CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07839650AD_tACSrehabUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Combined With Cognitive Training in Alzheimer's Disease

An interventional study of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Sham Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation, Alzheimer Disease (AD) and Alzheimer Dementia (AD), sponsored by IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli. Recruiting at 2 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical and biological efficacy, as well as predictors of efficacy, of a home-based intervention combining transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) with individualized computerized cognitive training in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD).

In neurodegenerative diseases, including AD, neurodegeneration is accompanied by alterations in brain oscillatory activity. Restoration of these oscillations through neuronal entrainment has shown beneficial effects in animal models, while previous studies in patients with AD have demonstrated that gamma-frequency tACS applied over the precuneus is safe and well tolerated and is associated with improvements in cognitive performance and cholinergic function, as well as modulation of brain oscillatory activity. Cognitive rehabilitation may also improve memory performance in patients with mild AD. Based on this evidence, the present study investigates a multimodal approach combining gamma-tACS with individualized computerized memory training.

The study is a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial involving 30 participants with mild AD. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group 1 will receive real gamma-tACS for 8 weeks (5 sessions/week, 60 minutes/session) combined with cognitive training (2 sessions/week, 30 minutes/session); Group 2 will receive sham tACS according to the same schedule, combined with the same cognitive training. tACS will be applied over the precuneus. Treatment will initially be performed in the hospital and will subsequently be administered at home under remote supervision by the study team.

Assessments will be performed at baseline (T00), after 8 weeks of treatment (T08), and at follow-up visits at 16 weeks (T16) and 24 weeks (T24) from baseline. At each time point, participants will undergo clinical and neuropsychological assessment, blood sampling, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The occurrence of adverse events will be monitored throughout the duration of the study.

The main objectives of the study are: 1) to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of the combined intervention on cognitive performance; 2) to investigate intervention-induced changes in biological markers of neurodegeneration, inflammation, and synaptic function; 3) to evaluate the effects of the intervention on cholinergic transmission through the TMS short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) measure; and 4) to investigate potential predictors of treatment efficacy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation
  • Alzheimer Disease (AD)
  • Alzheimer Dementia (AD)
  • Cognitive Rehabilitation

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients:

  • Male or female participants aged ≥18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form;
  • Clinical diagnosis of mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) according to current clinical criteria;
  • Availability of a caregiver who can assist the participant and who has successfully completed the required training for the use of the device at home.

Caregivers:

  • Male or female caregivers aged ≥18 years;
  • Compliance with participation in the in-hospital training;
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score >27/30.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age below that specified in the inclusion criteria;
  • Inability to understand;
  • Contraindications to tACS and TMS (e.g., presence of a cardiac pacemaker or metallic implants incompatible with electrical or magnetic fields, history of epilepsy, or current pregnancy, as assessed using the safety questionnaire).
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Real tACS

    Device: Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation · Behavioral: Individualized Computerized Memory Training

  • Sham comparator
    Sham tACS

    Device: Sham Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation · Behavioral: Individualized Computerized Memory Training

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscranial Alternating Current Stimulation

    40 at-home sessions (5 days/week for 8 weeks), each consisting of the application of tACS (real, 40 Hz) applied over the precuneus for a duration of 60 minutes each.

  • DeviceSham Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

    40 at-home sessions (5 days/week for 8 weeks), each consisting of the application of sham tACS applied over the precuneus for a duration of 60 minutes each. The electrode placement will be identical to that used for real stimulation. However, the electrical current will be automatically interrupted approximately 5 seconds after the start of stimulation, making it impossible for the participant to distinguish between sham and real stimulation.

  • BehavioralIndividualized Computerized Memory Training

    Participants will receive individualized computerized memory training for 8 weeks (2 sessions/week, 30 minutes/session) through synchronous telerehabilitation. The memory training will be individualized based on each participant's performance on the Face-Name Association Task (FNAT) and will use an errorless learning approach.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

    The global cognitive functioning will be assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); MMSE scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating a more preserved cognition.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 24

  2. Semantic Fluency Test

    Lexical-semantic access and executive functioning will be evaluated by Semantic Fluency Test. Participant is asked to generate as many words as possible from a given category within a limited time (60 seconds); higher scores indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 8, 16, and 24

  3. Trail Making Test (TMT - A, B)

    Executive function will be assessed using the Trail Making Test, including Part A (visual attention and processing speed) and Part B (task switching and cognitive flexibility). Higher completion times reflect poorer performance.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 8, 16, and 24

  4. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

    Verbal memory will be assessed using the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), including immediate recall (sum of trials), delayed recall after 15 minutes. Scores reflect the number of correctly recalled items.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 8, 16 and 24

  5. Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog-13)

    The ADAS-Cog-13 consists of 13 tasks assessing cognitive domains including memory, language, praxis, orientation, and attention. Total scores range from 0 to 85, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive impairment.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 8, 16 and 24

  6. Face-Name Associative Memory Test (FNAT)

    The Face-Name Associative Memory Test is used to assess the participant's associative memory and is composed of encoding and retrieval phases, with higher scores indicating better function.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 8, 16 and 24

  7. Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL)

    ADCS-ADL evaluates activities of daily living. The scores range from 0-78 with lower scores indicating more severe functional impairment.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 8, 16 and 24

  8. Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)

    Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) is designed to be a structured clinical interview about neuropsychiatric and behavioral symptoms; the score ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 144 (severe symptoms).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 8, 16 and 24

  9. Clinical Dementia Rating scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SoB)

    The Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) assesses cognitive and functional impairment across six domains: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. Total scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive and functional impairment.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 8, 16 and 24

  10. Clinical Dementia Rating scale - Global Score (CDR-GS)

    The Clinical Dementia Rating Global Score (CDR-GS) assesses the overall severity of cognitive and functional impairment across six domains: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. Global scores range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 8, 16 and 24

  11. Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)

    The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) assesses the perceived burden experienced by caregivers of individuals with dementia. It consists of 22 items rated on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 0 to 88, with higher scores indicating greater caregiver burden.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 8, 16, and 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in SAI measurements

    By using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the investigators will evaluate the effects of gamma tACS on short latency afferent inhibition (SAI), which is a marker of cholinergic transmission. SAI is expressed as percent of the unconditioned motor evoked potential.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 8, 16, and 24

  2. Change From Baseline in Biological Marker Concentrations

    A venous blood draw will be performed at each timepoint. Samples will be processed for serum, plasma, and DNA extraction. Changes from baseline in biological marker concentrations, including plasma p-tau217, will be evaluated over time.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 8, 16, and 24

  3. Demographic characteristics

    Demographic characteristics (age, gender, and level of education) will be evaluated as predictors of treatment efficacy and examined for associations with differential treatment response.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Baseline Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB)

    The Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) will be used to assess disease severity at baseline and evaluated as a predictor of treatment efficacy and examined for associations with differential treatment response. The CDR-SB assesses cognitive and functional impairment across six domains: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. Total scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Baseline Clinical Dementia Rating - Global Score (CDR-GS)

    The Clinical Dementia Rating - Global Score (CDR-GS) will be used to assess disease severity at baseline and evaluated as a predictor of treatment efficacy and examined for associations with differential treatment response. The CDR-SB assesses cognitive and functional impairment across six domains: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. Global scores range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Level of Education and Occupational Attainment as Proxies of Cognitive Reserve

    Level of education and occupational attainment will be assessed at baseline as proxy measures of cognitive reserve and examined for associations with differential treatment response.

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Plasma Biomarker Profile

    The plasma biomarker profile will be evaluated as a predictor of treatment efficacy and examined for associations with differential treatment response.

    Time frame: Baseline

06

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni Di Dio - Fatebenefratelli
    Brescia, Brescia 25125, Italy
    Recruiting
  • IRCCS S. Maria Nascente - Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi
    Milan, Italy
    • Francesca Baglio, MD · Contact · +390240308951
    Not yet recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Clare L, Wilson BA, Carter G, Hodges JR, Adams M. (2001). Long-term maintenance of treatment gains following a cognitive rehabilitation intervention in early dementia of Alzheimer type: a single case study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 11:477-494. doi: 10.1080/09602010042000213
  • Clare L, Wilson BA, Breen K, Hodges JR. (1999). Errorless learning of face-name associations in early Alzheimer's disease. Neurocase. 5:37-46. doi: 10.1080/13554799908404063
  • Williams MM, Storandt M, Roe CM, Morris JC. Progression of Alzheimer's disease as measured by Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes scores. Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Feb;9(1 Suppl):S39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Aug 1. PubMed 22858530 ↗
  • Verma N, Beretvas SN, Pascual B, Masdeu JC, Markey MK; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. New scoring methodology improves the sensitivity of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) in clinical trials. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015 Nov 12;7(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13195-015-0151-0. PubMed 26560146 ↗
  • Tokimura H, Di Lazzaro V, Tokimura Y, Oliviero A, Profice P, Insola A, Mazzone P, Tonali P, Rothwell JC. Short latency inhibition of human hand motor cortex by somatosensory input from the hand. J Physiol. 2000 Mar 1;523 Pt 2(Pt 2):503-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00503.x. PubMed 10699092 ↗
  • Rentz DM, Amariglio RE, Becker JA, Frey M, Olson LE, Frishe K, Carmasin J, Maye JE, Johnson KA, Sperling RA. Face-name associative memory performance is related to amyloid burden in normal elderly. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2776-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.006. Epub 2011 Jun 12. PubMed 21689670 ↗
  • Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1. PubMed 20633386 ↗
  • McCue M, Fairman A, Pramuka M. Enhancing quality of life through telerehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010 Feb;21(1):195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2009.07.005. PubMed 19951786 ↗
  • Massimini M, Ferrarelli F, Huber R, Esser SK, Singh H, Tononi G. Breakdown of cortical effective connectivity during sleep. Science. 2005 Sep 30;309(5744):2228-32. doi: 10.1126/science.1117256. PubMed 16195466 ↗
  • Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Ferbert A, Wroe S, Asselman P, Marsden CD. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol. 1993 Nov;471:501-19. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019912. PubMed 8120818 ↗
  • Hoy KE, Bailey N, Arnold S, Windsor K, John J, Daskalakis ZJ, Fitzgerald PB. The effect of gamma-tACS on working memory performance in healthy controls. Brain Cogn. 2015 Dec;101:51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 12. PubMed 26580743 ↗
  • Herrmann CS, Rach S, Neuling T, Struber D. Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 14;7:279. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00279. eCollection 2013. PubMed 23785325 ↗
  • Hajos M, Boasso A, Hempel E, Shpokayte M, Konisky A, Seshagiri CV, Fomenko V, Kwan K, Nicodemus-Johnson J, Hendrix S, Vaughan B, Kern R, Megerian JT, Malchano Z. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy estimate of evoked gamma oscillation in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. Front Neurol. 2024 Mar 6;15:1343588. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1343588. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38515445 ↗
  • Galasko D, Bennett D, Sano M, Ernesto C, Thomas R, Grundman M, Ferris S. An inventory to assess activities of daily living for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11 Suppl 2:S33-9. PubMed 9236950 ↗
  • Davis RN, Massman PJ, Doody RS. Cognitive intervention in Alzheimer disease: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2001 Jan-Mar;15(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/00002093-200101000-00001. PubMed 11236819 ↗
  • Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2308-14. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.12.2308. PubMed 7991117 ↗
  • Cotelli M, Manenti R, Brambilla M, Petesi M, Rosini S, Ferrari C, Zanetti O, Miniussi C. Anodal tDCS during face-name associations memory training in Alzheimer's patients. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Mar 19;6:38. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00038. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24678298 ↗
  • Cotelli M, Calabria M, Zanetti O. Cognitive rehabilitation in Alzheimer's Disease. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2006 Apr;18(2):141-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03327429. PubMed 16702783 ↗
  • Costa A, Bagoj E, Monaco M, Zabberoni S, De Rosa S, Papantonio AM, Mundi C, Caltagirone C, Carlesimo GA. Standardization and normative data obtained in the Italian population for a new verbal fluency instrument, the phonemic/semantic alternate fluency test. Neurol Sci. 2014 Mar;35(3):365-72. doi: 10.1007/s10072-013-1520-8. Epub 2013 Aug 21. PubMed 23963806 ↗
  • Clare L, Wilson BA, Carter G, Roth I, Hodges JR. Relearning face-name associations in early Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology. 2002 Oct;16(4):538-47. doi: 10.1037//0894-4105.16.4.538. PubMed 12382992 ↗
  • Clare L, Woods RT, Moniz Cook ED, Orrell M, Spector A. Cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive training for early-stage Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(4):CD003260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003260. PubMed 14583963 ↗
  • Clare L, Wilson BA, Carter G, Breen K, Gosses A, Hodges JR. Intervening with everyday memory problems in dementia of Alzheimer type: an errorless learning approach. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000 Feb;22(1):132-46. doi: 10.1076/1380-3395(200002)22:1;1-8;FT132. PubMed 10649552 ↗
  • Carlesimo GA, De Risi M, Monaco M, Costa A, Fadda L, Picardi A, Di Gennaro G, Caltagirone C, Grammaldo L. Normative data for measuring performance change on parallel forms of a 15-word list recall test. Neurol Sci. 2014 May;35(5):663-8. doi: 10.1007/s10072-013-1573-8. Epub 2013 Nov 12. PubMed 24218156 ↗
  • Cappa SF, Benke T, Clarke S, Rossi B, Stemmer B, van Heugten CM; European Federation of Neurological Societies. EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol. 2003 Jan;10(1):11-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00537.x. PubMed 12534988 ↗
  • Cantoni V, Casula EP, Tarantino B, Cupidi C, Huber N, Altomare D, Premi E, Zummo E, Esposito R, Leonardi C, Herukka SK, Solje E, Ferrari A, Cotelli MS, Gasparotti R, Martorana A, Fracassi C, Santarnecchi E, Koch G, Haapasalo A, Grassi M, Benussi A, Borroni B. Home-Based Gamma Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Patients With Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Dec 1;8(12):e2546556. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.46556. PubMed 41359335 ↗
  • Benussi A, Grassi M, Palluzzi F, Koch G, Di Lazzaro V, Nardone R, Cantoni V, Dell'Era V, Premi E, Martorana A, di Lorenzo F, Bonni S, Ranieri F, Capone F, Musumeci G, Cotelli MS, Padovani A, Borroni B. Classification Accuracy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Diagnosis of Neurodegenerative Dementias. Ann Neurol. 2020 Mar;87(3):394-404. doi: 10.1002/ana.25677. Epub 2020 Jan 23. PubMed 31925823 ↗
  • Benussi A, Cantoni V, Grassi M, Brechet L, Michel CM, Datta A, Thomas C, Gazzina S, Cotelli MS, Bianchi M, Premi E, Gadola Y, Cotelli M, Pengo M, Perrone F, Scolaro M, Archetti S, Solje E, Padovani A, Pascual-Leone A, Borroni B. Increasing Brain Gamma Activity Improves Episodic Memory and Restores Cholinergic Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease. Ann Neurol. 2022 Aug;92(2):322-334. doi: 10.1002/ana.26411. Epub 2022 Jun 6. PubMed 35607946 ↗
  • Benussi A, Cantoni V, Cotelli MS, Cotelli M, Brattini C, Datta A, Thomas C, Santarnecchi E, Pascual-Leone A, Borroni B. Exposure to gamma tACS in Alzheimer's disease: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover, pilot study. Brain Stimul. 2021 May-Jun;14(3):531-540. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Mar 21. PubMed 33762220 ↗
  • Bahar-Fuchs A, Clare L, Woods B. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 5;2013(6):CD003260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003260.pub2. PubMed 23740535 ↗
  • Backman L, Dixon RA. Psychological compensation: a theoretical framework. Psychol Bull. 1992 Sep;112(2):259-83. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.259. PubMed 1454895 ↗
  • Antal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M, Brockmoller J, Brunoni AR, Chen R, Cohen LG, Dowthwaite G, Ellrich J, Floel A, Fregni F, George MS, Hamilton R, Haueisen J, Herrmann CS, Hummel FC, Lefaucheur JP, Liebetanz D, Loo CK, McCaig CD, Miniussi C, Miranda PC, Moliadze V, Nitsche MA, Nowak R, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Poppendieck W, Priori A, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell J, Rueger MA, Ruffini G, Schellhorn K, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wexler A, Ziemann U, Hallett M, Paulus W. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1774-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19. PubMed 28709880 ↗
  • Amodio P, Wenin H, Del Piccolo F, Mapelli D, Montagnese S, Pellegrini A, Musto C, Gatta A, Umilta C. Variability of trail making test, symbol digit test and line trait test in normal people. A normative study taking into account age-dependent decline and sociobiological variables. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2002 Apr;14(2):117-31. doi: 10.1007/BF03324425. PubMed 12092785 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07839650
Lead sponsor
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli
Responsible party
Prof. Barbara Borroni (Professor, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 24, 2026
Start date
Sep 16, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion