ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06907420GammaSZUpdated Apr 2, 2025

40 Hz Visual Stimulation as an Intervention in Schizophrenia

An interventional study of Visual stimulation in Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia, Schizophrenia Disorders and Schizoaffective Disorder, sponsored by Technical University of Munich. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-02.

Sponsored by Technical University of Munich · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In schizophrenia, an abnormal reduction in neuronal gamma oscillations (30-100 Hz) is associated with negative symptoms such as cognitive dysfunction. The literature suggests that rescuing gamma oscillations through non-invasive brain stimulation may be an accessible and safe add-on strategy to mitigate negative symptoms. Here, a stimulation protocol based on gamma visual stimulation will be tested. This pilot study will follow an uncontrolled clinical trial design: A minimum of ten patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or a schizoaffective disorder and predominant negative symptoms will be recruited at Klinikum rechts der Isar. They will undergo a multisession stimulation protocol, consisting of one hour of 40 Hz visual stimulation per day over five consecutive days, during which they will be encouraged to fall asleep. An equal number of patients will be recruited for a treatment-as-usual group without intervention. Pre- and post-assessments will include EEG, a cognitive test battery (THINC-IT), a mood scale (PANAS), and a schizophrenia symptom scale (PANSS). This study's results will inform on the feasibility of gamma visual stimulation as a potential add-on intervention in schizophrenia.

Read the detailed description

SAMPLE Inward patients at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany diagnosed with schizophrenia (F20) or a schizoaffective disorder (F25) will be recruited. Treating physicians will screen and pre-select patients who are primarily affected by negative symptoms and on stable medication and/or psychotherapy (treatment as usual) throughout the study period. The target sample size for this pilot is at least N = 10 patients who undergo the experimental study protocol, and an equal number of patients who only complete the scales as a treatment-as-usual control group.

PROTOCOL - EXPERIMENTAL GROUP The protocol for the experimental group will be as follows. After written informed consent was obtained by their treating physician, patients will undergo session 0 for pre-tests five to one day(s) before the first stimulation session. For a fair comparison with the post-tests in the last session, patients will be asked not to drink coffee in the three hours beforehand, to rest at the lab for one hour, and then to complete the mood and cognition scales (PANAS and THINC-IT). The psychiatric symptom assessment (PANSS) will be carried out by their treating physician before the first stimulation in session 1.

The stimulation protocol will take place the week after, from Monday to Friday, at approximately the same time of day as session 0. Patients should again avoid consuming coffee three hours before each session start, to facilitate sleep. In session 1 (Monday), the EEG will first be set up. The session will start with a five-minute resting-state EEG recording; then, patients will lay down and undergo the visual stimulation protocol with their eyes closed for one hour. They will be encouraged to relax and fall asleep during this time. Afterward, we will inquire about adverse events and the EEG will be removed. In sessions 2 to 4 (Tuesday to Thursday), no EEG will be recorded. Patients will undergo one hour of visual stimulation and subsequently be asked about adverse events in the same way as in session 1. In the last session 5, the protocol will be the same as in session 1, including EEG, five minutes of resting-state recording, and one hour of visual stimulation. Afterward, as in session 0, patients will also complete the mood and cognition scales (PANAS and THINC-IT). The psychiatric symptom assessment (PANSS) will be carried out by their treating physician zero to three days after the last stimulation session.

PROTOCOL - CONTROL GROUP As for the control group, after written informed consent was obtained by their treating physician, patients will undergo session 0 analogously to the experimental group for the pre-tests. This procedure will be repeated 7-10 days later for the post-tests.

VISUAL STIMULATION Visual stimulation parameters will be analogous to a previous study (Hainke et al., 2025). A customized sleep mask with inbuilt LEDs externally linked to a microcontroller will be used to deliver visual stimuli. Its high-wavelength LEDs with a narrow spectral peak at 605 nm and an illuminance of 80 lux will flicker at 40 Hz in a square wave pattern at a 50 % duty cycle. Light will be faded in at the beginning and out at the end for 10 seconds, respectively. Patients will be asked to keep their eyes closed and encouraged to fall asleep for the full stimulation duration of 60 minutes.

After every stimulation session, the experimenter will verbally inquire about adverse events, by asking the patient: "Have you experienced any undesired effects during or after the stimulation?". If the patient answers yes, they will be asked to describe the adverse event and then rate its severity as mild, moderate or severe and whether it was unlikely, likely or certainly related to the stimulation.

For the resting-state measurement, the LEDs will be flickering at 40 Hz as during the stimulation, but they will be covered with black tape ("blackout"). This controls for the possibility of electrical interference from the mask on EEG data (Hainke et al., 2025). Here, patients will remain awake.

EEG SETUP EEG will be measured in the experimental group at sessions 1 and 5 using the Neurofax system at the clinic's sleep laboratory, supported by Polaris.One software (Nihon Kohden Europe GmbH, Rosbach v.d.H., Germany). The sampling rate will be 1000 Hz. Gold cup electrodes will be positioned at A1, A2 (mastoids reference), FpZ (ground), left EOG, left EMG, C3, C4, O1, Oz, O2, PO3, POz, and PO4. Sleep scoring will be performed automatedly and offline using the Python library YASA based on the C4, EOG, and EMG electrodes, and participants' sex and age (Vallat \& Walker, 2021).

EEG PROCESSING

Data will be pre-processed using MNE Python as in Hainke et al. (2025):

Band-pass filtering (0.16-300 Hz) Bad channel rejection by visual inspection Electrode averaging by Region of Interest: central (C3, C4) and occipital (O1, Oz, O2, PO3, POz, PO4) Re-referencing to the mastoid average (A1, A2) Dividing data into 30-second epochs Bad epoch rejection (\<50% sleep scoring algorithm certainty or stimulation duration \<25 seconds) For frequency domain analyses, epochs with a peak to peak amplitude > 1 mV will be rejected. All 30-s epochs will be subjected to a Fast-Fourier Transform using a Hamming window to obtain the Power Spectral Density per epoch. For time domain analyses, data will be further divided into 25 ms segments length of one cycle of a 40 Hz oscillation); segments with a peak-to-peak amplitude >100 μV will be rejected. 30-s epochs and 25-ms segments will be averaged by region of interest (central / occipital), condition (blackout / stimulation), session (1 / 5), and state (awake / light sleep / deep sleep). Light sleep is defined as NREM1 and NREM2; deep sleep is defined as NREM3.

EEG OUTCOMES The two resulting EEG outcomes describe the Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials (SSVEPs), i.e., the magnitude of the neuronal response to 40 Hz visual stimulation, from complementary perspectives. EEG signals can be interpreted in the time domain or the frequency domain; analysing both allows for maximal information gain about underlying neuronal processes (Hainke et al., 2025). In the time domain, SSVEP magnitude is quantified as the peak-to-peak amplitude of the 25-ms segment average in microvolts. In the frequency domain, SSVEP magnitude is quantified as the signal-to-noise ratio of power at 40 Hz, i.e., the power spectral density value at 40 Hz in dB divided by the surrounding values [38 to 39.5 Hz] + [40.5 to 42 Hz] in dB.

COGNITIVE \& PSYCHIATRIC OUTCOMES The following scales will be completed by both the experimental and control group patients, in the respective first and last session. Cognition will be assessed with the THINC-integrated tool test battery (THINC-IT; Harrison et al., 2018), presented on a Windows laptop. It has previously been used to assess cognition in schizophrenia (Szmyd et al., 2023) and has five components: Spotter (Choice Reaction Time), Symbol Check (1-back test), Trails (Trails Making Test B), Codebreaker (Digit Symbol Substitution Test), and a self-reported cognitive function questionnaire (5-item Perceived Deficit Questionnaire). Mood will be measured with the Positive And Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988). The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS; Kay et al., 1987) will be administered by a trained physician to quantify schizophrenia-related psychiatric symptoms.

An interim analysis will be conducted when a sample of 10 patients in the experimental group has been reached.

02

Conditions studied

  • Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia
  • Schizophrenia Disorders
  • Schizoaffective Disorder

Keywords

  • gamma
  • 40 Hz
  • schizophrenia
  • visual stimulation
  • EEG
  • neuromodulation
  • flicker
  • sleep
  • negative symptoms
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,539 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 473 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 70 across 2,924 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Technical University of Munich is the lead sponsor of 319 studies on the registry; 57 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Medical diagnosis of schizophrenia (F20) or schizoaffective disorder (F25)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18 years
  • Any history of seizures
  • Acute suicidality assessed with the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS; Brent et al., 2008)
  • Any other relevant axis 1 disorder
  • Red-green colour blindness or current ocular disease
  • Alcohol, cannabis, or illicit drug addiction within the last 3 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Visual stimulation

    1 hour of 40 Hz visual stimulation per day over 5 days in addition to treatment as usual

    Device: Visual stimulation

  • No intervention
    TAU control

    Treatment as usual only

Interventions

  • DeviceVisual stimulation

    40 Hz visual stimulation will be delivered at the same time of day over 5 consecutive days. Participants will lay down while wearing the customized sleep mask with inbuilt red LEDs flickering at 40 Hz linked to a microcontroller. Participants will be asked to keep their eyes closed and encouraged to fall asleep for the full stimulation duration of 60 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visually evoked neuronal 40 Hz activity represented in the frequency domain

    Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials (SSVEP) at 40 Hz as an electrophysiological measure of neuronal responses to 40 Hz visual stimulation, represented in the frequency domain. A higher signal-to-noise ratio value at 40 Hz (unit-free), ranging from zero to infinite, represents a larger neuronal response.

    Time frame: Sessions 1 and 5 (first and last of the five stimulation days)

  2. Visually evoked neuronal 40 Hz activity represented in the time domain

    Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials (SSVEP) at 40 Hz as an electrophysiological measure of neuronal responses to 40 Hz visual stimulation, represented in the time domain. A larger peak-to-peak amplitude of the segment average in microvolts, ranging from zero to infinite, represents a larger neuronal response.

    Time frame: Sessions 1 and 5 (first and last of the five stimulation days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety as indicated by the total number and severity of adverse events

    Verbally inquired reports of adverse events (question: "Have you experienced any undesired effects during or after the stimulation?"). Severity rated as mild/moderate/severe; how likely it was related to the stimulation rated as unlikely/likely/certain. The intervention will be judged as "safe" if no adverse events are reported as severe and likely or certain to be related to the intervention.

    Time frame: Sessions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (from the first throughout the last of the five stimulation days)

  2. Positive and negative mood assessed by the PANAS scale

    Mood will be measured with the Positive And Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988). The negative and positive affect scores, each ranging from 10 to 50, will be subjected to statistical analyses separately. Mood improvements are quantified as a score increase in the positive scale from session 0 to session 5 and a score decrease in the negative scale from session 0 to session 5.

    Time frame: Session 0 (five to one day(s) before the first stimulation) and session 5 (immediately after the last stimulation)

  3. Schizophrenia negative symptoms measured with the PANSS negative scale

    The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS; Kay et al., 1987) will be administered by a trained physician to quantify schizophrenia-related psychiatric symptoms. The negative syndrome score, ranging from 7 to 49, will be used for statistical analyses. Improvement is quantified as a score decrease from before the stimulation to after the stimulation.

    Time frame: Five to one day(s) before the first stimulation and zero to three day(s) after the last stimulation

  4. Cognitive improvement assessed with the THINC-IT test battery

    Cognition will be assessed using the THINC-integrated tool (THINC-IT; Harrison et al., 2018). It has five components: Spotter (Choice Reaction Time), Symbol Check (1-back test), Trails (Trails Making Test B), Codebreaker (Digit Symbol Substitution Test), and a self-reported cognitive function questionnaire (5-item Perceived Deficit Questionnaire). For the self-reported questionnaire, higher total scores (range 5-25) mean a better outcome. For the other four subtests, lower reaction times (in milliseconds, range 0 to infinite), lower error rates (range 0 to total number of items per task), and fewer missing responses (range 0 to total number of items per task) mean a better outcome. Cognitive performance will be reported descriptively as the participant-level profile across subtests, measures, and sessions.

    Time frame: Session 0 (five to one day(s) before the first stimulation) and session 5 (immediately after the last stimulation)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
    Munich, Bavaria 81675, Germany
    • Ulrike Vogelmann, MD · Contact · ulrike.vogelmann@mri.tum.de · +4917661535471
    • Ulrike Vogelmann, MD · Principal investigator
    • Laura Hainke · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Vallat R, Walker MP. An open-source, high-performance tool for automated sleep staging. Elife. 2021 Oct 14;10:e70092. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70092. PubMed 34648426 ↗
  • Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261-76. doi: 10.1093/schbul/13.2.261. PubMed 3616518 ↗
  • Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. PubMed 3397865 ↗
  • Szmyd JK, Lewczuk K, Teopiz KM, McIntyre RS, Wichniak A. THINC-Integrated Tool (THINC-it): A Brief Measurement of Changes in Cognitive Functioning and Its Correlation with the Life Quality of Patients with Schizophrenia and Related Disorders-A Pilot Study. Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 24;13(3):389. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030389. PubMed 36979199 ↗
  • Harrison JE, Barry H, Baune BT, Best MW, Bowie CR, Cha DS, Culpepper L, Fossati P, Greer TL, Harmer C, Klag E, Lam RW, Lee Y, Mansur RB, Wittchen HU, McIntyre RS. Stability, reliability, and validity of the THINC-it screening tool for cognitive impairment in depression: A psychometric exploration in healthy volunteers. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Sep;27(3):e1736. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1736. Epub 2018 Aug 7. PubMed 30088298 ↗
  • Hainke L, Dowsett J, Spitschan M, Priller J. 40 Hz visual stimulation during sleep evokes neuronal gamma activity in NREM and REM stages. Sleep. 2025 Mar 11;48(3):zsae299. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsae299. PubMed 39700417 ↗
  • Brent, D., Lucas, C., Gould, M., Stanley, B., Brown, G., Fisher, P., Zelazny, J., Burke, A., & others. (2008). Columbia-suicide severity rating scale (C-SSRS)

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymised IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared, including EEG, THINC-IT, PANAS, PANSS, and adverse events reports data.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Analytic code

Time frame: IPD and supporting information will be made available immediately after the publication of study results, for an unrestricted duration.

Access criteria: The de-identified individual patient data, i.e., all IPD that underlie results in a publication, will be made accessible after its publication for non-commercial academic projects that have a legitimate research topic and a clearly stated hypothesis. In the event that the application is accepted, researchers will be asked to get the study approved by their institution's ethics board. The study principal investigator will subsequently provide the de-identified data sets via a safe data transfer system.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2025, 3 months after the start.

Of 755 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Schizophrenia, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 56. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 768 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 55.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 14, 2025
First posted
Apr 2, 2025
StartActual
Mar 14, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2025
CompletionEst.
Jul 2025
Last update
Apr 2, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06907420
Responsible party
Ulrike Vogelmann (Senior physician, Technical University of Munich) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 2, 2025
Start date
Mar 14, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 2, 2025

Study contacts

Ulrike Vogelmann, MD
Contact
ulrike.vogelmann@mri.tum.de
+4917661535471
Ulrike Vogelmann, MD
principal investigator · TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion