ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07498491EMBRACEUpdated Sep 30, 2026

Weighted Blanket Use for Adults With Chronic Pain

An interventional study of Weighted Blanket in Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain and Sleep Disturbance, sponsored by National University of Natural Medicine. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-30.

Sponsored by National University of Natural Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Sep 30, 2026Now Active, not recruitingPrimary completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic pain is a common condition that can affect sleep, daily functioning, and overall quality of life. Many individuals living with chronic pain seek non-medication approaches to help manage their symptoms. Weighted blankets are commonly used to promote relaxation and comfort during sleep, but there is limited research examining their potential role in supporting people with chronic pain.

This pilot study will explore the experiences of adults with chronic pain who use a weighted blanket during sleep. The study aims to better understand whether nightly use of a weighted blanket may be associated with changes in pain, sleep, and daily functioning. Findings from this study will help inform future research on non-medication approaches to managing chronic pain.

Approximately 44 adults with chronic pain will participate in the study. Participation will last about five weeks. After completing a virtual enrollment visit and baseline questionnaires, participants will receive a weighted blanket sized to approximately 10 percent of their body weight.

Participants will first complete a 7-day adjustment period using the blanket while sleeping. If they tolerate the blanket and use it nightly during this period, they will continue into a 4-week study phase in which they will use the weighted blanket each night.

During the study, participants will complete brief online surveys about their experiences and adherence to using the blanket. Pain and quality-of-life questionnaires will be completed at multiple time points, including at the start and end of the study. Participants will also provide feedback about their experience using the weighted blanket.

Results from this pilot study will help researchers better understand how weighted blankets may be used by adults with chronic pain and may help guide the design of future studies evaluating non-pharmacologic approaches to pain management.

Read the detailed description

Chronic pain is a widespread condition that can significantly affect physical functioning, sleep, emotional well-being, and overall quality of life. Many individuals living with chronic pain seek non-pharmacologic strategies to support symptom management, particularly approaches that may improve sleep and relaxation. Weighted blankets are commercially available products designed to apply gentle, evenly distributed pressure across the body. Although these blankets are widely used to promote comfort and relaxation during sleep, limited research has examined their use among adults with chronic pain.

This study is a single-arm pilot trial designed to explore the feasibility and participant experiences associated with nightly use of a weighted blanket among adults with chronic pain. The study will examine whether regular use of a weighted blanket during sleep is associated with changes in self-reported pain, sleep, and quality of life over a short intervention period. In addition to quantitative survey measures, participant feedback will provide insight into acceptability, adherence, and perceived benefits or challenges related to using a weighted blanket for pain management.

Adults with chronic pain will be recruited to participate in the study. Following eligibility screening and informed consent, participants will complete baseline questionnaires during a virtual enrollment visit. These assessments will include the PEG scale to measure pain intensity and interference, and the PROMIS-29 profile to assess domains of physical function, sleep disturbance, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and pain interference, along with demographic and health-related information.

Participants will receive a weighted blanket sized to approximately 10 percent of their body weight and will be instructed to use the blanket nightly while sleeping. Blanket weight will be assigned based on participant body weight using the following categories: participants weighing 100-149.9 pounds will receive a 10-pound blanket; participants weighing 150-199.9 pounds will receive a 15-pound blanket; participants weighing 200-249.9 pounds will receive a 20-pound blanket; and participants weighing 250-299.9 pounds will receive a 25-pound blanket. Participants will begin with a 7-day adjustment period to become accustomed to the blanket, followed by a 4-week intervention period during which the weighted blanket will be used nightly during sleep.

The active study phase will last four weeks. During this time, participants will be asked to use the weighted blanket nightly while sleeping. Participants will complete brief weekly surveys to report their adherence to using the blanket and share information about their experiences during the study period.

At the conclusion of the study, participants will complete follow-up questionnaires consistent with baseline measures, including the PEG scale and PROMIS-29 profile. These assessments will be used to evaluate changes in pain, sleep, physical function, and quality-of-life domains over the study period. Participants will also complete open-ended survey questions to describe their experiences using the weighted blanket, including any perceived benefits, challenges, or changes in symptoms.

This pilot study is designed to provide preliminary data regarding the acceptability, adherence, and potential effects of weighted blanket use among adults with chronic pain. The findings will help inform the design of future research examining non-medication approaches for chronic pain management and may guide the development of larger controlled studies in this area.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain
  • Musculoskeletal Pain
  • Sleep Disturbance
  • Pain Disorders

Keywords

  • chronic pain
  • weighted blanket
  • pain management
  • non-pharmacologic pain management
  • sleep intervention
03

In context

Chronic Pain

3,227 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 729 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 44 is below the median of 60 across 2,388 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

National University of Natural Medicine is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: Male and non-pregnant female adult participants must 18 years of age or older
  • Duration of pain: at least 3 months
  • Average Pain Intensity over the past week: ≥3/10 NRS
  • Safely able to lift a weighted blanket that is 10% of the participant's self-reported body weight (10-25 lbs.) without assistance.
  • Willing to sleep with a weighted blanket (10-25 lbs.) for a total of 35 (7 days for Run-In/Adjustment + 28 days of trial).
  • Willing to maintain current dietary patterns, activity level, and stable body weight for the duration of the study.
  • Willing to undergo study procedures, including completion of online questionnaires and surveys, and attend virtual study visits.
  • : Participants must be able to provide informed consent and comply with the study procedure.
  • Able to speak, read, and understand English.
  • Able to access WIFI to attend virtual visits and complete study surveys.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age: Participants younger than 18 years old.
  • Currently using a weighted blanket (will have opportunity for )
  • Inability to lift a 10-25 lbs. (10% of body weight) weighted blanket without assistance.
  • Inability or unwillingness to sleep with the weighted blanket nightly
  • Breathing/Respiratory Issue: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), (COPD- includes emphysema and chronic bronchitis), Tuberculosis (TB), severe asthma
  • Cancer: Lung cancer
  • Cardiovascular Disease: Congestive heart failure (CHF), severe cardiomyopathy
  • Circulatory Issues: Severe peripheral artery disease (PAD), severe or uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes
  • Recent surgery: Participants who recently had surgery and/or have an open wound.
  • Pregnancy or Lactation: Individuals who are pregnant, lactating, or planning a pregnancy within the next 35 days.
  • Co-sleeping: Individuals who co-sleep with their infant or young child.
  • Allergies: Known allergy or to any component of the study products (including cotton material, natural and plant-based dyes).
  • Claustrophobia
  • Participation in Other Pain Trials: Currently participating in another pain research study.
  • Any condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, does not justify the individuals' participation in the study that may impact their safety or confound trial results. This includes an increase in the participants' pain intensity during the baseline week or the active part of the trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Washout period

A planned gap after a treatment, so that its effects can lessen before the study treatment or a study assessment. Ask the study team and the doctor who prescribed it before changing any medicine.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
44 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Weighted Blanket Nightly Use for Chronic Pain

    Participants will receive a weighted blanket sized to approximately 10 percent of their body weight and will be instructed to use the blanket nightly during sleep. The study includes a 7-day run-in adjustment period followed by a 4-week intervention period. The run-in period allows participants to become accustomed to the blanket and assess tolerability. Participants who tolerate the blanket will continue using it nightly for the 4-week study phase. Participants will complete questionnaires at baseline, after the run-in period, and at the end of the study, along with brief weekly surveys to report adherence and experiences using the weighted blanket.

    Device: Weighted Blanket

Interventions

  • DeviceWeighted Blanket

    Participants will receive a weighted blanket sized to approximately 10 percent of their body weight for nightly use during sleep. Blanket weight will be assigned by body weight: 10 lb (100-149.9 lbs), 15 lb (150-199.9 lbs), 20 lb (200-249.9 lbs), and 25 lb (250-299.9 lbs). The blanket provides evenly distributed deep pressure across the body through weighted filling materials sewn into the fabric. Participants will begin with a 7-day run-in adjustment period to become accustomed to sleeping with the blanket and to assess tolerability. Those who tolerate the blanket will continue nightly use during a 4-week intervention period. The weighted blanket is intended to provide gentle pressure stimulation during sleep and is being evaluated as a non-pharmacologic approach that may support relaxation, sleep quality, and overall comfort in adults living with chronic pain.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in self-reported pain intensity

    Change in participant-reported pain intensity and interference as measured by the Pain, Enjoyment of Life, and General Activity (PEG) scale. The PEG is a validated 3-item measure assessing average pain intensity, pain interference with enjoyment of life, and pain interference with general activity over the past week, each rated on a 0-10 numeric scale. A composite score is calculated as the mean of the three items, with higher scores indicating greater pain and interference. Assessments will be administered via online surveys at baseline and at the end of the study, and scores will be compared to evaluate changes following nightly use of a weighted blanket.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention (approximately 5 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in physical function

    Change in physical function as measured by the PROMIS-29 Physical Function subdomain. This subdomain includes four self-reported items assessing the ability to perform daily activities. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 5 (without any difficulty) to 1 (unable to do), with higher scores indicating better physical function. Raw scores are summed and converted to standardized T-scores (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10), with higher T-scores indicating better physical function. T-scores may be interpreted as within normal limits (\>45), mild (40-44), moderate (30-39), or severe (\<30) impairment. Assessments will be administered via online surveys at baseline and at the end of the study, and scores will be compared to evaluate changes in physical function following nightly use of a weighted blanket.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention (approximately 5 weeks)

  2. Change in anxiety

    Change in anxiety as measured by the PROMIS-29 Anxiety subdomain. This subdomain includes four self-reported items assessing feelings of fear, difficulty focusing due to anxiety, feeling overwhelmed by worry, and general unease over the past 7 days. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always), with higher scores indicating greater anxiety severity. Raw scores are summed and converted to standardized T-scores (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10), with higher T-scores indicating greater anxiety. T-scores may be interpreted as within normal limits (\<55), mild (55-59), moderate (60-69), or severe (≥70) anxiety. Assessments will be administered via online surveys at baseline and at the end of the study, and scores will be compared to evaluate changes in anxiety following nightly use of a weighted blanket.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention (approximately 5 weeks)

  3. Change in depression

    Change in depression as measured by the PROMIS-29 Depression subdomain. This subdomain includes four self-reported items assessing feelings of worthlessness, helplessness, depression, and hopelessness over the past 7 days. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always), with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms. Raw scores are summed and converted to standardized T-scores (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10), with higher T-scores indicating greater depression severity. T-scores may be interpreted as within normal limits (\<55), mild (55-59), moderate (60-69), or severe (≥70) depression. Assessments will be administered via online surveys at baseline and at the end of the study, and scores will be compared to evaluate changes in depressive symptoms following nightly use of a weighted blanket.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention (approximately 5 weeks)

  4. Change in fatigue

    Change in fatigue as measured by the PROMIS-29 Fatigue subdomain. This subdomain includes four self-reported items assessing feelings of fatigue, difficulty initiating activities due to tiredness, feelings of being run-down, and average fatigue over the past 7 days. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much), with higher scores indicating greater fatigue severity. Raw scores are summed and converted to standardized T-scores (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10), with higher T-scores indicating greater fatigue. T-scores may be interpreted as within normal limits (\<55), mild (55-59), moderate (60-69), or severe (≥70) fatigue. Assessments will be administered via online surveys at baseline and at the end of the study, and scores will be compared to evaluate changes in fatigue following nightly use of a weighted blanket.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention (approximately 5 weeks)

  5. Change in sleep disturbance

    Change in sleep disturbance as measured by the PROMIS-29 Sleep Disturbance subdomain. This subdomain includes four self-reported items assessing sleep quality, sleep refreshment, overall sleep problems, and difficulty falling asleep over the past 7 days. Sleep quality is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (very good) to 5 (very poor). Sleep refreshment is rated from 1 (very much) to 5 (not at all). Sleep problems and difficulty falling asleep are rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). Raw scores are summed and converted to standardized T-scores (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10), with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. T-scores may be interpreted as within normal limits (\<55), mild (55-59), moderate (60-69), or severe (≥70) disturbance. Assessments will be administered via online surveys at baseline and at the end of the study, and scores will be compared to evaluate changes in sleep disturbance following nightly use of a weighted blanket.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention (approximately 5 weeks)

  6. Change in ability to participate in social roles and activities

    Change in ability to participate in social roles and activities as measured by the PROMIS-29 Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities subdomain. This subdomain includes four self-reported items assessing difficulty participating in leisure activities, family activities, work, and activities with friends over the past 7 days. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (always) to 5 (never), with higher scores indicating better ability to participate and less difficulty. Raw scores are summed and converted to standardized T-scores (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10), with higher T-scores indicating better functioning. T-scores may be interpreted as within normal limits (\>45), mild (40-44), moderate (30-39), or severe (\<30) impairment. Assessments will be administered via online surveys at baseline and at the end of the study, and scores will be compared to evaluate changes in social participation following nightly use of a weighted blanket.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention (approximately 5 weeks)

  7. Change in pain interference

    Change in pain interference as measured by the PROMIS-29 Pain Interference subdomain. This subdomain includes four self-reported items assessing the extent to which pain interfered with day-to-day activities, work around the home, participation in social activities, and household chores over the past 7 days. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much), with higher scores indicating greater pain interference. Raw scores are summed and converted to standardized T-scores (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10), with higher T-scores indicating greater interference from pain. T-scores may be interpreted as within normal limits (\<55), mild (55-59), moderate (60-69), or severe (≥70) pain interference. Assessments will be administered via online surveys at baseline and at the end of the study, and scores will be compared to evaluate changes in pain interference following nightly use of a weighted blanket.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention (approximately 5 weeks)

  8. Change in cognitive function

    Change in cognitive function as measured by the PROMIS Cognitive Function - Abilities subdomain. This subdomain includes self-reported items assessing the ability to concentrate and the ability to remember to complete tasks over the past 7 days. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much), with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Raw scores are summed and converted to standardized T-scores (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10), with higher T-scores indicating better cognitive abilities. T-scores may be interpreted as within normal limits (\>45), mild (40-44), moderate (30-39), or severe (\<30) impairment. Assessments will be administered via online surveys at baseline and at the end of the study, and scores will be compared to evaluate changes in cognitive function following nightly use of a weighted blanket.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention (approximately 5 weeks)

  9. Change in pain intensity

    Change in pain intensity as measured by the PROMIS Pain Intensity subdomain. This measure includes a single self-reported item assessing average pain over the past 7 days. Pain intensity is rated on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. Scores may be reported as raw values or converted to standardized T-scores (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10), with higher T-scores indicating greater pain severity. Assessments will be administered via online surveys at baseline and at the end of the study, and scores will be compared to evaluate changes in pain intensity following nightly use of a weighted blanket.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention (approximately 5 weeks)

Other outcomes

  1. Participant adherence to weighted blanket use

    Participants will complete brief weekly surveys reporting how consistently they used the weighted blanket during sleep. Responses will be used to assess adherence to the nightly intervention.

    Time frame: Weekly during the 4-week intervention period

  2. Participant experience with weighted blanket use

    Participants will complete open-ended survey questions describing their experiences using the weighted blanket, including perceived benefits, challenges, and overall acceptability of the intervention.

    Time frame: End of study (approximately 5 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, Amtmann D, Bode R, Buysse D, Choi S, Cook K, Devellis R, DeWalt D, Fries JF, Gershon R, Hahn EA, Lai JS, Pilkonis P, Revicki D, Rose M, Weinfurt K, Hays R; PROMIS Cooperative Group. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Aug 4. PubMed 20685078 ↗
  • Krebs EE, Lorenz KA, Bair MJ, Damush TM, Wu J, Sutherland JM, Asch SM, Kroenke K. Development and initial validation of the PEG, a three-item scale assessing pain intensity and interference. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jun;24(6):733-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0981-1. Epub 2009 May 6. PubMed 19418100 ↗
  • Benbir Senel G, Karadeniz D. Interim Analysis of a Prospective Polysomnographic Study of Weighted Blankets in Patients with Psychophysiological Insomnia. Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Dec 17;34(4):365-370. doi: 10.5152/pcp.2024.23795. PubMed 39772300 ↗
  • Suri P, Heagerty PJ, Timmons A, Jensen MP. Description and initial validation of a novel measure of pain intensity: the Numeric Rating Scale of Underlying Pain without concurrent Analgesic use. Pain. 2024 Jul 1;165(7):1482-1492. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003150. Epub 2024 Jan 2. PubMed 38189184 ↗
  • Baumgartner JN, Quintana D, Leija L, Schuster NM, Bruno KA, Castellanos JP, Case LK. Widespread Pressure Delivered by a Weighted Blanket Reduces Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pain. 2022 Jan;23(1):156-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Aug 20. PubMed 34425251 ↗
  • Baumgartner JN, Haupt MR, Case LK. Chronic pain patients low in social connectedness report higher pain and need deeper pressure for pain relief. Emotion. 2023 Dec;23(8):2156-2168. doi: 10.1037/emo0001228. Epub 2023 Mar 30. PubMed 36996174 ↗
  • Yu J, Yang Z, Sun S, Sun K, Chen W, Zhang L, Xu J, Xu Q, Liu Z, Ke J, Zhang L, Zhu Y. The effect of weighted blankets on sleep and related disorders: a brief review. Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 15;15:1333015. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1333015. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38686123 ↗
  • Ekholm B, Spulber S, Adler M. A randomized controlled study of weighted chain blankets for insomnia in psychiatric disorders. J Clin Sleep Med. 2020 Sep 15;16(9):1567-1577. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8636. PubMed 32536366 ↗
  • Reynolds S, Lane SJ, Mullen B. Effects of deep pressure stimulation on physiological arousal. Am J Occup Ther. 2015 May-Jun;69(3):6903350010p1-5. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2015.015560. PubMed 25871605 ↗
  • Jain SV, Panjeton GD, Martins YC. Relationship Between Sleep Disturbances and Chronic Pain: A Narrative Review. Clin Pract. 2024 Dec 9;14(6):2650-2660. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14060209. PubMed 39727797 ↗
  • Guy GP Jr, Miller GF, Legha JK, Rikard SM, Strahan AE, Mikosz C, Florence CS. Economic Costs of Chronic Pain-United States, 2021. Med Care. 2025 Sep 1;63(9):679-685. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002181. Epub 2025 Jul 3. PubMed 40730349 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 5 months after the start.

Of 1,295 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Chronic Pain, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 39. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,378 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 38.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Sep 30, 2026: primary completion Aug 2026 → Nov 2026 and completion Sep 2026 → Nov 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 23, 2026
First posted
Mar 27, 2026
StartActual
May 27, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 6, 2026was Aug 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 6, 2026was Sep 2026
Last update
Sep 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
changed Sep 30, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2026→Nov 6, 2026
Sep 30, 2026
Study completion
Sep 15, 2026→Nov 6, 2026
Sep 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 30, 2026
    Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
    Primary completion Aug 31, 2026→Nov 6, 2026
    Study completion Sep 15, 2026→Nov 6, 2026
    + 3 other changes: verification date, contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07498491
Lead sponsor
National University of Natural Medicine
Responsible party
Carina Staab (Principal Investigator, National University of Natural Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 27, 2026
Start date
May 27, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 6, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 6, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 30, 2026

Study contacts

Carina Staab, DC, MEd
principal investigator · National University of Natural Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion