ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07496723APP-AIRUpdated Apr 1, 2026

Comparison of Diagnostic Methods in Patients Operated for Suspected Appendicitis

An observational study in Acute Appendicitis, sponsored by Sanliurfa Education and Research Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-01.

Sponsored by Sanliurfa Education and Research Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies, but diagnostic uncertainty may still lead to unnecessary appendectomy in some patients. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) reporting and the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score in adult patients undergoing appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis. The primary objective is to determine the negative appendectomy rate based on final histopathology. Secondary objectives are to assess the agreement between AIR score, CT findings, intraoperative severity grading, and pathology results, and to explore diagnostic performance across patient subgroups. No study-specific intervention beyond routine clinical care will be performed.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, prospective observational study conducted in adult patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute appendicitis. Patients aged 18 years or older who undergo computed tomography (CT) after clinical evaluation, have a CT report compatible with acute appendicitis, and subsequently undergo appendectomy will be eligible for inclusion. Patients younger than 18 years, pregnant patients or those with suspected pregnancy, patients taken directly to surgery without CT evaluation, patients whose CT report suggests a diagnosis other than acute appendicitis, patients requiring an additional non-appendectomy surgical procedure because of another intraoperative pathology, and patients who decline participation will be excluded.

Clinical and demographic data will be collected prospectively using a standardized study form. Recorded variables will include age, sex, comorbidities, previous abdominal surgery history, symptom duration, physical examination findings, and laboratory parameters relevant to appendicitis assessment. The Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score will be calculated using routine clinical and laboratory data. CT examinations obtained as part of routine emergency care will be reviewed according to the official radiology reports. Intraoperative findings will be graded using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) appendicitis severity grading system. Final histopathologic examination of the resected appendix specimen will be used as the reference standard.

The primary outcome measure is the negative appendectomy rate, defined as appendectomy with final pathology not confirming acute appendicitis. Secondary outcome measures include agreement between AIR score and final pathology, agreement between CT report and final pathology, agreement between intraoperative AAST grading and final pathology, and differences in diagnostic performance across patient subgroups such as age, sex, and previous abdominal surgery history.

No study-specific intervention will be applied beyond routine diagnostic and therapeutic management. Treatment decisions will be made according to standard clinical practice. All data will be coded and recorded without directly identifiable patient information.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Appendicitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score
  • Appendectomy
  • Computed Tomography
03

In context

Appendicitis

419 studies on the registry are indexed under Appendicitis; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is close to the median of 200 across 151 observational studies indexed under Appendicitis.

Browse Appendicitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Sanliurfa Education and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute appendicitis who undergo computed tomography after clinical evaluation, have a CT report compatible with acute appendicitis, and subsequently undergo appendectomy at Sanliurfa Education and Research Hospital.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Presentation to the emergency department with suspected acute appendicitis
  • Underwent computed tomography after clinical evaluation
  • Computed tomography report compatible with acute appendicitis
  • Underwent appendectomy for presumed acute appendicitis
  • Provided

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age younger than 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Planned additional surgical intervention in the same session for a reason other than appendicitis
  • Intraoperative finding of a non-appendiceal pathology requiring a different surgical procedure
  • Refusal to participate in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients undergoing appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis

    Adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis who underwent CT evaluation and subsequent appendectomy after a CT report compatible with acute appendicitis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic agreement between CT report and final histopathology

    Concordance between computed tomography findings reported as compatible with acute appendicitis and final histopathologic diagnosis.

    Time frame: From CT evaluation to final pathology report, up to 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Negative appendectomy rate

    The proportion of patients who undergo appendectomy but whose final histopathologic examination does not confirm acute appendicitis.

    Time frame: From appendectomy to final pathology report, up to 30 days

  2. Agreement between AIR score and final histopathology

    Association between the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score and histopathologic confirmation of acute appendicitis.

    Time frame: From admission to final pathology report, up to 30 days

  3. Agreement between intraoperative AAST grading and final histopathology

    Concordance between intraoperative appendicitis severity grading based on the AAST classification and final histopathologic findings.

    Time frame: From surgery to final pathology report, up to 30 days

  4. Comparative diagnostic performance of CT report and AIR score

    Comparison of the diagnostic performance of computed tomography reporting and AIR score in predicting histopathologically confirmed acute appendicitis.

    Time frame: From admission to final pathology report, up to 30 days

  5. Diagnostic performance in patient subgroups

    Differences in diagnostic performance according to age, sex, comorbidities, and previous abdominal surgery history.

    Time frame: From admission to final pathology report, up to 30 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mariadason JG, Wang WN, Wallack MK, Belmonte A, Matari H. Negative appendicectomy rate as a quality metric in the management of appendicitis: impact of computed tomography, Alvarado score and the definition of negative appendicectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012 Sep;94(6):395-401. doi: 10.1308/003588412X13171221592131. PubMed 22943328 ↗
  • de Castro SM, Unlu C, Steller EP, van Wagensveld BA, Vrouenraets BC. Evaluation of the appendicitis inflammatory response score for patients with acute appendicitis. World J Surg. 2012 Jul;36(7):1540-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4. PubMed 22447205 ↗
  • Andersson M, Andersson RE. The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1843-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y. PubMed 18553045 ↗
  • Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Augustin G, Gori A, Boermeester M, Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Tarasconi A, De' Angelis N, Weber DG, Tolonen M, Birindelli A, Biffl W, Moore EE, Kelly M, Soreide K, Kashuk J, Ten Broek R, Gomes CA, Sugrue M, Davies RJ, Damaskos D, Leppaniemi A, Kirkpatrick A, Peitzman AB, Fraga GP, Maier RV, Coimbra R, Chiarugi M, Sganga G, Pisanu A, De' Angelis GL, Tan E, Van Goor H, Pata F, Di Carlo I, Chiara O, Litvin A, Campanile FC, Sakakushev B, Tomadze G, Demetrashvili Z, Latifi R, Abu-Zidan F, Romeo O, Segovia-Lohse H, Baiocchi G, Costa D, Rizoli S, Balogh ZJ, Bendinelli C, Scalea T, Ivatury R, Velmahos G, Andersson R, Kluger Y, Ansaloni L, Catena F. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3. PubMed 32295644 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared because this is a single-center study involving sensitive patient-level clinical data, and there is no pre-specified plan or institutional mechanism for external data sharing. Only aggregated, de-identified study results will be reported.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 10 months after the start.

Of 54 non-industry observational studies under Appendicitis, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 56. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 56 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 22, 2026
First posted
Mar 27, 2026
StartActual
Mar 18, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jan 31, 2027
Last update
Apr 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07496723
Lead sponsor
Sanliurfa Education and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Vedat Kaplan (Principal Investigator, Sanliurfa Education and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 27, 2026
Start date
Mar 18, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 1, 2026

Study contacts

Vedat Kaplan, MD
Contact
vedat_kaplan_@hotmail.com
+905459045165

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion