ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07536594RELIEF-RCUpdated Apr 17, 2026

Relief Efficacy of Lidocaine Versus Morphine for Acute Renal Colic in the Emergency Department

An interventional study of Lidocaine and Morphine 0,1 mg/kg in Renal Colic, Kidney Stones, Urolithiasis, Hypocitraturia and Opioid Use During Medical Care, sponsored by Loma Linda University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-17.

Sponsored by Loma Linda University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The opioid epidemic continues to be a major public health crisis in the United States. According to the Center for Disease Control, approximately 8 million Americans reported misusing prescription opioids in 2023, with over 5 million Americans reporting that they suffer from opioid use disorder. The United States government estimates that 105,000 people died from drug overdose in 2023, and approximately 80,000 of those deaths can be attributed to opioids (\~76%). In acknowledgement of the opioid crisis, we wish to contribute to ongoing efforts to reduce unnecessary and excessive opioid prescription.

In 2012, researchers in Iran published a randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous (IV) lidocaine to IV morphine for acute renal colic, reporting that 90% patients responded "successfully" in the lidocaine group versus 70% in the morphine group. They also concluded that there was a statistically significant difference between pain scores between the two groups at all time points, favoring the lidocaine group. However, the study was conducted at a single emergency department in Tabriz, Iran, with a relatively homogenous patient population, and the researchers did not explicitly define their primary outcome variable for what constituted a "successful" response in the treatment groups. The investigators of this study aim to build upon this preliminary evidence by recruiting a more diverse population to improve generalizability and by predefining pain-reduction thresholds to allow for more meaningful comparison between the interventions.

Read the detailed description

Purpose

● To determine whether IV lidocaine is more efficacious than IV morphine in decreasing or resolving acute renal colic pain refractory to initial treatment with parenteral ketorolac

Primary Objective ● To compare the efficacy of IV lidocaine versus IV morphine in achieving at least 50% reduction of pain score at 30 minutes for renal colic requiring rescue medication after initial treatment with parenteral ketorolac

Secondary Objectives

  • To compare reduction in pain scores at 15, 60, and 90 minutes between the two intervention groups;
  • To determine if there is a statistically significant difference in emergency department length of stay (ED LOS) between the two intervention groups
  • To determine if there is a statistically significant difference in need for further rescue medications between the two intervention groups
  • To determine the incidence of adverse effects between the two intervention groups
  • To evaluate whether there is a correlation between age and efficacy of treatment between the two intervention groups

Study Design This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial. Study participants will be randomized to receive either IV lidocaine or IV morphine if they fail initial standard treatment with parenteral ketorolac for suspected acute renal colic.

Study Date Range and Duration The estimated study period will be from 1/1/2026 to 12/31/2027.

The study will be carried out for two calendar years, and may be halted early when sufficient participant enrollment has occurred.

Number of Study Sites

  1. Loma Linda University Medical Center - Adult Emergency Department (Adult ED)
  2. Loma Linda University Medical Center - East Campus Advanced Urgent Care (AUC)

Primary Outcome Variables

● Response to treatment: pain assessment using a numeric rating scale (0 to 10) at 30 minutes

Secondary and Exploratory Outcome Variables

  • Response to treatment: pain assessment using a numeric rating scale (0 to 10) at 15, 60, and 90 minutes
  • Adverse events attributed to IV lidocaine or IV morphine
  • ED LOS
  • Need for additional rescue medications after either IV lidocaine or IV morphine

Study Population Study participants will be enrolled from patients who have suspected renal colic as determined by the treating clinician at the Loma Linda Adult ED or AUC.

Number of Participants This study seeks to enroll at least 248 patients over the study period, with at least 190 patients required to achieve a standard statistical power of 80%. Patients will be randomized into two groups - 124 patients per group.

Study Schedule All data and information, including consent and screening, will be gathered during the course of a patient's single visit at the Loma Linda Adult ED or AUC.

02

Conditions studied

  • Renal Colic
  • Kidney Stones, Urolithiasis, Hypocitraturia
  • Opioid Use During Medical Care

Keywords

  • renal colic
  • kidney stones
  • lidocaine
  • opioid use
03

In context

Renal Colic

79 studies on the registry are indexed under Renal Colic; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 118 across 60 interventional studies indexed under Renal Colic.

Browse Renal Colic studies →

Lead sponsor

Loma Linda University is the lead sponsor of 306 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Of its 29 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

In order to be eligible for inclusion in the study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years at time of visit
  • Able and willing to consent for participation in study
  • Documentation of suspected renal colic as primary complaint as evidenced by reported flank pain, back pain, abdominal pain, or groin pain, or as determined by the treating clinician
  • Requires additional treatment due to inadequate analgesia or clinical suspicion of unsafe discharge secondary to pain after initial treatment with parenteral ketorolac

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Any individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  • Age \< 18 years
  • Use of analgesia for renal colic within 6 hours prior to clinician evaluation
  • Inability or unwillingness to consent for participation in study
  • Experienced a severe adverse event that required clinician intervention after initial treatment with parenteral ketorolac
  • Documented history of allergic or anaphylactic reaction to NSAIDs, lidocaine, or morphine
  • Documented history of cardiac arrhythmias
  • Documented history of chronic use of opioid medications for unrelated diagnoses
  • Currently pregnant
  • Documented history of end-stage renal or hepatic dysfunction
  • Clinical to NSAIDs, lidocaine, or morphine per clinician discretion
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Lidocaine Drip

    Weight-based dose of IV lidocaine will be 1.5 mg/kg, maximum 200 mg, delivered as IV infusion over 10 minutes

    Drug: Lidocaine

  • Active comparator
    Morphine, IV Push

    Weight-based IV morphine will be 0.1 mg/kg, maximum 10 mg, delivered as IV push.

    Drug: Morphine 0,1 mg/kg

Interventions

  • We hypothesize that IV lidocaine outperforms IV morphine at 30 minutes in achieving ≥ 50% reduction in pain score for renal colic that is refractory to initial treatment with parenteral ketorolac.

  • DrugMorphine 0,1 mg/kg

    We hypothesize that IV lidocaine outperforms IV morphine at 30 minutes in achieving ≥ 50% reduction in pain score for renal colic that is refractory to initial treatment with parenteral ketorolac.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Response to treatment

    Pain assessment using a numeric rating scale (0 to 10) at 30 minutes

    Time frame: 30 minutes after completion of medication administration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Response to treatment

    Pain assessment using a numeric rating scale (0 to 10) at 15, 60, and 90 minutes

    Time frame: 15, 60, 90 minutes after completion of medication administration

  2. Adverse events

    Adverse events attributed to IV lidocaine or IV morphine

    Time frame: From time of drug administration to time of patient disposition (admit, observation status, or discharge) in the emergency department, assessed up to 24 hours

  3. Emergency Department Length of Stay

    Time frame: From time of patient registration in the emergency department to time of patient disposition (admit, observation status, or discharge) in the emergency department, assessed up to 24 hours

  4. Rescue medications

    Need for additional rescue medications after either IV lidocaine or IV morphine

    Time frame: From time of drug administration to time of patient disposition (admit, observation status, or discharge) in the emergency department, assessed up to 24 hours

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Garnett MF, Minino AM. Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 2003-2023. NCHS Data Brief. 2024 Dec;(522):1. doi: 10.15620/cdc/170565. PubMed 40623710 ↗
  • Krieger A, Zaidan N, Zhao P, Borin JF, Goldfarb DS. Questionable role of opioids for analgesia in renal colic and its urological interventions. BJUI Compass. 2025 Jun 11;6(6):e70038. doi: 10.1002/bco2.70038. eCollection 2025 Jun. PubMed 40503371 ↗
  • Seyhan AU, Yilmaz E. Treatment of Renal Colic by Nerve Blockade with Lidocaine Versus Intravenous Dexketoprofen. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Aug;31(8):921-925. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.08.921. PubMed 34320708 ↗
  • Motov S, Fassassi C, Drapkin J, Butt M, Hossain R, Likourezos A, Monfort R, Brady J, Rothberger N, Mann SS, Flom P, Gulati V, Marshall J. Comparison of intravenous lidocaine/ketorolac combination to either analgesic alone for suspected renal colic pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;38(2):165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048. Epub 2019 Jan 30. PubMed 30770244 ↗
  • Motamed H, Maleki Verki M. Intravenous Lidocaine Compared to Fentanyl in Renal Colic Pain Management; a Randomized Clinical Trial. Emerg (Tehran). 2017;5(1):e82. doi: 10.22037/emergency.v5i1.18894. Epub 2017 Oct 23. PubMed 29201964 ↗
  • Firouzian A, Alipour A, Rashidian Dezfouli H, Zamani Kiasari A, Gholipour Baradari A, Emami Zeydi A, Amini Ahidashti H, Montazami M, Hosseininejad SM, Yazdani Kochuei F. Does lidocaine as an adjuvant to morphine improve pain relief in patients presenting to the ED with acute renal colic? A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;34(3):443-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.11.062. Epub 2015 Dec 1. PubMed 26704774 ↗
  • Soleimanpour H, Hassanzadeh K, Vaezi H, Golzari SE, Esfanjani RM, Soleimanpour M. Effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine for patients with renal colic in the emergency department. BMC Urol. 2012 May 4;12:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-12-13. PubMed 22559856 ↗
  • Eaton SH, Cashy J, Pearl JA, Stein DM, Perry K, Nadler RB. Admission rates and costs associated with emergency presentation of urolithiasis: analysis of the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2006-2009. J Endourol. 2013 Dec;27(12):1535-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0205. Epub 2013 Nov 19. PubMed 24251430 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — For patient data protection; all recruitment is taking place at once facility. Deidentified patient data will be made available upon request.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07536594
Responsible party
Sarah Aly (Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 17, 2026
Start date
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 17, 2026

Study contacts

Sarah Aly, DO, MSc
Contact
sarahaly@llu.edu
(909)558-7407

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lidocaine

Start the discussion