ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT04205877Updated Dec 20, 2019

The U.S. PDA Registry

An observational study in Ductus Arteriosus, Patent, sponsored by Le Bonheur Children's Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Days to 1 Year. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-20.

Sponsored by Le Bonheur Children's Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
5,000
Ages
3 Days to 1 Year
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the continued safety and efficacy in a real-world setting of transcatheter device closure of the PDA in premature infants less than 2kg in weight at the time of device implant using the Amplatzer Piccolo Occluder device and other devices performed in the USA.

Read the detailed description

Based on the IMPACT registry, there are over 6000 transcatheter device closures of PDA that occurs in the United States annually. However, there are no comprehensive data collection tools for this procedure. The current databases do not include multiple data points, or follow-up data, or a section for specific adverse events to be documented. Moreover, until now, there has been no approved devices for PDA closure in children \< 2kg. This clinical study is the first of its kind to collect data from all transcatheter device closure of PDA in children \< 2kg performed in the USA.This study will be limited to children between 700 to 2000 grams who are the most vulnerable population undergoing this procedure. This will allow us to understand the real world experience (efficacy and safety) of using the Amplatzer Piccolo Occluder and other devices in an extremely vulnerable, yet highly underserved population. The study will allow for standardization of this procedure throughout the country for the small children (\<2 kg) with a PDA. This is a multi-center, single arm, observational data collection study. This will be a large population study to help analyze outcomes in subjects \<2 kg. The trial has two primary endpoints for safety and effectiveness without formal hypothesis. The safety and effectiveness results will be compared with data reported in the ADO II AS IDE and Continued Access Protocol studies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ductus Arteriosus, Patent
03

In context

Ductus Arteriosus, Patent

146 studies on the registry are indexed under Ductus Arteriosus, Patent; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 5,000 is above the median of 81 across 56 observational studies indexed under Ductus Arteriosus, Patent.

Browse Ductus Arteriosus, Patent studies →

Lead sponsor

Le Bonheur Children's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Days to 1 Year
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population is patients with diagnosis of PDA with clinical indication for transcatheter PDA closure, and weigh less than 2 kg at the time of device implant.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosis of PDA.
  2. Clinical indication for transcatheter PDA closure (discretion of the physician).
  3. Weight \<2 kg at the time of device implant.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Weight \<700 gm or greater than or equal to 2 kg at the time of device implant.
  2. Age \< 3 days at the time of device implant.
  3. Pre-existing coarctation of the aorta.
  4. Pre-existing left pulmonary artery stenosis.
  5. Cardiac output that is dependent on right to left shunt through the PDA due to pulmonary hypertension.
  6. Intracardiac thrombus that interferes with device implant.
  7. Active infection requiring treatment at the time of impant.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
5,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Registry Group

    All participants will have the same data collected at the same time points.

    Device: Transcatheter PDA Closure

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscatheter PDA Closure

    Device utilized for closure of PDA, study is to help assure continued safety and effectiveness of FDA approved Amplatzer Piccolo Occluder device as well as other devices used off label for PDA closure in premature infants less than 2 kg at the time of device implant.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vascular Access Complications (Safety)

    Access vessel complications include femoral arterial or femoral/jugular venous complications noted during the procedure, immediately after the procedure or delayed (\>24 hours). They range from bleeding from access sites, arterial or venous thrombosis with or without the need for treatment to loss of limb secondary to arterial occlusion.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Valvular Injury (Safety)

    Valvular injury includes damage to the tricuspid valve or other cardiac valve resulting in immediate post-procedural valvular dysfunction.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Device Embolization (Safety)

    Device embolization includes malposition of the device either during or after the procedure or delayed (\>24 hours). The outcome of device embolization ranges from observation, transcatheter retrieval at time of procedure or at a separate time, surgical retrieval, other end organ damage, to mortality.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Pulmonary or Aortic Vessel Stenosis (Safety)

    Adjacent vessel stenosis includes a narrowing of the aorta or the left pulmonary artery directly as a consequence of device implantation for PDA closure. Vessel stenosis could happen either during or after the procedure or delayed (\>24 hours). The outcome of vessel stenosis ranges from no intervention needed to repeated transcatheter and surgical therapies.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Rate of Effective PDA Closure (Effectiveness)

    The effectiveness endpoint is the rate of effective closure of the PDA using a transcatheter device within six months post procedure. If more than one attempt is required, or multiple devices are required during the same procedure, it is still considered effective if there is Grade 0 or Grade 1 shunt, as defined below, at follow-up by transthoracic echocardiography or if a second procedure is not required following the initial attempt. If there is device embolization, adjacent vessel stenosis that required retrieval of the device and replacement during the same procedure with less than Grade 1 shunt during follow-up, it is still considered effective. Conversely, if an AE is noted after the procedure that requires a second procedure for treatment that results in greater than Grade 1 shunt, then the procedure is considered not effective, even if the initial attempt was effective. See protocol for PDA shunt definitions.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Significant obstruction of the left pulmonary artery

    Significant obstruction of the left pulmonary artery is defined as less than 30% flow to the left lung by lung perfusion scan or a peak instantaneous gradient in left pulmonary artery ≥35 mmHg by echocardiogram if lung perfusion scan is not available or as determined by the interventional cardiologist based on angiographic appearance.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Significant obstruction of the aorta

    Significant obstruction of the aorta is defined as a gradient of ≥20 mmHg in the aortic isthmus by invasive aortic catheterization or a mean gradient ≥20 mmHg in the aortic isthmus by echocardiogram if invasive aortic catheterization is not available.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tashiro J, Perez EA, Sola JE. Reduced Hospital Mortality With Surgical Ligation of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Premature, Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: A Propensity Score-matched Outcome Study. Ann Surg. 2016 Mar;263(3):608-14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001228. PubMed 25822689 ↗
  • Schneider DJ. The patent ductus arteriosus in term infants, children, and adults. Semin Perinatol. 2012 Apr;36(2):146-53. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.09.025. PubMed 22414886 ↗
  • Mahoney LT, Coryell KG, Lauer RM. The newborn transitional circulation: a two-dimensional Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Sep;6(3):623-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80123-6. PubMed 4031274 ↗
  • Philip R, Waller BR 3rd, Agrawal V, Wright D, Arevalo A, Zurakowski D, Sathanandam S. Morphologic characterization of the patent ductus arteriosus in the premature infant and the choice of transcatheter occlusion device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 1;87(2):310-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26287. Epub 2015 Nov 3. PubMed 26525611 ↗
  • Krichenko A, Benson LN, Burrows P, Moes CA, McLaughlin P, Freedom RM. Angiographic classification of the isolated, persistently patent ductus arteriosus and implications for percutaneous catheter occlusion. Am J Cardiol. 1989 Apr 1;63(12):877-80. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90064-7. No abstract available. PubMed 2929450 ↗
  • Pass RH. Amplatzer Duct Occluder device: a new technology for the closure of the moderate-to-large-sized patent ductus arteriosus. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006 May;3(3):291-6. doi: 10.1586/17434440.3.3.291. PubMed 16681450 ↗
  • Moore JW, Levi DS, Moore SD, Schneider DJ, Berdjis F. Interventional treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in 2004. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Jan;64(1):91-101. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20243. PubMed 15619281 ↗
  • Perlo f, Joseph K.The Clinical Recognition of Congenital Heart Disease. Philadelphia: Saunders. Print.
  • Gross RE, Hubbard JP. Landmark article Feb 25, 1939: Surgical ligation of a patent ductus arteriosus. Report of first successful case. By Robert E. Gross and John P. Hubbard. JAMA. 1984 Mar 2;251(9):1201-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.251.9.1201. No abstract available. PubMed 6363741 ↗
  • Kabra NS, Schmidt B, Roberts RS, Doyle LW, Papile L, Fanaroff A; Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms Investigators. Neurosensory impairment after surgical closure of patent ductus arteriosus in extremely low birth weight infants: results from the Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms. J Pediatr. 2007 Mar;150(3):229-34, 234.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.11.039. PubMed 17307535 ↗
  • Chorne N, Leonard C, Piecuch R, Clyman RI. Patent ductus arteriosus and its treatment as risk factors for neonatal and neurodevelopmental morbidity. Pediatrics. 2007 Jun;119(6):1165-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3124. PubMed 17545385 ↗
  • Teixeira LS, Shivananda SP, Stephens D, Van Arsdell G, McNamara PJ. Postoperative cardiorespiratory instability following ligation of the preterm ductus arteriosus is related to early need for intervention. J Perinatol. 2008 Dec;28(12):803-10. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.101. Epub 2008 Jul 10. PubMed 18615091 ↗
  • Porstmann W, Wierny L, Warnke H, Gerstberger G, Romaniuk PA. Catheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus. 62 cases treated without thoracotomy. Radiol Clin North Am. 1971 Aug;9(2):203-18. No abstract available. PubMed 4938290 ↗
  • Weisz DE, McNamara PJ. Patent ductus arteriosus ligation and adverse outcomes: causality or bias? J Clin Neonatol. 2014 Apr;3(2):67-75. doi: 10.4103/2249-4847.134670. PubMed 25024972 ↗
  • Gruenstein DH, Ebeid M, Radtke W, Moore P, Holzer R, Justino H. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus using the AMPLATZER duct occluder II (ADO II). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;89(6):1118-1128. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26968. Epub 2017 Mar 4. PubMed 28258658 ↗
  • Kenny D, Morgan GJ, Bentham JR, Wilson N, Martin R, Tometzki A, Oslizlok P, Walsh KP. Early clinical experience with a modified Amplatzer ductal occluder for transcatheter arterial duct occlusion in infants and small children. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct 1;82(4):534-40. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24522. Epub 2013 Jun 29. PubMed 22718329 ↗
  • Sungur M, Karakurt C, Ozbarlas N, Baspinar O. Closure of patent ductus arteriosus in children, small infants, and premature babies with Amplatzer duct occluder II additional sizes: multicenter study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug 1;82(2):245-52. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24905. Epub 2013 Apr 8. PubMed 23460349 ↗
  • Bruckheimer E, Godfrey M, Dagan T, Levinzon M, Amir G, Birk E. The Amplatzer Duct Occluder II Additional Sizes device for transcatheter PDA closure: initial experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun 1;83(7):1097-101. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25445. Epub 2014 Mar 4. PubMed 24532416 ↗
  • Baspinar O, Sahin DA, Sulu A, Irdem A, Gokaslan G, Sivasli E, Kilinc M. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus in under 6 kg and premature infants. J Interv Cardiol. 2015 Apr;28(2):180-9. doi: 10.1111/joic.12196. Epub 2015 Apr 2. PubMed 25832591 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — A Data Management Plan (DMP) will describe procedures used for data review, database cleaning, and issuing and resolving data queries. If appropriate, the DMP may be updated throughout the clinical investigation duration. All revisions will be tracked and document controlled. Subject data will be captured in a validated electronic data capture (EDC) system. Only authorized site personnel will be permitted to enter the CRF data through the EDC system. An electronic audit trail will be used to track any subsequent changes of the entered data.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Clinical study report

Time frame: Data will become available when it is collected and added to the national database. It will be available for 12 years.

Access criteria: Investigators will submit proposal to request data to the Proposal Review Committee. If approved, de-identified data will be shared.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 20, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04205877
Lead sponsor
Le Bonheur Children's Hospital
Collaborators
Abbott
Responsible party
Shyam K. Sathanandam, MD (Associate Professor of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee. Director of Cath Lab, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital., Le Bonheur Children's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 20, 2019
Start date
Jan 1, 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 20, 2019

Study contacts

Shyam K Sathanandam, MD
Contact
ssathan@uthsc.edu
901-287-6380
Jorden Cunningham, BSN
Contact
jorden.cunningham@lebonheur.org
901-287-7457
Shyam Sathanandam, MD
principal investigator · National Principal Investigator

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion