An interventional study of High-level perceptual learning-based training and Low-level perceptual learning-based training in Visual Field Defect, Stroke and Hemianopia Homonymous, sponsored by Georgetown University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.
Sponsored by Georgetown University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The BRIGHT (Behavioral Rehabilitation Through Image-Guided Home-based Training) study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of image-guided, home-based perceptual training at improving visual performance in individuals with visual field loss.
Using a prospective, crossover design, BRIGHT combines visual behavioral testing, neuroimaging, and a home-based intervention. It aims to 1) identify neural pathways that support training-induced visual plasticity; and 2) compare the efficacy of different types of visual training delivered in a home-based setting.
8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.
Browse Stroke studies →Georgetown University is the lead sponsor of 292 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.
Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (71%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
DSM diagnostic criteria
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A 3 week at-home online perceptual learning-based training using high-level visual stimuli.
Behavioral: High-level perceptual learning-based training
A 3 week at-home online perceptual learning-based training using low-level visual stimuli.
Behavioral: Low-level perceptual learning-based training
Behavioral intervention consisting of repeated computerized visual discrimination tasks targeting higher-order visual processing
behavioral intervention consisting of repeated computerized visual discrimination tasks targeting low-level visual processing
Change in high-level perceptual discrimination performance
Change in performance on an online computerized high-level perceptual discrimination task. Participants complete a computerized high-level perceptual discrimination task during a 3-week training period (5 days per week). Task difficulty is adaptively adjusted using a 3-up/1-down staircase procedure to estimate perceptual discrimination thresholds corresponding to approximately 75% accuracy.
Time frame: Week 2-4 or Week 7-9 of the study (depending on the order)
Change in low-level perceptual discrimination performance
Change in performance on an online computerized low-level perceptual discrimination task. Participants complete a computerized high-level perceptual discrimination task during a 3-week training period (5 days per week). Task difficulty is adaptively adjusted using a 3-up/1-down staircase procedure to estimate perceptual discrimination thresholds corresponding to approximately 75% accuracy.
Time frame: Week 2-4 or Week 7-9 of the study (depending on the order)
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.