ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07490938EASEUpdated Sep 2, 2026

Electroacupuncture vs. Auricular Acupressure vs. Waitlist Control for Breast Cancer Endocrine Therapy-Related Joint Pain

An interventional study of Electroacupuncture Group and Auricular Acupressure Group in Breast Cancer Survivors and Endocrine Therapy-Induced Joint Pain, sponsored by First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Recruiting at 6 sites in China. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-02.

Sponsored by First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture and auricular acupressure for improving joint pain related to endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients. A total of 200 participants will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of three groups: the Electroacupuncture Group (n=80), the Auricular Acupressure Group (n=80), or the Waitlist Control Group (n=40), using a central stratified block randomization method.

The primary objective is to compare changes in Worst Pain Item score among the three groups from baseline to the end of the treatment period, as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF). Secondary objectives include assessing pain interference, overall health status through the PROMIS scale, and quality of life specifically related to endocrine therapy using the FACT-ES. Additionally, the study will evaluate analgesic medication use (QAQ), patient expectations (Acupuncture Expectancy Scale), treatment adherence, and the occurrence of adverse events. By comparing these interventions, this study aims to generate high-quality evidence for the management of treatment-related arthralgia in breast cancer survivors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer Survivors
  • Endocrine Therapy-Induced Joint Pain
03

In context

Arthralgia

277 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthralgia; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 73 across 218 interventional studies indexed under Arthralgia.

Browse Arthralgia studies →

Lead sponsor

First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • or cytologically confirmed breast cancer, stage I-IV, according to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (8th edition);
  • Aged 18-75 years;
  • Experiencing joint pain attributed to endocrine therapy, including localized or generalized joint pain, with symptoms persisting for at least 1 week;
  • Completion of all planned surgeries, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, with a scheduled continuation of endocrine therapy for at least 1 additional year;
  • Self-reported worst joint pain score of ≥3 on a 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during the past week;
  • ≥1 year;
  • Voluntarily sign the .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bone involving the same site as the affected joint attributed to endocrine therapy;
  • History of fracture or surgery involving the affected joints within the past 6 months;
  • Implanted electronic medical devices;
  • Not suitable for acupuncture, including but not limited to bleeding tendencies (e.g. coagulation disorders or purpura) or local skin lesions at the intended acupoint sites.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Electroacupuncture Group

    The electroacupuncture protocol follows a standardized framework consisting of a core acupoint formula combined with individualized local points. The core formula includes GV26 (Shuigou), LI4 (Hegu), PC6 (Neiguan), ST36 (Zusanli), GB34 (Yanglingquan), LR3 (Taichong), and SP6 (Sanyinjiao). For the individualized component, 1 to 4 additional acupoints are selected based on the two most severely affected joint areas. Acupuncture frequency: Acupuncture is performed twice a week, 30 minutes each time, for 8 weeks, totaling 16 sessions.

    Procedure: Electroacupuncture Group

  • Experimental
    Auricular Acupressure Group

    Auricular point sticking prescription: Basic auricular points combined with the corresponding auricular points of the affected joints. Auricular point frequency: Twice a week, the sticker is removed after 2 days and reapplied the next day, for 8 weeks, totaling 16 sessions.

    Procedure: Auricular Acupressure Group

  • No intervention
    Waitlist Control Group

    After random grouping, only the basic treatment plan is adopted, and no acupoint stimulation therapy is received within 16 weeks.

Interventions

  • ProcedureElectroacupuncture Group

    Electroacupuncture is performed using the basic prescription combined with the prescription for the affected joints. Basic prescription: Shuigou (GV26), Hegu (LI4), Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), Yanglingquan (GB34), Taichong (LR3), Sanyinjiao (SP6). On this basis, 1 to 4 additional acupoints are selected based on the two most severely affected joint areas. Needle selection: The acupuncture needles (40 or 75 mm x 0.25 mm gauge, and 40 mm x 0.18 mm gauge, Huatuo, Suzhou, China) will be used. An electroacupuncture stimulator (SDZ-V, Huatuo, Suzhou, China) will be used, delivering alternating frequencies of 2 Hz/10 Hz with no more than four electrode pairs simultaneously.

  • ProcedureAuricular Acupressure Group

    The auricular acupressure protocol is formed by combining the basic auricular point prescription and the auricular point prescription corresponding to the affected joints. The basic points include Shenmen, Sympathetic, Endocrine, and Subcortex, while the additional points are selected by the acupuncturist based on the 1-2 joint regions with the most pain as reported by the patient. Once identified, Vaccaria seed (Zhongyan Taihe, Beijing, China) is taped onto the points until the patient perceives a distinct sensation of soreness or tenderness. Participants will be instructed to apply pressure to each ear three times per day, pressing each side for approximately 3 minutes per session. The auricular patches will be removed 2 to 4 days after during a follow-up visit at the clinic.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Worst Pain score of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form

    A single-item numeric rating scale. Min: 0, Max: 10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome (more severe pain).

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12weeks, 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. The pain severity score of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form

    The mean of 4 items (worst, least, average, and pain "now"). Min: 0, Max: 10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

  2. The pain interference score of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form

    The mean of 7 items (general activity, mood, walking, work, relations, sleep, enjoyment). Min: 0, Max: 10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

  3. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES) scale

    A scale assessing quality of life in patients receiving endocrine therapy. Min: 0, Max: 76 (for the ES subscale). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

  4. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health scale (PROMIS Global Health)

    10 items assessing physical, mental, and social health. Results are typically converted to T-scores. Min: 0, Max: 100(standardized). Higher scores mean a better outcome (better health).

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

  5. The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)

    It comprises two primary components: the EQ-5D-5L Index Score and the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS). For the Index Score, values typically range from less than 0 to 1, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. The EQ VAS provides a self-rated assessment of overall health on a scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores represent better self-rated health.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

  6. Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire(CEQ)

    It utilizes two different scoring formats-a 1-9 Likert scale and a 0%-100% percentage scale. The composite score for a single factor typically ranges from a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 27. Higher scores indicate a better outcome, representing a higher psychological expectation for symptom improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. The Quantity Analgesic Questionnaire (QAQ)

    The Quantity Analgesic Questionnaire (QAQ) is a clinical assessment tool designed to quantify the total amount of analgesic medication consumed by a patient over a specific period. By accounting for both the potency and the frequency of various medications, the questionnaire provides a standardized numerical value representing the patient's medication burden. The scale typically yields a score where the minimum value is 0, with no fixed maximum value as the total depends on the specific dosages and variety of medications reported. Higher scores mean a worse outcome, as they indicate a higher quantity of analgesic intake and a greater pharmacological burden.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

  2. Safety and acupuncture-related adverse events

    Time frame: At the end of 8 weeks of treatment

  3. Treatment Adherence Assessed by the Number of Completed Treatment Sessions

    Treatment adherence is assessed by calculating the total number of scheduled intervention sessions the participant completed. Min: 0, Max: 16. Higher scores indicate a better outcome (greater treatment adherence).

    Time frame: At the end of 8 weeks of treatment

  4. Adherence Rate to Endocrine Therapy Based on Patient Diaries

    Treatment adherence is assessed using a daily patient diary, where participants record their intake of oral endocrine therapy medications. The adherence rate is calculated as the percentage of days the participant successfully took the medication as prescribed out of the total number of days in the assessment period. Min: 0%, Max: 100%. Higher scores indicate a better outcome (higher treatment adherence).

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

07

Study locations

6 of 6 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be shared to protect participant privacy and comply with institutional data governance policies.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2027, 18 months after the start.

Of 64 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Arthralgia, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 31. This study's planned 18 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 82 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 29.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 12, 2026
First posted
Mar 24, 2026
StartActual
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Sep 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07490938
Lead sponsor
First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Responsible party
Li Li (Head of Breast Cancer Endocrine Therapy-Related Joint Pain Research, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 24, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 2, 2026

Study contacts

Li Li
Contact
lilitcm@foxmail.com
86+18222626653
Jing Xue
Contact
xuejing506@163.com
Li Li
study chair · First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion