ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07380490SAFE-PFOUpdated Oct 5, 2026

Comparing Two PFO Closure Devices in Adults With Previous Stroke or TIA

An interventional study of PFO Closure procedure in Patent Foramen Ovale, Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), sponsored by Giuseppe Tarantini. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-05.

Sponsored by Giuseppe Tarantini · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Updated Oct 5, 2026Now RecruitingFirst site in Germany+4 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,260
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, single-blind, investigator-driven, non-profit clinical trial designed to compare the safety and efficacy of the Cocoon PFO Occluder with the Amplatzer PFO Occluder family in patients requiring percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO). Eligible participants are adults with a history of cryptogenic embolic stroke or neurologically confirmed transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the previous 12 months and a PFO suitable for transcatheter closure.

A total of up to 1260 subjects will be enrolled across multiple European centers. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive either the Cocoon PFO Occluder (experimental group) or an Amplatzer PFO closure device (control group). The procedure will be performed as soon as possible after randomization, preferably within 14 days and no later than 45 days.

The primary endpoint is a non-inferiority comparison of a composite outcome at 12 months, including recurrent ischemic stroke, TIA, or all-cause death. Secondary endpoints include PFO closure rate at 6 months, assessed by echocardiographic imaging, and other measures of safety, device performance, and clinical outcomes.

The study is conducted in a single-blind fashion: patients will not be informed of the device they receive unless they explicitly request this information. Any patient who chooses to be unblinded will continue to participate without affecting eligibility or follow-up, and the date of unblinding will be documented to allow appropriate sensitivity analyses.

This trial aims to provide robust comparative evidence on the clinical performance of the Cocoon PFO Occluder relative to the Amplatzer PFO Occluder to guide optimal device selection in patients with cryptogenic stroke or TIA associated with PFO.

02

Conditions studied

  • Patent Foramen Ovale
  • Stroke
  • Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)

Keywords

  • PFO Closure
  • Cocoon PFO Occluder
  • Amplatzer PFO Occluder
  • Patent Foramen Ovale
  • Cryptogenic Stroke
  • Transient Ischemic Attack
03

In context

Foramen Ovale, Patent

136 studies on the registry are indexed under Foramen Ovale, Patent; 47 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,260 is above the median of 154 across 69 interventional studies indexed under Foramen Ovale, Patent.

Browse Foramen Ovale, Patent studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Giuseppe Tarantini as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with >18 years of age and \<65 years of age, regardless of gender
  • Patients with normal or aneurysm type PFO confirmed by imaging examination [Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)/ Transesophageal Echocardiography (TOE) or Intracardiac Echocardiography], and who exhibit spontaneous right-to-left shunting or right-to-left shunting during Valsalva maneuver.
  • Patients with history of cryptogenic embolic stroke or in the previous 12 months [stroke is defined as acute focal neurological deficit presumed to be due to focal ischemia, and either 1) symptoms persisting 24 hours or greater, or 2) symptoms persisting less than 24 hours but associated with MR or CT findings of a new, neuroanatomically relevant, cerebral infarct. Transient Ischemic Attack is defined as acute focal neurological deficit (defined as focal motor deficit, aphasia, difficulty walking, hemisensory deficit, amaurosis fugax, blindness, or focal visual deficit) presumed due to focal ischemia, lasting between 5 minutes and 24 hours, that is not associated with MR or CT findings of a new cerebral infarct]. The diagnosis of cryptogenic embolic stroke or TIA has to be confirmed by a neurologist.
  • The size of PFO must be amenable to selection of a Cocoon PFO Occluder or Amplatzer PFO closure device.
  • Patients are informed of the nature of the trial and agree to all requirements for participation in the trial, signed the form, and agreed to complete the follow-up and follow-up examination

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have definite causes of stroke or unrelated to the PFO
  • RLS caused by other causes, such as atrial septal defect or pulmonary arteriovenous shunt
  • Patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (chronic or intermittent) Intracardiac thrombus or tumor
  • Patients with mitral or aortic valve stenosis or severe regurgitation
  • Mitral or aortic valve vegetation or prosthesis
  • Active endocarditis or other untreated infectious diseases
  • Dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy
  • (LVEF) \<35%
  • Left ventricular aneurysm or akinesis Myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris within 12 months
  • Previous intracardiac surgery or percutaneous PFO-closure
  • Atherosclerosis or arteriopathy of intra- or extracranial vessels with >50% diameter stenosis in the artery supplying the infarcted territory.
  • Patients with non-embolic cryptogenic stroke (for example lacunar stroke) or with other identifiable causes of stroke, including but not limited to aortic arch plaques (protruding >4 mm into the lumen), large artery atherosclerotic disease, an established cardioembolic source, small-vessel occlusive disease, or arterial dissection
  • \< 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or with any history of renal dialysis or renal transplantation
  • Severe liver function impairment ( (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) greater than 3 times the value)
  • Severe pulmonary disease including pulmonary hypertension (clinical diagnosis)
  • Uncontrollable hypertension or diabetes mellitus
  • to anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs, either before or after the PFO closure procedure
  • Active or planned (within 12 months) pregnancy, or lactating female patients
  • Patients with hypercoagulable states
  • Patients diagnosed with a neurological disease that causes progressive neurological dysfunction
  • Malignant tumors or other serious diseases resulting in a of less than 12 months
  • Anatomy in which the device would interfere with intracardiac or vascular structures
  • Psychiatric conditions that may interfere with medical compliance and compliance with follow-up
  • Patient is currently participating in another drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint yet
  • Patient with any medical condition that would make him/her inappropriate for treatment as per the current IFU of respective devices or in the opinion of the Investigator
  • Inability to obtain from patient or legally authorized representatives
  • Stroke with poor outcome at time of enrollment (Modified Rankin score >3)
  • Subjects who will not be available for follow up for the duration of the trial
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
1,260 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cocoon PFO Occluder - experimental

    Participants undergo percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Cocoon PFO Occluder device. The procedure is performed under standard clinical practice. Follow-up includes echocardiographic assessment of PFO closure and routine clinical evaluations. Participants are assigned to the two study arms using a 3:1 randomization scheme (Cocoon PFO Occluder : Amplatzer PFO Occluder).

    Device: PFO Closure procedure

  • Active comparator
    Amplatzer PFO Occluder - Control

    Participants undergo percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder device, considered the current standard of care. Follow-up includes echocardiographic assessment of PFO closure and routine clinical evaluations. Participants are assigned to the two study arms using a 3:1 randomization scheme (Cocoon PFO Occluder : Amplatzer PFO Occluder).

    Device: PFO Closure procedure

Interventions

  • DevicePFO Closure procedure

    Percutaneous PFO closure performed according to standard clinical practice. The procedure is scheduled within 45 days after randomization and includes initiation of dual antiplatelet therapy before the intervention. Closure is performed following the Instructions for Use (IFU) of the assigned device and is guided by intracardiac echocardiography or transesophageal echocardiography. After device implantation, patients undergo routine post-procedure assessment and are instructed to follow antiplatelet therapy consistent with European clinical practice guidelines. Endocarditis prophylaxis is recommended for six months. The procedural steps are identical for both study arms; the only difference is the device implanted (Cocoon PFO Occluder or Amplatzer PFO Occluder). Participants are assigned to the two study arms using a 3:1 randomization scheme (Cocoon PFO Occluder : Amplatzer PFO Occluder).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite endpoint of recurrent ischemic stroke, TIA, or all-cause death at 12 months

    A non-inferiority comparison between the Cocoon PFO Occluder and the Amplatzer PFO Occluder in terms of a composite endpoint including: 1. Recurrent ischemic stroke, defined as an acute focal neurological deficit presumed to result from focal ischemia, with symptoms lasting ≥24 hours, or \<24 hours if accompanied by MRI or CT evidence of a new, anatomically relevant cerebral infarct. 2. Transient ischemic attack (TIA), defined as an acute focal neurological deficit (e.g., focal motor deficit, aphasia, gait disturbance, hemisensory deficit, amaurosis fugax, blindness, or focal visual deficit) presumed due to focal ischemia, lasting between 5 minutes and 24 hours, and not associated with MRI or CT evidence of a new infarct. Clinical evaluation by a neurologist is required. 3. All-cause mortality.

    Time frame: 12 months after the procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. PFO Closure Rate

    Complete closure is defined as right-to-left shunt (RLS) grade 0. Effective closure is defined as RLS grade 0 or 1 on imaging (TTE as default, TOE when clinically indicated)

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Composite of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke, TIA, or Death

    Composite endpoint including recurrent ischemic stroke, TIA (neurologist-confirmed), or all-cause mortality.

    Time frame: 30 days and 6 months

  3. Neurological Death

    Death attributable to neurological causes.

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months

  4. Cardiovascular Death

    Death attributable to cardiovascular causes.

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months

  5. Recurrent Symptomatic Non-Fatal Stroke

    TIA defined according to the same criteria as the primary endpoint and confirmed by a neurologist

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months

  6. Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

    Incidence of any serious adverse event as defined by standard reporting criteria.

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months

  7. Device- or Procedure-Related Serious Adverse Events

    SAE related to the device or procedure, including but not limited to: death, systemic embolism, device embolization or malposition, device thrombosis, cardiac injury/perforation, pericardial tamponade/effusion, endocarditis, atrial fibrillation, and severe vascular access complications

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months

  8. Clinically Significant New Atrial Arrhythmia

    New atrial arrhythmia (including AF) confirmed by ECG, Holter, or approved monitoring device. AF defined per international guidelines (≥30-second episode with absence of P waves and irregular RR intervals).

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months

  9. Device Success

    Successful delivery, deployment at intended site, and retrieval of the delivery system.

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

  10. Procedural Success

    Device success without device- or procedure-related SAE prior to discharge

    Time frame: At hospital discharge

  11. Change in Monthly Migraine Days

    Change in monthly migraine days in patients with a neurologist-confirmed diagnosis of migraine.

    Time frame: Months 9-12 vs. baseline (3 months before implantation)

  12. Quality of Life (SF-36 Score)

    Assessment of quality of life using the SF-36 questionnaire.

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months

  13. Systemic Embolism

    Incidence of systemic embolic events confirmed clinically or by imaging

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months

  14. Possible/Probable Device-Related Allergy

    Device-related allergic reactions adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

    Time frame: 12 months

  15. Echocardiographic Markers of Device Endothelialization

    Evaluation of endothelialization using surrogate TOE markers: device surface echogenicity, peri-device flow, presence of thrombus/mass, visible disc surface area, and bubble contrast washout. Data will be summarized as the proportion of participants meeting criteria for complete endothelialization at each follow-up time point.

    Time frame: At 6 months (±1 month) post-procedure At 12 months (±2 months) post-procedure Additional TOE as clinically indicated through study completion (up to 12 months)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Heart and Diabetes Center NRW (HDZ NRW), Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology
    Bad Oeynhausen, North Rhine-Westphalia (Nordrhein-Westfalen) 32545, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Werner Scholtz, MD · Contact
    • Werner Scholtz, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Testa L, Popolo Rubbio A, Squillace M, Albano F, Cesario V, Casenghi M, Tarantini G, Pagnotta P, Ielasi A, Popusoi G, Paloscia L, Durante A, Maffeo D, Meucci F, Valentini G, Ussia GP, Cioffi P, Cortese B, Sangiorgi G, Contegiacomo G, Bedogni F. Patent foramen ovale occlusion with the Cocoon PFO Occluder. The PROS-IT collaborative project. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 11;9:1064026. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1064026. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36712245 ↗
  • Turc G, Calvet D, Guerin P, Sroussi M, Chatellier G, Mas JL; CLOSE Investigators. Closure, Anticoagulation, or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials, Sequential Meta-Analysis, and New Insights From the CLOSE Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 17;7(12):e008356. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008356. PubMed 29910193 ↗
  • Lee PH, Song JK, Kim JS, Heo R, Lee S, Kim DH, Song JM, Kang DH, Kwon SU, Kang DW, Lee D, Kwon HS, Yun SC, Sun BJ, Park JH, Lee JH, Jeong HS, Song HJ, Kim J, Park SJ. Cryptogenic Stroke and High-Risk Patent Foramen Ovale: The DEFENSE-PFO Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2335-2342. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.046. Epub 2018 Mar 12. PubMed 29544871 ↗
  • Mas JL, Derumeaux G, Guillon B, Massardier E, Hosseini H, Mechtouff L, Arquizan C, Bejot Y, Vuillier F, Detante O, Guidoux C, Canaple S, Vaduva C, Dequatre-Ponchelle N, Sibon I, Garnier P, Ferrier A, Timsit S, Robinet-Borgomano E, Sablot D, Lacour JC, Zuber M, Favrole P, Pinel JF, Apoil M, Reiner P, Lefebvre C, Guerin P, Piot C, Rossi R, Dubois-Rande JL, Eicher JC, Meneveau N, Lusson JR, Bertrand B, Schleich JM, Godart F, Thambo JB, Leborgne L, Michel P, Pierard L, Turc G, Barthelet M, Charles-Nelson A, Weimar C, Moulin T, Juliard JM, Chatellier G; CLOSE Investigators. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelets after Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 14;377(11):1011-1021. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705915. PubMed 28902593 ↗
  • Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE, Smalling RW, Berry S, MacDonald LA, Marks DS, Tirschwell DL; RESPECT Investigators. Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 21;368(12):1092-100. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301440. PubMed 23514286 ↗
  • Meier B, Kalesan B, Mattle HP, Khattab AA, Hildick-Smith D, Dudek D, Andersen G, Ibrahim R, Schuler G, Walton AS, Wahl A, Windecker S, Juni P; PC Trial Investigators. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 21;368(12):1083-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211716. PubMed 23514285 ↗
  • Furlan AJ, Reisman M, Massaro J, Mauri L, Adams H, Albers GW, Felberg R, Herrmann H, Kar S, Landzberg M, Raizner A, Wechsler L; CLOSURE I Investigators. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):991-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009639. PubMed 22417252 ↗
  • Pristipino C, Sievert H, D'Ascenzo F, Mas JL, Meier B, Scacciatella P, Hildick-Smith D, Gaita F, Toni D, Kyrle P, Thomson J, Derumeaux G, Onorato E, Sibbing D, Germonpre P, Berti S, Chessa M, Bedogni F, Dudek D, Hornung M, Zamorano J; European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI); European Stroke Organisation (ESO); European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI); Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC); ESC Working group on GUCH; ESC Working group on Thrombosis; European Haematological Society (EHA). European position paper on the management of patients with patent foramen ovale. General approach and left circulation thromboembolism. EuroIntervention. 2019 Jan 20;14(13):1389-1402. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00622. No abstract available. PubMed 30141306 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 5, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in Germany
Show site
  • Heart and Diabetes Center NRW (HDZ NRW), Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology · Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
Oct 5, 2026
Start date
Apr 2026→Jul 24, 2026 (actual)
Oct 5, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 2028→Jul 2028
Oct 5, 2026
Study completion
Apr 2028→Jul 2028
Oct 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 5, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    1 site added — first site in Germany
    Show site
    • Heart and Diabetes Center NRW (HDZ NRW), Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology · Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
    Start date Apr 2026→Jul 24, 2026 (now actual)
    Primary completion Apr 2028→Jul 2028
    Study completion Apr 2028→Jul 2028
    + 2 other changes: verification date and oversight details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07380490
Lead sponsor
Giuseppe Tarantini
Collaborators
Sahajanand Medical Technologies Limited
Responsible party
Giuseppe Tarantini (Professor, Sahajanand Medical Technologies Limited) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 2, 2026
Start date
Jul 24, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 5, 2026

Study contacts

Daniela Ramaccini, PhD, PharmaD
Contact
d.ramaccini@endocorelab.org
+39 3534390426
Francesco Cardaioli, MD
Contact
francesco.cardaioli@gmail.com
+39 338 1986562
Giuseppe Tarantini, MD, PhD, FESC
principal investigator · University of Padova

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion