory Ewing Sarcoma Phase I/II Trials: Current Perspective From the Euro-Ewing Consortium. JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Sep;9:e2500377. doi: 10.1200/PO-25-00377. Epub 2025 Sep 19. PubMed 40971749 ↗
  • Gupta A, Dietz MS, Riedel RF, Dhir A, Borinstein SC, Isakoff MS, Aye JM, Rainusso N, Armstrong AE, DuBois SG, Wagner LM, Rosenblum JM, Cohen-Gogo S, Albert CM, Zahler S, Chugh R, Trucco M. Consensus recommendations for systemic therapies in the management of relapsed Ewing sarcoma: A report from the National Ewing Sarcoma Tumor Board. Cancer. 2024 Dec 1;130(23):4028-4039. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35537. Epub 2024 Aug 25. PubMed 39182183 ↗
  • Shah C, Campbell SR, Murphy E, Braunstein S, Dietz MS, Binitie O, Kastenberg ZJ, Yanagawa J, Halpern J, Kis B, Hunt S, Yazdanpanah F, Gupta A, Trucco M. Consensus recommendations regarding local and metastasis-directed therapies in the management of relapsed/recurrent Ewing sarcoma. Cancer. 2025 May 1;131(9):e35858. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35858. PubMed 40251761 ↗
  • Hayes-Jordan A, Anderson P, Curley S, Herzog C, Lally KP, Green HL, Hunt K, Mansfield P. Continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion for desmoplastic small round cell tumor. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Aug;42(8):E29-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.05.047. PubMed 17706484 ↗
  • Aguilera D, Hayes-Jordan A, Anderson P, Woo S, Pearson M, Green H. Outpatient and home chemotherapy with novel local control strategies in desmoplastic small round cell tumor. Sarcoma. 2008;2008:261589. doi: 10.1155/2008/261589. PubMed 18566684 ↗
  • Hayes-Jordan A, Green H, Fitzgerald N, Xiao L, Anderson P. Novel treatment for desmoplastic small round cell tumor: hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion. J Pediatr Surg. 2010 May;45(5):1000-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.034. PubMed 20438942 ↗
  • Hayes-Jordan A, Anderson PM. The diagnosis and management of desmoplastic small round cell tumor: a review. Curr Opin Oncol. 2011 Jul;23(4):385-9. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e3283477aab. PubMed 21577112 ↗
  • Pinnix CC, Fontanilla HP, Hayes-Jordan A, Subbiah V, Bilton SD, Chang EL, Grosshans DR, McAleer MF, Sulman EP, Woo SY, Anderson P, Green HL, Mahajan A. Whole abdominopelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy for desmoplastic small round cell tumor after surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):317-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.1985. Epub 2011 Nov 19. PubMed 22104361 ↗
  • Subbiah V, Brown RE, Jiang Y, Buryanek J, Hayes-Jordan A, Kurzrock R, Anderson PM. Morphoproteomic profiling of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway in desmoplastic small round cell tumor (EWS/WT1), Ewing's sarcoma (EWS/FLI1) and Wilms' tumor(WT1). PLoS One. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e68985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068985. Print 2013. PubMed 23922674 ↗
  • Hayes-Jordan A, Green HL, Lin H, Owusu-Agyemang P, Fitzgerald N, Arunkumar R, Mejia R, Okhuysen-Cawley R, Mauricio R, Fournier K, Ludwig J, Anderson P. Complete cytoreduction and HIPEC improves survival in desmoplastic small round cell tumor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;21(1):220-4. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3269-y. Epub 2013 Sep 18. PubMed 24046124 ↗
  • Hayes-Jordan A, LaQuaglia MP, Modak S. Management of desmoplastic small round cell tumor. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2016 Oct;25(5):299-304. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Sep 14. PubMed 27955733 ↗
  • Osborne EM, Briere TM, Hayes-Jordan A, Levy LB, Huh WW, Mahajan A, Anderson P, McAleer MF. Survival and toxicity following sequential multimodality treatment including whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy for patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumor. Radiother Oncol. 2016 Apr;119(1):40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.10.016. Epub 2015 Oct 30. PubMed 26527430 ↗
  • Bulbul A, Fahy BN, Xiu J, Rashad S, Mustafa A, Husain H, Hayes-Jordan A. Desmoplastic Small Round Blue Cell Tumor: A Review of Treatment and Potential Therapeutic Genomic Alterations. Sarcoma. 2017;2017:1278268. doi: 10.1155/2017/1278268. Epub 2017 Nov 1. PubMed 29225486 ↗
  • Hayes-Jordan AA, Coakley BA, Green HL, Xiao L, Fournier KF, Herzog CE, Ludwig JA, McAleer MF, Anderson PM, Huh WW. Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Results of a Phase 2 Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;25(4):872-877. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6333-9. Epub 2018 Jan 30. PubMed 29383611 ↗
  • Menegaz BA, Cuglievan B, Benson J, Camacho P, Lamhamedi-Cherradi SE, Leung CH, Warneke CL, Huh W, Subbiah V, Benjamin RS, Patel S, Daw N, Hayes-Jordan A, Ludwig JA. Clinical Activity of Pazopanib in Patients with Advanced Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor. Oncologist. 2018 Mar;23(3):360-366. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0408. Epub 2017 Dec 6. PubMed 29212731 ↗
  • Subbiah V, Lamhamedi-Cherradi SE, Cuglievan B, Menegaz BA, Camacho P, Huh W, Ramamoorthy V, Anderson PM, Pollock RE, Lev DC, Qiao W, McAleer MF, Benjamin RS, Patel S, Herzog CE, Daw NC, Feig BW, Lazar AJ, Hayes-Jordan A, Ludwig JA. Multimodality Treatment of Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor: Chemotherapy and Complete Cytoreductive Surgery Improve Patient Survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 1;24(19):4865-4873. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0202. Epub 2018 Jun 5. PubMed 29871905 ↗
  • Tarek N, Hayes-Jordan A, Salvador L, McAleer MF, Herzog CE, Huh WW. Recurrent desmoplastic small round cell tumor responding to an mTOR inhibitor containing regimen. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Jan;65(1). doi: 10.1002/pbc.26768. Epub 2017 Sep 22. PubMed 28941151 ↗
  • Morani AC, Bathala TK, Surabhi VR, Yedururi S, Jensen CT, Huh WW, Prasad S, Hayes-Jordan A. Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor: Imaging Pattern of Disease at Presentation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Mar;212(3):W45-W54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20179. Epub 2019 Jan 23. PubMed 30673334 ↗
  • Anderson P, Ghisoli M, Crompton BD, Klega KS, Wexler LH, Slotkin EK, Stanbery L, Manning L, Wallraven G, Manley M, Horvath S, Bognar E, Nemunaitis J. Pilot Study of Recurrent Ewing's Sarcoma Management with Vigil/Temozolomide/Irinotecan and Assessment of Circulating Tumor (ct) DNA. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 May 1;29(9):1689-1697. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-2292. PubMed 36780200 ↗
  • Anderson PM, Tu ZJ, Kilpatrick SE, Trucco M, Hanna R, Chan T. Routine EWS Fusion Analysis in the Oncology Clinic to Identify Cancer-Specific Peptide Sequence Patterns That Span Breakpoints in Ewing Sarcoma and DSRCT. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 6;15(5):1623. doi: 10.3390/cancers15051623. PubMed 36900411 ↗
  • Anderson, P.M., et al., Sarcoma gene fusion breakpoints: non-random event patterns in sarcoma with gene fusions including Ewing sarcoma, DSRCT, rhabdomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, CCNB3-BCOR, and CIC-DUX. Connective Tissue Oncology Society 2022 Vancouver , Canada, 2022.
  • Minas TZ, Surdez D, Javaheri T, Tanaka M, Howarth M, Kang HJ, Han J, Han ZY, Sax B, Kream BE, Hong SH, Celik H, Tirode F, Tuckermann J, Toretsky JA, Kenner L, Kovar H, Lee S, Sweet-Cordero EA, Nakamura T, Moriggl R, Delattre O, Uren A. Combined experience of six independent laboratories attempting to create an Ewing sarcoma mouse model. Oncotarget. 2017 May 23;8(21):34141-34163. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9388. PubMed 27191748 ↗
  • Bauer J, Kohler N, Maringer Y, Bucher P, Bilich T, Zwick M, Dicks S, Nelde A, Dubbelaar M, Scheid J, Wacker M, Heitmann JS, Schroeder S, Rieth J, Denk M, Richter M, Klein R, Bonzheim I, Luibrand J, Holzer U, Ebinger M, Brecht IB, Bitzer M, Boerries M, Feucht J, Salih HR, Rammensee HG, Hailfinger S, Walz JS. The oncogenic fusion protein DNAJB1-PRKACA can be specifically targeted by peptide-based immunotherapy in fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 27;13(1):6401. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33746-3. PubMed 36302754 ↗
  • Yang W, Lee KW, Srivastava RM, Kuo F, Krishna C, Chowell D, Makarov V, Hoen D, Dalin MG, Wexler L, Ghossein R, Katabi N, Nadeem Z, Cohen MA, Tian SK, Robine N, Arora K, Geiger H, Agius P, Bouvier N, Huberman K, Vanness K, Havel JJ, Sims JS, Samstein RM, Mandal R, Tepe J, Ganly I, Ho AL, Riaz N, Wong RJ, Shukla N, Chan TA, Morris LGT. Immunogenic neoantigens derived from gene fusions stimulate T cell responses. Nat Med. 2019 May;25(5):767-775. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0434-2. Epub 2019 Apr 22. PubMed 31011208 ↗
  • Veeriah S, Taylor BS, Meng S, Fang F, Yilmaz E, Vivanco I, Janakiraman M, Schultz N, Hanrahan AJ, Pao W, Ladanyi M, Sander C, Heguy A, Holland EC, Paty PB, Mischel PS, Liau L, Cloughesy TF, Mellinghoff IK, Solit DB, Chan TA. Somatic mutations of the Parkinson's disease-associated gene PARK2 in glioblastoma and other human malignancies. Nat Genet. 2010 Jan;42(1):77-82. doi: 10.1038/ng.491. Epub 2009 Nov 29. PubMed 19946270 ↗
  • Morris LG, Kaufman AM, Gong Y, Ramaswami D, Walsh LA, Turcan S, Eng S, Kannan K, Zou Y, Peng L, Banuchi VE, Paty P, Zeng Z, Vakiani E, Solit D, Singh B, Ganly I, Liau L, Cloughesy TC, Mischel PS, Mellinghoff IK, Chan TA. Recurrent somatic mutation of FAT1 in multiple human cancers leads to aberrant Wnt activation. Nat Genet. 2013 Mar;45(3):253-61. doi: 10.1038/ng.2538. Epub 2013 Jan 27. PubMed 23354438 ↗
  • Ho AS, Kannan K, Roy DM, Morris LG, Ganly I, Katabi N, Ramaswami D, Walsh LA, Eng S, Huse JT, Zhang J, Dolgalev I, Huberman K, Heguy A, Viale A, Drobnjak M, Leversha MA, Rice CE, Singh B, Iyer NG, Leemans CR, Bloemena E, Ferris RL, Seethala RR, Gross BE, Liang Y, Sinha R, Peng L, Raphael BJ, Turcan S, Gong Y, Schultz N, Kim S, Chiosea S, Shah JP, Sander C, Lee W, Chan TA. The mutational landscape of adenoid cystic carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2013 Jul;45(7):791-8. doi: 10.1038/ng.2643. Epub 2013 May 19. PubMed 23685749 ↗
  • Riaz N, Havel JJ, Kendall SM, Makarov V, Walsh LA, Desrichard A, Weinhold N, Chan TA. Recurrent SERPINB3 and SERPINB4 mutations in patients who respond to anti-CTLA4 immunotherapy. Nat Genet. 2016 Nov;48(11):1327-1329. doi: 10.1038/ng.3677. Epub 2016 Sep 26. PubMed 27668655 ↗
  • Turcan S, Makarov V, Taranda J, Wang Y, Fabius AWM, Wu W, Zheng Y, El-Amine N, Haddock S, Nanjangud G, LeKaye HC, Brennan C, Cross J, Huse JT, Kelleher NL, Osten P, Thompson CB, Chan TA. Mutant-IDH1-dependent chromatin state reprogramming, reversibility, and persistence. Nat Genet. 2018 Jan;50(1):62-72. doi: 10.1038/s41588-017-0001-z. Epub 2017 Nov 27. PubMed 29180699 ↗
  • Ma X, Riaz N, Samstein RM, Lee M, Makarov V, Valero C, Chowell D, Kuo F, Hoen D, Fitzgerald CWR, Jiang H, Alektiar J, Alban TJ, Juric I, Parthasarathy PB, Zhao Y, Sabio EY, Verma R, Srivastava RM, Vuong L, Yang W, Zhang X, Wang J, Chu LK, Wang SL, Kelly DW, Pei X, Chen J, Yaeger R, Zamarin D, Zehir A, Gonen M, Morris LGT, Chan TA. Functional landscapes of POLE and POLD1 mutations in checkpoint blockade-dependent antitumor immunity. Nat Genet. 2022 Jul;54(7):996-1012. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01108-w. Epub 2022 Jul 11. PubMed 35817971 ↗
  • Wilky BA, Schwartz GK, Gordon MS, El-Khoueiry AB, Bullock AJ, Henick B, Agulnik M, Singh A, Mahadevan D, Stebbing J, Delepine C, Chand D, Avagyan M, Wu W, Johnson B, Grossman JE, O'Day S, Trent JC, Jones RL, Tsimberidou AM. Botensilimab (Fc-enhanced anti-cytotoxic lymphocyte-association protein-4 antibody) Plus Balstilimab (anti-PD-1 antibody) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Metastatic Sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr 10;43(11):1358-1368. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-02524. Epub 2025 Jan 27. PubMed 39869830 ↗
  • Palmer CD, Rappaport AR, Davis MJ, Hart MG, Scallan CD, Hong SJ, Gitlin L, Kraemer LD, Kounlavouth S, Yang A, Smith L, Schenk D, Skoberne M, Taquechel K, Marrali M, Jaroslavsky JR, Nganje CN, Maloney E, Zhou R, Navarro-Gomez D, Greene AC, Grotenbreg G, Greer R, Blair W, Cao MD, Chan S, Bae K, Spira AI, Roychowdhury S, Carbone DP, Henick BS, Drake CG, Solomon BJ, Ahn DH, Mahipal A, Maron SB, Johnson B, Rousseau R, Yelensky R, Liao CY, Catenacci DVT, Allen A, Ferguson AR, Jooss K. Individualized, heterologous chimpanzee adenovirus and self-amplifying mRNA neoantigen vaccine for advanced metastatic solid tumors: phase 1 trial interim results. Nat Med. 2022 Aug;28(8):1619-1629. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01937-6. Epub 2022 Aug 15. PubMed 35970920 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All side effects of each participant are to be documented in Epic and available Cleveland Clinic monitoring and FDA audit, if needed. For patients getting vaccine + checkpoint inhibition safety and efficacy data (without patient identifiers) will be shared with Agenus, supplier of the antiPD1 antibodies.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Clinical study report

Time frame: Data will be available in in a timely, proactive manner to allow monthly Cleveland Clinic study monitoring and also to be ready for any potential FDA audit

Access criteria: on site for Cleveland Clinic Monitoring

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Oct 2029, 36 months later.

Of 41 phase 1 interventional studies under Sarcoma, Ewing, half reached primary completion within 89 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 65 and three quarters within 134. This study's planned 36 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 6, 2026
First posted
Jul 10, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2029
CompletionEst.
Jul 2030
Last update
Sep 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07695311
Lead sponsor
Rabi Hanna
Collaborators
The Little Warriors Foundation
Responsible party
Rabi Hanna (Principal Investigator, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 17, 2026

Study contacts

Peter M Anderson, MD, PhD
Contact
andersp@ccf.org
216-308-2706
Rabi Hanna, MD
Contact
hannar2@ccf.org
216-407-8655
Rabi Hanna, MD
principal investigator · Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation Taussig Cancer Institute
Peter M Anderson, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation Taussig Cancer Institute
Matteo Trucco, MD
principal investigator · Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation Taussig Cancer Institute
Timothy A Chan, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Center for Immunotherapy and Immuno-Oncology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion