ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07590960Updated Jul 29, 2026

Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel for Mandibular Lingual Root Coverage

An interventional study of Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel with Connective Tissue Graft in Gingival Recession and Mucogingival Deformity - Insufficient Keratinized Tissue, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will follow adults who have gum recession on the tongue side of the lower teeth. Participants will receive a gum surgery called the Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel technique with a connective tissue graft taken from the roof of the mouth. The study will include 20 participants and will follow them for up to 24 months after surgery. The main outcome is how much of the exposed root is covered 6 months after surgery. The study will also measure gum thickness, gum width, tooth sensitivity, healing, patient comfort, satisfaction, and three-dimensional soft tissue changes using intraoral scans.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-site prospective case series at the University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine. Adults with single or multiple Cairo RT1 lingual gingival recessions of at least 3 mm on mandibular incisors, canines, or premolars will be enrolled if they meet the study eligibility criteria.

All participants will receive the same surgical treatment. During the procedure, the surgeon will create a tunnel under the gum tissue on the tongue side of the affected lower tooth or teeth. A small piece of tissue will be taken from the palate, prepared as a connective tissue graft, placed under the gum tissue, and stabilized with sutures to help cover the exposed root surface.

Participants will have study visits before surgery, on the day of surgery, during early healing, and at scheduled follow-up visits through 24 months after surgery. The primary outcome will be assessed at 6 months after surgery.

At follow-up visits, the study team will collect gum measurements, assess tooth sensitivity, record healing or post-operative complications, and collect patient-reported outcomes about pain, discomfort, function, appearance, and satisfaction. Intraoral photographs and intraoral scans will also be collected to document healing and measure three-dimensional soft tissue changes over time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gingival Recession
  • Mucogingival Deformity - Insufficient Keratinized Tissue

Keywords

  • Gingival Recession
  • Tissue Grafts
  • Tooth Sensitivity
03

In context

Gingival Recession

426 studies on the registry are indexed under Gingival Recession; 106 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 30 across 390 interventional studies indexed under Gingival Recession.

Browse Gingival Recession studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,419 studies on the registry; 168 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (44%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65 years
  • Single or multiple Cairo RT1 lingual gingival recessions ≥3 mm on mandibular incisors, canines, or premolars
  • Identifiable CEJ on the lingual aspect
  • Vital uniradicular teeth
  • Full-mouth plaque score \<20%
  • Smokes less than 10 cigarettes per day
  • Adequate mouth opening for lingual access
  • Sufficient palatal donor tissue thickness (≥2 mm at 2-3 mm from gingival margin)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Positive urine pregnancy test or self-reported lactation
  • Smoker more than 10 cigarettes per day
  • Uncontrolled systemic diseases, at the discretion of the PI (diabetes >7%, cardiovascular disease, )
  • Use of medications affecting periodontal tissues (phenytoin, calcium channel blockers, immunosuppressants)
  • Use of blood thinners
  • Previous root coverage surgery at treated sites
  • Teeth with cervical restorations or caries on lingual surfaces
  • Inadequate attached gingiva (\<1 mm)
  • Prominent lingual frenum attachment requiring frenectomy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel with Connective Tissue Graft

    Adults with single or multiple Cairo RT1 mandibular lingual gingival recessions of at least 3 mm on mandibular incisors, canines, or premolars who will receive standardized Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel surgery with a deepithelialized connective tissue graft and will be followed for up to 24 months.

    Procedure: Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel with Connective Tissue Graft

Interventions

  • ProcedureModified Coronally Advanced Tunnel with Connective Tissue Graft

    The procedure consists of lingual tunnel preparation without vertical releasing incisions, followed by placement of a deepithelialized connective tissue graft harvested from the palate. Root surface conditioning may be performed with EDTA gel before graft placement. The graft is positioned to cover the exposed root surface, and the lingual flap is advanced coronally and secured with sutures to achieve stable, tension-free coverage.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Root Coverage from Baseline at 6 Months

    Mean root coverage will be calculated as baseline recession depth minus recession depth at 6 months post-surgery. Recession depth will be measured in millimeters from the cementoenamel junction to the gingival margin at the mid-lingual aspect using a UNC-15 periodontal probe by a calibrated examiner blinded to baseline measurements

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage Root Coverage at 6 Months

    Percentage root coverage will be calculated as \[(baseline recession depth minus 6-month recession depth) / baseline recession depth\] × 100. Additional measurements will be collected at 3, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months post-surgery for descriptive analyses.

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  2. Frequency of Complete Root Coverage at 6 Months

    Recession depth will be measured in millimeters from the cementoenamel junction to the gingival margin at the mid-lingual aspect using a UNC-15 periodontal probe.

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  3. Change from Baseline in Recession Depth at 6 Months

    Recession depth will be measured from the cementoenamel junction to the gingival margin at the mid-lingual aspect using a UNC-15 periodontal probe.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-surgery

  4. Change from Baseline in Recession Width at 6 Months

    Recession width will be measured as the mesiodistal width of the recession defect at the cementoenamel junction level.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-surgery

  5. Change from Baseline in Clinical Attachment Level at 6 Months

    Clinical attachment level will be measured from the cementoenamel junction to the base of the sulcus at the treated lingual site using a UNC-15 periodontal probe.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-surgery

  6. Change from Baseline in Probing Depth at 6 Months

    Probing depth will be measured from the gingival margin to the base of the sulcus at the treated lingual site using a UNC-15 periodontal probe.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-surgery

  7. Change from Baseline in Keratinized Tissue Width at 6 Months

    Keratinized tissue width will be measured from the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction using a UNC-15 periodontal probe.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-surgery

  8. Change from Baseline in Gingival Thickness at 6 Months

    Gingival thickness will be measured 2 mm apical to the gingival margin using a #15 endodontic file with a rubber stop under local anesthesia.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-surgery

  9. Surgical time (minutes)

    Surgical time will be recorded in minutes from incision to final suture.

    Time frame: Day of surgery

  10. Number of Participants with Early Post-operative Complications Within 2 Weeks

    Early complications will include graft exposure, wound dehiscence, infection, bleeding, or other post-operative complications documented during early healing.

    Time frame: Up to 2 weeks post-surgery

  11. Post-operative Pain Score on Visual Analog Scale at Day 7

    Post-operative pain will be assessed using a 100-millimeter visual analog scale, where 0 represents no pain and 100 represents extreme pain. Additional pain assessments will be collected on Days 1 and 3 post-surgery for descriptive analyses.

    Time frame: Day 7 post-surgery

  12. Functional Impairment Score on Visual Analog Scale at Day 7

    Functional impairment related to speaking, swallowing, or eating will be assessed using a 100-millimeter visual analog scale, where 0 represents no impairment and 100 represents extreme impairment. Additional assessments will be collected on Days 1 and 3 post-surgery for descriptive analyses.

    Time frame: Day 7 post-surgery

  13. Aesthetic Satisfaction Score on Visual Analog Scale at 6 Months

    Patient satisfaction with the appearance of the treated area will be assessed using a 100-millimeter visual analog scale, where 0 represents extremely unsatisfied and 100 represents extremely satisfied. Additional assessments will be collected at 12 and 24 months post-surgery for descriptive analyses.

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  14. Overall Treatment Satisfaction Score on Visual Analog Scale at 6 Months

    Overall satisfaction with the treatment outcome will be assessed using a 100-millimeter visual analog scale, where 0 represents extremely unsatisfied and 100 represents extremely satisfied. Additional assessments will be collected at 12 and 24 months post-surgery for descriptive analyses.

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  15. Willingness to undergo the procedure again (VAS 0-100 mm; higher score = better outcome)

    Participants will rate their willingness to undergo the procedure again using a 100-mm visual analog scale, where 0 represents would not undergo the procedure again and 100 represents definitely would undergo the procedure again.

    Time frame: 24 months post-surgery

  16. Change from Baseline in Root Hypersensitivity Score on Visual Analog Scale at 6 Months

    Root hypersensitivity will be assessed using a 100-millimeter visual analog scale after an air blast test, where higher scores indicate greater hypersensitivity. Additional assessments will be collected at 12 and 24 months post-surgery for descriptive analyses.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-surgery

  17. Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Volume Change at 6 Months

    Soft tissue volume change will be assessed using intraoral scans exported as STL files. Baseline and 6-month scans will be superimposed, and the absolute volumetric difference within a standardized region of interest will be calculated in cubic millimeters. Additional scans will be collected at 3, 12, and 24 months post-surgery for descriptive analyses.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-surgery

  18. Mean Soft Tissue Thickness Change from Intraoral Scans at 6 Months

    Mean tissue thickness change will be calculated as the average perpendicular distance between superimposed baseline and 6-month intraoral scan surfaces within the defined region of interest. Additional scans will be collected at 3, 12, and 24 months post-surgery for descriptive analyses.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-surgery

  19. Long-term Stability of Root Coverage at 24 Months

    Long-term stability will be measured as the change in recession depth from baseline to 24 months post-surgery, expressed in millimeters. This outcome assesses whether the root coverage achieved at the 6-month primary endpoint is maintained over the extended follow-up period.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 months post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cairo F, Nieri M, Cincinelli S, Mervelt J, Pagliaro U. The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes: an explorative and reliability study. J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Jul;38(7):661-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01732.x. Epub 2011 Apr 20. PubMed 21507033 ↗
  • Cairo F, Rotundo R, Miller PD, Pini Prato GP. Root coverage esthetic score: a system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases. J Periodontol. 2009 Apr;80(4):705-10. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080565. PubMed 19335093 ↗
  • Aroca S, Keglevich T, Barbieri B, Gera I, Etienne D. Clinical evaluation of a modified coronally advanced flap alone or in combination with a platelet-rich fibrin membrane for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions: a 6-month study. J Periodontol. 2009 Feb;80(2):244-52. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080253. PubMed 19186964 ↗
  • Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Nguyen TVN, Tattan M, Ravida A, Wang HL. Efficacy of tunnel technique in the treatment of localized and multiple gingival recessions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2018 Sep;89(9):1075-1090. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0066. Epub 2018 Aug 13. PubMed 29761502 ↗
  • Chambrone L, Tatakis DN. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015 Feb;86(2 Suppl):S8-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.130674. PubMed 25644302 ↗
  • Zuhr O, Baumer D, Hurzeler M. The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: critical elements in design and execution. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S123-42. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12185. PubMed 24640997 ↗
  • Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, Bissada NF, Bouchard P, Cortellini P, Demirel K, de Sanctis M, Ercoli C, Fan J, Geurs NC, Hughes FJ, Jin L, Kantarci A, Lalla E, Madianos PN, Matthews D, McGuire MK, Mills MP, Preshaw PM, Reynolds MA, Sculean A, Susin C, West NX, Yamazaki K. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S237-S248. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0733. PubMed 29926943 ↗
  • Scheyer ET, Sanz M, Dibart S, Greenwell H, John V, Kim DM, Langer L, Neiva R, Rasperini G. Periodontal soft tissue non-root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015 Feb;86(2 Suppl):S73-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.140377. PubMed 25644301 ↗
  • Cortellini P, Bissada NF. Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S204-S213. doi: 10.1002/JPER.16-0671. PubMed 29926948 ↗
  • Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Zucchelli G, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Gingival phenotype modification therapies on natural teeth: A network meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2020 Nov;91(11):1386-1399. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0715. Epub 2020 Jun 12. PubMed 32392401 ↗
  • Assis G, Nevins M, Kim DM. The Use of Autogenous Gingival Graft for Treatment of Lingual Recession on Mandibular Anterior Teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 Sep/Oct;37(5):667-671. doi: 10.11607/prd.3263. PubMed 28817130 ↗
  • Soileau KM. Treatment of a mucogingival defect associated with intraoral piercing. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005 Apr;136(4):490-4. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0205. PubMed 15884319 ↗
  • Wilcko MT, Wilcko WM, Murphy KG, Carroll WJ, Ferguson DJ, Miley DD, Bouquot JE. Full-thickness flap/subepithelial connective tissue grafting with intramarrow penetrations: three case reports of lingual root coverage. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005 Dec;25(6):561-9. PubMed 16353531 ↗
  • Zucchelli G, Bentivogli V, Ganz S, Bellone P, Mazzotti C. The connective tissue graft wall technique to improve root coverage and clinical attachment levels in lingual gingival defects. Int J Esthet Dent. 2016;11(4):538-548. PubMed 27730223 ↗
  • Mehrotra VK, Triveni MG, Tarun Kumar AB, Chandra RV. Minimally invasive treatment of mandibular anterior lingual defects by vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access technique and connective tissue graft: a case report. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2017;7(4):195-200.
  • Alves JP, Marques TM, Malta Santos NB, Correia Sousa M, Coutinho Alves C, Correia AR. Lingual Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access: Proof of Concept 18-Month Follow-Up. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2019 Dec;9(4):196-202. doi: 10.1002/cap.10072. Epub 2019 Sep 26. PubMed 31507099 ↗
  • Yadav VS, Kamra P, Singh N, Chandra RV. Treatment of multiple lingual gingival recession defects in mandibular incisors with modified coronally advanced tunnel technique. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9(Suppl 2):S345-9.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 12 months after the start.

Of 233 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Gingival Recession, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 30. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 235 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 30.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 1, 2026
First posted
May 15, 2026
StartActual
Jul 23, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
Jul 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07590960
Responsible party
Andrea Ravida (Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 15, 2026
Start date
Jul 23, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Study contacts

Andrea Ravida, DDS, MS, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh, Department of Periodontics and Preventive Dentistry

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion