ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07603310RECRUIT-PEEPUpdated Jul 10, 2026

Influence of Lung Recruitment Potential on Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Titration Strategies in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Patients.

An interventional study of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Titration guided by Static Compliance and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Titration guided by Transpulmonary Pressure in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), sponsored by Hospital Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino. Recruiting at 1 site in Chile. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-10.

Sponsored by Hospital Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by severe hypoxemia and diffuse alveolar collapse, often requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Non-individualized mechanical ventilation settings can cause ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) prevents alveolar collapse, but its effect varies among individuals. The recruitment-to-inflation (R/I) ratio evaluates bedside lung recruitment potential. This pilot study aims to compare two individualized PEEP titration strategies-one guided by the best static respiratory compliance and another guided by transpulmonary pressure via an esophageal balloon-and evaluate how baseline lung recruitment potential alters the early physiological responses to these interventions. Both strategies are preceded by an identical, standardized pressure-controlled initial lung recruitment maneuver to establish a baseline recruitment state.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group pilot study conducted at the Adult Intensive Care Unit of Hospital Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino (HFRZ). Eligible adult patients under invasive mechanical ventilation with moderate-to-severe ARDS within 36 hours of fulfilling Berlin criteria will be evaluated.

Prior to randomization, the patient's recruitment potential will be measured bedside using the R/I ratio (where > 0.5 indicates high recruitment potential and \<= 0.5 indicates low potential). Eligible participants will then be randomized 1:1 into two PEEP titration groups:

  1. PEEP titration targeted to achieve the best static compliance of the respiratory system.
  2. PEEP titration guided by transpulmonary pressure measured via an esophageal balloon to target a positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure.

Crucially, immediately before starting the specific PEEP titration protocol in either group, an identical, standardized lung recruitment maneuver will be performed. This maneuver is executed in pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) with a control pressure of 15 cmH2O, I:E ratio of 1:1, FiO2 1.0, starting with PEEP 5 cmH2O and increasing by 5 cmH2O every 10 seconds up to PEEP 25 cmH2O, maintaining a maximum peak pressure limit of 40 cmH2O for exactly 1 minute.

Standard baseline ventilator parameters will follow protective ventilation targets: volume-controlled ventilation, tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg of predicted body weight, respiratory rate adjusted to keep pH 7.25-7.45, plateau pressure \< 28 cmH2O, and driving pressure \< 14 cmH2O. Physiological parameters (PaO2/FiO2, driving pressure, ventilatory ratio, static compliance) will be recorded at 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours. The primary outcome is the change in oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) at 24 hours. The study will explore how the baseline phenotype of lung recruitability alters early mechanical and gas exchange outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)

Keywords

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Positive End-Expiratory Pressure
  • Respiratory Mechanics
  • Lung Volume Measurements
  • Esophageal Monitoring
  • Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury
  • Artificial Respiration
03

In context

Acute Lung Injury

382 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Lung Injury; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 52 is below the median of 60 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Acute Lung Injury.

Browse Acute Lung Injury studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of moderate or severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) according to the Berlin definition: acute onset, bilateral opacities not fully explained by heart failure or fluid overload, and Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood/Fraction of inspired oxygen \<= 200 mmHg with Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) >= 5 cmH2O.
  • ARDS duration \< 36 hours since fully meeting Berlin consensus criteria.
  • Relative hemodynamic stability: absence of shock, defined as norepinephrine dose \<= 0.5 mcg/kg/min.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of active pulmonary air leaks (bronchopleural fistula, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum).
  • Severe uncorrected hemodynamic instability (norepinephrine > 0.5 mcg/kg/min).
  • for esophageal balloon placement (esophageal obstruction, known perforation, recent esophageal surgery, severe esophagitis).
  • Elevated intracranial pressure or conditions where hypercapnia-induced increases in intracranial pressure must be avoided (intracranial hemorrhage, cerebral contusion, cerebral edema, mass effect with midline shift on CT).
  • Known pregnancy.
  • Severe coagulopathy ( count \< 5,000/uL or > 3).
  • Airway opening pressure higher than 15 cmH2O (AOP > 15 cmH2O).
  • History of severe neuromuscular disease or chronic respiratory disease.
  • Having received invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 96 hours.
  • Inability to obtain or refusal by the legal representative.
  • Contained laparotomy (open abdomen).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
52 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Best Static Compliance Titration

    Patients receive positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration guided by the best static compliance of the respiratory system after undergoing a standardized initial lung recruitment maneuver

    Procedure: Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Titration guided by Static Compliance

  • Experimental
    Transpulmonary Pressure Titration

    Patients receive positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration guided by transpulmonary pressure estimation via an esophageal balloon catheter after undergoing an identical standardized initial lung recruitment maneuver.

    Procedure: Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Titration guided by Transpulmonary Pressure

Interventions

  • ProcedurePositive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Titration guided by Static Compliance

    Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Titration by Static Compliance: Following the initial recruitment maneuver, an individualized PEEP decremental titration step-protocol is performed to identify the specific PEEP level that maximizes the static compliance of the respiratory system, aiming to optimize the balance between alveolar recruitment and overdistension. Initial Lung Recruitment Maneuver : Prior to individualized PEEP titration, all participants in this arm will undergo an initial standardized lung recruitment maneuver. This procedure will be executed in Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV) mode, utilizing a driving/control pressure of 15 cmH2O. The recruitment process will begin at a baseline Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O, followed by incremental steps of 5 cmH2O every 10 seconds until reaching a maximum PEEP of 25 cmH2O. A peak airway pressure limit of 40 cmH2O will be strictly maintained during the maneuver for a total duration of 1 minute.

    Also known as: Initial Lung Recruitment Maneuver

  • ProcedurePositive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Titration guided by Transpulmonary Pressure

    Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Titration by Transpulmonary Pressure: Following the initial recruitment maneuver, PEEP is titrated and protocolized via real-time esophageal balloon monitoring to target and maintain a slightly positive expiratory transpulmonary pressure, minimizing cyclic alveolar collapse and overdistension. Initial Lung Recruitment Maneuver: Prior to individualized PEEP titration, all participants in this arm will undergo an initial standardized lung recruitment maneuver. This procedure will be executed in Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV) mode, utilizing a driving/control pressure of 15 cmH2O. The recruitment process will begin at a baseline Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O, followed by incremental steps of 5 cmH2O every 10 seconds until reaching a maximum PEEP of 25 cmH2O. A peak airway pressure limit of 40 cmH2O will be strictly maintained during the maneuver for a total duration of 1 minute.

    Also known as: Initial Lung Recruitment Maneuver

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Early Oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 Ratio).

    The change in gas exchange efficiency is calculated as the absolute difference between the baseline Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio measured 24 hours after individualized Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) titration.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours post-PEEP titration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evolution of Static Compliance of the Respiratory System

    Changes in static compliance calculated via the formula: Tidal Volume / (Plateau Pressure - Positive End-Expiratory Pressure).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours

  2. Evolution of Driving Pressure and Plateau Pressure

    Serial monitoring of driving pressure (Plateau Pressure - Positive End-Expiratory Pressure) and plateau pressure to evaluate lung stress.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours

  3. Ventilatory Efficiency

    Evaluated using the Ventilatory Ratio (VR), which correlates physiological dead space and minute ventilation.

    Time frame: Baseline, 24, 48, and 72 hours

  4. Incidence of Elevated Airway Opening Pressure (AOP)

    Proportion of patients exhibiting an airway opening pressure greater than 5 cmH2O.

    Time frame: Pre-randomization (Baseline)

  5. Ventilator-Free Days (VFD)

    Number of days alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation within a 28-day window.

    Time frame: Up to Day 28

  6. Incidence of Procedure-Related Adverse Events

    Proportion of participants experiencing complications due to recruitment maneuvers or Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) titration (e.g., severe hypotension, barotrauma).

    Time frame: Throughout mechanical ventilation (Up to 28 days)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino Hospital
    Rancagua, Región del Libertador General Bernardo O’Higgins 2820000, Chile
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) generated during this clinical trial will not be shared with other researchers due to ethical, legal, and privacy considerations. The study involves the collection of sensitive personal and health-related information. Furthermore, the informed consent process did not include provisions for unrestricted sharing of individual-level data with third parties. To ensure compliance with applicable data protection regulations and to safeguard participant confidentiality, only aggregated and anonymized study results will be made available through scientific publications, presentations, or upon reasonable request. These grouped data will provide sufficient information to support scientific transparency, interpretation of findings, and secondary analyses without compromising the privacy of participants

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 12 months after the start.

Of 51 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Acute Lung Injury, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 34. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 52 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 34.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 18, 2026
First posted
May 22, 2026
StartActual
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 30, 2027
Last update
Jul 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07603310
Lead sponsor
Hospital Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 22, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 10, 2026

Study contacts

Esteban Santis, RT.
Contact
esteban.santis@ogb.cl
940367716 ext. +56
Hospital Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino
Contact
carolina.lindsay.brain@gmail.com
729383 ext. +56
Francisco Cerda, RT.
study chair · Hospital Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino
Javier Astudillo, MD.
study chair · Hospital Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino
Jennifer Ayuso, RT.
study chair · Hospital Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino
Rodrigo Arevalo, RT.
study chair · Hospital Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino
Carlos Pellegrini, MD.
study chair · Hospital Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino
Esteban Santis, RT.
principal investigator · Hospital Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion