ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07505784BetaTACSFTDUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Frontotemporal Dementia

An interventional study of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Sham Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD), sponsored by IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, clinical and biological efficacy, and predictors of efficacy of an intervention consisting of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in patients with Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD).

In addition to typical symptoms, FTD also present alterations in brain oscillations. In animal models of neurodegeneration, restoration of oscillations via neuronal "entrainment" phenomena has demonstrated a significant reduction in toxic protein accumulation, resulting in improved cognitive function.

tACS is a neurophysiological noninvasive method of neuromodulation increasingly studied for its therapeutic potential. It has been shown to safely modulate the oscillatory frequencies underlying multiple cognitive functions, including verbal memory, perception, and working memory.

In light of this evidence, it is proposed to apply a single-session treatment of β-tACS stimulation in patients with FTD and to evaluate its clinical effects, oscillatory modifications by EEG, and changes in neurophysiological indices such as short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF), both compromised in the disease.

The study has a cross-over design (multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blind), with FTD patients randomly assigned to one of the two arms: i) Group 1, who will receive a real tACS session first (1h); ii) Group 2, who will instead undergo a sham tACS session (1h). In the next phase (cross-over), one week after the first phase, the groups will reverse the treatment: Group 1 will receive tACS sham and Group 2 will receive real tACS.

The main objectives of the study are: [1] to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the single tACS treatment session; [2] to investigate the effects of the protocol on (short-term) cognitive performance in patients with FTD; [3] to verify intervention-induced changes in brain synchronization; [4] to evaluate changes in neurophysiological indices following treatment; and [5] evaluate any predictors of efficacy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation
  • Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD)
03

In context

Frontotemporal Dementia

208 studies on the registry are indexed under Frontotemporal Dementia; 72 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 50 across 128 interventional studies indexed under Frontotemporal Dementia.

Browse Frontotemporal Dementia studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female subjects aged over 40 years at the time of signing the form;
  • Presence of a clinical diagnosis of Frontotemporal Dementia according to clinical criteria (Rascovsky et al., 2011; Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age younger than that stated in the inclusion criterion;
  • Inability to understand;
  • for tACS and TMS: cardiac pacemaker carriers and metal implants that are not compatible with electric or magnetic fields, history of epilepsy, current pregnancy (Safety Questionnaire)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Group 1

    Group 1, who will undergo real tACS treatment, in a single 60-minute session and after one week of sham tACS treatment, in a single 60-minute session.

    Device: Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation · Device: Sham Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

  • Other
    Group 2

    Group 2, who will undergo sham tACS treatment, in a single 60-minute session and after one week of real tACS treatment, in a single 60-minute session.

    Device: Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation · Device: Sham Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscranial Alternating Current Stimulation

    The session will consist of the application of a session of tACS (real at 2.5 mA) at the cortical level for a duration of 60 minutes.

  • DeviceSham Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

    Application of sham tACS session at the cortical level for a duration of 60 minutes. The electrode placement will be identical to that used for real stimulation. However, the electrical current will be automatically interrupted approximately 30 seconds after the start of stimulation, making it impossible for the patient to distinguish between sham and real stimulation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety and Feasibility of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Protocol

    Safety will be assessed in terms of the frequency and severity of any adverse events, and feasibility will be assessed based on the study dropout rate. Safety and feasibility will be monitored throughout the study.

    Time frame: Periprocedurally, an average 1 week

  2. Phonemic Fluency Test

    Cognitive flexibility and verbal fluency will be evalueted by Phonemic Fluency Test. Subject is asked to generate as many words as possible from a given letter within a limited time (60 seconds); higher scores indicate better perfomance.

    Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after first stimulation. Immediately before and immediately after second stimulation, after a week.

  3. Semantic Fluency Test

    Lexical-semantic access and executive functioning will be evalueted by Semantic Fluency Test. Subject is asked to generate as many words as possible from a given category within a limited time (60 seconds); higher scores indicate better perfomance.

    Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after first stimulation. Immediately before and immediately after second stimulation, after a week.

  4. Trail Making Test (TMT - AB)

    Executive function will be assessed using the Trail Making Test, including Part A (visual attention and processing speed) and Part B (task switching and cognitive flexibility). Higher completion times reflect poorer performance.

    Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after first stimulation. Immediately before and immediately after second stimulation, after a week.

  5. Digit Span Test

    Short-term memory and working memory will be assessed respectively using the Digit Span forward and Digit Span backward. Scores reflect the maximum number of digits recalled in correct order.

    Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after first stimulation. Immediately before and immediately after second stimulation, after a week.

  6. Modified Emotion Recognition Test

    Emotion recognition from facial expressions will be evalueted by Modified Emotion Recognition Test. Subject is asked to choose an emotion from five options for each face showed; higher scores indicate better perfomance.

    Time frame: Immediately after first stimulation. Immediately after second stimulation, after a week.

  7. Berg's Card Sorting Task

    Cognitive flexibility and problem solving will be assessed by Berg's Card Sorting Task. Scores reflect correct answer, errors and reaction time.

    Time frame: At the end of first stimulation. At the end of second stimulation, after a week.

  8. Go/No-Go Task

    Inhibition control will be assessed by Go/No-Go Task. Scores reflect correct targets, false alarms, misses and response speed.

    Time frame: At the end of first stimulation. At the end of second stimulation, after a week.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in electroencephalography (EEG)

    Using resting-state EEG recorded under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions, the investigators will assess changes in EEG beta-band power (13-30 Hz). Beta power will be quantified from scalp EEG recordings using spectral power analysis performed on the pre-processed EEG data.

    Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after first stimulation. Immediately before and immediately after second stimulation, after a week.

  2. Effectiveness in restoring neurotransmission

    Neurotransmission will be assessed by measuring changes in glutamatergic (intracortical facilitation, ICF) and GABAergic (short-interval intracortical inhibition, SICI) neurotransmission assessed indirectly through TMS.

    Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after first stimulation. Immediately before and immediately after second stimulation, after a week.

  3. Demographic characteristics

    Demographic characteristics (age, gender, and level of education) will be evaluated as predictors of treatment efficacy and examined for associations with differential treatment response.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus J, van Swieten JC, Seelaar H, Dopper EG, Onyike CU, Hillis AE, Josephs KA, Boeve BF, Kertesz A, Seeley WW, Rankin KP, Johnson JK, Gorno-Tempini ML, Rosen H, Prioleau-Latham CE, Lee A, Kipps CM, Lillo P, Piguet O, Rohrer JD, Rossor MN, Warren JD, Fox NC, Galasko D, Salmon DP, Black SE, Mesulam M, Weintraub S, Dickerson BC, Diehl-Schmid J, Pasquier F, Deramecourt V, Lebert F, Pijnenburg Y, Chow TW, Manes F, Grafman J, Cappa SF, Freedman M, Grossman M, Miller BL. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011 Sep;134(Pt 9):2456-77. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr179. Epub 2011 Aug 2. PubMed 21810890 ↗
  • Pettorruso M, Miuli A, Di Natale C, Montemitro C, Zoratto F, De Risio L, d'Andrea G, Dannon PN, Martinotti G, di Giannantonio M. Non-invasive brain stimulation targets and approaches to modulate gambling-related decisions: A systematic review. Addict Behav. 2021 Jan;112:106657. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106657. Epub 2020 Sep 13. PubMed 32987305 ↗
  • Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1. PubMed 20633386 ↗
  • Nishida K, Yoshimura M, Isotani T, Yoshida T, Kitaura Y, Saito A, Mii H, Kato M, Takekita Y, Suwa A, Morita S, Kinoshita T. Differences in quantitative EEG between frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease as revealed by LORETA. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Sep;122(9):1718-25. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.02.011. Epub 2011 Mar 10. PubMed 21396882 ↗
  • Monaco M, Costa A, Caltagirone C, Carlesimo GA. Forward and backward span for verbal and visuo-spatial data: standardization and normative data from an Italian adult population. Neurol Sci. 2013 May;34(5):749-54. doi: 10.1007/s10072-012-1130-x. Epub 2012 Jun 12. PubMed 22689311 ↗
  • Lindau M, Jelic V, Johansson SE, Andersen C, Wahlund LO, Almkvist O. Quantitative EEG abnormalities and cognitive dysfunctions in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2003;15(2):106-14. doi: 10.1159/000067973. PubMed 12566600 ↗
  • Iyer MB, Mattu U, Grafman J, Lomarev M, Sato S, Wassermann EM. Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals. Neurology. 2005 Mar 8;64(5):872-5. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000152986.07469.E9. PubMed 15753425 ↗
  • Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, Kertesz A, Mendez M, Cappa SF, Ogar JM, Rohrer JD, Black S, Boeve BF, Manes F, Dronkers NF, Vandenberghe R, Rascovsky K, Patterson K, Miller BL, Knopman DS, Hodges JR, Mesulam MM, Grossman M. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology. 2011 Mar 15;76(11):1006-14. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6. Epub 2011 Feb 16. PubMed 21325651 ↗
  • Costa A, Bagoj E, Monaco M, Zabberoni S, De Rosa S, Papantonio AM, Mundi C, Caltagirone C, Carlesimo GA. Standardization and normative data obtained in the Italian population for a new verbal fluency instrument, the phonemic/semantic alternate fluency test. Neurol Sci. 2014 Mar;35(3):365-72. doi: 10.1007/s10072-013-1520-8. Epub 2013 Aug 21. PubMed 23963806 ↗
  • Caffarra P, Vezzadini G, Dieci F, Zonato F, Venneri A. Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci. 2002 Mar;22(6):443-7. doi: 10.1007/s100720200003. PubMed 11976975 ↗
  • Benussi A, Grassi M, Palluzzi F, Koch G, Di Lazzaro V, Nardone R, Cantoni V, Dell'Era V, Premi E, Martorana A, di Lorenzo F, Bonni S, Ranieri F, Capone F, Musumeci G, Cotelli MS, Padovani A, Borroni B. Classification Accuracy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Diagnosis of Neurodegenerative Dementias. Ann Neurol. 2020 Mar;87(3):394-404. doi: 10.1002/ana.25677. Epub 2020 Jan 23. PubMed 31925823 ↗
  • Benussi A, Cantoni V, Rivolta J, Zoppi N, Cotelli MS, Bianchi M, Cotelli M, Borroni B. Alpha tACS Improves Cognition and Modulates Neurotransmission in Dementia with Lewy Bodies. Mov Disord. 2024 Nov;39(11):1993-2003. doi: 10.1002/mds.29969. Epub 2024 Aug 13. PubMed 39136447 ↗
  • Benussi A, Cantoni V, Grassi M, Brechet L, Michel CM, Datta A, Thomas C, Gazzina S, Cotelli MS, Bianchi M, Premi E, Gadola Y, Cotelli M, Pengo M, Perrone F, Scolaro M, Archetti S, Solje E, Padovani A, Pascual-Leone A, Borroni B. Increasing Brain Gamma Activity Improves Episodic Memory and Restores Cholinergic Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease. Ann Neurol. 2022 Aug;92(2):322-334. doi: 10.1002/ana.26411. Epub 2022 Jun 6. PubMed 35607946 ↗
  • Antal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M, Brockmoller J, Brunoni AR, Chen R, Cohen LG, Dowthwaite G, Ellrich J, Floel A, Fregni F, George MS, Hamilton R, Haueisen J, Herrmann CS, Hummel FC, Lefaucheur JP, Liebetanz D, Loo CK, McCaig CD, Miniussi C, Miranda PC, Moliadze V, Nitsche MA, Nowak R, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Poppendieck W, Priori A, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell J, Rueger MA, Ruffini G, Schellhorn K, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wexler A, Ziemann U, Hallett M, Paulus W. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1774-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19. PubMed 28709880 ↗
  • Amodio P, Wenin H, Del Piccolo F, Mapelli D, Montagnese S, Pellegrini A, Musto C, Gatta A, Umilta C. Variability of trail making test, symbol digit test and line trait test in normal people. A normative study taking into account age-dependent decline and sociobiological variables. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2002 Apr;14(2):117-31. doi: 10.1007/BF03324425. PubMed 12092785 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 10 months after the start.

Of 51 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Frontotemporal Dementia, half reached primary completion within 41 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 97. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 54 studies reached it within 41 months; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 97.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 23, 2026
First posted
Apr 1, 2026
StartActual
Feb 3, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Feb 2027
Last update
Sep 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07505784
Lead sponsor
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli
Responsible party
Prof. Barbara Borroni (Professor, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 1, 2026
Start date
Feb 3, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion