ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07700446ReCOUPUpdated Oct 29, 2026

Efficacy of Upadacitinib Re-induction Therapy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Who Lost Response to 30 mg Maintenance Dose

A Phase 4 interventional study of Upadacitinib in Ulcerative Colitis (UC), sponsored by Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires Digestives. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-29.

Sponsored by Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires Digestives · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

ReCOUP is a multicenter clinical study designed to evaluate the efficacy of upadacitinib (Rinvoq®) in patients with ulcerative colitis whose disease has become active again despite maintenance treatment with upadacitinib 30 mg.

This study involves adult patients aged 18 to 64 years with active ulcerative colitis, who are being treated with upadacitinib and are not participating in another interventional clinical trial.

Participation in this study will depend on the patients' response to treatment during the 52-week maintenance period.

Several follow-up visits will be scheduled throughout the study according to a timetable defined by the protocol, and additional visits may be arranged if necessary depending on patients' health status.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ulcerative colitis
  • upadacitinib
  • re-induction
03

In context

Colitis, Ulcerative

1,853 studies on the registry are indexed under Colitis, Ulcerative; 472 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 70 across 1,236 interventional studies indexed under Colitis, Ulcerative.

Browse Colitis, Ulcerative studies →

Lead sponsor

Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires Digestives is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subjects must voluntarily sign and date an , approved by an IEC/IRB, prior to the initiation of any screening or study-specific procedures.
  2. Individuals at least 18 years old and less than 65 years.
  3. Laboratory values meeting the following criteria within the screening period prior to the first dose of study drug:

    • Serum (ALT) \< 2 × ;
    • Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \< 2 x ULN;
    • Estimated (GFR) by simplified 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula > 0 mL/min/1.73 m2;
    • Total white blood cell (WBC) count > 2,500/μL;
    • (ANC) > 1,500/μL;
    • count > 100,000/μL;
    • Absolute lymphocyte count > 850/μL;
    • > 10 g/dL.
  4. Are willing and able to comply with procedures required in this protocol.
  5. Subjects must not be incarcerated and must be freely willing and able to provide informed consent. Examples of subjects unable to freely provide informed consent may include some adults under legal protection measures (e.g., under guardianship/curatorship) or unable to express their consent and select adults under psychiatric care. Investigator's discretion should be applied.
  6. Diagnosis of moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis with a documented initial response to upadacitinib treatment (defined as adapted Mayo score of 5-9) and subsequent documented loss of response to upadacitinib 30 mg QD dose. This should be within 8 weeks of screening. This will allow for short term non-UC related flares to self-resolve, while at the same time allowing for adequate time interval between appointments.
  7. Subject has documented diagnosis of moderate to severe active UC with a modified Mayo score of 5 to 9 points and endoscopic subscore of 2 to 3 at the time of screening.
  8. Pregnancy testing in females of /individuals of childbearing potential; Recommendations of this protocol :

    Females of childbearing potential/Individuals of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at the Screening Visit.

  9. Female subjects of childbearing potential must practice at least 1 protocol-specified method of birth control, from Study Day 1 through at least 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Female subjects of nonchildbearing potential do not need to use birth control.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject with current diagnosis of Crohn's Disease or diagnosis of indeterminate colitis.
  2. Current diagnosis of fulminant colitis and/or toxic megacolon.
  3. History of (per investigator's judgment) drug or alcohol abuse within the last 6 months.
  4. Conditions that could interfere with drug absorption including but not limited to short bowel syndrome.
  5. History of colectomy (total or subtotal), ileoanal pouch, Kock pouch, or ileostomy or is planning bowel surgery.
  6. Subject has active TB or latent TB.
  7. Subject who received fecal microbial transplantation within 30 days prior to Baseline.
  8. Subject with new or chronic systemic use of known strong cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A inhibitors or strong inducers while on UPA therapy should be evaluated by caring physician as to possibility of this medication being responsible for the loss of response to UPA. Herbal therapies and other traditional medicines are defined as any herbal formulation that is intended to treat or prevent health problems and may include supplements based on herbs which the subject is taking.
  9. Subject currently receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN) or plan to receive TPN at any time during study treatment.
  10. Subject with positive C. difficile toxin stool assay during screening.
  11. Infection(s) requiring treatment with intravenous anti-infectives within 30 days prior to the Baseline visit or oral/intramuscular anti-infectives within 14 days prior to the baseline visit.
  12. Chronic recurring infection and/or active viral infection that, based on the investigator's clinical assessment, makes the subject an unsuitable candidate for the study
  13. Subject has current or past history of recurrent or disseminated (even a single episode) herpes zoster
  14. Subject has current or past history of disseminated (even a single episode) herpes simplex
  15. Prior or current gastrointestinal (GI) dysplasia, other than completely removed dysplastic lesion in any performed during or before the screening endoscopy.
  16. History of any , except for successfully treated nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) or localized carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
  17. History of gastrointestinal (GI) perforation (other than due to appendicitis or mechanical injury), diverticulitis, or significantly increased risk of GI perforation per investigator's judgment.
  18. History of an allergic reaction or significant sensitivity to constituents of upadacitinib (and its )
  19. Subject who previously received stem cell transplantation
  20. Subject has been a previous recipient of an organ transplant which requires continued .
  21. History of cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, coronary stenting, or aortocoronary bypass stenting or retinal vein occlusion; however, if the investigator determines there are no suitable treatment alternatives available for a subject who has experienced one of these events more than 6 months prior to the Baseline visit, the investigator must document a favorable benefit-risk assessment to justify the subject's inclusion in the study.

    In patients with known VTE risk factors other than cardiovascular or alignancy risk factors, participation in this clinical trial is considered the most suitable treatment option among treatment alternatives and the risks and benefits have been discussed with the subject.

  22. A serious AE or AE that is identified or a possible risk of UPA during prior treatment with upadacitinib that is deemed to have a causal relationship with upadacitinib by Investigator
  23. Subjects who have been treated with any drug of chemical or biologic nature within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of study treatment or who are currently enrolled in another interventional clinical study.
  24. Received treatment with rectal aminosalicylates or , other enemas/suppositories (other than required for endoscopy), within 7 days prior to the Screening endoscopy and during the remainder of the Screening Period.
  25. Received cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil or thalidomide within 30 days prior to Baseline.
  26. Subjects who received azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine within 10 days of Baseline.
  27. Subjects who received intravenous corticosteroids within 14 days prior to screening or during the screening period.
  28. Subjects who require corticosteroids to remain in the study
  29. Subject who received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (except topicalNSAIDs and the useof low dose aspirin for cardiovascular [CV] protection) within 7 days prior to baseline
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(17)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Upadacitinib re-induction strategy

    Patients with moderate to severe active UC who have had a loss of response to upadacitinib 30 mg maintenance dose will receive receive higher dose of upadacitinib for a specified period. Followed by a 52-week maintenance phase with upadacitinib 30 mg QD.

    Drug: Upadacitinib

Interventions

  • Upadacitinib is a selective JAK1 inhibitor. In this study, patients receive higher dose of upadacitinib as re-induction strategy. in the first timepoint, patients are managed according to disease response : patients without clinical response continue on higher updacatinib dose , patients with clinical response undergo endoscopy : patients with a positive endoscopy continue higher upadacitinib dose and patients with a negative endoscopy transition to the maintenance dose.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To determine the rate of re-capture of clinical response in subjects with moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis who had a loss of response to upadacitinib 30 mg QD maintenance dose prior to the study entry.

    Time frame: from baseline to Wk8

Secondary outcomes

  1. To determine the proportion of subjects achieving clinical response

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

  2. To determine the proportion of subjects achieving clinical response

    Time frame: Frome baseline to Week 16

  3. To determine the rate of clinical remission

    Time frame: Frome baseline to week 8 and week 16

  4. To determine the proportion of subjects achieving clinical remission

    Time frame: Frome basline to 52-week maintenance period.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Nov 2029, 36 months later.

Of 48 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Colitis, Ulcerative, half reached primary completion within 56 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 33 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 36 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 63 studies reached it within 43 months; a quarter within 25 and three quarters within 63.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 8, 2026
First posted
Jul 14, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2029
CompletionEst.
Apr 2030
Last update
Oct 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Secondary outcomes
3 time frame changed
What changed in the outcomes
  • Time frameTo determine the proportion of subjects achieving clinical responseFrom baseline to Wk8 → From baseline to Week 8
  • Time frameTo determine the proportion of subjects achieving clinical response#2Frome baseline to Wk16 → Frome baseline to Week 16
  • Time frameTo determine the rate of clinical remissionFrome baseline to wk8 and wk16 → Frome baseline to week 8 and week 16
Oct 29, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 29, 2026
    Secondary outcomes 3 time frame changed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • Time frameTo determine the proportion of subjects achieving clinical responseFrom baseline to Wk8 → From baseline to Week 8
    • Time frameTo determine the proportion of subjects achieving clinical response#2Frome baseline to Wk16 → Frome baseline to Week 16
    • Time frameTo determine the rate of clinical remissionFrome baseline to wk8 and wk16 → Frome baseline to week 8 and week 16

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07700446
Lead sponsor
Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires Digestives
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 14, 2026
Start date
Nov 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 29, 2026

Study contacts

Project Director Getaid
Contact
jmussot@getaid.org
+33 (0)9 72 57 61 60
Lucine Vuitton
principal investigator · CHU de Besançon, FRANCE

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Upadacitinib

Start the discussion