ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07522918Updated Jun 9, 2026Results posted

Single-Session Extraoral PBM After Third Molar Extraction

An interventional study of Dual-wavelength GaAlAs laser (650+904 nm) in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar, Edema and Trismus, sponsored by Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 17 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-09.

Sponsored by Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2025, registered Apr 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
17 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Postoperative pain, edema, and trismus are frequent complications following impacted mandibular third molar surgery. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of a single-session extraoral dual-wavelength photobiomodulation (PBM) (650+904 nm) applied immediately after extraction. The study aimed to assess the impact of this therapy on postoperative pain, edema, trismus, and quality of life (QoL) on days 2 and 7.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, parallel-group randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to evaluate the effects of a single-session extraoral photobiomodulation (PBM) application on postoperative outcomes following the surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

The study included 70 patients (age range: 17-25 years) with asymptomatic mesioangular impacted mandibular third molars (Pell-Gregory Class IB). Participants were randomly assigned to either a PBM group (n=35) or a control group (n=35). All surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon using a standardized technique.

Following the surgery, the PBM group received a single session of extraoral therapy using a dual-wavelength GaAlAs laser (650 nm + 904 nm) for 10 minutes, with a total energy of 270 J. The probe was held in stationary contact over the mandibular angle-ramus region. The control group received no laser application. Postoperative pain was evaluated using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on days 2 and 7. Secondary outcomes, including facial edema and trismus, were measured at baseline, day 2, and day 7 post-surgery. Additionally, Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) was assessed using a 100-mm VAS scale at the specified time points.

02

Conditions studied

  • Impacted Mandibular Third Molar
  • Edema
  • Trismus
  • Postoperative Pain

Keywords

  • Photobiomodulation
  • Low-Level Laser Therapy
  • Third Molar Surgery
  • Quality of Life
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
03

In context

Edema

566 studies on the registry are indexed under Edema; 95 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is above the median of 52 across 401 interventional studies indexed under Edema.

Browse Edema studies →

Lead sponsor

Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
17 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Indication for extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar in the mesioangular position.
  • Asymptomatic tooth in Pell-Gregory Class IB position.
  • Absence of systemic disease ( status).
  • Healthy status of the impacted tooth and surrounding tissues.
  • Adequate oral hygiene.
  • Absence of malignant or premalignant oral lesions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Regular use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or antibiotics within the preceding week.
  • Presence of a diagnosed psychiatric disorder.
  • Active smoking.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PBM

    Participants received a single 10-minute session of extraoral dual-wavelength photobiomodulation (650+904 nm) immediately following the surgical extraction.

    Device: Dual-wavelength GaAlAs laser (650+904 nm)

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Participants underwent the same standardized surgical extraction protocol but received no additional photobiomodulation therapy.

Interventions

  • DeviceDual-wavelength GaAlAs laser (650+904 nm)

    Extraoral PBM (GRR Laser) applied for 10 minutes, delivering a total energy of 270 J (fluence: 2.73 J/cm² and irradiance: 4.54 mW/cm²).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain

    Postoperative pain assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS; 0 = no pain, 100 = worst imaginable pain)

    Time frame: Postoperative Day 2, and Postoperative Day 7.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Edema

    Facial edema quantified by the sum of distances between three anatomical reference points: tragus to labial commissure, gonion to lateral canthus, and gonion to labial commissure. Total facial distance measured in mm

    Time frame: Preoperatively (baseline), Postoperative Day 2, and Postoperative Day 7.

  2. Trismus

    Assessed by measuring the maximum interincisal distance (MID) between the incisal edges of the maxillary and mandibular central incisors during maximum active mouth opening.Maximum interincisal opening measured in mm using a digital caliper.

    Time frame: Preoperatively (baseline), Postoperative Day 2, and Postoperative Day 7.

  3. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL)

    Quality of life was assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 represents the worst quality of life and 100 represents normal quality of life. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life

    Time frame: Postoperative Day 2 and Postoperative Day 7.

07

Results

Posted Jun 9, 2026

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, between February 2025 and January 2026.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePBM GroupControl Group
Started3535
Completed3535
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPostoperative Pain

Postoperative pain assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS; 0 = no pain, 100 = worst imaginable pain)

Time frame:
Postoperative Day 2, and Postoperative Day 7.
Reported as:
Mean · mm (0-100 VAS)
Postoperative Pain
mm (0-100 VAS)PBM GroupControl Group
Postoperative Day 220.34 ± 24.3841.43 ± 25.15
Postoperative Day 76.74 ± 15.089.34 ± 11.16
Statistical analysis
  • PBM Group vs Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001
SecondaryPostoperative Edema

Facial edema quantified by the sum of distances between three anatomical reference points: tragus to labial commissure, gonion to lateral canthus, and gonion to labial commissure. Total facial distance measured in mm

Time frame:
Preoperatively (baseline), Postoperative Day 2, and Postoperative Day 7.
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Postoperative Edema
mmPBM GroupControl Group
Preoperative (Baseline)284.00 ± 18.57288.20 ± 20.31
Postoperative Day 2300.89 ± 19.46306.83 ± 20.59
Postoperative Day 7290.40 ± 16.90292.80 ± 20.94
Statistical analysis
  • PBM Group vs Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = >0.05
SecondaryTrismus

Assessed by measuring the maximum interincisal distance (MID) between the incisal edges of the maxillary and mandibular central incisors during maximum active mouth opening.Maximum interincisal opening measured in mm using a digital caliper.

Time frame:
Preoperatively (baseline), Postoperative Day 2, and Postoperative Day 7.
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Trismus
mmPBM GroupControl Group
Preoperative (Baseline)46.54 ± 5.3245.91 ± 5.10
Postoperative Day 232.14 ± 6.4528.45 ± 7.12
Postoperative Day 741.20 ± 5.8039.15 ± 6.25
Statistical analysis
  • PBM Group vs Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = =0.374
SecondaryOral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL)

Quality of life was assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 represents the worst quality of life and 100 represents normal quality of life. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life

Time frame:
Postoperative Day 2 and Postoperative Day 7.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale (0-100)
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL)
score on a scale (0-100)PBM GroupControl Group
Postoperative Day 269.83 ± 25.8750.51 ± 23.24
Postoperative Day 792.34 ± 12.9387.89 ± 15.40
Statistical analysis
  • PBM Group vs Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.002

Adverse events

Collected over 7 days postoperative. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PBM Group0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)
Control Group0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PBM GroupControl GroupTotal
Mean21.94 ± 2.8322.14 ± 2.422.04 ± 2.61
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PBM GroupControl GroupTotal
Female222042
Male131528
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)PBM GroupControl GroupTotal
Count of participants——0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Dentistry
    Konya, Meram 42090, Turkey (Türkiye)
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared to protect patient privacy and in accordance with the institutional data protection policy.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2025 to primary completion in Jan 2026, 11 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2026, 4 months after primary completion.

Of 153 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Edema, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 24. This study's 11 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 168 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 24.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 3, 2026
First posted
Apr 13, 2026
StartActual
Feb 15, 2025
Primary completionActual
Jan 20, 2026
CompletionActual
Jan 20, 2026
Results first posted
Jun 9, 2026
Last update
Jun 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07522918
Lead sponsor
Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi
Responsible party
Kubilay Isik (Professor, Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 13, 2026
Start date
Feb 15, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 20, 2026
Completion
Jan 20, 2026
Results posted
Jun 9, 2026
Last update
Jun 9, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion