ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07516353Updated Oct 29, 2026

my.naviGATE: A Guide to After-Treatment Effects for Adolescents and Young Adults

An interventional study of my.naviGATE Digital Tool in Sarcoma, Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma, sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 24 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-29.

Sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Updated Oct 29, 2026Start date movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
143
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 24 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to design and test a novel, personalized digital intervention-my.naviGATE-for adolescent and young adults (AYA) with cancer. my.naviGATE is a mobile app that provides personalized survivorship education, access to virtual peer navigation, and responsive participant-reported outcomes (PROs).

Read the detailed description

This multi-center, pilot study aims to design and test a novel, personalized digital intervention-my.naviGATE-for adolescent and young adults (AYA) with cancer. My.naviGATE is a mobile app that provides personalized survivorship education, access to virtual peer navigation, and responsive participant-reported outcomes (PROs).

Participants in this research study will be randomized into 1 of 2 study groups: my.naviGATE Group versus Usual Care Group. Randomization means a participant is placed into a study group by chance.

The research study procedures include questionnaires or surveys, use of the mobile app for those randomized to the intervention, and qualitative interviews with study personnel for a subset of participants.

It is expected about 143 people will participate in this research study.

The Hyundai Hope On Wheels Foundation is supporting this research study by providing funding.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sarcoma
  • Osteosarcoma
  • Ewing Sarcoma
  • Rhabdomyosarcoma
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia
  • Aml
  • ALL
  • Medulloblastoma
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ,Lymphomas

Keywords

  • Cancer Survivorship
  • Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer
  • Late Effects of Cancer Treatment
  • Hodgkin and mature B-cell Lymphomas
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma
  • Sarcoma
  • Osteosarcoma
  • Ewing Sarcoma
  • Rhabdomyosarcoma
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia
  • Aml
  • ALL
  • Medulloblastoma
03

In context

Sarcoma

1,607 studies on the registry are indexed under Sarcoma; 366 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 143 is above the median of 40 across 1,255 interventional studies indexed under Sarcoma.

Browse Sarcoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 834 studies on the registry; 122 are open to participants now.

Of its 114 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 78 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 24 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 15-24 who are currently undergoing cancer treatment at one of the three participating sites: DFCI, CNH, or RPOCH.
  • Patients must have initiated and be actively receiving cancer directed therapy for a newly diagnosed cancer.
  • Patients must be actively receiving cancer directed therapy, between the time of diagnosis and end of therapy for the following diagnoses: 1) Sarcomas: including osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma; 2) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML); 3) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma (ALL); 4) Hodgkin and mature B-cell Lymphomas; and 5) Medulloblastoma.
  • Patients whose treatment includes alkylators, anthracyclines, and/or radiation.

Inclusion of Children:

  • This study is designed to keep AYAs aged 15-24 engaged in cancer survivorship care and therefore a subset of participants will be \<18 years of age. The rationale for inclusion of children in this study is that AYA cancer survivors are particularly vulnerable to loss to follow-up and consequently lack of risk-based survivorship care, resulting in increased risk for preventable toxicity. Many existing interventions to improve engagement in survivorship screening and care are introduced after treatment completion and in long-term survivorship. Yet, for patients who are unaware of their late effect risks, and/or those who move frequently and are lost to follow-up, this may be too late. This study is designed to improve awareness of and engagement in risk-informed survivorship care for AYAs. This study presents no more than minimal risk to participants.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are unwilling to give or assent to participate will be excluded. For patients under 18, patients whose guardians do not give informed consent will be excluded.
  • Patients with no chance of cure as identified by the AYA's physician, will be excluded given that issues of survivorship are not relevant and may be distressing to this population. Similarly, patients with disease will also be excluded.
  • Patients who are non-English-speaking and -reading will be excluded as the digital tool is being developed initially in English.
  • We will seek physician permission before offering enrollment to patients. If the provider team requests that the patient not be approached to participate, the patient will be excluded.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
143 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    my.naviGATE Group

    Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to this study group and will complete the following: * Baseline survey * 1 month survey * 6 month survey * Virtual interview (subset of participants)

    Behavioral: my.naviGATE Digital Tool

  • No intervention
    Usual Care Group

    Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to this study group and will receive standard oncology care and will complete the following: * Baseline survey * 1 month survey * 6 month survey

Interventions

  • Behavioralmy.naviGATE Digital Tool

    : A HIPAA-compliant digital health intervention in the form of a mobile application that provides personalized cancer survivorship education based on individual treatment regimens, virtual visits with trained peer navigators, and collection questionnaires/survey responses.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Patient Activation Measure (PAM)-13 Score from Baseline to 6 Months Post-EOT

    The Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) is a validated, self-administered questionnaire assessing knowledge, skills, and confidence for self health-management. It has 13 items with a standardized score from 1-100 derived from 4-point Likert scale answer choices ranging from "Disagree Strongly" to "Agree Strongly;" a higher standardized score represents greater activation.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 1-month post EOT (+2 months) and 6-months post EOT (+2 months)

  2. Application (App) Feasibility Rate (Intervention Group)

    App feasibility rate is the proportion of participants in the intervention group ever using the my.naviGATE app. Usage metrics are collected through the app development platform.

    Time frame: Assessed at 1-month post EOT (+2 months) and 6-months post EOT (+2 months)

  3. Application (App) Acceptability Rate (Intervention Group)

    App acceptability will be assessed in the intervention group with an adapted acceptability electronic (E)-scale for web-based PROs in cancer care. Acceptability rate is the proportion of patients achieving acceptability on the 3-item scale, each using the 5-point Likert scale (1=lowest acceptability/not acceptable to 5 highest acceptability). The score ranges from 3-15 points and a score of 12 or higher indicates acceptability. (Tariman et al. Appl Nurs Res. 2011)

    Time frame: Assessed at 1-month post EOT (+2 months) and 6-months post EOT (+2 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Assessment of Cancer Communication Experiences (PACE) Scale Score (Treatment Completed Set) at 6 Months Post-EOT

    The PACE Scale (treatment completed set) is a 6-item questionnaire assessing communication and support experiences during and after cancer treatment. Questions are rated on a Likert-style scale ranging from "Never" to "Always" or "Poor" to "Excellent." Across a sample of patients with a variety of cancers, 70% rated post-cancer treatment communication as excellent.

    Time frame: Assessed at 1-month post EOT (+2 months) and 6-months post EOT (+2 months)

  2. Preparedness for Survivorship Score at 6 Months Post-EOT

    Preparedness for survivorship is measured on a 10-item scale with response items ranging from "strongly agree" (4) to "strongly disagree" (1) or "strongly satisfied" (5) to "not at all satisfied" (1); higher mean composite scores suggests increased perceived preparedness for survivorship.

    Time frame: Assessed at 1-month post EOT (+2 months) and 6-months post EOT (+2 months)

  3. Self-Efficacy Score at 6 Months Post-EOT

    Self-efficacy for late effect and survivorship care planning will be measured by two adapted 3-item self-efficacy scales. The mean of the Late Effects Self-Efficacy scale is 3.3 (SD=1.1), and the mean of the Survivorship Care Planning Self-Efficacy scale is 3.9 (SD=1.2). Items are rated from 1=not confident to 5=extremely confident; higher scores suggest greater perceived self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Assessed at 1-month post EOT (+2 months) and 6-months post EOT (+2 months)

  4. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Score Change at 6 Months Post-EOT

    The 9-item PROMIS Pediatric Scale for Global Health (participant age \<18) and 10-item PROMIS Scale for Global Health (participant age 18+) are validated measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Responses are scored on a scale of 1-5, and the total score is converted to a T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) fixed at 10. Higher scores suggest better perceived HRQoL. The final question on the adult version is scored 1-10.

    Time frame: Assessed at 1-month post EOT (+2 months) and 6-months post EOT (+2 months)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: [contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication

Access criteria: DFCI- Contact the Beffer office for Dana -Farber Innovations (BODFI) at innovations@dfci.harvard.edu

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Dec 2028, 25 months later.

Of 144 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sarcoma, half reached primary completion within 61 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 34 and three quarters within 120. This study's planned 25 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 147 studies reached it within 59 months; a quarter within 34 and three quarters within 120.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Aug 2026 → Nov 2026, on Oct 29, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 31, 2026
First posted
Apr 8, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 20, 2026was Aug 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2030
Last update
Oct 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Aug 20, 2026→Nov 20, 2026
Oct 29, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 29, 2026
    Start date Aug 20, 2026→Nov 20, 2026
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07516353
Collaborators
Hyundai Hope On Wheels
Responsible party
Katie Greenzang,MD (Sponsor-Investigator, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 8, 2026
Start date
Nov 20, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 29, 2026

Study contacts

Katie Greenzang, MD
Contact
katie_greenzang@dfci.harvard.edu
6176325992
Katie Greenzang, MD
principal investigator · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion