ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07688109HIEDI-YemenUpdated Jul 7, 2026

Primary Versus Delayed Wound Closure in Complicated Appendectomy (The HIEDI-Yemen Trial)

An interventional study of Primary Closure with HIEDI and Delayed Primary Closure with HIEDI in Appendicitis, Surgical Wound Infection and Postoperative Complications, sponsored by Sana'a University. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in Yemen. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Sana'a University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare primary wound closure (PC) versus delayed primary closure (DPC) after standardized wound decontamination using the High-Efficiency Incision and Drainage with Irrigation (HIEDI) technique in patients undergoing open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in Sana'a, Yemen.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does primary closure with HIEDI result in a non-inferior or lower incidence of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) at 30 days compared with delayed primary closure with HIEDI?
  • Does primary closure with HIEDI reduce length of hospital stay and improve the trajectory of objective wound healing compared with delayed primary closure with HIEDI?
  • What is the impact of each closure method on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life?

Researchers will compare the two groups to determine the optimal, evidence-based standard of care for wound management in complicated appendicitis within a resource-limited setting.

Participants will:

  • Undergo open appendectomy for intraoperatively confirmed complicated appendicitis (perforation or gangrene).
  • Receive standardized HIEDI wound decontamination (meticulous debridement and pulsatile irrigation with minimum 500 mL povidone-iodine 1:10 solution).
  • Be randomly allocated to either primary closure (all layers closed at surgery) or delayed primary closure (skin/subcutaneous tissue left open and closed 3-5 days later).
  • Attend follow-up visits at days 7, 14, and 30 for wound assessment, infection surveillance, and outcome evaluation.
Read the detailed description

Complicated appendicitis (perforation or gangrene) is a significant cause of postoperative morbidity worldwide. Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is the most common complication, with reported rates exceeding 30% in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In Sana'a, Yemen, local data from Al-Thawra Modern General Hospital documented a 27.5% SSI rate specifically in this patient population. The optimal wound closure strategy-primary closure (PC) versus delayed primary closure (DPC)-remains debated, with previous studies yielding conflicting results largely due to lack of standardized intraoperative wound decontamination.

The High-Efficiency Incision and Drainage with Irrigation (HIEDI) technique is a standardized, aggressive decontamination protocol combining meticulous debridement of wound edges with pulsatile high-pressure irrigation using a minimum of 500 mL of povidone-iodine solution (1:10 dilution). By applying HIEDI uniformly to both study arms, this trial isolates the effect of closure timing on SSI risk.

This is a prospective, multicenter, parallel-group, 1:1 randomized controlled superiority trial with blinded outcome assessment, conducted at three tertiary care hospitals in Sana'a, Yemen. The findings will provide high-level, locally generated evidence to establish a safe, resource-conscious standard of care for Yemen and similar settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Appendicitis
  • Surgical Wound Infection
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Wound Healing

Keywords

  • Complicated appendicitis
  • Primary wound closure
  • Delayed primary closure
  • Surgical Site Infection
  • HIEDI technique
  • Wound decontamination
  • Appendectomy
  • Yemen
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • High-Efficiency Incision and Drainage with Irrigation
03

In context

Appendicitis

419 studies on the registry are indexed under Appendicitis; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 111 across 252 interventional studies indexed under Appendicitis.

Browse Appendicitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Sana'a University is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 12 years and older
  • Intraoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis (perforation or gangrene)
  • Undergoing open appendectomy via McBurney or Rocky-Davis incision
  • Ability to provide written (patient or legal guardian for minors)
  • Availability for 30-day follow-up

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Generalized peritonitis requiring midline laparotomy
  • status (e.g., chronic or immunosuppressive therapy, diagnosed infection)
  • Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus ( [HbA1c] greater than 8%)
  • Pregnancy
  • Concurrent
  • (ASA) physical status classification IV or V
  • Laparoscopic appendectomy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Primary Closure with HIEDI

    Participants undergo open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis followed by the High-Efficiency Incision and Drainage with Irrigation (HIEDI) protocol. All wound layers including skin are closed at the time of initial surgery using the Primary Closure (PC) technique. Target enrollment: 100 participants.

    Procedure: Primary Closure with HIEDI

  • Active comparator
    Delayed Primary Closure with HIEDI

    Participants undergo open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis followed by the High-Efficiency Incision and Drainage with Irrigation (HIEDI) protocol. Deep fascial layers are closed; subcutaneous tissue and skin are left open, packed with saline-soaked gauze, and closed at the bedside 3-5 days postoperatively if no infection signs are present using the Delayed Primary Closure (DPC) technique. Target enrollment: 100 participants.

    Procedure: Delayed Primary Closure with HIEDI

Interventions

  • ProcedurePrimary Closure with HIEDI

    Following open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, the surgical wound undergoes the High-Efficiency Incision and Drainage with Irrigation (HIEDI) protocol: meticulous debridement of wound edges and pulsatile high-pressure irrigation with a minimum of 500 mL of povidone-iodine solution (1:10 dilution). All layers of the surgical wound, including the skin, are closed at the time of the initial surgery using standard techniques.

  • ProcedureDelayed Primary Closure with HIEDI

    Following open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, the surgical wound undergoes the High-Efficiency Incision and Drainage with Irrigation (HIEDI) protocol: meticulous debridement of wound edges and pulsatile high-pressure irrigation with a minimum of 500 mL of povidone-iodine solution (1:10 dilution). The deep fascial layers are closed; the subcutaneous tissue and skin are left open, packed with saline-soaked gauze, and covered. The wound is closed at the bedside 3-5 days postoperatively if no signs of infection are present.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) at 30 Days

    Surgical Site Infection (SSI) diagnosed according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria, classified as superficial incisional, deep incisional, or organ/space infection. Assessed by trained outcome assessors blinded to treatment allocation.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective Wound Healing Trajectory (ASEPSIS Score)

    Objective assessment of wound healing and surgical site infection using the standardized ASEPSIS scoring system (evaluating criteria including erythema, serous discharge, purulent exudate, and separation of tissues). Lower scores represent superior healing.

    Time frame: Day 7, Day 14, and Day 30 postoperatively

  2. Length of Hospital Stay (days)

    Total number of days from hospital admission to discharge. Shorter stays indicate more efficient recovery.

    Time frame: From admission to discharge, assessed up to 30 days

  3. Incidence of Other Postoperative Complications

    Incidence of wound dehiscence, intra-abdominal abscess, hematoma, seroma, and need for reintervention. Binary (yes/no) for each complication.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days postoperatively

  4. Patient Satisfaction Score (0-100 scale)

    Overall satisfaction with surgical care and recovery measured on a 0-100 scale using a study-specific validated questionnaire. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: Day 7, Day 14, Day 30

  5. Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L score)

    Health-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Time frame: Day 7, Day 14, Day 30

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Al-Gumhori Teaching Hospital
    Sanaa, Yemen
    • Dr. Abdulla Salem Faraj, M.D. · Contacta770378499@gmail.com · +967770378499
    • Dr. Yasser Abdurabo Obadiel, Associate Professor · ContactYasser.Obadiel@su.edu.ye · +967770378499
    • Dr. Abdulla Salem Faraj, M.D. · Principal investigator
  • Al-Kuwaint University Hospital
    Sanaa, Yemen
    • Dr. Abdulla Salem Faraj, M.D. · Contacta770378499@gmail.com · +967770378499
    • Dr. Yasser Abdurabo Obadiel, Associate Professor · ContactYasser.Obadiel@su.edu.ye · +967770378499
    • Dr. Abdulla Salem Faraj, M.D. · Principal investigator
  • Al-Thawra Modern General Hospital
    Sanaa, Yemen
    • Dr. Abdulla Salem Faraj, M.D. · Contacta770378499@gmail.com · +967770378499
    • Dr. Yasser Abdurabo Obadiel, Associate Professor · ContactYasser.Obadiel@su.edu.ye · +967770378499
    • Dr. Abdulla Salem Faraj, M.D. · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The study team does not plan to share individual participant data with other researchers. This is a single-center thesis study with limited data management infrastructure, and the dataset contains identifiable clinical information that cannot be sufficiently de-identified for broad sharing under local ethical guidelines.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07688109
Lead sponsor
Sana'a University
Responsible party
Haitham Mohammed Jowah (Lecturer, Sana'a University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 7, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Study contacts

Dr. Abdulla Salem Faraj, M.D.
Contact
a770378499@gmail.com
+967770378499
Dr. Yasser Abdurabo Obadiel, Associate Professor
Contact
Yasser.Obadiel@su.edu.ye
+967770378499
Dr. Yasser Abdurabo Obadiel, Associate Professor
study director · Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana'a University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion