ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06587412Updated Jun 2, 2026

Treatment of Lateral Epicondylalgia With Shock Waves

An interventional study of Radial shock waves treatment and Focal Shock Waves treatment in Epicondylitis of the Elbow and Epicondylitis, Lateral, sponsored by University of Alcala. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-02.

Sponsored by University of Alcala · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lateral epicondylalgia (LET) is characterized by pain, decreased muscle strength of the wrist extensor muscles, and disability. Among the treatments proposed in the literature, both focal shockwave therapy and radial shockwave therapy have been considered effective in the management of this musculoskeletal disorder. The objective of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of these two shockwave applications on the signs and symptoms of subjects with lateral epicondylalgia. In this clinical trial, subjects will be evaluated for elbow pain using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), grip strength using a handheld dynamometer, and degree of disability using the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire (PRTEE). A six-month follow-up will be performed.

Patients will be randomly divided into three groups. The first group will receive radial shock waves (rESWT), the second group will receive focal shock waves (fESWT), and the third group, which will act as a control, will receive a placebo treatment with very low energy parameters according to the literature.

Subjects will receive three sessions, one session per week.

02

Conditions studied

  • Epicondylitis of the Elbow
  • Epicondylitis, Lateral

Browse trials for

03

In context

Tennis Elbow

296 studies on the registry are indexed under Tennis Elbow; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 50 across 262 interventional studies indexed under Tennis Elbow.

Browse Tennis Elbow studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alcala is the lead sponsor of 128 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pain in the lateral epicondyle >3 months
  • Pain when performing resisted grip
  • Positive Cozen test
  • Positive Maudsley test

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Systemic diseases (Fibromyalgia, Diabetes, Arthritis)
  • Local infection or Cancer
  • Recent treatments (Physiotherapy, )-
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Radial Shock Wave Treatment

    Patients assigned to this group will receive three sessions. During each session, 2000 pulses will be administered using a radial shock wave generator, with a pressure of 2.5 bars and a frequency of 8 Hz.

    Other: Radial shock waves treatment

  • Experimental
    Focal Shock Wave Treatment

    Patients assigned to this group will receive three sessions. During each session, 2000 pulses will be delivered by a focal shock wave generator, with an energy flux density of 0.2 mJ/mm² and a frequency of 4 Hz.

    Other: Focal Shock Waves treatment

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Shock Waves

    Subjects in this group will receive a placebo treatment with very low energy settings, designed to simulate therapy without offering real therapeutic effects. This group will receive 20 pulses per session, with an energy flux density of 0.08 mJ/mm².

    Other: shock waves placebo treatment

Interventions

  • OtherRadial shock waves treatment

    Subjects in this group will receive radial shock waves

  • OtherFocal Shock Waves treatment

    Subjects in this group will receive focal shock waves

  • Othershock waves placebo treatment

    Subjects in this group will receive a shock waves placebo treatment with very low energy settings

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The pain VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, used to record patients' pain progression. VAS is a straight horizontal line of fixed length, usually 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the parameter to be measured where "0" on the far left is no pain and "10" on the far right is the worst pain possible.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline pain at 6 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Grip strength

    Grip strength is a measure of muscular strength or the maximum force/tension generated by one's forearm muscles. It will be recorded using a hand-held dynamometer. The subject is asked to exert grip strength until pain appears. It is measured in newtons.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline pain at 6 month

  2. Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE)

    The PRTEE is a population specific 15-item questionnaire designed to measure forearm pain and disability associated with lateral epicondyle tendinopathy. 0% is the best and 100% is the worst disability outcome

    Time frame: Change from Baseline pain at 6 month

  3. The Global Rating of Change (GROC)

    It's a scale that assesses whether the patient condition has gotten worse, better, or stayed the same and to quantify the magnitude of that change, typically following treatment.Subjects will make global ratings of changes regarding their level of well-being from their neck pain since the initial examination on a 15-point self-report scale (from -7 to 7), where -7 is the worst possible value and 7 is the best possible value.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline pain at 6 month

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06587412
Responsible party
Prof. Dr. Daniel Pecos Martín (Professor, University of Alcala) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Start date
Mar 12, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 20, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 2, 2026

Study contacts

Yanira Rodriguez-García, Master
Contact
yanira.rodriguez@edu.uah.es
34 918855142

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion