ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07456111ByproUpdated Mar 6, 2026

A Comparison of Remimazolam Besylate and Propofol Sedation in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopic Polypectomy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Remimazolam besylate and Propofol in Colonic Polyp and Sedation Complication, sponsored by Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb. Recruiting at 1 site in Croatia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-06.

Sponsored by Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Jan 2026).
  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this prospective, randomized, controlled study is to compare remimazolam besilat/sufentanyl and propofol/sufentanyl in patients during colonoscopic polypectomies procedures.

Patients undergoing colonoscopic polypectomies in procedural sedation using remimazolam besylate/sufentanyl are circulatory and respiratory as or more stable when compared with propofol/sufentanyl sedation.

Read the detailed description

Following the approval for the research by the Ethics Committee (Clinical Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia), a total of ninety (90) patients will be included in the research. Forty five (45) patients will be assigned to the study group (SG) and forty five (45) patients to the control group (CG).

Research Goals:

Primary goals

  1. Observe and compare circulatory and respiratory stability in patients undergoing procedural sedation with either remimazolam besylate or propofol during colonoscopic polypectomies
  2. Define and compare the incidence of hypotension between the study grou and the control group.
  3. Define and compare the incidence of respiratory depression between the study group and the control group.

Secondary goals

  1. Define and compare the success of remimazolam besylate sedation compared with propofol.
  2. Define and compare the time required to achieve adequate sedation between the two observed groups.
  3. Define and compare the time to achieve full consciousness between the two observed groups.
  4. Define and compare the time to complete recovery between the two groups.

Patients from both groups, upon arrival to the gastroenterology ward will have a peripheral venous line installed by puncturing one of the veins on the dorsum of the hand or forearm. The veins of choice include the rete venosum dorsale manus, vena cephalica and vena basilica, and an 18 G or 20 G intravenous cannula will be placed. After confirming the functionality of the venous line, the intravenous administration of Fifty will follow. The infusion rate will depend on the patient's BMI and circulatory status.

Study Group (SG):

A total of 45 patients are included in this group. After non-invasive monitoring, positioning the patient in the left lateral position and placing a nasal catheter with a continuous oxygen flow of 3 l/min, the patient will receive the intravenous opioid analgesic Sufentanyl 0.2 mcg/kg over a period of 30 seconds.

After 1 to 2 minutes the patient will receive remimazolam besylate intravenously in a dose of 5.0 mg over a period of 1 minute. After two minutes, a maintenance dose of 2.5 mg will be administered using the titration method over a period of 15 seconds until the desired sedation effect is achieved.The maximum intravenous dose of administered remimazolam besylate will be 33 mg.BIS monitoring and a modified MOAA/S (Modified Observers Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale) scale will be used to assess the depth of sedation. The first measurement of the depth of sedation will be initially following the complete administration of the sedative remimazolam besylate and will serve as the initial/starting point. Afterwards, a measurement of the MOAA/S scale will be performed every 30 seconds for a total of 3 minutes. The most desirable level of sedation for the planned procedure is defined as a MOAA/S measurement of \<3.

Control group (CG)

A total of 45 patients will be included in this group.

Firstly, non-invasive monitoring will be applied to the patient, then they will be placed in the left lateral position and through a nasal catheter a continuous oxygen flow of 3l/min will be administered. The patient will be given intravenous opioid analgesia Sufentanyl 0.2 mg/kg. within 30 seconds. After approximately 1-2 minutes the patient will receive the titrated anesthetic propofol intravenously at a dose of 1.5 to 2.5 mg/kg, (20.0 to 30.0 mg propofol every 10 seconds). In elderly patients and patients with ASA grade III, the total dose of propofol will be at least 1 mg/kg with an administration rate of 10.0 to 20.0 mg every 10 seconds.

Sedation will be maintained using propofol in a continuous intravenous infusion. The maintenance dose given will be 0.5 to 1.0 mg propofol/kg/hour.

BIS monitoring and a modified MOAA/S (Modified Observers Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale) scale will be used to assess the depth of sedation. The first measurement of the MOAA/S score will be conducted after the total intravenous propofol dose was administered and this first measurement will be considered the starting/zero measurement. MOAA/S scale point will be measured every 30 seconds for a total of 3 minutes. A measurement of \<3 points will be considered the most desirable level of sedation for the planned procedure.

In both study groups the following parameters will continuously be measured:

  1. Pulse oxymetry (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), EKG, heart rate (HR) and rhythm, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure.
  2. Circulatory parameters including systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure will be measured:

Primary measurement:

Upon patients' arrival to the pre-op room (first measurement) and 5 minutes before proceeding to the operating theater.

During the procedure:

Before administering the sedative remimazolam besylate or propofol and at 3, 5, 10, and 15 minutes. (every 5 minutes during the procedure) until the patient is consciousness, followed by the first of five sets of MOAAS/S measurements upon completion of the procedure or when the last dose of medication is given.

Frequency of hypotension in both groups of patients and comparing the results between the SG and CG.

Hypotension during the procedure using sedation or propofol is defined as:

a decrease in systolic systemic pressure of 20% or more compared with the first measurement before the administration of remimazolam besylata or propofol.

A mean arterial pressure of ≤60 mmHg during while the patient is under sedation.

4. Sinus bradycardia is defined as a decreased cardiac rate. 5. The frequency of respiratory depression compared between the two groups, SG and CG.

Respiratory depression during sedation is defined as:

Respiratory rate of \<8 breaths per minute and/or a peripheral blood oxygen percentage of (SpO2) \<90.

6. BIS monitoring. 7. The success of procedural sedation using remimazolam besylate and sedation using propofol:

Will be shown as the percentage of successfully sedated patients defined as:

The completion of endoscopic polypectomy, without the need for rapid/fast acting emergency sedation or a maximum number of 5 additional doses given withing 15 minutes of the first dose to maintain adequate sedation.

8. The time to achieve adequate sedation is defined as the time from administering the first dose of medication until achieving \<3 points on the MOAA/S scale and/ora BIS.

9. The time to achieve full consciousness is defined as the time since the administration of the last dose of medication until the patient is fully aware, or until the patients has 5 points on the MOAA/S scale.

10. The time needed for the patient to fully recover after the procedure in both groups is defined by the criteria for patient dismissal using the - Modified Aldrete score scale.

The total volume of the given crystalloid solution (Plasma-lyte) will be measured in both groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colonic Polyp
  • Sedation Complication

Keywords

  • Remimazolam besylate
  • Propofol
  • Procedural sedation
  • Polypectomy
  • Circulatory stability
  • Respiratory stability
  • Respiratory depression
03

In context

Colonic Polyps

377 studies on the registry are indexed under Colonic Polyps; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is below the median of 274 across 250 interventional studies indexed under Colonic Polyps.

Browse Colonic Polyps studies →

Lead sponsor

Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients both male and female
  • ages 18 to 60 years,
  • with one or more colonic polyps confirmed by colonoscopy and scheduled for a colonoscopy and polypectomy
  • The duration of the colonoscopy ranges from 30 to 50 minutes.
  • ASA status (American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status) I-III.
  • (Body mass index) 18.5-29.9 kg/m2.
  • Only patients who signed an waiver and consented to participate in the research study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged >60 years
  • ASA status IV-V,
  • >29.9 kg/m2,
  • a high risk of vomiting, regurgitation and/or aspiration of gastric contents.
  • Patients with:
  • uncontrolled hypertension (systolic pressure >160 mmHg),
  • heart disease (cardiomyopathy, cardiac-rhythm disorder, \<45%, stenosis or heart valve insufficiency and coronary heart disease)
  • lung disease (pneumonia, , asthma and pulmonary tumors),
  • kidney diseases (kidney failure, GF 30/59 ml/min/1.73m2),
  • liver diseases,
  • coagulation disorders
  • lymphatic tissue diseases
  • extended malignant disease.
  • History of allergy on nutritional allergens including soy bean, benzodiazepines, propofol or opioids.
  • Patients who currently use analgesic medications or other psycho-pharmaceuticals.
  • History of illicit drug use.
  • Children, pregnant and nursing women.
  • Alcohol dependency.
  • Patients involved in other clinical research studies,
  • patients who refused to take part in the research or have not signed the written form.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Remimazolam besylat

    Drug: Remimazolam besylate

  • Active comparator
    Propofol

    Drug: Propofol

Interventions

  • The patient will receive the intravenous opioid analgesic sufentanyl 0.2 mcg/kg over a period of 30 seconds. After 1 to 2 minutes the patient will receive remimazolam besylate intravenously in a dose of 5.0 mg over a period of 1 minute. After two minutes, a maintenance dose of 2.5 mg will be administered using the titration method over a period of 15 seconds until the desired sedation effect is achieved.The maximum intravenous dose of administered remimazolam besylate will be 33 mg.BIS monitoring and a modified MOAA/S scale will be used to assess the depth of sedation. The first measurement of the depth of sedation will be initially following the complete administration of the sedative remimazolam besylate and will serve as the initial/starting point. Afterwards, a measurement of the MOAA/S scale will be performed every 30 seconds for a total of 3 minutes. The most desirable level of sedation for the planned procedure is defined as a MOAA/S measurement of \<3.

  • The patient will be given intravenous opiod analgesia sufentanyl 0,2 mg/kg.within 30 seconds. After approximately 1-2 minutes the patient will receive the titrated anestetic propofol intravenously at a dose of 1,5 to 2,5 mg/kg (20,0 mg. propofol evry 10 seconds). In elderly patients and patients with ASA grade III, the total dose of propofol will be least 1 mg/kg with an administration rate of 10 every 10 seconds.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hemodynamic Stability - Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)

    Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) measured at multiple timepoints to assess overall circulatory stability. Comparison of MAP values between remimazolam and propofol groups.

    Time frame: from enrollment up to 2 hours after the procedure; approximately 2-4 hours per participant.

  2. Hemodynamic Stability - Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) measured at multiple timepoints to assess circulatory stability. Comparison between remimazolam and propofol groups.

    Time frame: from enrollment up to 2 hours after the procedure; approximately 2-4 hours per participant.

  3. Hemodynamic Stability - Heart Rate

    Heart rate (beats per minute) measured continuously via ECG monitoring. Comparison of heart rate values between study groups.

    Time frame: from enrollment up to 2 hours after the procedure; approximately 2-4 hours per participant.

  4. Incidence of Hypotension

    Percentage of participants experiencing hypotension defined as either: Decrease in systolic blood pressure ≥20% from baseline value (measured before remimazolam or propofol administration), OR Mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≤60 mmHg during procedural sedation

    Time frame: from enrollment up to 2 hours after the procedure; approximately 2-4 hours per participant.

  5. Incidence of Bradycardia

    Bradycardia is defined as a heart rate (HR) below 50 beats per minute (bpm), or a clinically significant decrease in HR of ≥20% from the pre-induction baseline, sustained for ≥1 minute and/or requiring pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention (e.g., atropine administration, reduction or discontinuation of the study drug). HR will be continuously monitored via standard intraoperative ECG monitoring and recorded at predefined time points: baseline (pre-induction), immediately post-induction (T1), at 5-minute intervals intraoperatively, at emergence from anesthesia, and at 15 and 30 minutes postoperatively in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The incidence of bradycardia will be expressed as the proportion of patients experiencing at least one episode meeting the above criteria within the defined observation window.

    Time frame: from enrollment up to 2 hours after the procedure; approximately 2-4 hours per participant.

  6. Respiratory Stability - Oxygen Saturation (SpO₂)

    Peripheral oxygen saturation (%) measured continuously via pulse oximetry. Comparison of SpO₂ values between study groups.

    Time frame: from enrollment up to 2 hours after the procedure; approximately 2-4 hours per participant.

  7. Incidence of Respiratory Depression

    Percentage of participants experiencing respiratory depression defined as: Respiratory rate \<8 breaths per minute, AND/OR Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) \<90%

    Time frame: from enrollment up to 2 hours after the procedure; approximately 2-4 hours per participant.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procedural Sedation Success Rate

    Percentage of participants achieving successful sedation defined as: Completion of entire endoscopic polypectomy procedure, AND No need for rescue sedation (defined as propofol 1.5-2.5 mg/kg IV by titration for inadequate sedation level in either group), AND Maximum of 5 additional drug doses within 15 minutes of initial dose

    Time frame: During the endoscopic procedure (estimated 30-50 minutes

  2. Time to Adequate Sedation Level

    Time in minutes from first drug dose to achievement of adequate sedation level, defined as MOAA/S (Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation) score \<3 AND/OR BIS (Bispectral Index) value 50-70

    Time frame: From first drug administration until adequate sedation achieved (estimated 1-5 minutes)

  3. Time to Full Alertness

    Time in minutes from last drug dose to full patient alertness, defined as achieving MOAA/S score of 5

    Time frame: From last drug administration until full alertness (estimated 10-20 minutes post-procedure)

  4. Time to Recovery Room Discharge Readiness

    Time in minutes from last drug dose to patient meeting discharge criteria from recovery room using Modified Aldrete Scoring System

    Time frame: From last drug administration until meeting discharge criteria (estimated 15-30 minutes post-procedure)

  5. Depth of Sedation - BIS Values

    Bispectral Index (BIS) values (0-100 scale) measured continuously to assess depth of sedation. Target range 50-70. Comparison of BIS values between study groups throughout procedure.

    Time frame: From baseline through procedure completion until full alertness (estimated 30-60 minutes)

  6. Depth of Sedation - MOAA/S Scores

    Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scores (0-5 scale) measured at baseline, after total drug dose (time zero), then every 30 seconds for 3 minutes. Target score \<3 for adequate sedation.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after drug administration, then every 30 seconds for 3 minutes, then as clinically indicated during procedure

  7. Total Drug Dosage

    Total dose of remimazolam besilate (mg) administered during procedure in the intervention group and total dose of propofol (mg) administered during procedure in the control group. Total dose of sufentanil (micrograms) administered in both groups (0.2 mcg/kg initial dose)

    Time frame: During procedure (estimated 30-50 minutes)

  8. Procedure and sedation duration

    Duration of sedation and colonoscopic polypectomy procedure in minutes

    Time frame: From first drug administration to full alertness (estimated 30-60 minutes) From procedure start to procedure completion (estimated 30-50 minutes)

  9. Total Crystalloid Infusion Volume

    Total volume (mL) of Plasma-Lyte crystalloid solution administered during procedure

    Time frame: During procedure and recovery (estimated 30-90 minutes)

  10. Incidence of Post-Procedure Pain, nausea and vomiting

    Percentage of participants experiencing pain, nausea or vomiting in the post-procedure period

    Time frame: ost-procedure assessment before recovery room discharge (estimated 30-60 minutes after last drug dose)

  11. Satisfaction Score

    Patient-reported satisfaction with sedation procedure (VAS from 0-10) Endoscopist-reported satisfaction with sedation quality for procedure performance (VAS from 0-10)

    Time frame: Post-procedure before recovery room discharge

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhu X, Wang H, Yuan S, Li Y, Jia Y, Zhang Z, Yan F, Wang Z. Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam in Endoscopic Sedation-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 26;8:655042. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.655042. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34381792 ↗
  • Qiu Y, Gu W, Zhao M, Zhang Y, Wu J. The hemodynamic stability of remimazolam compared with propofol in patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection: A randomized trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 8;9:938940. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.938940. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36004376 ↗
  • Guo J, Qian Y, Zhang X, Han S, Shi Q, Xu J. Remimazolam tosilate compared with propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients: a prospective, randomized and controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jun 10;22(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01713-6. PubMed 35689208 ↗
  • Xin Y, Chu T, Wang J, Xu A. Sedative effect of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in colonoscopic polypectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 16;22(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01805-3. PubMed 35974309 ↗
  • Chen SH, Yuan TM, Zhang J, Bai H, Tian M, Pan CX, Bao HG, Jin XJ, Ji FH, Zhong TD, Wang Q, Lv JR, Wang S, Li YJ, Yu YH, Luo AL, Li XK, Min S, Li L, Zou XH, Huang YG. Remimazolam tosilate in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, phase III trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Feb;36(2):474-481. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15188. Epub 2020 Jul 24. PubMed 32677707 ↗
  • Dossa F, Megetto O, Yakubu M, Zhang DDQ, Baxter NN. Sedation practices for routine gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review of recommendations. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01561-z. PubMed 33413147 ↗
  • Sahinovic MM, Struys MMRF, Absalom AR. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Dec;57(12):1539-1558. doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0672-3. PubMed 30019172 ↗
  • Borkett KM, Riff DS, Schwartz HI, Winkle PJ, Pambianco DJ, Lees JP, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K. A Phase IIa, randomized, double-blind study of remimazolam (CNS 7056) versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2015 Apr;120(4):771-80. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000548. PubMed 25502841 ↗
  • Rex DK, Bhandari R, Desta T, DeMicco MP, Schaeffer C, Etzkorn K, Barish CF, Pruitt R, Cash BD, Quirk D, Tiongco F, Sullivan S, Bernstein D. A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep;88(3):427-437.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2351. Epub 2018 Apr 30. PubMed 29723512 ↗
  • Kim KM. Remimazolam: pharmacological characteristics and clinical applications in anesthesiology. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2022 Jan;17(1):1-11. doi: 10.17085/apm.21115. Epub 2022 Jan 20. PubMed 35139608 ↗
  • Hinkelbein J, Lamperti M, Akeson J, Santos J, Costa J, De Robertis E, Longrois D, Novak-Jankovic V, Petrini F, Struys MMRF, Veyckemans F, Fuchs-Buder T, Fitzgerald R. European Society of Anaesthesiology and European Board of Anaesthesiology guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in adults. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Jan;35(1):6-24. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000683. PubMed 28877145 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Individual participant data will not be shared due to regulatory, ethical, and practical constraints. Croatian healthcare data protection law (NN 14/19) and GDPR regulations mandate strict safeguarding of personal health information. The informed consent obtained from participants explicitly limits data use to this specific study and does not authorize sharing of individual-level data with external parties. Given the relatively small sample size (n=100) and the specific clinical context at a single tertiary center, there is meaningful risk of participant re-identification even with standard de-identification procedures. Additionally, our institution lacks the technical infrastructure for secure data repository management and controlled access mechanisms necessary for responsible IPD sharing. Resources for comprehensive data curation, security auditing, and long-term stewardship were not included in the study budget. However, we are committed to research transparency.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07456111
Lead sponsor
Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb
Responsible party
Željko Drvar (Principal invesitgator, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 6, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 6, 2026

Study contacts

Željko Drvar, MD, PhD
Contact
zeljko.drvar@kbc-zagreb.hr
003851 2388 888

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Remimazolam besilate

Start the discussion