ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07520448PRESMAP-TBUpdated Apr 14, 2026

Prevention and Mass Screening of TB in Prisons in Paraguay

An interventional study of Type 1 - Intensive Intervention and Type 2 - Optimized intervention in Tuberculosis (TB), TB Infection and Prisoners, sponsored by Universidad Nacional de Caaguazu. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Paraguay. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-14.

Sponsored by Universidad Nacional de Caaguazu · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
4,500
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The goal of this interventional study is to evaluate three tuberculosis (TB) screening and prevention strategies in prisons in Paraguay. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Which strategy is more effective for reducing the incidence rate of active TB?
  • Which strategy is more effective for reducing the TB infection rate?
  • Are these strategies safe, feasible, and cost-effective in prison settings?

Researchers will compare three cluster-based, non-randomized programmatic strategies implemented in three prisons. These strategies differ in the frequency of screening, the diagnostic methods used, and the approach to tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT).

Participants will:

  • undergo informed consent and clinical evaluation
  • receive TB screening through symptom assessment, chest digital X-ray with CAD, and rapid molecular testing, depending on site strategy
  • undergo IGRA testing and preventive therapy assessment, depending on the assigned strategy
  • be followed for 18 months, with screening rounds every 6 months or annually depending on the prison
02

Conditions studied

  • Tuberculosis (TB)
  • TB Infection
  • Prisoners
  • Epidemiology

Browse trials for

03

In context

Tuberculosis

1,170 studies on the registry are indexed under Tuberculosis; 175 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 4,500 is above the median of 150 across 820 interventional studies indexed under Tuberculosis.

Browse Tuberculosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad Nacional de Caaguazu is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Be a person deprived of liberty (PDL) residing in one of the participating penitentiary centers during the study period.
  2. Be 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment.
  3. Be present in the penitentiary facility at the time of a screening round or enter the facility during the study period.
  4. Provide to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Are currently undergoing treatment for active tuberculosis at the time of the screening round.
  2. Have a medical condition that, in the opinion of the clinical staff, prevents the safe performance of the planned diagnostic procedures.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
4,500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Prison 1. Intensive intervention. Mass screening twice a year and massive TPT.

    Arm 1. Prison One. This is the branch with the highest intervention intensity. Mass screenings for active and latent TB will be conducted at months 0, 6, 12, and 18. Mass TB testing will be performed on the entire prison population.

    Diagnostic Test: Type 1 - Intensive Intervention

  • Active comparator
    Prison 2. Optimized intervention. Mass screening twice a year and TPT to specific cases

    This is the "optimized" intervention arm. Mass screening for active and latent TB will be conducted at months 0, 6, 12, and 18. The TPT test will only be performed on cases of latent TB infection in HIV-positive individuals and other immunocompromised patients.

    Diagnostic Test: Type 2 - Optimized intervention

  • Sham comparator
    Prison 3. Control intervention. Mass screening once a year and TPT to specific cases

    This is the "control" intervention arm. Mass screenings for active and latent TB will be conducted at month 0 and 12 months. The TB test will only be performed on cases of latent infection in HIV-positive individuals and other immunocompromised patients. It is the usual NTP intervention.

    Diagnostic Test: Type 3. Control.

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testType 1 - Intensive Intervention

    Type 1. This is the branch with the highest intervention intensity. Mass screenings for active and latent TB will be conducted at months 0, 6, 12, and 18. Mass TB testing will be performed on the entire prison population.

  • Diagnostic testType 2 - Optimized intervention

    Type 2. This is the intervention with mass screenings for active and latent tuberculosis that will be carried out in months 0, 6, 12 and 18. TPT treatment will only be given to groups of people with HIV+ and other immunocompromised individuals.

  • Diagnostic testType 3. Control.

    Type 3. This intervention involves mass screening for active and latent tuberculosis, to be conducted in months 0 and 12. TPT treatment will be administered only to HIV-positive and other immunocompromised individuals. This intervention is similar to that of the NTP.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Point prevalence of active tuberculosis at each screening round

    Proportion of participants diagnosed with microbiologically or clinically confirmed active tuberculosis during each 6-month mass screening round in participating prisons.

    Time frame: At baseline and every 6 months up to 24 months

  2. Incidence of active tuberculosis between screening rounds

    Number of new active tuberculosis cases identified between consecutive screening rounds among participants without active TB at the previous round.

    Time frame: Continuously assessed between screening rounds over 24 months

  3. Incidence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI conversion) between screening rounds

    Proportion of participants with negative LTBI test at a prior round who convert to positive at a subsequent screening round.

    Time frame: Every 6 months up to 24 months

  4. Progression from latent tuberculosis infection to active tuberculosis

    Proportion of participants diagnosed with LTBI who develop active tuberculosis during follow-up.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Point prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) at each screening round

    Proportion of participants with LTBI at each screening round. Proportion of screened participants with a positive LTBI test result during each mass screening round conducted every 6 months in participating prisons.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  2. Cumulative yield of repeated mass screening

    Total number and proportion of active tuberculosis cases identified through sequential mass screening rounds over the study period.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  3. Interval tuberculosis diagnoses between screening rounds

    Number and proportion of active tuberculosis cases identified between scheduled mass screening rounds through routine clinical evaluation or passive case detection.

    Time frame: Continuously assessed between rounds up to 24 months

Other outcomes

  1. Comparative performance of diagnostic tests for LTBI and active tuberculosis

    Comparison of performance metrics between screening diagnostic tests used for detection of latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  2. Cost-effectiveness of sequential mass tuberculosis screening

    Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Cost per tuberculosis case detected and cost per infection prevented associated with sequential mass screening compared with routine practice.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú
    Coronel Oviedo, Caaguazú Department, Paraguay
08

References and documents

Publications

  • da Silva Peres Bezerra W, Jung E, Croda MG, de Oliveira RD, da Silva Santos A, Tsuha DH, Dos Santos PCP, Cunha EAT, Croda J, Andrews JR. The role of tuberculosis symptoms in transmission risk to cell contacts in prisons. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 May 27:2025.05.27.25328413. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.27.25328413. PubMed 40492062 ↗
  • Pivetta de Araujo RC, Martinez L, da Silva Santos A, Ferreira Lemos E, Dias de Oliveira R, Croda M, Porto Batestin Silva D, Lemes IBG, Cunha EAT, Goncalves TO, Pereira Dos Santos PC, Oliveira da Silva B, Cavalheiro Maymone Goncalves C, Andrews J, Croda J. Serial Mass Screening for Tuberculosis Among Incarcerated Persons in Brazil. Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 14;78(6):1669-1676. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae055. PubMed 38324908 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data underlying the results reported in this study will be shared after de-identification. Shared data will include demographic characteristics, incarceration-related variables, screening participation, diagnostic test results for active tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection, treatment initiation and completion for tuberculosis preventive therapy, and follow-up outcomes across screening rounds. Data will be provided in a coded format with removal of direct identifiers to protect participant confidentiality.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary study results and will remain available for 5 years following publication. Supporting documents, including the study protocol and statistical analysis plan, will be available at the time of publication.

Access criteria: De-identified individual participant data and supporting documents will be available to qualified researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Requests must be submitted to the study investigators and will be reviewed by the study steering committee and relevant ethical oversight bodies. Data will be shared under a data use agreement that ensures confidentiality, prohibits re-identification, and limits use to the approved research objectives. Access will be provided through secure electronic transfer.

Data sharing details ↗ · osf.io

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 16 months later.

Of 169 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Tuberculosis, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 16 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 171 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 2, 2026
First posted
Apr 9, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Apr 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07520448
Lead sponsor
Universidad Nacional de Caaguazu
Responsible party
Guillermo Sequera (PhD, MD, Caaguazú National University, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazu) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 9, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 14, 2026

Study contacts

Guillermo Sequera, PhD, MD
principal investigator · Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion