ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07595718Updated Sep 24, 2026

AI-Based Phenome Data Analysis for Predicting the Onset of Major Diseases

An observational study in Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Breast Neoplasms and Low Back Pain, sponsored by Jae Yong Jeon, MD. Recruiting at 1 site in South Korea. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by Jae Yong Jeon, MD · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
30 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 569 studies in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 with a site in Korea, Republic of — 68 open to participants now, 82 under way, 24 of them phase 3. Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 · Korea, Republic of.

Planned enrollment
45th of 78
1,000 · median 1,470
Started
2026
with 27 others
Observational
78 of 569
12 open now
Primary completion
2026-10
later than 34 of 81 live
Registered
552nd of 569
by date

Among the 569 studies in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 with a site in Korea, Republic of, this one is the 45th largest by planned enrollment of the 78 observational ones, is one of 28 that started in 2026, is one of 78 observational ones, reaches primary completion later than 34 of the 81 other live ones, and was the 552nd registered.

By phase

569 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 3198 · 20 open
Phase 4116 · 17 open
Phase 195 · 8 open
Observationalthis study78 · 12 open
No phase48 · 8 open
Phase 228 · 3 open
Phase 2/36 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2001; this study’s year is marked. 28 started in 2026.

Size and results

Median enrollment 173 across the 491 interventional studies, 1,470 across the 78 observational. Of the 432 that completed or were terminated, 159 (37%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 569 studies in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 with a site in Korea, Republic of, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study aims to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive model to estimate the risk of incident onset of five major diseases or conditions: cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, breast cancer, low back pain, and osteoarthritis, in adults aged 30 to 65 years.

For each participant, an index date will be defined as the date of a prior health screening or another protocol-defined baseline clinical date. Incident disease status for each target disease or condition will be ascertained by retrospective review of electronic medical records for up to 10 years after the index date.

The study integrates retrospective clinical, health screening, laboratory, imaging, and electronic medical record data with prospectively collected biospecimen, proteomic, genomic, questionnaire, lifestyle, and digital health data. Prospective study procedures will be completed over approximately 1 week, with up to 2 additional weeks if needed.

By combining multimodal data, this study seeks to improve disease risk prediction and to identify clinical and biological factors associated with disease onset, ultimately supporting personalized risk stratification and preventive healthcare strategies.

Read the detailed description

This observational study aims to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive model for assessing the risk of incident onset of five major diseases or conditions: cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, breast cancer, low back pain, and osteoarthritis, in adults aged 30 to 65 years.

The study uses a hybrid retrospective and prospective data collection design. Retrospective clinical, health screening, laboratory, imaging, and electronic medical record data will be combined with prospectively collected biospecimen, proteomic, genomic, questionnaire, lifestyle, and digital health data.

For disease-onset analyses, an index date will be defined for each participant as the date of a prior health screening or another protocol-defined baseline clinical date. For each target disease or condition, participants without that target disease or condition at the index date will be classified as incident cases if a new diagnosis is identified in electronic medical records up to 10 years after the index date. Participants without a diagnosis of that target disease or condition through the available observation period will be classified as persistent controls. Disease occurrence will be ascertained through retrospective electronic medical record review rather than through new prospective long-term follow-up.

A total of approximately 1,000 participants will be enrolled. The disease group will include approximately 700 adults aged 30 to 65 years with a confirmed diagnosis of one or more of the five target diseases or conditions. The healthy control group will include approximately 300 adults aged 30 to 65 years without a prior diagnosis of any of the five target diseases or conditions.

Retrospective data collection will include medical records, health screening results, laboratory results, and imaging-related data. Prospective data collection will include blood samples for proteomic and genomic analyses, questionnaires, lifestyle and behavioral data, and digital health assessments. App-based questionnaires and digital assessments will be performed at home over approximately 7 days. If app-based sleep assessment or other digital assessments are not completed within this period, up to 2 additional weeks may be provided.

These multimodal data will be integrated to create a high-dimensional phenomic and omics dataset for AI model development. Machine learning and deep learning approaches will be applied to predict disease risk for each target disease or condition. Model performance will be evaluated using discrimination, diagnostic performance, and calibration metrics. Reclassification metrics will be evaluated only if a prespecified comparator risk score is available for the relevant target disease or condition.

The study aims to improve prediction of disease onset and to enhance understanding of biological and clinical factors associated with disease risk. The resulting model is expected to support personalized risk stratification and preventive healthcare strategies.

03

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Low Back Pain
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study will involve two distinct groups of participants: a disease group and a healthy control group.

  1. Disease Group:

    The disease group will consist of adults aged 30 to 65 years who have been diagnosed with at least one of the following conditions:

    Type 2 diabetes mellitus Breast cancer Cardiovascular disease Osteoarthritis Low back pain These participants will undergo questionnaires, digital assessments, physical examinations, and blood tests as part of the study.

  2. Healthy Control Group:

The healthy control group will consist of adults aged 30 to 65 years with no prior diagnosis of any of the conditions listed above (type 2 diabetes mellitus, breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, osteoarthritis, or low back pain).

This group will also undergo similar assessments including questionnaires, physical examinations, and blood tests, but they will not have the aforementioned conditions.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults aged 30 to 65 years.
  2. Disease group: Participants with a confirmed diagnosis of at least one of the following conditions: type 2 diabetes mellitus, breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, osteoarthritis, or low back pain.
  3. Healthy control group: Participants with no prior diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, osteoarthritis, or low back pain.
  4. No history or current diagnosis of major medical conditions that may affect study outcomes, including but not limited to chronic kidney disease or liver cirrhosis.
  5. Ability to understand the study procedures and provision of written prior to participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants with incomplete or insufficient clinical or health screening data.
  2. Participants considered inappropriate for study participation by the investigator.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Week
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Disease Group

    Adults aged 30 to 65 years with one or more of the five major diseases. Five major diseases are Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Breast Neoplasms, Low Back Pain and Osteoarthritis.

  • Healthy Control Group

    Adults aged 30 to 65 years without five major diseases.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Incident Target Disease or Condition Identified Up to 10 Years After the Index Date

    Incident target disease or condition will be assessed for five prespecified target diseases or conditions: cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, breast cancer, low back pain, and osteoarthritis. For each target disease or condition, incident occurrence will be defined as a new diagnosis recorded in electronic medical records after the index date among participants without that target disease or condition at the index date. Results will be summarized separately for each target disease or condition as the number and percentage of participants with incident disease or condition.

    Time frame: Up to 10 years after the index date

Secondary outcomes

  1. Discriminative performance of the artificial intelligence model in distinguishing between disease and control groups using baseline data from health screenings and clinical records (AUROC, PR-AUC)

    Discriminative performance will be assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC). These metrics will evaluate the ability of the artificial intelligence model to distinguish participants with incident target disease or condition from persistent controls. Incident disease status will be ascertained by retrospective electronic medical record review up to 10 years after the index date.

    Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 9 months

  2. Diagnostic Performance of the Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Incident Target Diseases or Conditions

    Diagnostic performance will be assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value at a prespecified risk threshold. These metrics will evaluate the ability of the artificial intelligence model to classify participants with incident target disease or condition and persistent controls. Incident disease status will be ascertained by retrospective electronic medical record review up to 10 years after the index date.

    Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 9 months

  3. Brier Score of the Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Incident Target Diseases or Conditions

    The Brier score will be calculated as the mean squared difference between predicted risk and observed incident disease status for the five target diseases or conditions. Incident disease status will be ascertained by retrospective electronic medical record review up to 10 years after the index date. Lower values indicate better prediction accuracy.

    Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 9 months

  4. Calibration Slope of the Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Incident Target Diseases or Conditions

    Calibration slope will be estimated by comparing predicted risk with observed incident disease status for the five target diseases or conditions. Incident disease status will be ascertained by retrospective electronic medical record review up to 10 years after the index date. A value close to 1 indicates better calibration.

    Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 9 months

  5. Calibration Intercept of the Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Incident Target Diseases or Conditions

    Calibration intercept will be estimated by comparing predicted risk with observed incident disease status for the five target diseases or conditions. Incident disease status will be ascertained by retrospective electronic medical record review up to 10 years after the index date. A value close to 0 indicates better calibration-in-the-large.

    Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 9 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 6 months after the start.

Of 432 non-industry observational studies under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 96. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 602 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 62.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 18, 2026
First posted
May 19, 2026
StartActual
Apr 2, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
Sep 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07595718
Lead sponsor
Jae Yong Jeon, MD
Responsible party
Jae Yong Jeon, MD (Professor, Asan Medical Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 19, 2026
Start date
Apr 2, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Jaeyong Jeon
Contact
jyjeon71@gmail.com
+82-2-3010-3791

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion