CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07562867Updated May 1, 2026

AI-Supported Gamified Training for Sharps Injury Prevention in Nurses

An interventional study of Experimental: Intervention Group and control group in Sharps Injuries, Needlestick Injuries and Occupational Exposure, sponsored by Baskent University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-01.

Sponsored by Baskent University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the effect of a Health Belief Model (HBM)-based, artificial intelligence (AI)-supported gamified training program on nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward the prevention of sharps injuries. Sharps injuries remain a significant occupational risk for healthcare workers, particularly nurses, despite existing standard precautions.

The study will be conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the validity and reliability of the Sharps Injury Prediction Scale will be tested in a nurse population. In the second phase, a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design will be used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention.

The study will be carried out in two hospitals from the same healthcare group located in different cities to prevent interaction between groups. A total of 36 nurses will be included, with 18 participants in the intervention group and 18 in the control group.

The intervention group will receive a structured, HBM-based training program consisting of seven sessions incorporating AI-supported content, gamified scenarios, interactive materials, and feedback mechanisms to enhance engagement and promote behavior change. The control group will receive routine institutional training on sharps injury prevention.

Data will be collected at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and two months later. Outcome measures include nurses' knowledge, attitudes toward safe sharps use, and sharps injury risk perception.

It is expected that the AI-supported gamified training program will significantly improve knowledge, attitudes, and risk awareness compared to routine training. The findings may support the integration of innovative, theory-based educational interventions into institutional training programs to enhance occupational safety.

Read the detailed description

Sharps injuries are among the most common occupational hazards for healthcare workers, particularly nurses, due to their frequent exposure to invasive procedures and contact with blood and body fluids. These injuries are associated with the risk of transmission of serious infections such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV. Despite the implementation of standard precautions and institutional training programs, the incidence of sharps injuries remains a significant concern, highlighting the need for more effective and behavior-focused educational interventions.

Traditional training methods are often limited in their ability to promote sustained behavioral change. In this context, theory-based and technology-supported approaches may provide more effective solutions. The Health Belief Model (HBM) is widely used to explain and predict health-related behaviors by focusing on individuals' perceptions of risk, benefits, barriers, and self-efficacy. Integrating HBM into educational interventions may enhance the effectiveness of training programs aimed at improving safe practices.

In addition, recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and gamification have introduced innovative opportunities in health education. AI-supported systems can provide personalized learning experiences, while gamification techniques, such as interactive scenarios, feedback, and rewards, can increase motivation, engagement, and knowledge retention. These approaches may be particularly beneficial in nursing education, where active participation and behavioral reinforcement are essential.

This study will be conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the validity and reliability of the Sharps Injury Prediction Scale will be evaluated in a nurse population. In the second phase, a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design will be used to assess the effectiveness of an HBM-based, AI-supported gamified training program.

The study will be carried out in two hospitals within the same healthcare group located in different cities to minimize interaction between groups. A total of 36 nurses will be included. The intervention group will receive a structured training program consisting of seven sessions designed based on HBM constructs, incorporating AI-supported educational materials, gamified learning tools, and interactive components. The control group will receive routine institutional training.

Data will be collected at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and two months after the intervention. Outcome measures will include knowledge levels, attitudes toward safe use of sharps, and risk perception related to sharps injuries.

The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the development of innovative, theory-based educational strategies and support the integration of AI-supported and gamified training approaches into healthcare institutions to enhance occupational safety among nurses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sharps Injuries
  • Needlestick Injuries
  • Occupational Exposure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sharps injuries
  • Nursing education
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Registered nurses working in the participating hospitals
  • Working in the institution for at least 2 months (Phase 1) or newly employed within the last 1 month (Phase 2)
  • Willing to participate in the study
  • Able to use smartphone-based technologies
  • Providing written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having received prior training based on the Health Belief Model for sharps injury prevention
  • Previous professional nursing experience before current employment (for newly recruited nurses in Phase 2)
  • Being on leave during the data collection period
  • Failure to attend training sessions (intervention group)
  • Incomplete data collection forms
  • Withdrawal from the study at any stage
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    Nurses in the intervention group will receive a Health Belief Model-based, AI-supported gamified training program designed to improve knowledge and attitudes toward sharps injury prevention.

    Behavioral: Experimental: Intervention Group

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Standard training provided by the institution, including lectures and question-answer sessions on sharps injury prevention.

    Behavioral: control group

Interventions

  • BehavioralExperimental: Intervention Group

    A structured training program consisting of seven sessions, incorporating artificial intelligence-supported educational content, gamified scenarios, interactive videos, and digital feedback mechanisms to enhance learning and promote behavior change.

  • Behavioralcontrol group

    Standard training provided by the institution, including lectures and question-answer sessions on sharps injury prevention.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Nurses' knowledge level regarding sharps injury prevention

    Knowledge level will be assessed using a structured knowledge questionnaire consisting of 25 items developed based on the literature. Higher scores indicate greater knowledge regarding sharps injury prevention.

    Time frame: Baseline (pretest), immediately after the intervention (posttest), and 2 months after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Attitudes toward safe use of sharps

    Attitudes will be measured using the "Attitude Scale for Safe Use of Sharps Medical Instruments," a validated Likert-type scale. Higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward safe practices.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 2 months after the intervention

  2. Sharps injury risk perception and prediction score

    Risk perception and prediction will be assessed using the adapted Sharps Injury Prediction Scale based on the Health Belief Model. Higher scores reflect increased perceived severity, benefits, and awareness of preventive behaviors.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 2 months after the intervention

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to ethical and privacy considerations. The study involves human participants, and sharing individual-level data may pose a risk to confidentiality despite anonymization. Data will be used solely for research purposes in accordance with ethical approval and institutional regulations.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07562867
Lead sponsor
Baskent University
Responsible party
İsmail Kuşoğlu (Researcher, PhD student, Baskent University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 1, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 1, 2026

Study contacts

İsmail Kuşoğlu, PhD. Student
Contact
22310206@mail.baskent.edu.tr
+905062172248
Ziyafet Uğurlu, Professor
principal investigator · Baskent University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion