CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07468955Updated Jul 30, 2026

Impact of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Patient Outcomes

An interventional study of Exercise Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Heart Disease, sponsored by Kutahya Health Sciences University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 30 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-30.

Sponsored by Kutahya Health Sciences University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2019, registered Mar 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
65
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
30 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objective: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the impact of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on functional capacity, depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, and sleep quality in patients with heart disease.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who participated in a structured CR program. Clinical records were reviewed to compare pre- and post-rehabilitation outcomes. Functional capacity was assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), while depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, and sleep quality were evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Short Form-36 (SF-36), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), respectively.

Read the detailed description

Background and Rationale:Cardiovascular diseases remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs are widely recognized as a cornerstone of secondary prevention, aiming to improve physical fitness, psychological well-being, and overall health status in cardiac patients. However, real-world retrospective data assessing the multi-dimensional impact of structured CR-encompassing functional capacity, psychological distress (depressive symptoms), health-related quality of life, and sleep quality-simultaneously remain crucial for optimizing patient care protocols.

Study Objectives:The primary objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate the changes in clinical, functional, and psychosocial outcomes following participation in a structured cardiac rehabilitation program. Specifically, the study aims to compare pre- and post-rehabilitation measures regarding: Functional exercise capacity, depressive symptom severity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), sleep quality.

Study Design and Patient Population:This study utilizes a retrospective observational design. Clinical records and institutional databases will be systematically reviewed to identify patients with heart disease who were admitted to and completed a structured cardiac rehabilitation program.

Data Collection and Outcome Measures: All patient data regarding baseline characteristics, clinical history, and pre- and post-rehabilitation assessments are routinely collected as part of standard clinical care. The primary and secondary outcome measures to be extracted and analyzed include:

  1. Functional Capacity: Assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), measuring the distance walked in 6 minutes as an indicator of submaximal aerobic capacity.
  2. Depressive Symptoms: Evaluated via the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), a self-report questionnaire measuring the severity of depression.
  3. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Evaluated using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey, covering both physical and mental component summaries.
  4. Sleep Quality: Assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), measuring sleep habits and disturbances over a 1-month time interval.

Statistical Analysis: De-identified data will be analyzed using JASP statistical software. Normality of distribution for continuous variables will be tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Paired-samples t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests will be utilized to compare pre-rehabilitation (baseline) and post-rehabilitation outcomes, depending on data normality. A p-value of \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Coronary Heart Disease
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 65 is below the median of 124 across 3,436 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Kutahya Health Sciences University is the lead sponsor of 209 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease (CAD), status post-myocardial infarction (MI), stable angina, or those who have undergone cardiac surgery
  • Availability of complete pre- and post-rehabilitation clinical records, including 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), BDI, SF-36, and PSQI scores.
  • Patients classified as stable by a cardiologist prior to the initiation of the exercise program.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of severe orthopedic, neurological, or musculoskeletal disorders that prevent the performance of the 6-Minute Walk Test or exercise training.
  • Patients with severe cognitive impairment
  • Unstable angina pectoris, uncontrolled arrhythmias, or advanced heart failure (NYHA Class IV) that contraindicates aerobic exercise.
  • Patients who dropped out of the rehabilitation program before completion or had more than a 20% absence rate in sessions.
  • Patients who underwent major non-cardiac surgery within the last 3 months.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cardiac Rehabilitation Group

    Patients in this group participated in a structured, multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation program. The intervention included individualized aerobic exercise training, resistance exercises, patient education, and psychosocial counseling.

    Other: Exercise Based Cardiac Rehabilitation

Interventions

  • OtherExercise Based Cardiac Rehabilitation

    The intervention consists of a structured, exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program. The exercise protocol was tailored to each patient's clinical status and typically included aerobic endurance training complemented by resistance training for major muscle groups. Each session lasted approximately 40-60 minutes, consisting of a 10-minute warm-up, 20-40 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity or high-intensity interval training (1:1 ratio), and a 10-minute cool-down period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Capacity

    unctional capacity is assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). The distance walked in 6 minutes is recorded in meters. An increase in distance indicates improved functional exercise capacity.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (6 week later)

  2. Change in Depressive Symptom

    Assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The BDI is a 21-item self-report scale. Scores range from 0 to 63, where higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (6 week later)

  3. Change in Quality of Life

    Assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey. It consists of 36 items covering 8 dimensions of health. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each subscale, with higher scores representing better health status.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (6 week later)

  4. Change in Sleep Quality

    Assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI consists of 19 individual items generating 7 component scores. The global score ranges from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality (scores \>5 suggest significant sleep disturbance).

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (6 week later)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kutahya Şehir Hastanesi Yoncalı Yerleşkesi
    Kütahya, Center 43100, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared due to institutional policies regarding data privacy and the protection of sensitive patient information under national data protection laws.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07468955
Lead sponsor
Kutahya Health Sciences University
Responsible party
Ismail Okur (Assit. Prof., Kutahya Health Sciences University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 13, 2026
Start date
Jul 14, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2023
Completion
Mar 8, 2026
Last update
Jul 30, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion