ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07625683SIROPSEDALUpdated Jun 4, 2026

Observational Study of SIROPSEDAL in Acute Cough

An observational study in Acute Cough, Upper Respiratory Tract Infection and Common Cold, sponsored by Laboratoires Elerte. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 1 Year and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-04.

Primary conditionCommon ColdRegistry: Respiratory Tract InfectionsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Respiratory Tract Infections — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Common Cold
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Common Cold, a narrower term within Respiratory Tract Infections.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Laboratoires Elerte · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
124
Ages
1 Year and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective, multicenter, observational post-market clinical follow-up study evaluates the performance and safety of SIROPSEDAL in children and adults with acute cough treated in routine clinical practice. Patients prescribed SIROPSEDAL independently of study participation will be followed for 7 +/- 1 days using patient-reported outcomes including a cough visual analog scale and the Cough Symptom Score.

Read the detailed description

SIROPSEDAL is a CE-marked medical device syrup indicated for the relief of dry and productive cough in adults and children from 1 year of age. This non-interventional multicenter French study is conducted under real-life conditions of use. The primary objective is to evaluate the percentage of patients achieving a clinically meaningful reduction of at least 17 mm in cough intensity on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale between baseline and Day 2. Secondary outcomes include changes in cough intensity, Cough Symptom Score evolution, percentage of patients without cough, associated clinical signs, safety, device deficiencies and compliance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Cough
  • Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
  • Common Cold

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • acute cough
  • cough
  • cough syrup
  • PMCF
  • Cough Symptom Score
03

In context

Common Cold Reclassified

219 studies on the registry are indexed under Common Cold; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 124 is close to the median of 114 across 25 observational studies indexed under Common Cold.

Browse Common Cold studies →

Lead sponsor

Laboratoires Elerte is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Compared within Common Cold, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Respiratory Tract Infections. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Children and adults from 1 year of age presenting with acute cough for less than 10 days in French general practice, for whom SIROPSEDAL has been prescribed in routine care independently of study participation.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age greater than or equal to 1 year.
  • Acute cough evolving for less than 10 days.
  • Cough intensity VAS greater than 40/100.
  • SIROPSEDAL prescribed independently from study participation.
  • No hospitalization required.
  • Written from the patient or from parent(s)/legal representative for minors, as applicable.
  • Able to attend the Day 7 +/- 1 day visit or teleconsultation.
  • Affiliated with or beneficiary of a health insurance system.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ACE inhibitor or sartan use.
  • Asthma or .
  • ongoing or within the previous 3 days.
  • Antibiotics ongoing or within the previous 3 days.
  • Antitussives ongoing or within the previous 3 days.
  • Antihistamines ongoing or within the previous 3 days.
  • Aerosol therapy ongoing or within the previous 3 days.
  • Severe signs suggesting a causal disease requiring additional investigations according to the investigator.
  • Severe signs requiring corticosteroids, aerosol therapy or centrally acting antitussive treatment according to the investigator.
  • Any listed in the instructions for use.
  • Patient under legal protection.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Intolerance, or allergy to one or more product components.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
124 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Responder rate at Day 2

    Percentage of patients with a clinically meaningful reduction of at least 17 mm in cough intensity between baseline and Day 2 on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale evaluating cough intensity during the previous 24 hours.

    Time frame: Day 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in cough intensity assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The scale ranges from 0 mm (no cough) to 100 mm (worst cough imaginable), with higher scores indicating greater cough intensity.

    Cough intensity will be assessed by the participant using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 mm (no cough) to 100 mm (worst cough imaginable). The outcome measure is the change from baseline to Day 2 and Day 7 ±1. Higher scores indicate greater cough intensity.

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 2 and Day 7 ±1

  2. Responder rate at Day 7

    Percentage of patients with a clinically meaningful reduction of at least 17 mm in cough intensity.

    Time frame: Day 7 ±1

  3. Change From Baseline in Total Cough Symptom Score (CSS)

    Change from baseline in total cough frequency assessed using the Cough Symptom Score (CSS). The total CSS score ranges from 0 to 10 and is calculated as the sum of the daytime and nighttime CSS components. Higher scores indicate more frequent cough symptoms.

    Time frame: Day 2 and Day 7 ±1 day

  4. Change From Baseline in Daytime Cough Symptom Score (CSS)

    Change from baseline in daytime cough frequency assessed using the daytime component of the Cough Symptom Score (CSS). The daytime CSS component is scored from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates no cough symptoms and 5 indicates the highest frequency of daytime cough symptoms. Higher scores indicate more frequent cough symptoms.

    Time frame: Day 2 and Day 7 ±1 day

  5. Change From Baseline in Nighttime Cough Symptom Score (CSS)

    Change from baseline in nighttime cough frequency assessed using the nighttime component of the Cough Symptom Score (CSS). The nighttime CSS component is scored from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates no cough symptoms and 5 indicates the highest frequency of nighttime cough symptoms. Higher scores indicate more frequent cough symptoms

    Time frame: Day 2 and Day 7 ±1 day

  6. Percentage of Participants With Rhinitis

    Percentage of participants presenting rhinitis, assessed by investigator interview and clinical evaluation and recorded as present or absent (yes/no).

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7 ±1 day or end of study

  7. Percentage of Participants With Sneezing

    Percentage of participants presenting sneezing, assessed by investigator interview and clinical evaluation and recorded as present or absent (yes/no).

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7 ±1 day or end of study

  8. Percentage of Participants With Colored Sputum

    Percentage of participants presenting colored sputum, assessed by investigator interview and clinical evaluation and recorded as present or absent (yes/no).

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7 ±1 day or end of study

  9. Percentage of Participants With Fever

    Percentage of participants presenting fever, assessed by investigator interview and clinical evaluation and recorded as present or absent (yes/no).

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7 ±1 day or end of study

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07625683
Collaborators
Clin-Experts
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 4, 2026
Start date
Oct 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 4, 2026

Study contacts

Renaud URBINELLI
Contact
etudes@clin-experts.fr
0756882093

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion