ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07682090RESET-FMSUpdated Jul 2, 2026

Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Pain and Autonomic Dysfunction in Fibromyalgia (RESET-FMS)

An interventional study of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Sham Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Fibromyalgia Syndrome, sponsored by University of Roma La Sapienza. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-02.

Sponsored by University of Roma La Sapienza · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 41 studies in Fibromyalgia with a site in Italy — 16 open to participants now, 17 under way, none of them phase 3. Fibromyalgia · Italy.

Planned enrollment
16th of 31
80 · median 80
Started
2026
with 5 others
No phase
21 of 41
12 open now
Primary completion
2027-05
later than 11 of 16 live
Registered
36th of 41
by date
Lead sponsor
5 of 41
University of Roma La Sapienza

Among the 41 studies in Fibromyalgia with a site in Italy, this one is the 16th largest by planned enrollment of the 31 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 6 that started in 2026, is one of 21 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 11 of the 16 other live ones, and was the 36th registered.

Fibromyalgia

1,244 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibromyalgia; 256 are open to participants now.

Browse Fibromyalgia studies →

Open to participants now

16 of the 41 studies in Fibromyalgia with a site in Italy are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

10 more — sign in →

All 16 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Italy have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Italy →

Who these studies take

Of the 161 Fibromyalgia studies recruiting now, 50 (31%) set no upper age limit and 97 (60%) stop at 75 or younger; 15 take children under 18; 35 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 70 Years · female · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 41 studies in Fibromyalgia with a site in Italy, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic pain condition characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, cognitive symptoms, and autonomic dysfunction, significantly impairing quality of life. Increasing evidence suggests that, beyond central pain dysregulation, patients with FMS frequently exhibit autonomic nervous system dysfunction, characterized by sympathetic nervous system (SNS) hyperactivity at rest, with reduced SNS recruitment during orthostatic challenge. Moreover, approximately 50% of patients with FMS show reduced intraepidermal small fiber density on skin biopsy, a condition referred to as small fiber pathology (SFP), which has recently been suggested to contribute to autonomic dysfunction in these patients. Despite currently available pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, therapeutic efficacy remains limited, highlighting the need for novel mechanism-based interventions.

Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that enhances parasympathetic activity through stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve. Preliminary studies suggest that tVNS may improve pain, autonomic symptoms, mood, and quality of life in patients with FMS, although available evidence is limited by small sample sizes and heterogeneous methodologies.

The RESET-FMS study is a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of tVNS in patients with FMS. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either active tVNS or sham stimulation for four consecutive weeks. Stimulation will be administered daily for 30 minutes using the Nurosym™ device applied at the tragus of the external ear.

The primary objective is to assess the effect of active tVNS compared with sham stimulation on fibromyalgia severity, measured by the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (rFIQ) at the end of treatment (T4), adjusted for baseline values.

Exploratory objectives include:

  • evaluation of autonomic symptoms, fatigue, pain distribution, symptom severity, and sleep quality using validated clinical scales, including the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Widespread Pain Index (WPI), Symptom Severity Score (SSS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at T4;
  • assessment of the persistence of treatment effects four weeks after treatment discontinuation (T8);
  • evaluation of treatment effects during intermediate assessments (T2);
  • evaluation of the effects of tVNS on non-invasive indices of autonomic nervous system function, including heart rate variability (HRV) and sudomotor function assessed by dynamic sweat test (DST);
  • analysis of serum biomarkers potentially associated with autonomic dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and cognitive symptoms, including neuropeptide Y (NPY), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and neurofilament light chain (NFL);
  • comparison of treatment response between patients with and without evidence of small-fiber pathology on skin biopsy;
  • identification of clinical and biological predictors of response to tVNS. The study is expected to provide clinically relevant evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of tVNS in FMS and to improve the understanding of the relationship between pain modulation, autonomic dysfunction, and peripheral nervous system involvement in this condition. The identification of predictors of treatment response may contribute to the development of more personalized therapeutic strategies for patients with FMS.
Read the detailed description

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic pain condition characterized by widespread pain associated with fatigue, sleep disturbances, cognitive symptoms, mood alterations, and autonomic dysfunction, leading to substantial impairment in quality of life and daily functioning. Current evidence supports the concept of FMS as a nociplastic pain disorder, in which altered central pain processing and impaired descending pain modulation play a key pathophysiological role. However, increasing evidence suggests that peripheral nervous system involvement and autonomic nervous system dysfunction may also contribute significantly to symptom generation and clinical heterogeneity in this condition.

Several studies have demonstrated that patients with FMS frequently exhibit cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction, characterized by sympathetic nervous system hyperactivity at rest and impaired autonomic adaptive responses during orthostatic challenge. These abnormalities have been documented through heart rate variability (HRV) analysis and other autonomic function tests and have been associated with orthostatic intolerance symptoms, fatigue, and pain severity. In addition, approximately 50% of patients with fibromyalgia show evidence of reduced intraepidermal nerve fiber density on skin biopsy, a condition referred to as small fiber pathology (SFP). Recent findings suggest that small fiber involvement in FMS non è limitato alle piccole fibre somatiche, ma anche alle fibre autonomiche simpatiche post- gangliari. Il ruolo della SFP nella FMS è ancora sconosciuto, tuttavia un recente studio ha dimostrato come la SFP contribuisca alla disfunzione autonomica nella FMS.

Despite the availability of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic approaches, including antidepressants, gabapentinoids, physical therapy, and psychological interventions, treatment efficacy in FMS remains limited. Consequently, there is growing interest in mechanism-based neuromodulation strategies targeting autonomic dysfunction and central pain modulation pathways.

Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique designed to stimulate the auricular branch of the vagus nerve through cutaneous electrical stimulation applied to specific regions of the external ear. By enhancing parasympathetic activity and modulating central autonomic and pain-processing networks, tVNS has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for chronic pain disorders and conditions associated with autonomic imbalance. Preliminary studies in FMS suggest that tVNS may improve pain, autonomic symptoms, mood, and quality of life; however, currently available studies are limited by relatively small sample sizes and heterogeneous methodologies.

The RESET-FMS study is a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in female patients with fibromyalgia syndrome and to investigate clinical and biological predictors of treatment response.

Female participants meeting the diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia according to the 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria will be enrolled and randomized to receive either active tVNS or sham stimulation. Randomization will be computer-generated with variable block sizes in order to ensure allocation concealment and balance between groups throughout the enrollment period. Both participants and outcome assessors will remain blinded to treatment allocation.

The intervention will consist of daily 30-minute stimulation sessions administered for four consecutive weeks using the Nurosym™ device applied at the tragus of the external ear. Participants allocated to the active treatment group will receive standard transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation, whereas the sham group will undergo identical procedures using a stimulation modality that does not deliver a therapeutic vagal stimulation pattern.

The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of active tVNS compared with sham stimulation on fibromyalgia severity, measured by the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (rFIQ) at the end of treatment (T4), adjusted for baseline values.

Exploratory objectives include:

  • evaluation of autonomic symptoms, fatigue, pain distribution, symptom severity, and sleep quality using validated clinical scales, including the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Widespread Pain Index (WPI), Symptom Severity Score (SSS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI);
  • assessment of the persistence of treatment effects four weeks after treatment discontinuation (T8);
  • evaluation of treatment effects during intermediate assessment (T2);
  • comparison of treatment response between patients with and without evidence of small fiber pathology on skin biopsy;
  • evaluation of the effects of tVNS on non-invasive indices of autonomic nervous system function, including heart rate variability (HRV) and sudomotor function assessed by dynamic sweat test (DST);
  • evaluation of changes in serum biomarkers potentially associated with autonomic dysfunction and neuroinflammation following tVNS treatment, including neuropeptide Y (NPY), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and neurofilament light chain (NFL);
  • identification of clinical and biological predictors of response to tVNS. Clinical assessments will be performed at baseline, during treatment, at the end of treatment, and during follow-up evaluations. Participants will complete validated questionnaires assessing fibromyalgia severity, autonomic symptoms, fatigue, sleep quality, and symptom burden. Cardiovascular autonomic function will be assessed through ECG-derived HRV analysis, including spectral analysis of R-R interval variability. Skin biopsy will be performed at baseline to evaluate intraepidermal nerve fiber density and morphological evidence of small fiber pathology. Blood samples collected at baseline and at the end of treatment will be used for serum biomarker analysis.

Statistical analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. The primary endpoint will be analyzed using mixed-effects models for repeated measures with adjustment for baseline values. Exploratory analyses will evaluate treatment effects on autonomic function parameters and biomarker levels, as well as predictors of clinical response. Additional subgroup analyses will compare treatment response in patients with and without evidence of small fiber pathology.

The study is expected to provide clinically relevant evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in fibromyalgia syndrome and to improve understanding of the relationship between autonomic dysfunction, peripheral nervous system involvement, and nociplastic pain mechanisms in this condition. Furthermore, the identification of predictors of response to vagal neuromodulation may contribute to the development of more personalized therapeutic strategies for patients with fibromyalgia.

03

Conditions studied

  • Fibromyalgia Syndrome

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome according to the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria;
  • Stable pharmacological treatment for at least 1 month before enrollment;
  • Ability to understand and complete study procedures and questionnaires;
  • Ability to provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of an active implantable medical device or any implanted metallic or electronic device near the ear or heart;
  • History of severe coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction;
  • Heart failure classified as (NYHA) class II-IV;
  • Cardiac arrhythmias or severe bradycardia;
  • Carotid artery atherosclerosis;
  • Chronic kidney disease stage II or higher;
  • Concomitant immune-mediated rheumatic disease;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Active or previous malignancy not in remission;
  • Ongoing infection;
  • Changes in pharmacological treatment within 1 month before enrollment;
  • Concomitant central or peripheral nervous system disorders, except isolated small-fiber pathology on skin ;
  • Cognitive impairment detected during neurological examination;
  • Severe psychiatric comorbidities requiring specific treatment;
  • Pain caused by other medical conditions that cannot be distinguished from fibromyalgia-related pain;
  • Current or previous alcohol or substance abuse;
  • Inadequate understanding of the Italian language.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive active transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) using the Nurosym™ device applied at the tragus of the external ear. Stimulation sessions will last 30 minutes and will be administered once daily for four consecutive weeks. Stimulation intensity will be individually adjusted by participants until a mild tingling sensation is perceived at the stimulation site. The device delivers an active therapeutic vagal stimulation pattern intended to modulate autonomic nervous system activity and pain processing pathways.

    Device: Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive sham transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation using the Nurosym™ device applied at the tragus of the external ear. Sham stimulation sessions will last 30 minutes and will be administered once daily for four consecutive weeks. Participants will follow the same procedures used for active stimulation, including adjustment of stimulation intensity until a mild tingling sensation is perceived. However, after the session is initiated, the device will automatically reduce stimulation output to zero within a few seconds, without delivering an active therapeutic vagal stimulation pattern.

    Device: Sham Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation

    Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) will be delivered using the Nurosym™ device applied at the tragus of the external ear. Participants will undergo one 30-minute stimulation session daily for four consecutive weeks. Stimulation intensity will be individually adjusted until a mild tingling sensation is perceived at the stimulation site. The intervention is designed to activate the auricular branch of the vagus nerve and modulate autonomic nervous system activity and pain-processing pathways.

  • DeviceSham Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation

    Sham transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation will be delivered using the Nurosym™ device applied at the tragus of the external ear. Participants will undergo one 30-minute session daily for four consecutive weeks and will follow the same procedures used for active stimulation, including adjustment of stimulation intensity until a mild tingling sensation is perceived. However, after initiation of the session, the device will automatically reduce stimulation output to zero within a few seconds and will not deliver an active therapeutic vagal stimulation pattern.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (rFIQ) Score at Week 4

    The primary outcome measure will be the difference between active transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation and sham stimulation in the change from baseline to Week 4 in the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (rFIQ) score. The rFIQ is a validated questionnaire assessing the overall impact of fibromyalgia on daily functioning and symptom severity, with higher scores indicating greater disease burden. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment at Week 4

Other outcomes

  1. Change in COMPASS-31 questionnaire at Week 4

    Change from baseline to Week 4 in autonomic symptom burden measured using the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31). The questionnaire will be administered electronically through a REDCap-based application. Higher scores indicate greater autonomic symptom severity.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment at Week 4

  2. Change in Sudomotor Function at Week 4

    Changes in sudomotor function will be assessed using dynamic sweat testing (DST) performed at baseline and Week 4. DST will be used as a non-invasive measure of autonomic small-fiber function by evaluating sweat production and sudomotor responses.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment at Week 4

  3. Change in Serum Biomarker Levels at Week 4

    Changes in serum biomarkers potentially associated with autonomic dysfunction and neuroinflammation will be assessed between baseline and Week 4. Serum levels of neuropeptide Y (NPY), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and neurofilament light chain (NFL) will be measured using commercially available ELISA assays.

    Time frame: From baseline to the end of Week 4

  4. Change in Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) Score at Week 2

    Change from baseline to Week 2 in fibromyalgia-related health status measured using the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR). Higher scores indicate greater disease impact and functional impairment. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 2

  5. Change in Widespread Pain Index (WPI) Score at Week 4

    Change from baseline to Week 4 in pain distribution measured using the Widespread Pain Index (WPI). Higher scores indicate a greater number of painful body regions. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment at Week 4

  6. Change in Symptom Severity Score (SSS) at Week 4

    Change from baseline to Week 4 in symptom severity measured using the Symptom Severity Score (SSS). Higher scores indicate greater severity of fibromyalgia-related symptoms. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment at Week 4

  7. Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score at Week 4

    Change from baseline to Week 4 in sleep quality measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment at Week 4

  8. Change in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score at Week 4

    Change from baseline to Week 4 in fatigue severity measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment at Week 4

  9. Change in COMPASS-31 Score at Week 2

    Change from baseline to Week 2 in autonomic symptom burden measured using the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31). Higher scores indicate greater autonomic symptom severity. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 2

  10. Change in Widespread Pain Index (WPI) Score at Week 2

    Change from baseline to Week 2 in pain distribution measured using the Widespread Pain Index (WPI). Higher scores indicate a greater number of painful body regions. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 2

  11. Change in Symptom Severity Score (SSS) at Week 2

    Change from baseline to Week 2 in the Symptom Severity Score (SSS), a measure of the severity of core fibromyalgia symptoms, including fatigue, unrefreshing sleep, cognitive symptoms, and other somatic symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 2

  12. Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score at Week 2

    Change from baseline to Week 2 in sleep quality measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 2

  13. Change in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score at Week 2

    Change from baseline to Week 2 in fatigue severity measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 2

  14. Change in Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) Score at Week 8

    Change from baseline to Week 8 in fibromyalgia-related health status measured using the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR). Higher scores indicate greater disease impact and functional impairment. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

  15. Change in COMPASS-31 Score at Week 8

    Change from baseline to Week 8 in autonomic symptom burden measured using the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31). Higher scores indicate greater autonomic symptom severity. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

  16. Change in Widespread Pain Index (WPI) Score at Week 8

    Change from baseline to Week 8 in pain distribution measured using the Widespread Pain Index (WPI). Higher scores indicate a greater number of painful body regions. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

  17. Change in Symptom Severity Score (SSS) at Week 8

    Change from baseline to Week 8 in the Symptom Severity Score (SSS), a measure of the severity of core fibromyalgia symptoms, including fatigue, unrefreshing sleep, cognitive symptoms, and other somatic symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

  18. Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score at Week 8

    Change from baseline to Week 8 in sleep quality measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

  19. Change in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score at Week 8

    Change from baseline to Week 8 in fatigue severity measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity. Questionnaire data will be collected electronically using a REDCap-based application.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

  20. Change in Total Heart Rate Variability Power at Week 4

    Change from baseline to Week 4 in total heart rate variability power derived from electrocardiogram R-R interval recordings. Total power reflects overall heart rate variability across the analyzed frequency spectrum and is expressed in milliseconds squared (ms²).

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 4

  21. Change in Low-Frequency Heart Rate Variability Power at Week 4

    Change from baseline to Week 4 in low-frequency heart rate variability power derived from electrocardiogram R-R interval recordings. Low-frequency power is expressed in milliseconds squared (ms²).

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 4

  22. Change in Low-Frequency Heart Rate Variability in Normalized Units at Week 4

    Change from baseline to Week 4 in low-frequency heart rate variability expressed in normalized units (LFnu), derived from electrocardiogram R-R interval recordings. Higher values indicate a greater relative contribution of low-frequency oscillations to heart rate variability.

    Time frame: From baseline to week 4

  23. Change in LF/HF Ratio at Week 4

    Change from baseline to Week 4 in the ratio between low-frequency and high-frequency heart rate variability components (LF/HF ratio), derived from electrocardiogram R-R interval recordings. The LF/HF ratio is a dimensionless measure of sympathovagal balance.

    Time frame: From baseline to week 4

  24. Change in Total Heart Rate Variability Power at Week 8

    Change from baseline to Week 8 in total heart rate variability power derived from electrocardiogram R-R interval recordings. Total power reflects overall heart rate variability across the analyzed frequency spectrum and is expressed in milliseconds squared (ms²).

    Time frame: From baseline to week 8

  25. Change in Low-Frequency Heart Rate Variability Power at Week 8

    Change from baseline to Week 8 in low-frequency heart rate variability power derived from electrocardiogram R-R interval recordings. Low-frequency power is expressed in milliseconds squared (ms²).

    Time frame: From baseline to week 8

  26. Change in Low-Frequency Heart Rate Variability in Normalized Units at Week 8

    Change from baseline to Week 8 in low-frequency heart rate variability expressed in normalized units (LFnu), derived from electrocardiogram R-R interval recordings. Higher values indicate a greater relative contribution of low-frequency oscillations to heart rate variability.

    Time frame: From baseline to week 8

  27. Change in LF/HF Ratio at Week 8

    Change from baseline to Week 8 in the ratio between low-frequency and high-frequency heart rate variability components (LF/HF ratio), derived from electrocardiogram R-R interval recordings. The LF/HF ratio is a dimensionless measure of sympathovagal balance.

    Time frame: from baseline to week 8

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Human Neuroscience
    Rome, Lazio 00185, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Pietro Falco, MD, PhD · Contactpietro.falco@uniroma1.it · +393462159105
    • Andrea Truini, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Pietro Falco, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Eleonora Galosi, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Caterina Maria Leone, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Giuseppe Di PIetro, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Giulia Di Stefano, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Manuela Di Franco, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Cristina Iannuccelli, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Giulio Dolcini, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Martina Favretti, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front Public Health. 2017 Sep 28;5:258. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29034226 ↗
  • Lange G, Janal MN, Maniker A, Fitzgibbons J, Fobler M, Cook D, Natelson BH. Safety and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in fibromyalgia: a phase I/II proof of concept trial. Pain Med. 2011 Sep;12(9):1406-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01203.x. Epub 2011 Aug 3. PubMed 21812908 ↗
  • Beekwilder JP, Beems T. Overview of the clinical applications of vagus nerve stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr;27(2):130-8. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3181d64d8a. PubMed 20505378 ↗
  • Zamuner AR, Barbic F, Dipaola F, Bulgheroni M, Diana A, Atzeni F, Marchi A, Sarzi-Puttini P, Porta A, Furlan R. Relationship between sympathetic activity and pain intensity in fibromyalgia. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Jan-Feb;33(1 Suppl 88):S53-7. Epub 2015 Mar 18. PubMed 25786044 ↗
  • Lommano MG, Farah S, Bianchi B, Risa AM, Sarzi-Puttini P, Salaffi F, Di Carlo M. Non-invasive auricular vagus nerve stimulation in fibromyalgia: Impacts on autonomic function, central sensitization and pain catastrophizing. Joint Bone Spine. 2026 Jan;93(1):105966. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2025.105966. Epub 2025 Sep 9. PubMed 40935122 ↗
  • Sarzi-Puttini P, Atzeni F, Diana A, Doria A, Furlan R. Increased neural sympathetic activation in fibromyalgia syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Jun;1069:109-17. doi: 10.1196/annals.1351.009. PubMed 16855138 ↗
  • Ruggieri M, Paparella G, Clemente L, Libro G, Gargano CD, de Tommaso M. Plasma neurofilament light chain in fibromyalgia: A case control study exploring correlation with clinical and cognitive features. Eur J Pain. 2025 Mar;29(3):e4752. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4752. Epub 2024 Nov 4. PubMed 39494473 ↗
  • Falco P, Galosi E, Di Stefano G, Leone C, Di Pietro G, Tramontana L, De Stefano G, Litewczuk D, Esposito N, Truini A. Autonomic Small-Fiber Pathology in Patients With Fibromyalgia. J Pain. 2024 Jan;25(1):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.020. Epub 2023 Jul 29. PubMed 37524221 ↗
  • Sommer C, Uceyler N. Small fiber pathology in fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain Rep. 2024 Dec 24;10(1):e1220. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001220. eCollection 2025 Feb. PubMed 39726855 ↗
  • Meeus M, Goubert D, De Backer F, Struyf F, Hermans L, Coppieters I, De Wandele I, Da Silva H, Calders P. Heart rate variability in patients with fibromyalgia and patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Oct;43(2):279-87. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Jul 6. PubMed 23838093 ↗
  • Dolcini G, Favretti M, Franculli D, Buoncuore G, Pellegrino G, Di Carlo M, Sarzi-Puttini P, Conti F, Iannuccelli C, Di Franco M. Vagal nerve stimulation and fibromyalgia: an additional therapeutic option. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2025 Jun;43(6):1095-1104. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/johqvo. Epub 2025 Jun 27. PubMed 40576705 ↗
  • Falco P, Galosi E, Litewczuk D, Evangelisti E, Di Stefano G, Arendt-Nielsen L, Truini A, Leone CM. Autonomic small fiber involvement in painful long COVID: a histological and clinical study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2026 Jan 14;19:1719705. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1719705. eCollection 2025. PubMed 41613157 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this study will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding investigator, following publication, for purposes of scientific research and after approval of a methodologically sound proposal.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: Beginning 6 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

Access criteria: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to the corresponding investigator. Data will be shared after approval of the proposal and execution of a data access agreement, in accordance with institutional and ethical regulations.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 11 months after the start.

Of 438 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Fibromyalgia, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 31. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 451 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 30.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 12, 2026
First posted
Jul 2, 2026
StartActual
Jun 8, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 25, 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 30, 2027
Last update
Jul 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07682090
Collaborators
Azienda Policlinico Umberto I
Responsible party
Andrea Truini (Full Professor of Neurology, University of Roma La Sapienza) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 2, 2026
Start date
Jun 8, 2026
Primary completion
May 25, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 2, 2026

Study contacts

Pietro Falco, MD, PhD
Contact
pietro.falco@uniroma1.it
+393462159105
Andrea Truini, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Roma La Sapienza

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion