ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07612982Updated May 29, 2026

Hybrid vs Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Injection in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

An interventional study of Ultrasound-guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection with fluoroscopic confirmation and Fluoroscopy-guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, sponsored by Marmara University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-29.

Sponsored by Marmara University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common degenerative condition that can cause chronic low back and leg pain, especially during walking or standing. Interlaminar epidural steroid injections are widely used to relieve pain and improve function in patients who do not respond adequately to conservative treatments.

These injections are usually performed under fluoroscopic guidance, which allows accurate needle placement but exposes patients and healthcare providers to ionizing radiation. Ultrasound guidance has emerged as an alternative technique that avoids radiation exposure; however, ultrasound alone may not always confirm correct epidural spread of the injected medication.

This prospective, randomized clinical trial aims to compare two commonly used imaging approaches for interlaminar epidural steroid injections in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: fluoroscopy-guided injection and ultrasound-guided injection with fluoroscopic confirmation (hybrid technique). The study will evaluate patient satisfaction, radiation exposure, procedure time, technical success, pain relief, and functional outcomes.

The results of this study are expected to help identify the most effective and safe imaging guidance method for interlaminar epidural steroid injections in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, randomized clinical trial will compare two imaging guidance strategies for interlaminar epidural steroid injection in adult patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: a fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural steroid injection group and an ultrasound-guided interlaminar epidural steroid injection group with fluoroscopic confirmation of epidural spread (hybrid technique).

All procedures will be performed at a single tertiary care center by experienced clinicians using standardized institutional protocols. In both groups, the interlaminar epidural space will be accessed using a midline or paramedian approach, and the same corticosteroid formulation and injection volume will be administered to ensure treatment consistency.

Procedural outcomes will include total procedure time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose parameters recorded directly from the fluoroscopy unit, and technical success defined as correct epidural space access with appropriate contrast spread. Radiation exposure will be assessed using dose metrics provided by the imaging system, allowing comparison between the two guidance techniques.

Patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated using validated pain and functional assessment tools at baseline and during routine follow-up visits according to the study protocol. Patient satisfaction will be assessed following the procedure. Adverse events related to the procedure will be documented and monitored throughout the study period.

By systematically comparing these two imaging guidance approaches under standardized clinical conditions, this study aims to clarify whether ultrasound-guided interlaminar epidural steroid injection with fluoroscopic confirmation can reduce radiation exposure while maintaining procedural efficiency, technical accuracy, and clinical effectiveness comparable to conventional fluoroscopy-guided injection.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Keywords

  • Fluoroscopy
  • Radiation exposure
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Interventional Ultrasonography
  • Epidural Injections
03

In context

Spinal Stenosis

458 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Stenosis; 105 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 44 is below the median of 80 across 281 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Stenosis.

Browse Spinal Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Marmara University is the lead sponsor of 599 studies on the registry; 138 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 40 and 75 years
  • Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis confirmed by clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Presence of neurogenic claudication symptoms for at least 3 months
  • Inadequate response to conservative treatment, including medication, physical therapy, or exercise
  • Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score ≥ 4 at baseline
  • Ability to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous lumbar spine surgery
  • Vertebral fracture, spinal , or history of significant lumbar trauma
  • Peripheral vascular claudication or peripheral polyneuropathy
  • Epidural injection within the past 6 months
  • Medical conditions severely limiting ambulation unrelated to lumbar spinal stenosis (e.g., severe cardiopulmonary disease or advanced hip/knee osteoarthritis)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Coagulation disorders or inability to safely discontinue anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy according to guideline recommendations
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics, corticosteroids, or contrast agents
  • Active local or systemic infection
  • (BMI) > 30 kg/m²
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
44 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ultrasound-assisted fluoroscopy-confirmed lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection

    Lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection using betamethasone (CALES) will be performed under ultrasound guidance, followed by fluoroscopic confirmation of needle position and contrast spread.

    Procedure: Ultrasound-guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection with fluoroscopic confirmation

  • Active comparator
    Fluoroscopy-guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection

    Lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection using betamethasone (CALES) will be performed according to standard clinical practice under fluoroscopic guidance, with fluoroscopic confirmation of needle position and contrast spread.

    Procedure: Fluoroscopy-guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection

Interventions

  • ProcedureUltrasound-guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection with fluoroscopic confirmation

    Lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection using betamethasone (CALES) will be performed under ultrasound guidance, followed by fluoroscopic confirmation of needle position and contrast spread.

  • ProcedureFluoroscopy-guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection

    Lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection using betamethasone (CALES) will be performed according to standard clinical practice under fluoroscopic guidance, with fluoroscopic confirmation of needle position and contrast spread.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction with the procedure was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale.

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

  2. Radiation Exposure

    Radiation exposure measured as air kerma (mGy) during the procedure.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  3. Procedure Time

    Procedure time defined as the duration from identification of the target interlaminar space using ultrasound or fluoroscopy to completion of the injection.

    Time frame: During the procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 hour, and 3 weeks after the procedure

  2. Functional Status

    Functional status assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 weeks after the procedure

  3. Technical Success

    Successful completion of interlaminar epidural steroid injection with confirmed epidural spread.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  4. Number of Needle Insertions

    Number of needle insertion attempts required to complete the procedure.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  5. Fluoroscopy Time

    Total fluoroscopy time automatically recorded by the fluoroscopy unit during the procedure.

    Time frame: During the procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared publicly. De-identified aggregate data may be available upon reasonable request, subject to institutional policies and ethical approval.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07612982
Lead sponsor
Marmara University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 29, 2026
Start date
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 29, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion