ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07643896ADVANCEUpdated Oct 15, 2026

The ADVANCE (Assay Development and Validation for Pre-Natal and Obstetric Conditions) Study is the Largest U.S.-Based Prospective Study Demonstrating a Circulating Fetal Cell (CFC) Based Approach to Non-invasive Fetal Risk Assessment

An observational study in Pregnant Individuals, Aneuploidy and Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21), sponsored by BillionToOne Inc.. Recruiting at 9 sites in United States. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-15.

Sponsored by BillionToOne Inc. · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Updated Oct 15, 20263 sites addedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of the ADVANCE (Assay Development and Validation for Pre-Natal and Obstetric Conditions) study is to compare the concordance of results of a novel non-invasive circulating fetal cell (CFC) assay to the results of prenatal invasive diagnostic testing or postnatal genetic and clinical diagnosis of the resulting neonate. This is a prospective study of pregnant individuals.

Read the detailed description

BillionToOne Inc. is conducting a large prospective study to evaluate the performance of a non-invasive circulating fetal cell (CFC) assay. Circulating fetal cells, rare, intact trophoblast cells of placental origin present in maternal blood, offer a unique opportunity to directly analyze fetal genetic material without the need for invasive procedures. These cells are most abundant during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Building on this biology, the investigators developed a circulating fetal cell assay (UNITY Confirm) that isolates fetal-derived placenta cells from maternal blood and performs single-cell genomic analysis to assess chromosomal copy number. By combining cell-type-specific markers and genotyping to distinguish fetal from maternal cells, this approach enables direct evaluation of fetal chromosomal status, unlike cfDNA methods that rely on analysis of mixed DNA fragments.

This prospective study enrolls pregnant individuals between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation with singleton pregnancies and aims to include over 1,000 participants. CFC testing results are compared to prenatal or postnatal diagnostic outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnant Individuals
  • Aneuploidy
  • Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21)
  • 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
  • Trisomy 13
  • Trisomy 18
  • Sex Chromosome Abnormalities

Keywords

  • pregnant
  • aneuploidy
  • NIPT
  • NIPS
  • circulating fetal cell
03

In context

Aneuploidy

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Aneuploidy; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 325 across 38 observational studies indexed under Aneuploidy.

Browse Aneuploidy studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with BillionToOne Inc. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

pregnant individuals between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation with singleton pregnancies

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • pregnant individuals between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation
  • singleton gestation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- active cancer

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • High Risk

    Pregnant individuals between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation with singleton pregnancies and who have a clinical indication for CFC testing, such as high-risk cfDNA results for common aneuploidies, copy number variants including 22q11.2, or sex chromosome aneuploidies

  • General Risk

    Pregnant individuals between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation with singleton pregnancies (excluding gestational surrogates) who do not have a clinical indication for CFC and are undergoing prenatal diagnostic testing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Concordance

    CFC results will be compared with prenatal diagnostic testing results, CVS, amniocentesis, products of conception, when available, and postnatal diagnostic testing.

    Time frame: From enrollment and up to 12 months following enrollment

  2. Concordance with the accepted method of diagnosis

    CFC results will be compared with prenatal diagnostic testing results, CVS, amniocentesis, products of conception, when available, and postnatal diagnostic testing. Results are considered concordant when CFC findings are consistent with the known or fetal or neonatal diagnosis.

    Time frame: From enrollment and up to 12 months following enrollment

07

Study locations

9 of 9 sites recruiting
  • Valley Perinatal Services
    Phoenix, Arizona 85004, United States
    Recruiting
  • Brar Practice
    Riverside, California 92506, United States
    Recruiting
  • San Gabriel Valley Perinatal Medical Group
    West Covina, California 91710, United States
    Recruiting
    • Richard Burwick, MD · Contactdr.burwick@sgvpmg.com · (626) 337-4425
    • Richard Burwick, MD · Principal investigator
  • Sarasota Memorial Health Care System
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
    Recruiting
  • Pediatrix Medical Group of Georgia
    Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States
    Recruiting
  • Woman's Hospital
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70817, United States
    Recruiting
  • Carnegie Imaging for Women
    New York, New York 10128, United States
    Recruiting
  • UT Physicians Maternal-Fetal Medicine
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
    Recruiting
  • Pediatrix Medical Group
    Houston, Texas 773339, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — CFC result and diagnostic testing result

Supporting information: Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: when data collection is complete and up to 2 years post-study completion date

Access criteria: Other researchers after the appropriate date use agreements are in place.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Sites
3 sites added
Show 3 added (3 United States)
  • Brar Practice · Riverside, United States
  • Carnegie Imaging for Women · New York, United States
  • UT Physicians Maternal-Fetal Medicine · Houston, United States
Oct 15, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 15, 2026
    3 sites added
    Show 3 added (3 United States)
    • Brar Practice · Riverside, United States
    • Carnegie Imaging for Women · New York, United States
    • UT Physicians Maternal-Fetal Medicine · Houston, United States
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07643896
Lead sponsor
BillionToOne Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 12, 2026
Start date
Jan 10, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 15, 2026

Study contacts

Shannon O'Rourke Senior Research Manager, MS, CGC
Contact
unityregistry@billiontoone.com
650-460-2551
Julia Wynn, MS, MS, CGC
principal investigator · BillionToOne Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion