ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07598435RIITSTROKEUpdated Jun 3, 2026

Rhythmic Initiation vs Isometric Training for Arm Recovery After Stroke

An interventional study of Rhythmic Initiation (PNF technique) and Isometric Resistance Training in Stroke and Upper Extremity Paresis, sponsored by University of Faisalabad. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-03.

Sponsored by University of Faisalabad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2026, registered May 2026).
  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide. Many stroke survivors experience persistent weakness, loss of motor control, and poor coordination in their upper limb, which limits their ability to perform daily activities and return to independent living. This study compares two physical therapy approaches for patients in the subacute stage of stroke recovery (1 to 6 months after stroke). The first approach is Rhythmic Initiation, a technique from Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) that uses smooth, guided movement patterns progressing from passive to active movement. The second approach is Isometric Resistance Training, which involves holding static muscle contractions against resistance without moving the joint. The study will enroll 40 patients aged 40 to 60 years with unilateral upper limb weakness from a first-time stroke. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Rhythmic Initiation or Isometric Resistance Training for 30 minutes per session, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks. The researchers will measure changes in motor function, muscle strength, coordination, and spasticity before and after the 4-week intervention. The results will help physiotherapists understand which approach is more effective for upper limb rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-blind, parallel-arm, randomized clinical trial. Eligible participants will be recruited from Medina Teaching Hospital and The Canal Hospital in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Inclusion criteria include age 40-60 years, both genders, clinically diagnosed first-ever subacute stroke (1-6 months post-onset), and unilateral upper limb involvement. Exclusion criteria include severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale >3), recurrent or bilateral stroke, shoulder subluxation or pain limiting movement, and cognitive or perceptual deficits. After providing written informed consent, participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either Group A (Rhythmic Initiation) or Group B (Isometric Resistance Training). The randomization sequence will be generated using computer software, and allocation will be concealed in sealed opaque envelopes. The outcome assessor will be blinded to group assignment. Group A intervention: Rhythmic Initiation follows a four-step sequence-passive movement, active-assistive movement, active movement, and light resisted movement-using PNF diagonal patterns (D1 flexion/extension) for the affected upper limb. Each session lasts 30 minutes, 5 days per week for 4 weeks. The therapist emphasizes smooth rhythm and provides verbal cues throughout. Group B intervention: Isometric Resistance Training involves static contractions of major upper limb muscles including shoulder abductors, elbow flexors/extensors, and wrist flexors/extensors. Each contraction is held for 6 to 10 seconds at approximately 60-70% of maximum voluntary contraction. Participants perform 10 repetitions per muscle group, completing 3 sets. Rest periods of 30 to 60 seconds are provided between sets. Sessions last 30 minutes, 5 days per week for 4 weeks. Outcome measures are assessed at baseline (week 0) and after 4 weeks of intervention. The primary outcome is upper extremity motor function measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) scale. Secondary outcomes include muscle strength measured by handheld dynamometry (shoulder, elbow, wrist), coordination measured by the timed finger-to-nose test, and spasticity measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25. Paired t-tests will examine within-group changes from baseline to week 4. Independent t-tests will compare between-group differences. A p-value less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Upper Extremity Paresis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Stroke Rehabilitation
  • PNF
  • Isometric Exercise
  • Upper Limb
  • Motor Function
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Faisalabad is the lead sponsor of 86 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinically diagnosed subacute stroke (1 to 6 months post-onset)
  • Unilateral upper limb involvement
  • Age 40 to 60 years
  • Both genders
  • Medically stable and able to participate in physical therapy
  • Able to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score >3)
  • Recurrent or bilateral stroke
  • Shoulder subluxation
  • Shoulder or upper limb pain limiting active movement
  • Cognitive or perceptual deficits impairing ability to follow instructions
  • Other neurological disorder affecting upper limb (e.g., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis)
  • Orthopedic condition affecting upper limb function
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rhythmic Initiation Group

    Participants receive Rhythmic Initiation technique for the affected upper limb. Each 30-minute session follows a sequence: passive movement, active-assistive movement, active movement, and light resisted movement using PNF diagonal patterns (D1 or D2). Sessions occur 5 days per week for 4 weeks.

    Other: Rhythmic Initiation (PNF technique)

  • Experimental
    Isometric Resistance Training Group

    Participants receive isometric strengthening exercises for upper limb muscles (shoulder abductors, elbow flexors/extensors, wrist flexors/extensors). Contractions held 6-10 seconds at 60-70% MVC, 10 repetitions × 3 sets. Sessions occur 30 minutes, 5 days/week for 4 weeks.

    Other: Isometric Resistance Training

Interventions

  • OtherRhythmic Initiation (PNF technique)

    What: Rhythmic Initiation technique from PNF. How: Therapist guides patient's affected upper limb through a four-step sequence-passive movement (therapist moves limb), active-assistive movement (patient helps with therapist assistance), active movement (patient moves independently), and light resisted movement (therapist adds gentle resistance). The movement follows PNF diagonal pattern D1 (flexion-adduction-external rotation to extension-abduction-internal rotation) or D2. Verbal cues emphasize smooth, rhythmic motion. When: 30 minutes per session, 5 days per week. How long: 4 weeks total. By whom: Trained physical therapist. Where: Outpatient rehabilitation department.

  • OtherIsometric Resistance Training

    What: Isometric Resistance Training (static muscle contractions without joint movement). How: Patient contracts target muscle against resistance provided by therapist or stationary object. Target muscles include shoulder abductors, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, wrist flexors, and wrist extensors. Each contraction held 6-10 seconds at 60-70% of maximum voluntary contraction. Patient performs 10 repetitions per muscle group, completing 3 sets. Rest 30-60 seconds between sets. When: 30 minutes per session, 5 days per week. How long: 4 weeks total. By whom: Trained physical therapist. Where: Outpatient rehabilitation department.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Upper Extremity Motor Function

    Measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) scale. The FMA-UE evaluates motor function, sensation, coordination, and reflex activity in the upper limb. Scores range from 0 to 66, with higher scores indicating better motor function. The assessment is performed by a blinded outcome assessor.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Upper Limb Muscle Strength

    Measured using a handheld dynamometer. Maximum isometric strength recorded for shoulder abductors, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, wrist flexors, and wrist extensors. Three trials per muscle group; best score recorded in kilograms or Newtons.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)

  2. Change in Upper Limb Coordination

    Measured by the timed finger-to-nose test. Patient seated, asked to alternately touch examiner's finger (held at shoulder height with arm fully extended) and then their own nose as quickly as possible. Time to complete 10 repetitions recorded in seconds.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)

  3. Change in Spasticity

    Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Spasticity graded from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (rigid in flexion or extension). Assessed at shoulder, elbow, and wrist.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07598435
Lead sponsor
University of Faisalabad
Responsible party
Dr. Marium Zafar (Assistant Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Faisalabad) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 20, 2026
Start date
Jan 19, 2026
Primary completion
May 19, 2026
Completion
Jun 24, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 3, 2026

Study contacts

Dr Marium Zafar, MS-NMPT
Contact
mariumzafar.dpt@tuf.edu.pk
+92 300 4561972
Dr Muhammad Ateeb, PhD Public Health
Contact
mateeb.oric@tuf.edu.pk
+923357333383

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion