ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07143422Updated Aug 27, 2025

Sharp Risks in a Time of Crisis: Needle-Stick Injuries in Eastern Sudan Healthcare

An observational study in Needlestick Injuries, sponsored by National Center for Gastroentestinal and Liver Disease. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-27.

Sponsored by National Center for Gastroentestinal and Liver Disease · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
272
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Needle-stick injuries (NSIs) expose healthcare providers to serious bloodborne infections such as HBV, HCV, and HIV. These injuries are prevalent in Africa and worsened by poor training, limited resources, and systemic issues. In Sudan, the ongoing war has intensified healthcare challenges, increasing NSI risks.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among doctors and nurses in Eastern Sudan using an interview-based questionnaire. Stratified random sampling ensured proportional representation. Data were analyzed using SPSS (p \< 0.05). Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained.

02

Conditions studied

  • Needlestick Injuries

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Needlestick injuries
  • Health care workers
  • Safety
03

In context

Needlestick Injuries

30 studies on the registry are indexed under Needlestick Injuries; 3 are open to participants now.

Browse Needlestick Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

National Center for Gastroentestinal and Liver Disease is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of doctors and nurses actively employed in healthcare facilities, including hospitals and clinics, within Kassala and Al Qadarif states in Eastern Sudan. These healthcare providers are at risk of needle-stick injuries due to their direct involvement in clinical procedures using needles and sharps. Non-clinical staff, hygienists, medical students, and other personnel not directly involved in patient care or exposure to sharps were excluded. A census with stratified random sampling was used to ensure proportional representation across professions and healthcare settings.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Doctors who are currently employed and actively working in healthcare facilities such as hospitals and clinics in Kassala and Al Qadarif states, Eastern Sudan.

Nurses who are currently employed and actively working in healthcare facilities such as hospitals and clinics in Kassala and Al Qadarif states, Eastern Sudan.

Healthcare providers who are at risk of needle-stick injuries as part of their routine clinical duties, including procedures involving needles and sharps.

Participants who provide to take part in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Non-clinical staff who do not engage in direct patient care or handling of needles and sharps, such as administrative personnel.

Hygienists and other support staff whose job roles do not involve exposure to needle-stick injuries.

Medical students and trainees who are not fully employed healthcare providers within the facilities at the time of the study.

Individuals who do not consent or refuse to participate in the study.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
272 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of Needle-Stick Injuries Among Healthcare Workers

    Percentage of healthcare workers reporting ≥1 needle-stick injury.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of healthcare workers reporting needle-stick injury reporting behavior

    Percentage of participants who reported their needle-stick injuries to hospital authorities or occupational health services, assessed by questionnaire.

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Frequency of Needle-Stick Injuries per Participant

    Number of needle-stick injuries reported by each participant, categorized as 0, 1-2, or ≥3 incidents.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07143422
Lead sponsor
National Center for Gastroentestinal and Liver Disease
Responsible party
Ahmed Rafei (Head of Reseach Department, National Center for Gastroentestinal and Liver Disease) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 27, 2025
Start date
Sep 11, 2015
Primary completion
Nov 15, 2016
Completion
Sep 11, 2017
Last update
Aug 27, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion