ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07497425eCLBPUpdated Aug 19, 2026

Neuroimmune Responses to Exercise in Chronic Back Pain

An interventional study of Physical Exercise in Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP), sponsored by McGill University. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Primary conditionInflammation(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?Inflammation is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by McGill University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2025, registered Mar 2026).
  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
216
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this mechanistic clinical trial is to learn how physical exercise affects the body and brain in people with chronic low back pain. The study will examine whether a 12-week online exercise program changes these measures compared with a waitlist group. Researchers will also study immune activity and brain function in people with chronic low back pain and compare them with healthy participants. Participants will complete questionnaires, provide blood samples, and undergo brain imaging scans.

Read the detailed description

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide, yet its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, limiting treatment effectiveness. Growing evidence suggests that CLBP is not solely driven by peripheral tissue pathology but involves maladaptive interactions between the immune system and the brain, particularly within reward- and emotion-related brain circuits. Physical exercise (PE) is universally recommended for CLBP and is known to influence both inflammatory processes and brain function, but the neuroimmune mechanisms through which PE alleviates pain are largely unknown. This study aims to address this critical gap by characterizing immune, neural, and autonomic alterations in CLBP and their modulation through structured PE training.

In this mechanistic randomized controlled trial, 144 individuals with CLBP will be randomized to a 12-week online PE program or a waitlist control, and 72 age- and sex-matched healthy controls will serve as comparators for baseline values and response to acute PE. Participants will undergo comprehensive assessments including questionnaires, movement-evoked pain testing, quantitative sensory testing, heart rate variability, blood sampling for immune gene expression (through whole blood transcriptomics), and multimodal MRI. Acute immune and autonomic responses to initial exercise sessions will also be examined to test whether short-term pro-inflammatory responses initiate longer-term adaptive and analgesic processes. By integrating immune, brain, and behavioral data, this study seeks to elucidate how neuroimmune interactions contribute to CLBP persistence and recovery, providing mechanistic insights to optimize exercise-based treatments.

In June 2025, the investigators initiated an initial pilot phase within the present trial to determine the feasibility of our recruitment strategies (recruitment of patient cohorts of 5-8 patients who will receive the PE intervention or be waitlisted according to block randomization) and compliance with the exercise program/waitlist protocol, and all intermediary data collection points. Feasibility was confirmed in February 2026, and recruitment of subsequent cohorts is planned to continue in March 2026. All future data collection will use the same core procedures and outcomes as the pilot phase, therefore, data collected during the pilot phase will be retained and may be included in the final analyses where appropriate.

At the time of this registration, preliminary analyses have only been conducted for the primary clinical outcome (pain intensity) as part of our assessment of feasibility. No inferential analyses have been conducted. Analyses of biological and neuroimaging measures, including transcriptomic and brain imaging data, are contingent on funding acquisition.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • mechanisms
  • immune system
  • inflammation
  • brain
  • chronic pain
  • exercise
03

In context

Inflammation Unverified

3,536 studies on the registry are indexed under Inflammation; 642 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 216 is above the median of 50 across 2,577 interventional studies indexed under Inflammation.

Browse Inflammation studies →

Lead sponsor

McGill University is the lead sponsor of 249 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Compared within Inflammation, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria-CLBP patients:

  • Have a diagnosis of chronic primary LBP, according to the criteria established by NIH Task Force on Research Standards for CLBP (Deyo et al., 2015). This will be determined by 1) the response to the National Institutes of Health minimum dataset for CLBP (NIH-md), including that LBP has been persistent for at least 3 months or recurrent for at least half of the days in the past 6 months, and 2) the results of a complete case history and physical examination (including functional tasks, quantitative sensory testing, and, if needed, neuro-orthopedic, palpation and range of motion assessments);
  • Report a CLBP intensity of at least 4 in a 0-10 numerical rating scale (0 = no pain, 10 = maximum possible pain).

Inclusion Criteria-Healthy controls:

- Be over 18 years and under 75 years of age;

Exclusion Criteria-CLBP patients:

  • Present any red flags indicative of serious pathology comorbid or as the cause of CLBP (Finucane et al., 2020);
  • Have a CLBP phenotype characterized by predominant nociceptive (as in fracture, infection, , inflammatory or rheumatic spondyloarthropathy, cauda equina syndrome, confirmed by MRI when suspected) or neuropathic pain mechanisms, the latter assessed through score in the DN4 questionnaire (Nijs, et al., 2024);
  • Present chronic or acute pain of higher intensity or perceived disability in any other body site than the low back;
  • Medical history of diabetes, neurological or psychiatric disorder;
  • Presence of significant cardiorespiratory problems or any other potential to physical exercise as assessed through the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+);
  • Following a regular structured PE training program (>60 min/week) at study's onset, and;
  • Presence of any contraindications to MRI examination (including any metallic implants or devices, being pregnant, and claustrophobia).

Exclusion criteria-Healthy controls:

  • Have symptoms or a diagnosis of any acute or chronic pain conditions;
  • Medical history of diabetes, neurological or psychiatric disorder;
  • Presence of significant cardiorespiratory problems or any other potential contraindications to physical exercise as assessed through the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+);
  • Following a regular structured PE training program (>60 min/week) at study's onset, and;
  • Presence of any contraindications to MRI examination (including any metallic implants or devices, being pregnant, and claustrophobia).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
216 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active intervention

    Physical Exercise Training

    Behavioral: Physical Exercise

  • No intervention
    Waitlist

    Participants assigned to the waitlist group will not receive the physical exercise program during the 12-week intervention period but will continue their usual care. After completion of the study assessments, they will be offered access to the exercise program.

  • Other
    Healthy controls

    Sex- and age-matched healthy volunteers will only participate in the first 2 weeks of PE intervention

    Behavioral: Physical Exercise

Interventions

  • BehavioralPhysical Exercise

    Patients in the PE training group will perform a 12-week online program comprising three 60-minute weekly training sessions. The training program is delivered by certified kinesiologists through a secured online platform. Healthy controls will participate only in the first 2 weeks of PE training.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Chronic Low Back Pain Intensity

    Self-reported low back pain intensity averaged over the past 7 days, measured using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10), where 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst imaginable pain." Item from the NIH minimum dataset on research standards for chronic low back pain. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12). In addition, assessed daily through electronic pain diaries.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Peripheral Blood Gene Expression (RNA Sequencing)

    Gene expression levels assessed in peripheral blood using RNA sequencing. Transcriptomic analyses evaluated differential gene expression and pathway analyses.

    Time frame: Blood samples collected at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12). In addition, samples also collected 14, 48 hours and 2 weeks after the first exercise session or at equivalent times for waitlist participants

  2. Nucleus Accumbens-Medial Prefrontal Cortex Functional Connectivity

    Functional connectivity assessed using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI). Seed-to-voxel analyses performed using anatomically defined bilateral nucleus accumbens and medial prefrontal cortex regions.

    Time frame: MRI acquired at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  3. Fractional Anisotropy of NAc-mPFC White Matter Tract

    Fractional Anisotropy (FA) measured using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) probabilistic tractography along the white matter connecting the nucleus accumbens and medial prefrontal cortex.

    Time frame: MRI acquired at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  4. Whole-Brain Intrinsic Connectivity

    Intrinsic connectivity analysis (voxel-wise network centrality; root mean square of all functional connections) performed using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) to quantify whole-brain functional connectivity.

    Time frame: MRI acquired at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  5. Tonic Pain Signature (ToPS)

    Expression of the Tonic Pain Signature (ToPS), a multivariate brain biomarker derived from whole-brain functional connectivity patterns predictive of sustained pain intensity. The ToPS score will be computed from resting-state fMRI data using validated model weights and applied to participant-level connectivity matrices.

    Time frame: MRI acquired at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  6. Nociplastic Functional Signature (NFS)

    Expression of the Nociplastic Functional Signature (NFS), a brain-based connectivity biomarker trained to classify nociplastic pain conditions. NFS scores will be calculated from resting-state fMRI connectivity patterns to quantify the presence of nociplastic pain-related network dysconnectivity.

    Time frame: MRI acquired at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  7. Hippocampal volume

    Structural volume of the bilateral hippocampus measured from T1-weighted anatomical MRI using automated segmentation. Hippocampal volume alterations have been reported in chronic pain populations and may reflect changes associated with pain chronification.

    Time frame: MRI acquired at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  8. Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus (SLF) White Matter Integrity

    Microstructural integrity of the Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus (SLF) assessed using DWI metrics (fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity). The SLF is a major fronto-parietal white-matter tract implicated in cognitive control, attention, and pain modulation networks. Loss of integrity in this tract may be associated with chronic pain severity.

    Time frame: MRI acquired at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  9. Heart rate variability: RMSSD

    Heart rate variability will be assessed using the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), a time-domain measure reflecting parasympathetic (vagal) cardiac modulation. 5 minutes of resting electrocardiogram (ECG) signals will be recorded using BIOPAC systems and processed using Kubios HRV software.

    Time frame: ECG will be collected at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12). In addition, ECG also conducted 14, 48 hours and 2 weeks after the first exercise session or at equivalent times for waitlist participants

  10. NIH minimum dataset pain impact stratification subscale

    Pain-related impact (pain impact stratification, 9 items 0-50), higher scores indicate greater pain impact on function. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  11. NIH minimum dataset emotional depression and distress subscale

    Pain-related emotional depression and distress (EDD, 4 items 0-16), higher scores indicate greater pain impact on this dimension. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  12. NIH minimum dataset sleep disturbance subscale

    Pain-related sleep disturbance (SlD, 2 items 0-8), higher scores indicate greater pain impact on this dimension. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  13. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (ODI)

    Pain-related disability measured using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (10 items). Each item is scored from 0-5, yielding a total score ranging from 0-50, with higher scores indicating greater disability. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  14. Fatigue severity scale

    The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) assesses the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. The questionnaire contains 9 items, each rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1-7). Scores are averaged across items, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue severity and functional impairment. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  15. Pittsburgh sleep quality index

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) assesses sleep quality and sleep disturbances over the past month. The instrument contains 19 self-rated items, generating 7 component scores summed into a global score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  16. Snaith-Hamilton pleasure scale

    The Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) assesses anhedonia (reduced ability to experience pleasure). The scale contains 14 items evaluating pleasure responses to everyday experiences. Total scores range from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating greater anhedonia. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  17. Multiple abilities self-assessed questionnaire

    The Multiple Ability Self-Report Questionnaire (MASQ) assesses self-perceived cognitive functioning in everyday life, including language, memory, attention, and visuospatial abilities. The questionnaire contains 38 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 38 to 190, with higher scores indicating greater perceived cognitive difficulties, as well as five subscales for specific cognitive dimensions: Language, Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, Visuo-perceptual Ability, and Attention/Concentration. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  18. Movement-evoked pain

    Movement-evoked pain (MeP) will be assessed as the difference between pain at rest and the peak pain intensity reported during or immediately after four movement tasks: balance, sit-to-stand, a tailored provocative movement, and a tailored lifting task. Pain intensity will be rated using a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) before, during and after each task. MeP is calculated with the formula (Peak Pain During/After Task - Pain at Rest), for a score ranging from -10 to +10. An aggregate MeP score will also be calculated as the sum of the score obtained from each task (ranging from -40 to +40).

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

Other outcomes

  1. Pain Catastrophizing Scale

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) assesses catastrophic thinking related to pain, including rumination, magnification, and helplessness. The scale contains 13 items rated on a 5-point scale (0-4). Total scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater pain catastrophizing. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  2. Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia

    The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) assesses fear of movement and injury related to pain. The questionnaire contains 17 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 17 to 68, with higher scores indicating greater fear of movement. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  3. Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

    The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) assesses confidence in performing activities despite pain. The questionnaire contains 10 items rated on a 7-point scale (0-6). Total scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater pain self-efficacy. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  4. Beck Depression Inventory

    The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) assesses severity of depressive symptoms. The instrument contains 21 items rated on a 4-point scale (0-3). Total scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  5. State anxiety inventory

    The State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-State) assesses current levels of anxiety. The questionnaire contains 20 items rated on a 4-point scale. Total scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  6. Pressure pain thresholds

    Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) will be measured in kgs using a Wagner FDx algometer. The PPT will be defined as the arithmetic mean of four consecutive measurements taken at two sites bilaterally: (1) the lumbar paraspinal or gluteal muscle, 2 cm lateral to the spinous process or posterior superior iliac spine of the participant's most painful lumbar segment, and (2) the thumbnail bed.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline (Pre-intervention, Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 12)

  7. Adverse reactions to physical exercise sessions

    After each individual exercise sessions, participants will be asked to complete a short questionnaire to assess whether an adverse reaction to physical exercise (yes/no and details) was experienced. This item will also serve to monitor adherence. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Immediately after each PE session (Monday, Thursday, and Weekend for 12 weeks)

  8. Pain related to physical exercise sessions

    After each individual exercise sessions, participants will be asked to complete a short questionnaire to assess pain during and after exercise in a 0-10 NRS. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Immediately after each PE session (Monday, Thursday, and Weekend for 12 weeks)

  9. Effort during physical exercise sessions

    After each individual exercise sessions, participants will be asked to complete a short questionnaire to assess effort during the exercise in a 0-100 Borg scale. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Immediately after each PE session (Monday, Thursday, and Weekend for 12 weeks)

  10. Fatigue due to physical exercise sessions

    After each individual exercise sessions, participants will be asked to complete a short questionnaire to assess fatigue after exercise in a 0-10 NRS. Data collected in REDCap.

    Time frame: Immediately after each PE session (Monday, Thursday, and Weekend for 12 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kaplan CM, Kelleher E, Irani A, Schrepf A, Clauw DJ, Harte SE. Deciphering nociplastic pain: clinical features, risk factors and potential mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurol. 2024 Jun;20(6):347-363. doi: 10.1038/s41582-024-00966-8. Epub 2024 May 16. PubMed 38755449 ↗
  • Langston PK, Mathis D. Immunological regulation of skeletal muscle adaptation to exercise. Cell Metab. 2024 Jun 4;36(6):1175-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2024.04.001. Epub 2024 Apr 25. PubMed 38670108 ↗
  • Peake JM, Neubauer O, Della Gatta PA, Nosaka K. Muscle damage and inflammation during recovery from exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017 Mar 1;122(3):559-570. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00971.2016. Epub 2016 Dec 29. PubMed 28035017 ↗
  • Leunig A, Gianeselli M, Russo SJ, Swirski FK. Connection and communication between the nervous and immune systems. Nat Rev Immunol. 2025 Dec;25(12):912-933. doi: 10.1038/s41577-025-01199-6. Epub 2025 Jul 10. PubMed 40640567 ↗
  • Bortsov A, Esfahani SJ, Lima LV, Ji RR, Mogil JS, Diatchenko L. How people resolve pain: insights from human transcriptomics into immune activation and therapeutic innovations. Pain. 2025 Nov 1;166(11S):S60-S64. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003671. PubMed 41086330 ↗
  • Grace PM, Hutchinson MR, Maier SF, Watkins LR. Pathological pain and the neuroimmune interface. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014 Apr;14(4):217-31. doi: 10.1038/nri3621. Epub 2014 Feb 28. PubMed 24577438 ↗
  • Hayden JA, Ellis J, Ogilvie R, Malmivaara A, van Tulder MW. Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9(9):CD009790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2. PubMed 34580864 ↗
  • Baliki MN, Petre B, Torbey S, Herrmann KM, Huang L, Schnitzer TJ, Fields HL, Apkarian AV. Corticostriatal functional connectivity predicts transition to chronic back pain. Nat Neurosci. 2012 Jul 1;15(8):1117-9. doi: 10.1038/nn.3153. PubMed 22751038 ↗
  • Parisien M, Lima LV, Dagostino C, El-Hachem N, Drury GL, Grant AV, Huising J, Verma V, Meloto CB, Silva JR, Dutra GGS, Markova T, Dang H, Tessier PA, Slade GD, Nackley AG, Ghasemlou N, Mogil JS, Allegri M, Diatchenko L. Acute inflammatory response via neutrophil activation protects against the development of chronic pain. Sci Transl Med. 2022 May 11;14(644):eabj9954. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj9954. Epub 2022 May 11. PubMed 35544595 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The study is currently still in a feasibility stage, this will be determined later

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 42 months after the start.

Of 877 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Inflammation, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 42 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 924 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 16, 2026
First posted
Mar 27, 2026
StartActual
Jun 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2029
Last update
Aug 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07497425
Lead sponsor
McGill University
Responsible party
Mathieu Roy (Associate Professor, McGill University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 27, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Study contacts

Carlos Gevers Montoro, PhD
Contact
backpain@muhc.mcgill.ca
+1-8199790448

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion