CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07616687OPTIMUpdated Jun 30, 2026

Optimal Care With Guselkumab in Crohn's Disease / OPTIM Study A Prospective Open Label Interventional, Multicenter Study

A Phase 4 interventional study of Guselkumab in Crohn Disease (CD) and Intensification, sponsored by Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires Digestives. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-30.

Sponsored by Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires Digestives · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
210
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic and destructive inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract characterized by phases of relapse and remission. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, anti-integrins and anti-interleukin (IL) 12/23 are the main therapeutic agents to obtain deep remission and prevent disability. Despite the significant advances these biologics represent in treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), many patients experience suboptimal responses, including primary non-response or a loss of effectiveness over time, often leading to treatment discontinuation. For all these medications, a dose-response relationship has been demonstrated and an increase in dose or dosing frequency is recommended. Dose escalation is now an essential therapeutic approach necessary in 30 to 50% of CD patients treated with biologics. This strategy, supported by international guidelines, allows for long-term efficacy to be maintained without compromising safety.

Guselkumab (GUS) is a monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of IL-23. In a recent phase III trial (GALAXI), GUS demonstrated superiority of both subcutaneous (SC) maintenance doses (200 mg every 4 weeks [q4w] and 100 mg every 8 weeks [q8w]) compared to placebo and ustekinumab. In the GALAXI phase III program, at least 30% of patients did not achieve clinical response after a 12-week intravenous induction, and almost 20% experienced a loss of response by week 44. In these patients, the benefit of an intensified dose of GUS (200 mg q4w) maintenance remains to be determined to guide clinicians in optimizing its use in clinical practice. The investigator aimed to evaluate the one-year effectiveness of GUS in CD in real-world settings and under optimal conditions allowing dose intensification.

Read the detailed description

Interventionnel, open multicenter study, the objectives are:

Primary Objective To evaluate the one-year effectiveness of GUS in CD in real-world setting.

Secondary Objectives

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of GUS intensification from 100 mg q8w to 200 mg q4w in patients with loss of response,
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of an intensified GUS 200 mg q4w maintenance therapy in patients who are primary non-responders to GUS SC induction at 12 weeks;
  • To assess the factors associated with GUS intensification effectiveness.
02

Conditions studied

  • Crohn Disease (CD)
  • Intensification

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Crohn's disease
  • Intensification
  • Guselkumab
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • - Patients with a diagnosis of CD according to ECCO guidelines,
  • 18 years of age or older at the time of informed consent,
  • Absence of contraindication to guselkumab,
  • Active disease according to PRO2 (abdominal pain > 1 or stool frequency > 3), and faecal calprotectin > 250 ug/g,
  • Objective active disease documented within ≤ 2 months by endoscopy or by MRI when not contraindicated, orby IUS),
  • Not currently participating in any interventional research.
  • Patient naïve or exposed to one or more advanced therapy, in accordance with the approved indication for guselkumab in Crohn's disease.
  • Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at the baseline Visit.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Patient under legal protection,
  • Previous exposure to an anti-IL23
  • Combination of advanced therapy with GUS,
  • Patient with ostomy,
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman,
  • Patient with perianal CD predominant disease.
  • Active clinically significant infection or HIV, Hep B, Hep C, or active tuberculosis
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
210 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Guselkumab Dose Optimization Strategy

    Participants with active Crohn disease receive guselkumab treatment as part of a treat-to-target strategy. During maintenance therapy, dose optimization may be performed according to clinical response criteria defined in the protocol.

    Drug: Guselkumab

Interventions

  • DrugGuselkumab

    Guselkumab is a human monoclonal antibody targeting IL-23. In this study, patients receive guselkumab as part of a treat-to-target strategy. At week 12 (W12), patients are managed according to disease response: those with adequate response continue standard maintenance dosing, while non-responders are escalated to an intensified treatment regimen with adjusted dosing frequency.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. - Steroid free clinical remission (SFCR) associated with fecal calprotectin < 250 ug/g at Week 48

    Steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR), defined as clinical remission measured by the patient reprt outcome, PRO2 : abdominal pain ≤ 1 and stool frequency ≤ 3, without corticosteroid use at the time of assessment, combined with fecal calprotectin \< 250 µg/g.

    Time frame: Week 48 +/- 12Weeks for the patients who are intensified between Week 32 and Week 48

  2. - Steroid free clinical remission (SFCR) associated with fecal calprotectin < 250 ug/g at Week 48

    Steroid free clinical remission measured by abdominal pain ≤ 1 and stool frequency ≤ 3 with feacal calprotection \< 250 ug/g at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48 (+/-12Weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. - Morphological remission at Week 48 assessed using the same tool that was used for the patient's inclusion: endoscopy, MRI or IUS (major secondary endpoint),

    Evaluation of the morphological remission at W48 by one of the morphological exams: endoscopy: SES-CD \<3 points, MRI: bowel wall thickness ≤3 mm without contrast enhancement, IUS: bowel wall thickness ≤3 mm without color doppler signal

    Time frame: Week 48

  2. SFCR associated with fecal calprotectin < 250 ug/g at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48,

    Evaluation of the clinical remission by PRO2: abdominal pain ≤ 1 and stool frequency ≤ 3, without corticoids associates with a biological remission defined by calprotectin \< 250 ug/g

    Time frame: Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

  3. Clinical remission at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

    Evaluation of the Clinical remission at the visits by the patient report outcome PRO2: abdominal pain ≤ 1 and stool frequency ≤ 3

    Time frame: Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

  4. Biomarker remission at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

    Evaluation of the biomarker remission: CRP \< 5 g/L and fecal calprotectin \<250 ug/g

    Time frame: Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48,

  5. Need for GUS dose intensification (Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48)

    Evaluation of the need of intensification at the visits if the FC increase (\> 25% with a minimal cut-off of 250 ug/g) between W12 and W48 or by a FC \> 250 µg/g at W24, or disease activity confirmed by : Endoscopy: SES-CD \> 3 points or IUS: bowel wall thickness ≥ 3 mm and/or with color doppler signal, or MRI : bowel wall thickness ≥3 mm and/or with contrast enhancement.

    Time frame: Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

  6. Serum levels of guselkumab (Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48)

    Analysis of the serum level of guselkumab

    Time frame: Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

  7. Neutralizing antibodies to guselkumab (Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48)

    Evaluation of the neutralization antibodies to guselkumab

    Time frame: Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

  8. Crohn's Disease-related hospitalization during study period (Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48)

    Crohn's Disease-related hospitalization during study period

    Time frame: Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

  9. -Change in the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire(SIBD-Q) from baseline (Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48)

    Analysis of the change in SIBD-Q (quality of life index) during the study Score range: 10 - 70 The higher the score, the better the patient's clinical status (i.e., greater likelihood of remission).

    Time frame: Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

  10. Guselkumab persistence

    Evaluation of the Guselkumab persistence during the study

    Time frame: Week 48

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Chu Amiens Picardie
    Amiens, 80054, France
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Dolinger M, Torres J, Vermeire S. Crohn's disease. Lancet. 2024 Mar 23;403(10432):1177-1191. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02586-2. Epub 2024 Mar 1. PubMed 38437854 ↗
  • 7. Panaccione R, Hart A, Steinwurz F et al. S1052 Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Guselkumab Induction Therapy in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease: Results Through Week 48 From the Phase 3 GRAVITI Study. Am J Gastroenterology 119(10S):p S740-S741, October 2024
  • 6. Panaccione, R et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease: results of the GALAXI 2 & 3 phase 3 studies. Oral presentation (Abstract #1057b) at Digestive Disease Week (DDW) 2024. May 2024.
  • Gordon H, Minozzi S, Kopylov U, Verstockt B, Chaparro M, Buskens C, Warusavitarne J, Agrawal M, Allocca M, Atreya R, Battat R, Bettenworth D, Bislenghi G, Brown SR, Burisch J, Casanova MJ, Czuber-Dochan W, de Groof J, El-Hussuna A, Ellul P, Fidalgo C, Fiorino G, Gisbert JP, Sabino JG, Hanzel J, Holubar S, Iacucci M, Iqbal N, Kapizioni C, Karmiris K, Kobayashi T, Kotze PG, Luglio G, Maaser C, Moran G, Noor N, Papamichael K, Peros G, Reenaers C, Sica G, Sigall-Boneh R, Vavricka SR, Yanai H, Myrelid P, Adamina M, Raine T. ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Crohn's Disease: Medical Treatment. J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Oct 15;18(10):1531-1555. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae091. No abstract available. PubMed 38877997 ↗
  • Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S, Argollo M, Pouillon L, Peppas S, Gonzalez-Lorenzo M, Lytras T, Bonovas S. Loss of Response to Vedolizumab and Ability of Dose Intensification to Restore Response in Patients With Crohn's Disease or Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Apr;17(5):838-846.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.026. Epub 2018 Jun 20. PubMed 29935327 ↗
  • Singh S, Murad MH, Fumery M, Sedano R, Jairath V, Panaccione R, Sandborn WJ, Ma C. Comparative efficacy and safety of biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec;6(12):1002-1014. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00312-5. Epub 2021 Oct 22. PubMed 34688373 ↗
  • Feuerstein JD, Ho EY, Shmidt E, Singh H, Falck-Ytter Y, Sultan S, Terdiman JP; American Gastroenterological Association Institute Clinical Guidelines Committee. AGA Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Medical Management of Moderate to Severe Luminal and Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease. Gastroenterology. 2021 Jun;160(7):2496-2508. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.04.022. No abstract available. PubMed 34051983 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 26, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07616687
Lead sponsor
Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires Digestives
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 1, 2026
Start date
Jun 18, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 15, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 30, 2026

Study contacts

MIRA RAAD
Contact
mraad@getaid.org
0033 6 85 29 97 64
Marie Coisnon
Contact
mcoisnon@getaid.org
0033 6 08 95 94 11
Mathurin Fumery, Investigator
principal investigator · Hospital of Amiens, France

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion