ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07686341PRISMUpdated Jul 7, 2026

PRecision Integrated Saturation Monitor

An observational study in CHD - Congenital Heart Disease and Single Ventricle Heart Disease, sponsored by Le Bonheur Children's Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 0 Months to 12 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Le Bonheur Children's Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
0 Months to 12 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to find out if an abdominal pulse oximeter device is as accurate as a conventional fingertip pulse oximeter in pediatric patients. In this study, we will be collecting data from your medical record while you are being treated in the hospital for your clinical care. Your baby will be in the study for 3 days. There will be no additional study visits. We will collect information already being obtained while your baby is at the hospital.

Read the detailed description

Conventional pulse oximeters are prone to motion artifacts due to their placement on high-activity limbs. Traditionally, inpatient pulse oximetry relies on clinical staff to verify the accuracy of readings and distinguish between real and false desaturation events. However, in outpatient environments, caregivers are left to manage and interpret signals that may not provide reliable information about their child's health. PRISM aims to improve pulse oximetry monitoring for children. We will test an innovative pulse oximeter prototype that mitigates motion artifacts by shifting the monitoring location from a high-activity limb to the abdomen while incorporating motion detection capabilities. Previously, we have successfully developed an abdomen-worn prototype for collection of ECG signals for infant monitoring (Figure 1). We obtained high-quality signals with a robust correlation to the gold-standard ECG. Our preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility of collecting physiological signals from the abdomen, supporting its use as a novel, baby-friendly monitoring site. Figure 1. Comparison of ECG signals between gold-standard chest ECG and abdomen ECG. Protocol Version 2: 11 June 2026 IRB NUMBER: STUDY00000178 IRB APPROVAL DATE: 6/29/2026 IRB EXPIRATION DATE: 6/2/2027 We will incorporate a commercially available pulse oximetry sensor into a biocompatible, flexible, 3D printed housing. The child-focused design will be specific for application to the abdomen and will clip onto the diaper or pants of the baby; the tension from the diaper or pants will provide ample force to ensure sufficient contact between the device and the skin to achieve robust signals (Figure 2). The device will be removed with each diaper change. Figure 2. Schematic demonstrating the proposed pulse oximeter and its abdominal application As pulse oximetry uses optical sensors, external factors such as ambient light may interfere with data acquisition. Additionally, maintaining reliable contact with the skin is crucial to ensure the emitted light penetrates the underlying tissue, rather than reflecting off the skin's surface. Here, we will design the sensor housing to shield the pulse oximetry sensors from ambient light and provide a contact surface flexible enough for direct skin-to-sensor contact. The PRISM prototype is intended to minimize the impact of motion artifacts, a common phenomenon that leads to inaccurate readings and unnecessary alarms. By shifting the monitoring location from high-activity limbs to the more stable abdomen, we aim to enhance the accuracy and reliability of the device's measurements compared to traditional pulse oximeters. This design choice is particularly relevant for infants and young children, who often experience restlessness and movement during routine monitoring.

Successful accomplishment of this will result in a working prototype with motion artifact-resistant SpO2 reading error of less than 3.0% RMSE from SaO2. This development will allow the caregiver to continuously monitor accurate oxygen status Hypoxemic conditions, or medical problems stemming from low oxygen saturation, can result in half a million deaths annually. Oxygen saturation levels, which determine hypoxic conditions, can be measured directly from arterial blood. This is the gold standard of oxygen saturation measurement and is often called SaO2. Oxygen saturation measured from pulse oximetry, referred to as SpO2, uses light transmission and can allow for early detection of hypoxic conditions. It's a popular belief that melanin can absorb light in pulse oximetry, leading to the overestimation of SpO2 in darker skin. Although individuals with darker skin are observed to have a SpO2 overestimation, clinicians have yet to devise a method to accurately predict oxygen saturation given this overestimation[1]. Various clinical data has been curated to specifically address the issue of biases and disparities of pulse oximeter measurements in darker skin tones including the MIT Critical Datathon 2023 utilizing MIMIC IV and the blood-gas and oximetry linked dataset (BOLD)[2]. One issue with these datasets is race is often used as a proxy for skin tone, but there is great variability in skin color, even within a single race. Without an algorithm to account for how variation in skin tone biases in SpO2 measurement, a disproportionate amount of people of color may continue to receive incorrect diagnoses, leading to health inequities.

These incorrect diagnoses can lead to hidden hypoxemia, which is a condition where the gold standard oxygen saturation of a patient is less than 88% while the pulse oximeter measurement reads over 88%5. Studies show a significant disparity with black patients experiencing nearly three times the frequency of undetected hypoxemia compared to white patients6. They also emphasize the need to integrate pulse oximetry data with other clinical and patient-reported information to address this bias in medical technology.

These results are expected to generate evidence for proof-of-concept for this advanced next-generation pulse oximetry to be further tested and commercialized.

02

Conditions studied

  • CHD - Congenital Heart Disease
  • Single Ventricle Heart Disease

Keywords

  • monitoring device
  • pediatric chd
  • single ventricle
  • svhd
03

In context

Heart Defects, Congenital

991 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Defects, Congenital; 251 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 119 across 440 observational studies indexed under Heart Defects, Congenital.

Browse Heart Defects, Congenital studies →

Lead sponsor

Le Bonheur Children's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Months to 12 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Eligible infants hospitalized in the intensive care unit (PICU, PCVICU,NICU) who have already had an arterial line placed and on continuous pulse oximetry monitoring will be considered for enrollment and will be identified and approached for participation during their admission.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 0-12 months of age. (Must be less than 1 year of life for the pulse oximeter portion of the study) Weight greater than 2 Kg at time of study
  • Admitted to an intensive care unit. (Not applicable for outpatient cohort)
  • Arterial line in place as standard of care (Not applicable for outpatient cohort)
  • provided by parent or LAR.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open Sternum
  • Skin abnormalities at the proposed sensor site (e.g., rash, eczema, wounds, stoma, or infection)
  • Known allergy or sensitivity to adhesives or materials used in the sensor
  • Excessive movement or irritability that precludes safe and effective placement of the sensor
  • Parent or legal guardian unable to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Devicevital sign monitoring

    The intervention will be to evaluate abdominal SpO2 against both traditional fingertip readings and gold standard SaO2 measurements by collecting routine data from the medical chart that was performed as standard of care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Abdominal SpO2 versus SaO2

    The primary outcome is the accuracy of abdominal SpO₂ versus SaO₂, measured as root mean square error (RMSE); target ≤ 3.0% RMSE.

    Time frame: From enrollment to end of study at 72 hours.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07686341
Lead sponsor
Le Bonheur Children's Hospital
Collaborators
The Consortium for Technology & Innovation in Pediatrics (CTIP)
Responsible party
Danielle Gottlieb Sen (MS, MD, MPH, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 7, 2026
Start date
Aug 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion