CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07564336ACL-AlloRevUpdated May 8, 2026

Achilles Allograft With or Without InternalBrace for ACL Revision Surgery

An interventional study of Revision ACL Reconstruction With Achilles Tendon Allograft and InternalBrace Augmentation and Revision ACL Reconstruction With Achilles Tendon Allograft Without InternalBrace Augmentation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Failure, sponsored by Medical University of Graz. Completed at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-08.

Sponsored by Medical University of Graz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2017, registered Apr 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluated outcomes after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Achilles tendon allografts with a calcaneal bone block, with or without additional InternalBrace augmentation. Revision ACL reconstruction is often more complex than primary ACL reconstruction because previous surgery may leave widened bone tunnels or bone defects. Achilles tendon allografts with attached bone blocks may help address these defects and allow reconstruction in a single surgical procedure.

Participants with MRI-confirmed ACL graft re-tear and clinical knee instability were randomized to undergo revision ACL reconstruction either with InternalBrace augmentation or without InternalBrace augmentation. Clinical outcomes, patient-reported knee function, health-related quality of life, and MRI findings were assessed during 13 months of follow-up. The study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled pilot trial to compare whether additional InternalBrace augmentation improved functional, radiographic, or quality-of-life outcomes after revision ACL surgery.

Read the detailed description

Anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery remains challenging and may have less predictable outcomes than primary ACL reconstruction. In revision cases, prior bone tunnels and bone defects can complicate graft fixation. Achilles tendon allografts with calcaneal bone blocks provide a reliable graft configuration and may help fill pre-existing bone defects during a one-stage revision procedure. InternalBrace augmentation is intended to provide additional support to the reconstructed ligament during the healing period, but clinical evidence for its use with allograft ACL revision surgery is limited.

This prospective, randomized controlled pilot study enrolled patients from February 2017 to September 2020 at the Medical University of Graz. Eligible participants had MRI-confirmed re-tear of the ACL graft and clinical and patient-reported knee instability. Patients with advanced associated lesions requiring reconstruction or prolonged restricted weight bearing, signs of infection, advanced osteoarthritis, or neuromuscular disease were excluded. For all included participants, the procedure was the first revision surgery on the affected knee. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Graz, and written informed consent was obtained before participation.

All participants underwent revision ACL reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with a calcaneal bone block. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either additional InternalBrace augmentation or no InternalBrace augmentation. The InternalBrace group received a non-resorbable polyethylene FiberTape fixed separately and independently from the ACL graft. Apart from the additional InternalBrace fixation in one group, the surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation protocol were the same for all participants.

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 13 months after surgery. Outcome measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm Knee Questionnaire, Tegner Activity Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Short Form-36. MRI scans were performed before surgery and 13 months after surgery to assess graft appearance, graft tightness, graft signal, ligament signs at the femoral and tibial tunnel insertions, and tunnel size.

The final analyzed study population included 30 participants, with 16 participants in the InternalBrace group and 14 participants in the non-InternalBrace group. Overall, clinical and patient-reported outcomes improved during follow-up. At the final 13-month follow-up, there were no clinically relevant differences between the InternalBrace and non-InternalBrace groups. Postoperative MRI showed elongated or insufficient ACL allografts in 15 of 30 participants, without significant differences between groups. The study concluded that ACL revision surgery using Achilles tendon allografts with bone blocks resulted in improved clinical outcomes at 13 months, but additional InternalBrace augmentation did not improve objective or subjective outcomes in this pilot trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Failure
  • Knee Instability

Keywords

  • ACL Revision Surgery
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision
  • ACL Reconstruction
  • Achilles Tendon Allograft
  • Allograft Reconstruction
  • InternalBrace
  • Suture Tape Augmentation
  • Knee Surgery
  • Revision ACL Reconstruction
  • Bone Block Allograft
03

In context

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

512 studies on the registry are indexed under Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 56 across 373 interventional studies indexed under Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.

Browse Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Graz is the lead sponsor of 459 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • MRI-confirmed re-tear of the anterior cruciate ligament.
  • Clinical knee instability.
  • Patient-reported knee instability.
  • Planned first revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the affected knee.
  • Ability to undergo the standardized postoperative rehabilitation protocol.
  • Written informed consent for study participation and use of study data.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced associated knee lesions, such as pronounced meniscal tears or cartilage defects, requiring reconstruction or prolonged reduced weight bearing.
  • Signs of infection.
  • Advanced-stage osteoarthritis.
  • Neuromuscular disease.
  • Previous revision surgery on the affected knee.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    InternalBrace Augmentation

    Participants underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with calcaneal bone block and additional InternalBrace augmentation. The InternalBrace consisted of non-resorbable polyethylene FiberTape fixed separately and independently from the ACL allograft.

    Procedure: Revision ACL Reconstruction With Achilles Tendon Allograft and InternalBrace Augmentation

  • Active comparator
    No InternalBrace Augmentation

    Participants underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with calcaneal bone block without additional InternalBrace augmentation. Apart from the InternalBrace augmentation, the surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation protocol were the same as in the InternalBrace group.

    Procedure: Revision ACL Reconstruction With Achilles Tendon Allograft Without InternalBrace Augmentation

Interventions

  • ProcedureRevision ACL Reconstruction With Achilles Tendon Allograft and InternalBrace Augmentation

    Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed using an Achilles tendon allograft with calcaneal bone block. In this group, a non-resorbable polyethylene FiberTape InternalBrace was additionally fixed separately and independently from the ACL allograft to support the graft during healing.

    Also known as: Revision ACL Reconstruction With InternalBrace, ACL Revision Surgery With InternalBrace Augmentation, Achilles Tendon Allograft ACL Revision With Suture Tape Augmentation

  • ProcedureRevision ACL Reconstruction With Achilles Tendon Allograft Without InternalBrace Augmentation

    Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed using an Achilles tendon allograft with calcaneal bone block. No additional InternalBrace or suture tape augmentation was used. Apart from the absence of InternalBrace augmentation, the surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation protocol were the same as in the InternalBrace augmentation group.

    Also known as: Revision ACL Reconstruction Without InternalBrace, ACL Revision Surgery Without InternalBrace Augmentation, Achilles Tendon Allograft ACL Revision Without Suture Tape Augmentation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. International Knee Documentation Committee Score

    The International Knee Documentation Committee score was used to assess patient-reported knee symptoms, function, and sports activity after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knee function.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lysholm Knee Questionnaire Score

    The Lysholm Knee Questionnaire was used to assess knee symptoms and functional limitations after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knee function.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery

  2. Tegner Activity Scale Score

    The Tegner Activity Scale was used to assess participant activity level after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a higher activity level.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery

  3. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

    The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was used to assess knee-related pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life. Subscale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery

  4. Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary Score

    The Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary score was used to assess physical health-related quality of life after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery

  5. Short Form-36 Mental Component Summary Score

    The Short Form-36 Mental Component Summary score was used to assess mental health-related quality of life after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better mental health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery

  6. MRI Assessment of ACL Allograft Tightness

    Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess anterior cruciate ligament allograft tightness. Grafts were categorized as tight, elongated, or insufficient.

    Time frame: 13 months after surgery

  7. MRI Assessment of Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Size

    Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure femoral and tibial tunnel size after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Tunnel size was measured in millimeters.

    Time frame: 13 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of Graz
    Graz, Styria 8036, Austria
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the publication will be shared upon reasonable request. Shared data may include baseline characteristics, group allocation, clinical outcome scores, patient-reported outcome measures, health-related quality-of-life scores, and MRI assessment data.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07564336
Lead sponsor
Medical University of Graz
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 4, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2021
Completion
Sep 30, 2021
Last update
May 8, 2026

Study contacts

Paul Ruckenstuhl, MD
principal investigator · Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion