CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07375771TACSDLB2Updated Sep 22, 2026

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Lewy Body Dementia

An interventional study of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Sham Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Lewy Body Dementia (LBD) and Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation, sponsored by IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli. Recruiting at 2 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-22.

Sponsored by IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, clinical and biological efficacy, and predictors of efficacy of an intervention consisting of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in patients with Lewy Body Dementia (DLB).

In neurodegenerative diseases, like DLB, the process of neurodegeneration is accompanied by a significant alteration in oscillatory activity.

tACS is a neurophysiological method of non-invasive modulation of the excitability of the central nervous system that uses a mild electrical current. Recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this method in modulating the natural brain oscillation frequencies underlying multiple cognitive processes, such as verbal memory, perception, and working memory. Preliminary data show that single stimulation with occipital α-tACS results in a significant improvement in visuospatial abilities and executive functions in patients wih DLB.

The study is double blind, randomised and placebo-controlled, participants will be randomised into two groups: group 1, participants will receive real tACS for 2 weeks, from Wednesday to Tuesday (5 sessions/week, lasting approximately 60 minutes each); and group 2, participants will receive placebo tACS for 2 weeks (5 sessions/week, lasting approximately 60 minutes each).

Visits will take place at the beginning of the study (T00), after 2 weeks (T02), and 12 weeks (T12, follow-up). During each visit, participants undergo the following procedures: (i) blood sampling, (ii) clinical and neuropsychological assessment, (iii) EEG, and (iv) TMS-EEG. The occurrence of adverse events will be monitored throughout the duration of the study. Specific biomarker analyses will be performed on the blood samples to study the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease and the effect of the experimental intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lewy Body Dementia (LBD)
  • Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female subjects aged over 18 at the time of signing the informed consent form;
  • Presence of a clinical diagnosis of Lewy body dementia according to clinical criteria (McKeith et al., 2017)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age younger than that stated in the inclusion criteria;
  • Incapacity to understand;
  • Contraindications for tACS and TMS: patients with cardiac pacemakers and metal implants that are not compatible with electric or magnetic fields, history of epilepsy, current pregnancy (Safety questionnaire)
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental: Real tACS

    10 sessions of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (5 sessions/week, 60 minutes/session)

    Device: Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Comparator: Sham tACS

    10 sessions of sham Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (5 sessions/week, 60 minutes/session)

    Device: Sham Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscranial Alternating Current Stimulation

    10 sessions (5 days/week for 2 weeks), each consisting in the application of a tACS session (real at 3 mA) at the cortical level for a duration of 60 minutes each.

  • DeviceSham Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

    10 sessions (5 days/week for 2 weeks), each consisting in the application of a sham tACS session at the cortical level for a duration of 60 minutes each. The electrode placement will be identical to that used for real stimulation. However, the electrical current will be automatically interrupted approximately 5 seconds after the start of stimulation, making it impossible for the patient to distinguish between sham and real stimulation

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Protocol

    Safety and tolerability will be assessed in terms of incidence and severity of any adverse events. Safety and tolerability will be monitored throughout the duration of the study.

    Time frame: Through study completion, at week 12

  2. Feasibility of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Protocol

    Feasibility will be assessed based on the drop-out rate. Feasibility will be monitored throughout the duration of the study.

    Time frame: Through study completion, at week 12

  3. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

    The global cognitive functioning will be assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); MMSE scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating a more preserved cognition.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

  4. Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)

    Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) is designed to be a structured clinical interview about neuropsychiatric and behavioral symptoms will be assessed by; the score ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 144 (severe symptoms).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  5. Qualitive Pentagon Test

    Praxis-constructive abilities will be assessed by Qualitive Pentagon Test; the subject is asked to copy two intersecting pentagons. Qualitive Pentagon Test scores range from 0 to 13, with higher scores indicating a better performance.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  6. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

    Verbal memory will be assessed using the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), including immediate recall (sum of trials), delayed recall after 15 minutes. Scores reflect the number of correctly recalled items.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  7. Trail Making Test (TMT - AB)

    Executive function will be assessed using the Trail Making Test, including Part A (visual attention and processing speed) and Part B (task switching and cognitive flexibility). Higher completion times reflect poorer performance.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  8. Clock Drawing Test (CDT)

    Constructional praxis abilities, mental representation skills, and visuospatial planning will be evaluated by Clock Drawing Test (CDT). CDT scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating a better performance.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  9. Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF)

    Visuoconstructive abilities and visual memory will be assessed by Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure. It requires the subject to copy a complex geometric figure and subsequently reproduce it from meory after a 10 minutes delay. Both tests score from 0 to 36, with higher score indicating a better performance.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  10. Phonemic Fluency Test

    Cognitive flexibility and verbal fluency will be evalueted by Phonemic Fluency Test. Subject is asked to generate as many words as possible from a given letter within a limited time (60 seconds); higher scores indicate better perfomance.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  11. Semantic Fluency Test

    Lexical-semantic access and executive functioning will be evalueted by Semantic Fluency Test. Subject is asked to generate as many words as possible from a given category within a limited time (60 seconds); higher scores indicate better perfomance.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  12. Digit Span Test

    Short-term memory and working memory will be assessed respectively using the Digit Span forward and Digit Span backward. Scores reflect the maximum number of digits recalled in correct order.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  13. Visual Search Task

    Attention and cognitive flexibility will be assessed using a Visual Search task. Participants will be instructed to identify and select a predefined target each time it appears on the screen. Performance will be quantified by the number of correct detections (hits), missed targets (omissions), and incorrect responses (errors).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Biological Markers

    A venous blood draw (35 ml) will be performed at each timepoint (T0, T02, T12). The samples will be processed for serum, plasma, and DNA extraction. Neurodegeneration biomarkers will be analyzed, specifically changes in plasma neurofilament light (NfL) levels (pg/mL) will be evaluated. The plasma biomarker profile will be evaluated as a predictor of treatment efficacy and correlated with differential treatment response.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  2. Change in electroencephalography (EEG)

    Using resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) recorded under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions, the investigators will assess changes in EEG alpha-band power (8-12 Hz). Alpha power will be quantified from scalp EEG recordings using spectral power analysis performed on the pre-processed EEG data.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  3. Change in TMS-EEG

    Cortical reactivity and effective connectivity will be assessed by analyzing TMS-evoked potentials, obtained from TMS-EEG coregistration after occipital cortex stimulation.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  4. Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL)

    Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL; range 0-6, higher scores indicating worse outcome) assesses the loss of daily self-sufficiency. It will be evaluated as predictors of treatment efficacy and examined for associations with differential treatment response.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)

    Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL; range 0-8, higher scores indicating worse outcome) assesses the loss of complex instrumental acitivities. It will be evaluated as predictors of treatment efficacy and examined for associations with differential treatment response.

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Part III (UPDRS-III)

    Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Part III (UPDRS-III; range 0-132, higher scores indicating worse outcome) assesses motor impairment. It will be evaluated as predictors of treatment efficacy and examined for associations with differential treatment response.

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Demographic characteristics

    Demographic characteristics (age, gender, and level of education) will be evaluated as predictors of treatment efficacy and examined for associations with differential treatment response.

    Time frame: Baseline

06

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni Di Dio - Fatebenefratelli Brescia
    Brescia, Italy 25125, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina di Trieste
    Trieste, TS 34139, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Aoki Y, Kazui H, Pascal-Marqui RD, Ishii R, Yoshiyama K, Kanemoto H, Suzuki Y, Sato S, Hata M, Canuet L, Iwase M, Ikeda M. EEG Resting-State Networks in Dementia with Lewy Bodies Associated with Clinical Symptoms. Neuropsychobiology. 2019;77(4):206-218. doi: 10.1159/000495620. Epub 2019 Jan 17. PubMed 30654367 ↗
  • Antal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M, Brockmoller J, Brunoni AR, Chen R, Cohen LG, Dowthwaite G, Ellrich J, Floel A, Fregni F, George MS, Hamilton R, Haueisen J, Herrmann CS, Hummel FC, Lefaucheur JP, Liebetanz D, Loo CK, McCaig CD, Miniussi C, Miranda PC, Moliadze V, Nitsche MA, Nowak R, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Poppendieck W, Priori A, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell J, Rueger MA, Ruffini G, Schellhorn K, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wexler A, Ziemann U, Hallett M, Paulus W. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1774-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19. PubMed 28709880 ↗
  • Amodio P, Wenin H, Del Piccolo F, Mapelli D, Montagnese S, Pellegrini A, Musto C, Gatta A, Umilta C. Variability of trail making test, symbol digit test and line trait test in normal people. A normative study taking into account age-dependent decline and sociobiological variables. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2002 Apr;14(2):117-31. doi: 10.1007/BF03324425. PubMed 12092785 ↗
  • Bagattini C, Mutanen TP, Fracassi C, Manenti R, Cotelli M, Ilmoniemi RJ, Miniussi C, Bortoletto M. Predicting Alzheimer's disease severity by means of TMS-EEG coregistration. Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Aug;80:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 13. PubMed 31077959 ↗
  • Benussi A, Cantoni V, Rivolta J, Zoppi N, Cotelli MS, Bianchi M, Cotelli M, Borroni B. Alpha tACS Improves Cognition and Modulates Neurotransmission in Dementia with Lewy Bodies. Mov Disord. 2024 Nov;39(11):1993-2003. doi: 10.1002/mds.29969. Epub 2024 Aug 13. PubMed 39136447 ↗
  • Bonato C, Miniussi C, Rossini PM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: a TMS/EEG co-registration study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Aug;117(8):1699-707. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Jun 22. PubMed 16797232 ↗
  • Bortoletto M, Veniero D, Thut G, Miniussi C. The contribution of TMS-EEG coregistration in the exploration of the human cortical connectome. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Feb;49:114-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.014. Epub 2014 Dec 22. PubMed 25541459 ↗
  • Hoy KE, Bailey N, Arnold S, Windsor K, John J, Daskalakis ZJ, Fitzgerald PB. The effect of gamma-tACS on working memory performance in healthy controls. Brain Cogn. 2015 Dec;101:51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 12. PubMed 26580743 ↗
  • Massimini M, Ferrarelli F, Huber R, Esser SK, Singh H, Tononi G. Breakdown of cortical effective connectivity during sleep. Science. 2005 Sep 30;309(5744):2228-32. doi: 10.1126/science.1117256. PubMed 16195466 ↗
  • Monaco M, Costa A, Caltagirone C, Carlesimo GA. Forward and backward span for verbal and visuo-spatial data: standardization and normative data from an Italian adult population. Neurol Sci. 2013 May;34(5):749-54. doi: 10.1007/s10072-012-1130-x. Epub 2012 Jun 12. PubMed 22689311 ↗
  • Morishima Y, Akaishi R, Yamada Y, Okuda J, Toma K, Sakai K. Task-specific signal transmission from prefrontal cortex in visual selective attention. Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jan;12(1):85-91. doi: 10.1038/nn.2237. Epub 2008 Dec 21. PubMed 19098905 ↗
  • Morrin H, Fang T, Servant D, Aarsland D, Rajkumar AP. Systematic review of the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions in people with Lewy body dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Mar;30(3):395-407. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217002010. Epub 2017 Oct 9. PubMed 28988547 ↗
  • Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1. PubMed 20633386 ↗
  • Treisman AM, Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5. No abstract available. PubMed 7351125 ↗
  • Ragazzoni A, Pirulli C, Veniero D, Feurra M, Cincotta M, Giovannelli F, Chiaramonti R, Lino M, Rossi S, Miniussi C. Vegetative versus minimally conscious states: a study using TMS-EEG, sensory and event-related potentials. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057069. Epub 2013 Feb 27. PubMed 23460826 ↗
  • McKeith IG, Boeve BF, Dickson DW, Halliday G, Taylor JP, Weintraub D, Aarsland D, Galvin J, Attems J, Ballard CG, Bayston A, Beach TG, Blanc F, Bohnen N, Bonanni L, Bras J, Brundin P, Burn D, Chen-Plotkin A, Duda JE, El-Agnaf O, Feldman H, Ferman TJ, Ffytche D, Fujishiro H, Galasko D, Goldman JG, Gomperts SN, Graff-Radford NR, Honig LS, Iranzo A, Kantarci K, Kaufer D, Kukull W, Lee VMY, Leverenz JB, Lewis S, Lippa C, Lunde A, Masellis M, Masliah E, McLean P, Mollenhauer B, Montine TJ, Moreno E, Mori E, Murray M, O'Brien JT, Orimo S, Postuma RB, Ramaswamy S, Ross OA, Salmon DP, Singleton A, Taylor A, Thomas A, Tiraboschi P, Toledo JB, Trojanowski JQ, Tsuang D, Walker Z, Yamada M, Kosaka K. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2017 Jul 4;89(1):88-100. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004058. Epub 2017 Jun 7. PubMed 28592453 ↗
  • Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Ferbert A, Wroe S, Asselman P, Marsden CD. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol. 1993 Nov;471:501-19. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019912. PubMed 8120818 ↗
  • Herrmann CS, Rach S, Neuling T, Struber D. Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 14;7:279. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00279. eCollection 2013. PubMed 23785325 ↗
  • Ferrarelli F, Massimini M, Peterson MJ, Riedner BA, Lazar M, Murphy MJ, Huber R, Rosanova M, Alexander AL, Kalin N, Tononi G. Reduced evoked gamma oscillations in the frontal cortex in schizophrenia patients: a TMS/EEG study. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;165(8):996-1005. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07111733. Epub 2008 May 15. PubMed 18483133 ↗
  • Cromarty RA, Elder GJ, Graziadio S, Baker M, Bonanni L, Onofrj M, O'Brien JT, Taylor JP. Neurophysiological biomarkers for Lewy body dementias. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan;127(1):349-359. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Jun 27. PubMed 26183755 ↗
  • Costa A, Bagoj E, Monaco M, Zabberoni S, De Rosa S, Papantonio AM, Mundi C, Caltagirone C, Carlesimo GA. Standardization and normative data obtained in the Italian population for a new verbal fluency instrument, the phonemic/semantic alternate fluency test. Neurol Sci. 2014 Mar;35(3):365-72. doi: 10.1007/s10072-013-1520-8. Epub 2013 Aug 21. PubMed 23963806 ↗
  • Caffarra P, Gardini S, Zonato F, Concari L, Dieci F, Copelli S, Freedman M, Stracciari A, Venneri A. Italian norms for the Freedman version of the Clock Drawing Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Nov;33(9):982-8. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2011.589373. Epub 2011 Aug 1. PubMed 22082081 ↗
  • Caffarra P, Vezzadini G, Dieci F, Zonato F, Venneri A. Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci. 2002 Mar;22(6):443-7. doi: 10.1007/s100720200003. PubMed 11976975 ↗
  • Carlesimo GA, De Risi M, Monaco M, Costa A, Fadda L, Picardi A, Di Gennaro G, Caltagirone C, Grammaldo L. Normative data for measuring performance change on parallel forms of a 15-word list recall test. Neurol Sci. 2014 May;35(5):663-8. doi: 10.1007/s10072-013-1573-8. Epub 2013 Nov 12. PubMed 24218156 ↗
  • Chatzikonstantinou S, McKenna J, Karantali E, Petridis F, Kazis D, Mavroudis I. Electroencephalogram in dementia with Lewy bodies: a systematic review. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 May;33(5):1197-1208. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01576-2. Epub 2020 May 7. PubMed 32383032 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07375771
Lead sponsor
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli
Responsible party
Prof. Barbara Borroni (Professor, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 29, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 22, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion