CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07453030PROPULSE-SchUpdated Mar 5, 2026

Long-Term Outcomes of Selexipag in Schistosomiasis-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

An observational study in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), sponsored by Caio Júlio César dos Santos Fernandes. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-05.

Sponsored by Caio Júlio César dos Santos Fernandes · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Schistosomiasis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension is a serious condition that can lead to shortness of breath, heart failure, frequent hospitalizations, and early death. Although treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension have improved over time, patients with this specific cause of the disease are often not included in long-term studies.

Selexipag is an oral medication used to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension and is part of routine clinical care in Brazil. Its long-term effects in patients with schistosomiasis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension are not well understood.

The PROPULSE-Sch study aims to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes in patients with schistosomiasis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension who received selexipag, compared with similar patients who did not receive this medication before it became available at the study center.

This is an observational study using data from routine medical care. All treatments are prescribed by the treating physicians, and participation in the study does not change patient care. The results may help improve understanding of long-term outcomes and support treatment decisions in this population.

Read the detailed description

Schistosomiasis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH-Sch) is a prevalent cause of pulmonary arterial hypertension in endemic regions and is associated with significant morbidity and premature mortality. Despite advances in targeted therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension, patients with PAH-Sch remain underrepresented in long-term studies, particularly in real-world clinical settings.

Selexipag, an oral selective prostacyclin IP receptor agonist, has demonstrated clinical and hemodynamic benefits in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Following its incorporation into routine clinical practice in Brazil, selexipag has been increasingly used in eligible patients with PAH-Sch. However, evidence regarding its long-term outcomes in this specific population is limited.

PROPULSE-Sch is a single-center, observational, longitudinal study with an ambispective design, combining retrospective data and prospective follow-up. The study evaluates long-term clinical outcomes associated with exposure to selexipag in patients with PAH-Sch, compared with a mirror cohort of clinically similar patients who did not receive selexipag prior to its availability at the center. To reduce confounding and indication bias inherent to observational comparisons, analyses are conducted using propensity score matching.

All treatment decisions, including initiation and intensification of therapy, are made exclusively by the treating physicians as part of routine clinical care. The study does not mandate any intervention, treatment assignment, or protocol-driven management. Data are obtained from medical records and standard follow-up visits. By using real-world data and robust observational methods, this study aims to contribute clinically relevant evidence on long-term outcomes in schistosomiasis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)

Keywords

  • Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
  • Schistosomiasis
  • Prostacyclin Pathway
  • Real-World Evidence
  • Propensity Score Matching
  • Long-Term Outcomes
  • Observational Study
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population includes adult patients with schistosomiasis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH-Sch) followed at a specialized pulmonary hypertension referral center. The population comprises two observational cohorts: patients who initiated oral selexipag as part of routine clinical care and a mirror cohort of clinically similar patients who did not receive selexipag prior to its availability at the center. All patients have confirmed pre-capillary pulmonary arterial hypertension and stable background therapy at the index date. Participants are followed longitudinally using data obtained from routine clinical practice to assess long-term clinical outcomes. No study-mandated interventions are performed.

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged 18 years or older.

  • Confirmed diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with schistosomiasis (PAH-Sch).
  • Diagnosis of pre-capillary pulmonary arterial hypertension confirmed by right heart catheterization, performed at any time prior to the index date (T0), as documented in the medical record.
  • Evidence of schistosomiasis infection, including epidemiological history and ultrasonographic findings compatible with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis.
  • Previous antiparasitic treatment for schistosomiasis.
  • Clinical stability at the index date, defined as absence of progressive right heart failure or clinical worsening within the previous 12 weeks.
  • World Health Organization (WHO) functional class I-III at the index date.
  • Stable background pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific therapy with a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor and/or endothelin receptor antagonist for at least 12 weeks prior to the index date.
  • For the treated cohort: initiation of oral selexipag as part of routine clinical care.
  • For the mirror cohort: eligibility for therapeutic escalation at the index date without exposure to selexipag.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • World Health Organization (WHO) functional class IV at the index date.
  • Progressive right heart failure or clinical deterioration within the 12 weeks prior to the index date.
  • Documented formal contraindication to selexipag in the medical record.
  • Insufficient baseline data at the index date to allow clinical characterization or inclusion in propensity score analyses.
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Selexipag-Treated PAH-Sch Cohort

    Adult patients with schistosomiasis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension who initiated oral selexipag as part of routine clinical care. The index date (T0) is defined as the date of selexipag initiation recorded in the medical record. Patients are followed longitudinally to assess long-term clinical outcomes.

  • Mirror PAH-Sch Cohort Without Selexipag

    Adult patients with schistosomiasis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension who did not receive selexipag and were followed at the same center prior to its availability. The index date (T0 mirror) is defined as the first visit at which patients met clinical eligibility criteria comparable to those of the treated cohort.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Clinical Worsening

    Time from the index date (T0) to the first occurrence of clinical worsening, defined as any of the following events: all-cause mortality; lung transplantation; non-elective hospitalization due to pulmonary arterial hypertension or right heart failure; therapeutic escalation defined as initiation of parenteral prostacyclin or addition of a new class of pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific therapy; or sustained worsening of World Health Organization functional class confirmed in two consecutive assessments at least 12 weeks apart and accompanied by objective evidence of disease progression, including a ≥15% decrease in six-minute walk distance and/or a ≥30% increase in BNP or NT-proBNP compared with baseline.

    Time frame: From index date (T0) up to 36 months of follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Improvement Composite Outcome

    Composite clinical improvement defined as improvement in at least two of the following criteria compared with baseline, without occurrence of clinical worsening: increase of at least 10% or 30 meters in six-minute walk distance; improvement to World Health Organization functional class I or II; or reduction of at least 30% in BNP or NT-proBNP levels.

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after index date

  2. Change in WHO Functional Class

    Change in WHO Functional Class

    Time frame: Up to 36 months of follow-up

  3. Change in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)

    Change in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)

    Time frame: Up to 36 months

  4. Change in BNP or NT-proBNP Levels

    Change in BNP or NT-proBNP Levels

    Time frame: Up to 36 months

  5. Hemodynamic Parameters

    Change in Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP)

    Time frame: Up to 36 months of follow-up

  6. Risk Stratification Scores

    Changes in pulmonary arterial hypertension risk stratification assessed using the COMPERA 2.0 risk score (four risk strata: low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high risk), evaluated during follow-up when sufficient clinical, functional, and laboratory data are available.

    Time frame: Up to 36 months of follow-up

  7. Treatment Tolerability

    Occurrence of adverse events during follow-up.

    Time frame: Up to 36 months of follow-up

  8. Hemodynamic Parameters

    Change in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)

    Time frame: Up to 36 months

  9. Hemodynamic Parameters

    Change in Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP)

    Time frame: Up to 36 months

  10. Hemodynamic Parameters

    Change in Cardiac Output or Cardiac Index

    Time frame: Up to 36 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
    São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-900, Brazil
07

References and documents

Publications

  • 1. Simonneau G, Montani D, Celermajer DS, Denton CP, Gatzoulis MA, Krowka M, et al. Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. janeiro de 2019;53(1):1801913. 2. Humbert M, Sitbon O, Simonneau G. Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. N Engl J Med. 30 de setembro de 2004;351(14):1425-36. 3. Calderaro D, Alves Junior JL, Fernandes CJCDS, Souza R. Pulmonary Hypertension in General Cardiology Practice. Arq Bras Cardiol [Internet]. 2019 [citado 24 de agosto de 2024]; Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0066-782X2019000900419&script=sci_arttext 4. Yoo HHB. Lesões Plexiformes na Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar: Estamos Ficando mais Próximos do Manejo com mais Paciência e Rigor? Arq Bras Cardiol. 18 de setembro de 2020;115(3):491-2. 5. D'Alonzo GE, Barst RJ, Ayres SM, Bergofsky EH, Brundage BH, Detre KM, et al. Survival in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Results from a national prospective registry. Ann Intern Med. 1o de setembro de 1991;115(5):343-9. 6. Barst RJ, Rubin LJ, Long WA, McGoon MD, Rich S, Badesch DB, et al. A comparison of continuous intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin) with conventional therapy for primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1o de fevereiro de 1996;334(5):296-301. 7. Galiè N, Ghofrani HA, Torbicki A, Barst RJ, Rubin LJ, Badesch D, et al. Sildenafil citrate therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 17 de novembro de 2005;353(20):2148-57. 8. Rubin LJ, Badesch DB, Barst RJ, Galiè N, Black CM, Keogh A, et al. Bosentan Therapy for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. N Engl J Med. 21 de março de 2002;346(12):896-903. 9. Hoeper MM, Badesch DB, Ghofrani HA, Gibbs JSR, Gomberg-Maitland M, McLaughlin VV, et al. Phase 3 Trial of Sotatercept for Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. N Engl J Med. 20 de abril de 2023;388(16):1478-90. 10. Mitchell JA, Ahmetaj-Shala B, Kirkby NS, Wright WR, Mackenzie LS, Reed DM, et al. Role of pr

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07453030
Lead sponsor
Caio Júlio César dos Santos Fernandes
Responsible party
Caio Júlio César dos Santos Fernandes (Principal investigator, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Mar 5, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 5, 2026

Study contacts

Caio Fernandes, Principal Investigator, MD
Contact
cjcfernandes@yahoo.com.br
+551126615034
Caio Fernandes, MD
principal investigator · UNIVERSIDADE SAO PAULO

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion