ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07628530RESTartUpdated Jun 8, 2026

Reference Equations and Normative Data for Isometric Quadriceps and Handgrip Muscles STrength in Southern European Populations - RESTart: a Multicentre Study

An observational study in Muscle Strength, Healthy and Chronic Respiratory Diseases, sponsored by University of Alcala. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 89 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-08.

Sponsored by University of Alcala · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
2,815
Ages
18 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational study aims to learn about peripheral muscle strength in healthy adults and people with chronic respiratory diseases. The study aims to develop reference data for quadriceps muscle strength and handgrip in adults living in Southern Europe and to assess whether these reference data can be used in people with chronic respiratory diseases.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What are the normal values for quadriceps and handgrip muscle strength in healthy adults aged 18-89 years living in Spain, Portugal and Italy?
  • Can the reference values developed in healthy adults be applied to people with chronic respiratory diseases?

Participants will attend one study visit. During this visit, researchers will:

  • Measure quadriceps muscle strength and handgrip.
  • Collect information about age, sex, height, weight and other health characteristics.
  • Perform simple functional tests related to mobility and physical performance.
  • Ask participants to complete questionnaires about symptoms, physical activity and health-related quality of life.
Read the detailed description

The RESTart study (Reference equations and normative data for isometric quadriceps and handgrip STrength in Southern European populations) is a multicentre observational cross-sectional study conducted in Spain, Portugal and Italy.

Peripheral muscle dysfunction, particularly reduced quadriceps muscle strength and handgrip, is common in people with chronic respiratory diseases and is associated with impaired physical function, hospitalisation and mortality. Accurate interpretation of muscle strength measurements requires population-specific reference equations and normative values. However, currently available reference data may not adequately represent Southern European populations.

The primary objective of the study is to develop reference equations and normative values for isometric quadriceps muscle strength and handgrip in healthy adults aged 18-89 years. A secondary objective is to validate/assess clinical application of these reference data in people with chronic respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, asthma, bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis.

Healthy participants will be recruited from community settings using proportional stratification according to age, sex and country. Participants with chronic respiratory diseases will be recruited from collaborating clinical centres.

Primary outcomes are isometric quadriceps muscle strength and handgrip assessed using standardised dynamometry protocols. Secondary outcomes include functional capacity, mobility and balance, symptoms, physical activity, health-related quality of life, and anthropometric variables; lung function and laboratory parameters only when available from medical records.

The study is expected to provide robust reference equations and normative values for Southern European populations, supporting improved identification and monitoring of peripheral muscle dysfunction in both clinical practice and research.

02

Conditions studied

  • Muscle Strength
  • Healthy
  • Chronic Respiratory Diseases

Keywords

  • Quadriceps strength
  • Handgrip
  • Muscle strength
  • Reference equations
  • Reference values
  • Normative data
  • Dynamometrry
  • Healthy adults
  • Peripheral muscle dysfunction
  • Chronic respiratory diseases
  • COPD
  • Asthma
  • Bronchiectasis
  • Interstitial lung disease
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Pulmonary rehabilitation
  • Southern Europe
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

5,520 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 856 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,815 is above the median of 158 across 1,497 observational studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alcala is the lead sponsor of 128 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Community-dwelling healthy adults and adults with chronic respiratory diseases recruited from participating centres in Spain, Portugal and Italy. Healthy participants will be recruited from the general population to develop reference equations and normative values for isometric quadriceps and handgrip strength. Participants with chronic respiratory diseases will be recruited from clinical settings to externally validate the developed reference equations and assess their clinical applicability.

Eligibility criteria

Healthy adults cohort

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18-89 years.
  • Spanish, Portuguese or Italian, or permanently resident in one of those countries for at least five years.
  • Be community-dwelling (i.e., not hospitalised or institutionalised).
  • Be functionally independent and capable of performing study assessments without assistance or limiting pain.
  • Be able to follow verbal instructions in the local language (Spanish, Portuguese or Italian, as appropriate).
  • Provide written .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute or chronic musculoskeletal conditions affecting strength: recent fractures, severe osteoarthrosis, ligament injury, acute tendinitis in hands/knee areas, among others.
  • Recent surgery (e.g., within the past six months) in upper or lower limbs.
  • Neuromuscular disorders: Parkinson, multiple sclerosis, stroke, peripheral neuropathies, among others.
  • Non-communicable diseases affecting strength or functional status: active cancer, any unstable heart diseases; any CRD; active rheumatological diseases, obesity (≥30kg/m2), uncontrolled metabolic diseases, among others (not included: controlled dyslipidaemia or arterial hypertension).
  • Cognitive impairments (e.g., dementia) or psychiatric disorders impairing following instructions.
  • Aid devices for walking or compromised functional mobility.
  • Moderate-to-severe pain during the assessment (VAS ≥4).
  • Systemic use for over one week in the previous six months (i.e., risk of muscle atrophy in type II fibres; or steroid myopathy).
  • Muscle relaxants use during the previous week (i.e., risk of not full muscle activation).
  • Pregnancy and postpartum (i.e., potential physiological changes which may alter muscle strength).
  • Current smoking.

Chronic respiratory disease cohort

Inclusion criteria:

  • Aged 18-89 years.
  • Clinical diagnosis of a chronic respiratory disease (e.g., , interstitial lung disease, asthma, bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis), confirmed by spirometry or clinical records.
  • Clinically stable (no exacerbation within the past four weeks).
  • Capacity to provide informed consent and complete study procedures.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Coexisting conditions which meet the exclusion criteria defined for healthy participants, apart from chronic respiratory diseases.
  • Current requirement for hospitalisation or acute medical management.
  • Severe functional limitation preventing completion of assessments.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
2,815 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Healthy adults cohort

    Healthy community-dwelling adults aged 18-89 years recruited in Spain, Portugal and Italy for the development of reference equations and normative data for isometric quadriceps strength and handgrip.

  • Chronic respiratory disease cohort

    Adults with stable chronic respiratory diseases recruited for external validation/clinical application of the developed reference equations and normative values. Eligible conditions include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, asthma, bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Isometric quadriceps muscle strength

    Quadricpes maximum voluntary contraction measured using a handheld dynamometer according to the standardised RESTart protocol. Strength will be recorded as the highest value obtained during the assessment and expressed in kilograms-force (kgf).

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Handgrip

    Handgrip mMaximum voluntary contraction measured using a hydraulic handgrip dynamometer according to standardised assessment procedures. Strength will be recorded as the highest value obtained during the assessment and expressed in kilograms-force (kgf).

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Five-repetition sit-to-stand test

    Functional capacity assessed by the time required to complete five sit-to-stand repetitions according to standardised procedures. Results will be expressed in seconds. Lower values indicate better lower-limb functional capacity.

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. One-minute sit-to-stand test

    Functional capacity assessed as the number of sit-to-stand repetitions completed in one minute according to standardised procedures. Higher values indicate better functional exercise capacity.

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Timed Up and Go test

    Mobility and dynamic balance assessed using the Timed Up and Go test. Results will be expressed in seconds. Lower values indicate better mobility and dynamic balance.

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. Modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale

    Dyspnoea severity assessed using the modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale. Scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater breathlessness.

    Time frame: Day 1

  5. Modified Borg dyspnoea scale

    Perceived breathlessness assessed using the modified Borg dyspnoea scale. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater breathlessness.

    Time frame: Day 1

  6. Dyspnoea-12

    Dyspnoea assessed using the Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating more severe breathlessness.

    Time frame: Day 1

  7. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue

    Fatigue assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue.

    Time frame: Day 1

  8. EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level

    Health-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D) questionnaire. The index score will be calculated according to the appropriate national value set. Higher scores indicate better health status. Self-rated health assessed using the EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived health.

    Time frame: Day 1

  9. St George's Respiratory Questionnaire

    Respiratory-specific health-related quality of life assessed using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse respiratory health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Day 1

  10. International Physical Activity Questionnaire-short form

    Physical activity assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-short form. Results will be expressed as minutes per week spent in vigorous/moderate/total physical activity, time per week spent walking and hours per day spent in sedentary behaviour (sitting).

    Time frame: Day 1

  11. Mini Nutritional Assessment-short form

    Nutritional status assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment-short form. Scores range from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating better nutritional status.

    Time frame: Day 1

Other outcomes

  1. Age

    Participant age recorded in completed years.

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Weight

    Participant weight recorded in kilograms.

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Height

    Participant height recorded in metres.

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. Body mass index

    Body mass index calculated as weight divided by height squared.

    Time frame: Day 1

  5. Sex

    Participant biological sex recorded as female or male.

    Time frame: Day 1

  6. Forced expiratory volume in one second percentage predicted (FEV1%pred)

    Lung function measured by spirometry when available from medical records.

    Time frame: Day 1

  7. Forced vital capacity percentage predicted (FVC%pred)

    Lung function measured by spirometry when available from medical records.

    Time frame: Day 1

  8. Systemic inflammation markers

    CRP, IL-6, eosinophils, fibrinogen, neutrophil elastase, ESR, KL-6, SP-D, FeNO, IgE, calprotectin, if available, from medical records.

    Time frame: Day 1

  9. Charlson Comorbidity Index

    Comorbidity burden assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Higher scores indicate greater comorbidity burden.

    Time frame: Day 1

  10. Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System

    Current medication use classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System.

    Time frame: Day 1

  11. Smoking Exposure (pack-year index)

    Lifetime smoking exposure quantified using the pack-year index, calculated from self-reported smoking history.

    Time frame: Day 1

  12. Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption

    Alcohol consumption assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C). Higher scores indicate greater alcohol consumption and increased risk of hazardous drinking.

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in publications arising from this study, including demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, peripheral muscle strength assessments, functional capacity outcomes, patient-reported outcomes/questionnaire scores, and other variables collected according to the study protocol, upon reasonable request to the principal investigator.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Analytic code

Time frame: Beginning 12 months following publication of the primary study results and ending 5 years after publication.

Access criteria: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for secondary analyses consistent with the aims of the study (e.g., individual participant data meta-analyses, validation studies, methodological research, and other scientifically justified secondary analyses).

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07628530
Responsible party
Nicola S. Diciolla (PT, M.Sc., Ph.D., University of Alcala) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 5, 2026
Start date
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 8, 2026

Study contacts

Nicola S. Diciolla, PT, Ph.D.
Contact
nicola.diciolla@uah.es
+34 918 85 48 28
María Torres-Lacomba, PT, Ph.D.
Contact
maria.torres@uah.es
+34 918 85 48 28

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion