An observational study in Surgical Wound Infection, sponsored by Alexandria University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.
Sponsored by Alexandria University · Observational
Many wound problems after surgery on the digestive system, including wound infection, are first noticed after the patient has already gone home. Delays in noticing a problem and contacting the hospital can delay treatment. Existing studies come mostly from high-income countries and usually look at only one group of people. No study from Egypt or the Arabic-speaking region was found in the sources reviewed.
This qualitative study will explore what helps and what gets in the way when patients, family caregivers, and nurses recognize, report, and respond to surgical wound problems after discharge from gastrointestinal surgery. Individual semi-structured interviews will be held in Egyptian Arabic, in person or by telephone, at three hospitals in Egypt. The planned participants are 20 patients discharged 2 to 6 weeks earlier, 12 family caregivers, 15 nurses, and up to 4 key informants, for a planned total of 51. Participants will be chosen purposefully to include a wide range of experiences, and recruitment in each group will stop once further interviews bring no new themes.
Interviews will be analysed with reflexive thematic analysis, guided by the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation. The main result is a description of the barriers and enablers. Further results are a model of the pathway from noticing a wound change, to reporting it, to the nursing response, and a set of requirements for a nurse-led remote follow-up service.
745 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound Infection; 151 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 51 is below the median of 239 across 135 observational studies indexed under Surgical Wound Infection.
Browse Surgical Wound Infection studies →Alexandria University is the lead sponsor of 604 studies on the registry; 140 are open to participants now.
Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Adult patients discharged 2 to 6 weeks earlier after gastrointestinal surgery, their family caregivers, registered nurses, and key informants responsible for discharge or follow-up policy, at three hospitals in Egypt.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Adults (18 years or older) discharged 2 to 6 weeks before interview after gastrointestinal surgery with an abdominal wound; planned n = 20. Interviewed once.
Adult family member most involved in the patient's wound care or communication with the hospital after discharge; planned n = 12. Interviewed once.
Registered nurses in gastrointestinal or general surgical wards, discharge planning, or infection prevention, with at least 1 year of experience; planned n = 15. Interviewed once.
Barriers and Enablers to Recognizing, Reporting, and Responding to Post-Discharge Surgical Wound Complications
Individual, relational, and service-level barriers and enablers described by patients, caregivers, nurses, and key informants in semi-structured interviews and identified through reflexive thematic analysis. This is a qualitative outcome with no numeric scale; results are reported as themes.
Time frame: Interviews from 10 November 2026 to 24 February 2027 (14 weeks), extendable by up to 4 weeks if the stopping rule is not met
Pathway Model From Noticing to Nursing Response
Model of the stages of noticing a wound change, judging concern, reporting, nurse triage, and follow-up, built from the themes and mapped to the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation.
Time frame: Through analysis, up to 31 March 2027
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.