ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07547670tDCSUpdated Jul 28, 2026

Effectiveness of tDCS in Paediatric Amblyopia.

An interventional study of tDCS in Amblyopia, Amblyopia Strabismic and Visual Acuity, sponsored by Universidad de Murcia. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-28.

Sponsored by Universidad de Murcia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized, double-blind clinical trial is to determine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can effectively and safely improve vision in children aged 4-14 years with strabismic or anisometropic amblyopia that has not responded to conventional patching therapy.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does tDCS produce significant and sustained improvements in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and stereopsis in children with amblyopia?

Is tDCS a safe, well-tolerated, and faster alternative or complementary treatment compared with standard occlusion therapy?

Does tDCS induce functional and structural changes in the visual cortex associated with increased neuroplasticity, including modulation of GABAergic activity?

If there is a comparison group:

Researchers will compare active tDCS with sham (placebo) stimulation to see if active treatment leads to greater visual recovery and cortical changes than placebo.

Participants will:

Receive several sessions of active or sham tDCS using low-intensity electrical stimulation applied to visual brain areas.

Undergo standard visual assessments, including visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and stereopsis.

Complete neurophysiological and neuroimaging evaluations (EEG, pattern visual evoked potentials, and functional MRI).

Provide biochemical measures related to GABA levels.

This study aims to validate tDCS as a non-invasive, child-friendly, and effective therapy that may overcome the limitations of patching and support its inclusion in paediatric clinical practice.

Read the detailed description

Amblyopia is a neurodevelopmental visual disorder characterised by reduced visual performance despite optimal optical correction and the absence of ocular pathology. It affects up to 2-4% of children and is the leading cause of visual impairment in this population. Conventional treatment involves optical correction and patching of the contralateral (non-amblyopic) eye, which usually produces limited improvement, low therapeutic compliance and frequent relapses, highlighting the need for new approaches based on neuroplasticity.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that can modify cortical excitability by regulating GABAergic inhibition in the primary visual cortex (V1). It has been safely used in children with attention deficit disorder, schizophrenia, epilepsy or cerebral palsy.

Preliminary data from our group show that after three sessions of tDCS on paediatric strabismic amblyopia, there are significant and sustained improvements in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and stereopsis at 3 months.

This project proposes a randomised, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety and optimal dosage regimen of tDCS in children aged 4 to 14 years with strabismic or anisometropic amblyopia classified as non-responsive to occlusion therapy, according to the criteria established by the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigation Group (PEDIG). Objective biomarkers will be included using electroencephalogram, visual evoked potentials (pattern) and functional magnetic resonance imaging to explore cortical functional and structural changes, together with biochemical assessment of GABA levels.

The expected outcome is to validate tDCS as an effective, rapid, and safe alternative or complementary therapy for amblyopia. Demonstrating sustained visual and cortical improvements would support its inclusion in paediatric clinical protocols and promote translational neuro-ophthalmological rehabilitation

02

Conditions studied

  • Amblyopia
  • Amblyopia Strabismic
  • Visual Acuity
  • Stereoscopic Vision

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • tDCS
  • Ambyopia
03

In context

Amblyopia

189 studies on the registry are indexed under Amblyopia; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 137 interventional studies indexed under Amblyopia.

Browse Amblyopia studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad de Murcia is the lead sponsor of 79 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 4-14 years.
  • Strabismic amblyopia resistant to patching (PEDIG criteria).
  • Anisometropic amblyopia resistant to patching (PEDIG criteria).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ocular pathology.
  • Nystagmus.
  • Mental disability.
  • Cognitive delay.
  • Neurological problems incompatible with treatment.
  • Pacemakers.
  • Intracranial electrodes.
  • Implanted defibrillators.
  • Cranial pathologies.
  • Cranial lesions.
  • Withdrawal will occur upon adverse events, protocol deviation, refusal, or loss to follow-up.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group tDCS

    Children aged 4 to 14 with amblyopia treated at one of the collaborating hospitals and centers, with visual acuity in the amblyopic eye between 20/32 and 20/200. They will undergo tests of visual acuity, stereoscopic visual acuity, fixation, and contrast sensitivity. The direct current will be gradually increased over 34 seconds to 2 mA, held constant for 15 minutes, and then gradually reduced to zero using NIC2® v2.1.2.0 software (Neuroelectrics®, Barcelona, Spain). The stimulating current is applied using two rubber electrodes housed in circular sponge pockets (8 cm² each) soaked in saline solution. The electrodes are placed at Oz (active/stimulating electrode, located in the visual cortex) and Cz (reference electrode).

    Device: tDCS

  • Sham comparator
    Group Sham

    The sham group is equipped with the same electrostimulation helmet, but the intensity protocol is set to 0 at all times. The same measurements are taken and exactly the same procedure is followed as with the experimental group.

    Device: tDCS

Interventions

  • DevicetDCS

    The direct current is gradually increased over 34 seconds until it reaches 2 mA, remains constant for 15 minutes, and then is gradually reduced to zero using NIC2® v2.1.2.0 software (Neuroelectrics®, Barcelona, Spain). The stimulating current is applied using two rubber electrodes housed in circular sponge pockets (8 cm² each) soaked in saline solution. The electrodes are placed at Oz (active/stimulating electrode, located in the visual cortex) and Cz (reference electrode). This includes a total of 3 sessions of 15 minutes and 34 seconds separated by 48 hours.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Acuity

    Visual acuity measurements were performed by the same examiner, using a calibrated optotype at a distance of six meters, before starting treatment, after each session, one month after treatment, and three months after treatment.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Stereoscopic visual acuity

    Stereoscopic visual acuity was measured using TNO test (with the butterfly plate corresponding to 1300" and the circular plate to 1200"), the subject places the test 40 cm away and must identify calibrated figures.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Contrast sensitivity

    Contrast sensitivity was measured using CSV-1000 test (3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree). The patient must identify scratched circles whose frequency is decreasing.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Eye Fixation

    Eye fixation was evaluated using the Topcon Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimeter (Topcon corporation, Tokyo, Japan), which delineates two distinct regions using 1° (P1) and 2° (P2) circles.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2026 to primary completion in Jun 2026, 0 months.

Of 58 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Amblyopia, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 72. This study's 0 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 71 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 16, 2026
First posted
Apr 23, 2026
StartActual
May 2, 2026
Primary completionActual
Jun 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2029
Last update
Jul 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07547670
Lead sponsor
Universidad de Murcia
Collaborators
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 23, 2026
Start date
May 2, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2026
Completion
Aug 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 28, 2026

Study contacts

Dr. Francisco Javier Valiente Soriano, Optics and Optometry
Contact
fjvaliente@um.es
+34 670 25 58 48

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion