CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07518030TELEHEARTUpdated May 18, 2026

Telemedicine-guided Uptitration of Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure

An interventional study of Telemedicine-based follow-up and Standard follow-up in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), sponsored by Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale di Piacenza. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-18.

Sponsored by Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale di Piacenza · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a single-center, randomized, open-label, no-profit interventional trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a telemedicine-based follow-up strategy compared with standard ambulatory care in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The study aims to determine whether telemedicine-guided management improves the optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), measured as change in GDMT score at 6 months. Patients will be randomized to either a telemedicine group, involving remote multiparametric monitoring and structured teleconsultations, or a standard-of-care group based on conventional in-person follow-up. Secondary objectives include the assessment of safety, treatment adherence, quality of life, and heart failure-related urgent visits, emergency department access, and hospitalizations. This study will provide evidence on the role of telemedicine in facilitating early and effective optimization of heart failure therapy and improving clinical management in a real-world setting.

Read the detailed description

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization worldwide. Despite strong guideline recommendations supporting the early and comprehensive initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), real-world implementation remains suboptimal. Many patients are discharged on incomplete therapy and experience significant delays in treatment optimization, particularly during the early post-discharge phase, which is known to be a high-risk period for clinical instability. Recent evidence has highlighted the importance of rapid and structured GDMT optimization, with early intensification strategies associated with improved clinical outcomes. However, traditional care pathways, largely based on in-person follow-up visits, are often limited by logistical constraints, reduced access, and delayed clinical reassessment. In this context, telemedicine has emerged as a promising tool to facilitate early follow-up, enhance monitoring, and support timely treatment adjustments.

The TELEHEART study is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial designed to evaluate whether a telemedicine-guided strategy can improve GDMT optimization compared with standard care in patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF following hospitalization for acute heart failure or recent clinical instability. Participants will be randomized to either a telemedicine-based follow-up strategy or standard in-person care. In the intervention arm, patients will undergo an early structured telemedicine consultation shortly after discharge, supported by remote monitoring of clinical parameters, including blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, body weight, and single-lead electrocardiogram recordings. This approach is intended to enable early reassessment and facilitate timely up-titration of GDMT in accordance with current guidelines. In the control arm, patients will receive standard follow-up according to local clinical practice. The primary objective of the study is to assess the effectiveness of the telemedicine-based strategy in improving GDMT optimization, measured through a predefined GDMT score reflecting both the initiation and up-titration of the four foundational drug classes for HFrEF, according to a structured and standardized scoring system (detailed in the Outcome Measures section).

A key secondary objective is to evaluate the safety of replacing the first post-discharge in-person clinical evaluation with a structured telemedicine consultation. Safety will be assessed using a predefined composite endpoint including worsening renal function (defined as a ≥30% reduction in eGFR or eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73m²), significant hyperkalemia (serum potassium >5.5 mEq/L), and symptomatic hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg associated with symptoms). Additional secondary objectives include the assessment of clinical outcomes, such as hospital readmissions and emergency department visits, as well as patient-reported outcomes. Treatment adherence, quality of life, and patient satisfaction with the telemedicine approach will be evaluated using validated questionnaires, including the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), and the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). By integrating structured telemedicine into early post-discharge management, this study aims to determine whether a more proactive, remotely supported care model can safely enhance treatment optimization and improve patient-centered outcomes in HFrEF.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)

Keywords

  • Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
  • Telemedicine
  • Guidelines direct medical therapy
  • Uptitration
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants must meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Provision of written informed consent.
  2. Age ≥18 years.
  3. Recent diagnosis of HFrEF, defined according to ESC criteria, established in either an inpatient or outpatient setting.
  4. No prior initiation of GDMT for HF at the time of enrollment, or treatment limited to a single agent with potential disease-modifying effects prescribed for a different clinical indication.
  5. Availability of adequate digital literacy, either by the patient or a caregiver, defined as the ability to use electronic devices for remote communication (phone/video calls), transmission of vital parameters (body weight, blood pressure, heart rate), and interaction with digital health tools. In cases of insufficient patient digital skills, the presence of a caregiver with adequate digital competence is acceptable.
  6. Any etiology of HF is eligible, including ischemic, valvular, primary or infiltrative cardiomyopathies, iatrogenic or toxic causes, and tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ongoing treatment with two or more guideline-directed heart failure medications at the time of HFrEF diagnosis
  • Presence of severe comorbidities or clinical instability requiring prolonged or continuous hospital management
  • Estimated life expectancy \<12 months
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Telemedicine-guided management

    Patients randomized to this arm will undergo an early structured telemedicine consultation after hospital discharge, supported by remote monitoring of clinical parameters including blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, body weight, and single-lead electrocardiogram. Follow-up is designed to enable early reassessment and facilitate timely initiation and up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) according to current recommendations.

    Other: Telemedicine-based follow-up

  • Active comparator
    Standard of care

    Patients randomized to this arm will receive standard post-discharge management according to local clinical practice, including in-person follow-up visits and GDMT optimization at the discretion of the treating physician.

    Other: Standard follow-up

Interventions

  • OtherTelemedicine-based follow-up

    Structured telemedicine follow-up including early post-discharge consultation and remote multiparametric monitoring (blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, body weight, and single-lead electrocardiogram). Clinical data are reviewed by a dedicated healthcare team to enable early reassessment and timely optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy.

    Also known as: TELEHEART intervention

  • OtherStandard follow-up

    Usual care consisting of standard in-person clinical follow-up visits and treatment optimization according to routine clinical practice.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) score

    Change in GDMT score from baseline (at enrollment) to 6 months. The GDMT score (range 0-5) reflects prescription and dose optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure (ACEi/ARB/ARNI, beta-blockers, MRAs, SGLT2 inhibitors), based on an adapted ADMINISTER score. ΔGDMT is defined as the difference between 6-month and baseline values. Full scoring details are provided in the study protocol.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of therapy-related adverse events during GDMT optimization (worsening renal function, hyperkalemia, or symptomatic hypotension)

    First occurrence of any of the following within 3 months after enrollment: 1. worsening renal function (≥30% decrease in eGFR from baseline or eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73 m²); 2. hyperkalemia (serum potassium \>5.5 mEq/L); 3. symptomatic hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg with symptoms such as dizziness, presyncope, or syncope).

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Change in health-related quality of life assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)

    Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score from baseline to 6 months. The KCCQ score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status. An increase of ≥5 points is considered clinically meaningful.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  3. Patient satisfaction and usability assessed by the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ)

    Patient-reported satisfaction and usability of telemedicine follow-up assessed using the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). The TUQ score ranges from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating better usability and satisfaction.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  4. Heart failure-related clinical events

    Urgent outpatient visits, emergency department visits, or hospitalizations for heart failure worsening within 6 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 6 months

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Clinical Research Office, AUSL Piacenza
    Piacenza, 29121, Italy
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Koehler F, Koehler K, Deckwart O, Prescher S, Wegscheider K, Kirwan BA, Winkler S, Vettorazzi E, Bruch L, Oeff M, Zugck C, Doerr G, Naegele H, Stork S, Butter C, Sechtem U, Angermann C, Gola G, Prondzinsky R, Edelmann F, Spethmann S, Schellong SM, Schulze PC, Bauersachs J, Wellge B, Schoebel C, Tajsic M, Dreger H, Anker SD, Stangl K. Efficacy of telemedical interventional management in patients with heart failure (TIM-HF2): a randomised, controlled, parallel-group, unmasked trial. Lancet. 2018 Sep 22;392(10152):1047-1057. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31880-4. Epub 2018 Aug 25. PubMed 30153985 ↗
  • Man JP, Koole MAC, Meregalli PG, Handoko ML, Stienen S, de Lange FJ, Winter MM, Schijven MP, Kok WEM, Kuipers DI, van der Harst P, Asselbergs FW, Zwinderman AH, Dijkgraaf MGW, Chamuleau SAJ, Schuuring MJ. Digital consults in heart failure care: a randomized controlled trial. Nat Med. 2024 Oct;30(10):2907-2913. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03238-6. Epub 2024 Aug 31. PubMed 39217271 ↗
  • Mebazaa A, Davison B, Chioncel O, Cohen-Solal A, Diaz R, Filippatos G, Metra M, Ponikowski P, Sliwa K, Voors AA, Edwards C, Novosadova M, Takagi K, Damasceno A, Saidu H, Gayat E, Pang PS, Celutkiene J, Cotter G. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial. Lancet. 2022 Dec 3;400(10367):1938-1952. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02076-1. Epub 2022 Nov 7. PubMed 36356631 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07518030
Lead sponsor
Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale di Piacenza
Responsible party
Andrea Tedeschi (Doctor, Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale di Piacenza) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 8, 2026
Start date
Mar 20, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 18, 2026

Study contacts

Clinical Research Office, AUSL Piacenza
Contact
ricerca@ausl.pc.it
+ 39 0523 302208

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion