ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07627503Updated Jun 5, 2026

Supine vs. Prone PCNL for Large Renal Stones: A Randomized Trial in Yemen.

An interventional study of Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in Kidney Calculi and Nephrolithiasis, sponsored by Sana'a University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Yemen. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-05.

Sponsored by Sana'a University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the safety, cost-effectiveness, and patient recovery of two different surgical positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in adults aged 18 to 70 years who have kidney stones larger than 2 cm. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the supine (lying on the back) surgical position result in fewer early postoperative complications than the traditional prone (lying on the stomach) position?
  • Does the supine position reduce the total surgery time, direct hospital costs, and postoperative pain?

Researchers will compare patients assigned to undergo PCNL in the supine position to those assigned to the prone position to see if the supine approach offers a safer, more cost-effective, and more comfortable recovery.

Participants will:

  • Undergo standard PCNL surgery to remove their kidney stones in either the supine or prone position.
  • Have their pain levels, surgery time, and any early surgical complications monitored during their hospital stay.
  • Complete brief questionnaires regarding their overall surgical satisfaction and quality of life at 1 month and 3 months after the procedure.
02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Calculi
  • Nephrolithiasis

Keywords

  • PCNL
  • Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
  • Kidney Stones
  • Supine PCNL
  • Prone PCNL
03

In context

Kidney Calculi

509 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Calculi; 146 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 86 across 391 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Calculi.

Browse Kidney Calculi studies →

Lead sponsor

Sana'a University is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18-70 years.
  • Diagnosis of solitary or multiple renal stones with a cumulative diameter greater than 2 cm, confirmed by imaging (CT KUB).
  • Patients eligible for standard PCNL (24-30 Fr).
  • (ASA) physical status I-III.
  • Willingness and ability to provide .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with active urinary tract infection (UTI) not responding to antibiotics.
  • Patients with bleeding diathesis or on anticoagulant therapy that cannot be safely discontinued.
  • Patients with anatomical abnormalities of the kidney or urinary tract that preclude standard PCNL.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease where general anesthesia or prolonged surgical positioning is .
  • Patients with a history of previous ipsilateral renal surgery.
  • Patients unwilling or unable to comply with follow-up protocols.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Supine PCNL

    Patients will undergo standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (24-30 Fr tract size) performed in the supine position.

    Procedure: Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

  • Active comparator
    Prone PCNL

    Patients will undergo standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (24-30 Fr tract size) performed in the conventional prone position.

    Procedure: Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

Interventions

  • ProcedureSupine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

    Standard PCNL performed with the patient in the supine position using a standard 24-30 Fr tract.

  • ProcedureProne Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

    Standard PCNL performed with the patient in the traditional prone position using a standard 24-30 Fr tract.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence and Severity of Early Postoperative Complications

    Complications will be assessed and classified using the Modified Clavien-Dindo Classification system. The scale ranges from Grade I (minor deviation from normal postoperative course) to Grade V (death of the patient). Lower grades indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Operative Time

    Total duration of the surgical procedure, measured continuously from the initial skin incision to the final skin closure, recorded in minutes.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (Day 0)

  2. Postoperative Pain Score

    Postoperative pain will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Lower scores indicate a better outcome (less postoperative pain).

    Time frame: At 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours post-surgery

  3. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)

    Measured using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. The utility index score will be calculated using the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia value set, ranging from -0.683 (worst possible health state) to 1.000 (full health), where higher scores indicate a better outcome (better health-related quality of life).

    Time frame: At 1 month and 3 months post-surgery

  4. Patient Satisfaction Score

    Overall patient satisfaction with the surgical experience, anesthetic process, and early recovery will be measured using a 5-point Likert-type satisfaction scale. The scale ranges from 1 (highly dissatisfied) to 5 (highly satisfied), where higher scores indicate a better outcome (greater patient satisfaction).

    Time frame: At 30 days post-surgery

  5. Direct Hospitalization Costs

    Total direct medical costs associated with the procedure, calculated as the sum of disposable medical supply costs and hospital stay duration costs. Measured in Yemeni Rials (YER).

    Time frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge (typically 1 to 7 days)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Al-Kuwait University Hospital
    Sanaa, 13078, Yemen
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jun 2026; primary completion for Jun 2027, 12 months later.

Of 183 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Kidney Calculi, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 54. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 199 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 51.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 31, 2026
First posted
Jun 4, 2026
StartEst.
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Jun 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07627503
Lead sponsor
Sana'a University
Responsible party
Haitham Mohammed Jowah (Lecturer, Sana'a University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 4, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 5, 2026

Study contacts

Haitham M Jowah, Lecturer
Contact
h.jowah@su.edu.ye
+967774831058
Waleed M Al-Ata, M.B.B.Ch
Contact
Walidalata@gmail.com
+967777775223
Waleed M Al-Ata, M.B.B.Ch
principal investigator · Al-Kuwait University Hospital
Khaled M Al-Kohlany, Associate Professor
study director · Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana'a University
Abualgaith A Alkholany, MD
study chair · Al-Kuwait University Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion