ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07647302Updated Jun 18, 2026

Acute Effects of Active and Passive Breaks in Office Workers

An interventional study of Active Break Exercises in Office Workers, sponsored by Istanbul Aydın University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 20 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-18.

Sponsored by Istanbul Aydın University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the acute effects of active and passive break applications during work hours on cervical and shoulder range of motion (ROM), neck functionality, pain intensity, and fatigue levels among office workers. Participants are randomly assigned to either an Active Break Group, performing structured exercises, or a Control Group with passive rest over a 5-day protocol.

Read the detailed description

Prolonged sitting and sustained static postures during computer use are significant occupational health hazards for office workers, frequently leading to cumulative mechanical loading, localized muscle fatigue, and functional impairments in the neck and shoulder regions. Continuous isometric muscle activity during desk work increases intramuscular pressure and reduces local circulation, which consequently decreases joint range of motion, restricts neck functionality, and elevates subjective fatigue levels. While traditional passive rest breaks (sitting quietly) are commonly utilized, they often fall short of mitigating these sedentary stress factors. In contrast, structured active rest breaks involving dynamic movement and stretching can trigger a "muscle pump" mechanism, enhance tissue oxygenation, lower viscoelastic stiffness, and systematically reduce fatigue and pain perceptions.

Although long-term exercise interventions are well-documented, clinical trials directly comparing the acute, immediate impacts of structured active breaks versus passive rest strategies on multi-dimensional outcomes remain limited. To address this methodological gap, this randomized controlled trial evaluates and compares the acute effects of active and passive break applications among office workers who work at a desk for at least 5 hours a day. Participants are randomly allocated into two parallel arms: the Active Break Group and the Control (Passive Break) Group. The intervention protocol spans a total of 5 working days, with both groups taking a 5-minute designated break every hour. The Active Break Group performs structured stretching and mobility exercises targeted at the cervical and shoulder regions under physiotherapist supervision, while the Control Group rests quietly at their workstations. Objective and subjective assessments are conducted at baseline and immediately following the 5-day protocol using cervical and shoulder range of motion (ROM) measurements via a goniometer, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain intensity, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) for neck functionality, and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-T) questionnaire to determine acute fatigue levels.

02

Conditions studied

  • Office Workers

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Rest
  • Fatigue
  • Range of motion, Articular
  • Occupational Health
  • Stretching
03

In context

Fatigue

2,229 studies on the registry are indexed under Fatigue; 426 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 54 across 1,757 interventional studies indexed under Fatigue.

Browse Fatigue studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul Aydın University is the lead sponsor of 70 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being between 20 and 55 years of age
  • Working at a desk while seated for at least 5 hours a day
  • Not participating in high-intensity physical activity regularly
  • Volunteering to participate in the study and providing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of recent trauma or surgery directed at the cervical or thoracic regions
  • Current state of pregnancy
  • Diagnosis of diabetes or similar chronic systemic diseases
  • Presence of any cognitive or physical limitation that could affect exercise performance or assessments
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Break Group

    The active break intervention is performed for 5 minutes every hour during the workday for a total of 5 working days. Under the supervision of a physiotherapist, participants perform structured active rest breaks consisting of stretching and mobility exercises targeted at the cervical and shoulder regions. The protocol includes: cervical flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation stretches; upper trapezius stretching, pectoral stretching, posterior capsule stretching; shoulder shrugs, shoulder rolls, and scapular retraction exercises. Each exercise is performed either as a 15-second stretch or completed for 10 repetitions per session, always maintained within a safe and pain-free range of motion.

    Behavioral: Active Break Exercises

  • No intervention
    Passive Break Group

    The passive break group takes a 5-minute passive rest break every hour during the workday for a total of 5 working days. During these designated break periods, participants remain seated quietly and rest at their workstations. They do not perform any physical exercises, stretching routines, or structured active movements, maintaining their usual sedentary work routine during the breaks.

Interventions

  • BehavioralActive Break Exercises

    The active break intervention is performed for 5 minutes every hour during the workday for a total of 5 working days. Under the supervision of a physiotherapist, participants perform structured active rest breaks consisting of stretching and mobility exercises targeted at the cervical and shoulder regions. The protocol includes: cervical flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation stretches; upper trapezius stretching, pectoral stretching, posterior capsule stretching; shoulder shrugs, shoulder rolls, and scapular retraction exercises. Each exercise is performed either as a 15-second stretch or completed for 10 repetitions per session, always maintained within a safe and pain-free range of motion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cervical Range of Motion

    Cervical range of motion including flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation will be measured in degrees using a goniometer to assess active neck mobility. Higher values in degrees indicate better cervical joint mobility.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (at the end of 5 working days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Shoulder Range of Motion

    Active shoulder range of motion (including flexion and abduction) will be measured in degrees using a goniometer to assess shoulder mobility. Higher values in degrees indicate better shoulder joint mobility.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (at the end of 5 working days)

  2. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    A 10-cm scale used to measure the subjective intensity of neck pain, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (at the end of 5 working days)

  3. Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    A self-reported questionnaire with 10 items used to measure how neck pain affects functionality and daily life activities. Total scores range from 0 to 50, where higher scores indicate greater neck disability.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (at the end of 5 working days)

  4. Checklist Individual Strength - Turkish Version (CIS-T)

    A 20-item self-report questionnaire used to assess different aspects of fatigue, including subjective fatigue, concentration, motivation, and physical activity levels. Total scores range from 20 to 140, where higher scores indicate greater fatigue levels.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (at the end of 5 working days)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hafez Taplux Group
    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07647302
Lead sponsor
Istanbul Aydın University
Responsible party
Seyedeh Simin Ashraftalesh (MSc student, physiotherapist, Istanbul Aydın University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 15, 2026
Start date
Jun 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 22, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 18, 2026

Study contacts

Seyedeh simin Ashraftalesh, BSc,PT
Contact
siminashraf1377@gmail.com
+90 5387782429
Gözde Başbuğ, PhD,PT
Contact
gozdebasbug@aydin.edu.tr
Gözde Başbuğ, PhD,PT
principal investigator · Istanbul Aydın University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion