ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07629635COMFORT-PFOUpdated Oct 8, 2026

Migraine Headaches Elimination With Patent Foramen Ovale-Directed Therapy

A Phase 3 interventional study of Prasugrel 5mg and Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Migraine Disease and Patent Foramen Ovale, sponsored by Columbia University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-08.

Sponsored by Columbia University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Oct 8, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Migraine is a common and often disabling condition, but its exact causes are not fully understood. Some people with migraines have a small opening in the heart wall called a patent foramen ovale (PFO). In some of these patients, closing this opening or taking a medication that inhibits blood platelets (prasugrel) has been shown to reduce migraines. However, not everyone benefits, and it is unclear why. This study is being done to better understand whether closing a PFO can provide lasting migraine relief - especially in patients whose migraines improve with prasugrel.

The goal of this study is to find out whether, in patients whose migraines improve while taking prasugrel, closing the PFO along with 24 weeks of prasugrel leads to better long-term migraine relief after stopping the medication, than by taking prasugrel for 24 weeks alone.

Participants will track their migraines daily using an electronic diary, then take prasugrel and compare their migraines while on the medication. Only patients whose migraines improve on this medication will continue in the study. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to one of two groups: 1) Medication-only group: Continue prasugrel for 24 weeks. 2) Procedure group: Undergo a minimally invasive procedure to close the PFO and continue prasugrel for 24 weeks. After treatment, the medication will be stopped in both groups, and participants will again track their migraines for about 8 weeks.

The main question is: Do patients who have PFO closure continue to have fewer migraines after stopping prasugrel compared with those who did not have the procedure?

Read the detailed description

The hypothesis of the COMFORT-PFO Study is that a subset of migraine patients with PFO have an underlying platelet-mediated migraine mechanism in which byproducts of platelet activation or aggregation enter the cerebral circulation via the PFO at supraphysiologic levels, thereby triggering migraine.

Inhibition of platelet activity with thienopyridine therapy is expected to reduce the generation of these byproducts in the systemic venous circulation and, consequently, their passage to the cerebral circulation. Similarly, transcatheter closure of the PFO eliminates the right-to-left pathway, resulting in reduced exposure of the brain to these platelet-derived factors. In this context, a response to thienopyridine therapy may serve as a clinical marker to identify patients in whom the PFO plays a mechanistic role in migraine pathophysiology.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether the clinical benefit in migraine reduction observed during initial thienopyridine therapy is maintained after treatment withdrawal, comparing subjects assigned to transcatheter PFO closure with those managed with medical therapy alone. Thienopyridine-responsiveness will be assessed using prasugrel hydrochloride in this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Migraine Disease
  • Patent Foramen Ovale

Keywords

  • Migraine Headaches
  • Patent Foramen Ovale
  • Thienopyridine
  • COMFORT-PFO
  • Prasugrel
03

In context

Foramen Ovale, Patent

136 studies on the registry are indexed under Foramen Ovale, Patent; 47 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 32 is below the median of 154 across 69 interventional studies indexed under Foramen Ovale, Patent.

Browse Foramen Ovale, Patent studies →

Lead sponsor

Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,136 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 180 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 148 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: ≥18 and \<55 at time of screening
  • Migraine headache with aura, or migraine headache without aura, fulfilling conditions of the Neurology Screening Tool (meeting ICHD-3 criteria)
  • Diagnosis of migraine for ≥ 1 year; onset of migraine symptoms \< 40 years of age
  • By history, an average headache burden of greater than one migraine headache day per week:
  • without current preventative therapy, OR
  • despite preventative therapy, OR
  • with reason to come off effective therapy (e.g. cost, aversion to injections, side effects)
  • If patient is taking preventive migraine medications, dose must be stable for at least 3 months prior to the screening visit. Patient agrees to continue preventive medication at the current dosage throughout the duration of the Baseline and On-treatment monitoring periods (Study Weeks 1 - 17).
  • Female patients capable of becoming pregnant agree to use two forms of or abstinence during their participation in the study.

Patient Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusions due to underlying patient medical issues:

  • Headache disorder other than migraine with aura, or migraine without aura
  • Patient has history of stroke, , or intracranial hemorrhage.
  • Patient has a history of thrombocytopenia within one year, or count \<100,000/mm3 identified during the screening laboratory evaluation.
  • Patient has severe hepatic impairment with reduced synthetic function as documented by prolongation of PT/, or with total >3.0 mg/dL identified during the screening laboratory evaluation.
  • Patient has previously implanted pacemaker, IVC filter, PFO closure device, ASD closure device, or left atrial appendage closure device or any cardiac history which, in the investigator's opinion, would preclude them from study participation.
  • Patient has documented right-to-left shunt source in addition to PFO such as atrial septal defect or pulmonary arteriovenous malformation.
  • Patient has a history of bleeding within 6 months of the screening visit, any active bleeding, or active peptic ulcer disease.
  • Patient has an uncontrolled arrhythmia, or if on therapy, has evidence of arrhythmia control failure within the past 90 days (e.g., supraventricular tachycardia or atrial fibrillation while under rhythm control).
  • Patient has elevated PVR which in the opinion of the implanting physician precludes safe PFO closure.
  • Patient has active infection at the time of screening that cannot be treated.
  • Patient is planning surgery during the study timeframe.
  • A female patient is pregnant or is planning pregnancy during the anticipated duration of the study. Urine or blood pregnancy screening will be performed as part of the screening laboratory evaluation.
  • Patient has documented nickel allergy/sensitivity
  • Patient has a documented history of non-compliance with medical care, which would preclude them, in the opinion of the study team

Exclusion Due to Medication Restrictions:

  • Patient has known or to thienopyridines
  • Patient has another medical condition requiring chronic antithrombotic therapy with antiplatelet, oral anticoagulant or injectable agents
  • Patient has need for daily use of NSAIDs other than for treatment of migraines
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
32 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A - Thienopyridine only

    16 patients will be randomized to this group. Thienopyridine medication (prasugrel) which was demonstrated to reduce headache frequency during study screening phases, will be continued for 6 months and then stopped. Post-therapy headache frequency will be compared with the patient's baseline headache frequency. After completion of the study procedures, patients in this group will be given the opportunity to get the PFO closure procedure.

    Drug: Prasugrel 5mg

  • Active comparator
    Group B - PFO closure plus thienopyridine

    16 patients will be randomized to this group. After demonstrating thienopyridine (prasugrel) benefit for migraine symptoms in the screening phases of the study, patients in this arm will undergo PFO closure, a non-surgical outpatient catheter procedure. They will remain on prasugrel for an additional 6 months. The medication will then be stopped. Post-therapy headache frequency will be compared with the patient's baseline headache frequency.

    Drug: Prasugrel 5mg · Device: Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale

Interventions

  • Six months of daily prasugrel therapy following randomization.

    Also known as: Prasugrel Hydrochloride

  • DeviceTranscatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale

    A standard transcatheter closure of PFO will be performed in the Group B cohort. During this non-surgical procedure, the GORE Cardioform Septal Occluder will be used to close the PFO (it is FDA-approved for exactly this purpose for prevention of recurrent stroke) but will be used here in an off-label fashion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction in Monthly Migraine Days (MMD)

    The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of randomized subjects maintaining a clinically meaningful migraine response, defined as a ≥50% reduction in Monthly Migraine Days (MMD) in the Post-Therapy monitoring session, compared with the Baseline monitoring session (following discontinuation of prasugrel).

    Time frame: upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effect Persistence (EP)

    Effect Preservation (EP) is a constructed metric which defines the extent to which the clinical benefit of migraine reduction observed during thienopyridine therapy is maintained following discontinuation of therapy. EP is calculated for each randomized subject as the proportion of the On-Therapy reduction in Monthly Migraine Days (MMD) that is preserved during the Post-Therapy period, expressed as a percentage. For each subject, EP is defined as: EP = (Post-Therapy Reduction in MMD / On-Therapy Reduction in MMD) × 100 where: Post-Therapy Reduction in MMD = Baseline MMD - Post-Therapy MMD On-Therapy Reduction in MMD = Baseline MMD - On-Therapy MMD EP provides a continuous, subject-level measure of treatment durability, allowing comparison of the extent to which the initial treatment effect is maintained following therapy discontinuation.

    Time frame: upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session

  2. Responder-based Endpoints

    Responder-based endpoints will assess higher thresholds of clinical response and will include the proportion of subjects achieving: * ≥75% reduction in MMD from Baseline during the Post-Therapy monitoring period * ≥90% reduction in MMD from Baseline, representing near complete elimination of migraine days * 100% reduction in MMD from Baseline, representing complete elimination of migraine days.

    Time frame: upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session

  3. Absolute reduction in MMD from Baseline to Post-Therapy

    This measure will calculate the absolute difference in MMD between the Baseline monitoring session and the Post-Therapy monitoring session.

    Time frame: upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session

  4. Percent reduction in MMD from Baseline to Post-Therapy

    This measure will assess the percentage difference in MMD between the Baseline monitoring session and the Post-Therapy session.

    Time frame: upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session

  5. Change in MSQ 2.1 Score (Baseline Score - Post-thienopyridine Score)

    The Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Version 2.1 is a 14-item patient-reported questionnaire to evaluate the impact of migraines on a patient's quality of life across 3 domains: Role Function-Restrictive (measures how migraines limit daily, social, and work-related activities), Role Function-Preventive (measures how migraines prevent these daily activities from happening altogether), and Emotional Function (assesses the emotional toll, frustration, and helplessness caused by migraines). In this modified version, the minimum score is 0, and the maximum score is 70, with each answer to the 14 questions receiving from 0 to 5 points. The cumulative score will be assessed at Baseline and after Treatment. The lower the score, the better Quality of Life. The absolute difference in the cumulative score will be compared, with a reduction from baseline indicating an improvement in quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session

  6. Change in HIT-6 Score (Baseline Score - Post-thienopyridine Score)

    The HIT-6 (Headache Impact Test) is a 6-item patient-reported questionnaire that measures how severely headaches impact daily life, social functioning, and ability to concentrate. Scores range from 36 to 78, with higher numbers indicating greater headache-related disability. This measure will assess the difference from the Baseline (at enrollment) HIT-6 score, to the HIT-6 score after completion of the Post-Therapy monitoring session. A decrease in the HIT-6 score reflects a reduction of the life impact imposed by migraines.

    Time frame: Baseline and upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wilmshurst PT, Nightingale S, Walsh KP, Morrison WL. Effect on migraine of closure of cardiac right-to-left shunts to prevent recurrence of decompression illness or stroke or for haemodynamic reasons. Lancet. 2000 Nov 11;356(9242):1648-51. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03160-3. PubMed 11089825 ↗
  • Schwerzmann M, Wiher S, Nedeltchev K, Mattle HP, Wahl A, Seiler C, Meier B, Windecker S. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale reduces the frequency of migraine attacks. Neurology. 2004 Apr 27;62(8):1399-401. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000120677.64217.a9. PubMed 15111681 ↗
  • Giardini A, Donti A, Formigari R, Salomone L, Palareti G, Guidetti D, Picchio FM. Long-term efficacy of transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure on migraine headache with aura and recurrent stroke. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):625-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20699. PubMed 16548006 ↗
  • Reisman M, Christofferson RD, Jesurum J, Olsen JV, Spencer MP, Krabill KA, Diehl L, Aurora S, Gray WA. Migraine headache relief after transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Feb 15;45(4):493-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.055. PubMed 15708692 ↗
  • Slavin L, Tobis JM, Rangarajan K, Dao C, Krivokapich J, Liebeskind DS. Five-year experience with percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale. Am J Cardiol. 2007 May 1;99(9):1316-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.054. Epub 2007 Mar 20. PubMed 17478165 ↗
  • Kimmelstiel C, Gange C, Thaler D. Is patent foramen ovale closure effective in reducing migraine symptoms? A controlled study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Apr 1;69(5):740-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21025. PubMed 17295330 ↗
  • Wahl A, Praz F, Tai T, Findling O, Walpoth N, Nedeltchev K, Schwerzmann M, Windecker S, Mattle HP, Meier B. Improvement of migraine headaches after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolism. Heart. 2010 Jun;96(12):967-73. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.181156. PubMed 20538672 ↗
  • Dowson A, Mullen MJ, Peatfield R, Muir K, Khan AA, Wells C, Lipscombe SL, Rees T, De Giovanni JV, Morrison WL, Hildick-Smith D, Elrington G, Hillis WS, Malik IS, Rickards A. Migraine Intervention With STARFlex Technology (MIST) trial: a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of patent foramen ovale closure with STARFlex septal repair implant to resolve refractory migraine headache. Circulation. 2008 Mar 18;117(11):1397-404. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727271. Epub 2008 Mar 3. PubMed 18316488 ↗
  • Mattle HP, Evers S, Hildick-Smith D, Becker WJ, Baumgartner H, Chataway J, Gawel M, Gobel H, Heinze A, Horlick E, Malik I, Ray S, Zermansky A, Findling O, Windecker S, Meier B. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in migraine with aura, a randomized controlled trial. Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 7;37(26):2029-36. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw027. Epub 2016 Feb 22. PubMed 26908949 ↗
  • Tobis JM, Charles A, Silberstein SD, Sorensen S, Maini B, Horwitz PA, Gurley JC. Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Migraine: The PREMIUM Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 5;70(22):2766-2774. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1105. PubMed 29191325 ↗
  • 11. The ESCAPE Migraine Trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00267371?cond=Migraine%20Headache&intr=PFO%20Closure&page=2&rank=15
  • Saver JL, Carroll JD, Thaler DE, Smalling RW, MacDonald LA, Marks DS, Tirschwell DL; RESPECT Investigators. Long-Term Outcomes of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Medical Therapy after Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 14;377(11):1022-1032. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610057. PubMed 28902590 ↗
  • Sondergaard L, Kasner SE, Rhodes JF, Andersen G, Iversen HK, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Settergren M, Sjostrand C, Roine RO, Hildick-Smith D, Spence JD, Thomassen L; Gore REDUCE Clinical Study Investigators. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 14;377(11):1033-1042. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707404. PubMed 28902580 ↗
  • Kent DM, Thaler DE; RoPE Study Investigators. The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) Study: developing risk models for application to ongoing randomized trials of percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure for cryptogenic stroke. Trials. 2011 Jul 27;12:185. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-185. PubMed 21794121 ↗
  • Kent DM, Saver JL, Kasner SE, Nelson J, Carroll JD, Chatellier G, Derumeaux G, Furlan AJ, Herrmann HC, Juni P, Kim JS, Koethe B, Lee PH, Lefebvre B, Mattle HP, Meier B, Reisman M, Smalling RW, Soendergaard L, Song JK, Mas JL, Thaler DE. Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in an Analysis of Pooled Individual Patient Data From Randomized Trials of Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale After Stroke. JAMA. 2021 Dec 14;326(22):2277-2286. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20956. PubMed 34905030 ↗
  • Rodes-Cabau J, Horlick E, Ibrahim R, Cheema AN, Labinaz M, Nadeem N, Osten M, Cote M, Marsal JR, Rivest D, Marrero A, Houde C. Effect of Clopidogrel and Aspirin vs Aspirin Alone on Migraine Headaches After Transcatheter Atrial Septal Defect Closure: The CANOA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Nov 24;314(20):2147-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13919. PubMed 26551304 ↗
  • Trabattoni D, Brambilla M, Canzano P, Becchetti A, Teruzzi G, Porro B, Fiorelli S, Muratori M, Tedesco CC, Veglia F, Montorsi P, Bartorelli AL, Tremoli E, Camera M. Migraine in Patients Undergoing PFO Closure: Characterization of a Platelet-Associated Pathophysiological Mechanism: The LEARNER Study. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2022 Apr 13;7(6):525-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.02.002. eCollection 2022 Jun. PubMed 35818509 ↗
  • 20. RELIEF Trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04100135?cond=Migraine%20Headache&term=relief%20clinical%20study&rank=1.
  • Safiri S, Pourfathi H, Eagan A, Mansournia MA, Khodayari MT, Sullman MJM, Kaufman J, Collins G, Dai H, Bragazzi NL, Kolahi AA. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine in 204 countries and territories, 1990 to 2019. Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):e293-e309. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002275. PubMed 34001771 ↗
  • Charleston L 4th, Royce J, Monteith TS, Broner SW, O'Brien HL, Manrriquez SL, Robbins MS. Migraine Care Challenges and Strategies in US Uninsured and Underinsured Adults: A Narrative Review, Part 1. Headache. 2018 Apr;58(4):506-511. doi: 10.1111/head.13286. Epub 2018 Mar 8. PubMed 29516470 ↗
  • Spencer BT, Qureshi Y, Sommer RJ. A retrospective review of clopidogrel as primary therapy for migraineurs with right to left shunt lesions. Cephalalgia. 2014 Oct;34(11):933-7. doi: 10.1177/0333102414523845. Epub 2014 Apr 25. PubMed 24770421 ↗
  • Reisman AM, Robbins BT, Chou DE, Yugrakh MS, Gross GJ, Privitera L, Nazif T, Sommer RJ. Ticagrelor for Refractory Migraine/Patent Foramen Ovale (TRACTOR): An open-label pilot study. Neurology. 2018 Nov 27;91(22):1010-1017. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006573. PubMed 30478067 ↗
  • Sommer RJ, Robbins BT. Migraine Headache and Patent Foramen Ovale: Observational Studies, the Randomized Clinical Trials, and the GORE RELIEF Clinical Study. Cardiol Clin. 2024 Nov;42(4):497-507. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2024.01.007. Epub 2024 Feb 29. PubMed 39322340 ↗
  • Sommer RJ, Nazif T, Privitera L, Robbins BT. Retrospective review of thienopyridine therapy in migraineurs with patent foramen ovale. Neurology. 2018 Nov 27;91(22):1002-1009. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006572. PubMed 30478066 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Upon completion, all study information will be de-identified, and shared with our colleagues at the Centro Cardiologico Monzino (Milan, Italy), Dr. Daniela Trabattoni. Dr. Trabattonia and her colleagues are performing a parallel trial with the same protocol, but using a PFO closure device not available in the United States.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: Starting April 2026, all supportive information is being shared collaboratively. No IPD will be shared until the study is completed at both sites (estimated 2028).

Access criteria: The two principal investigators (Sommer and Trabattoni) will have access to the de-identified data and supporting information, as well as their dedicated research teams. Outcome data from the two sites will be compared and potentially combined into a single report.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it moved

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 14 months later.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2026 → Oct 2026, on Oct 8, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 22, 2026
First posted
Jun 5, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 15, 2026was Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 2028
Last update
Oct 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 8, 2026
Sites
Columbia University Irving Medical Center - NewYork Presbyterian Hospital (CUIMC/NYP) is now Recruiting
Oct 8, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026→Oct 15, 2026
Oct 8, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 8, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    Columbia University Irving Medical Center - NewYork Presbyterian Hospital (CUIMC/NYP) is now Recruiting
    Start date Sep 1, 2026→Oct 15, 2026
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07629635
Collaborators
Occlutech International AB, W.L.Gore & Associates
Responsible party
Robert Sommer (Associate Professor of Medicine; Director of Invasive Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Columbia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 5, 2026
Start date
Oct 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 8, 2026

Study contacts

Robert J Sommer, MD
Contact
rs2463@cumc.columbia.edu
212-342-0886
Barbara T Robbins, FNP-BC
Contact
bs2575@cumc.columbia.edu
212-342-0886
Jessica Ailani, MD
principal investigator · MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
Robert J Sommer, MD
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion